Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
822
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
822 results for “systematic position”
Supplementary material 2 from: Lu Y-B, Zhang Y-X, Zou J-X (2023) The systematic position of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon (Kemp, 1918), with the description of a new species of Sinolapotamon Tai & Sung, 1975 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Potamidae) from southern China. ZooKeys 1166: 155-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.101737
Phylogenetic tree (BI) based on the COX1 gene
Supplementary material 4 from: Lu Y-B, Zhang Y-X, Zou J-X (2023) The systematic position of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon (Kemp, 1918), with the description of a new species of Sinolapotamon Tai & Sung, 1975 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Potamidae) from southern China. ZooKeys 1166: 155-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.101737
Phylogenetic tree (BI) based on 3 genes
Supplementary material 3 from: Lu Y-B, Zhang Y-X, Zou J-X (2023) The systematic position of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon (Kemp, 1918), with the description of a new species of Sinolapotamon Tai & Sung, 1975 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Potamidae) from southern China. ZooKeys 1166: 155-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.101737
Phylogenetic tree (ML) based on 3 genes
Supplementary material 1 from: Lu Y-B, Zhang Y-X, Zou J-X (2023) The systematic position of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon (Kemp, 1918), with the description of a new species of Sinolapotamon Tai & Sung, 1975 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Potamidae) from southern China. ZooKeys 1166: 155-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.101737
Phylogenetic tree (ML) based on the COX1 gene
FIGURE 36 in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 36 Metatibia of male. Lateral view, A) Merodon lucasi, B) Merodon alagoezicus. Scale: 0.5 mm. la–lamella.
FIGURE 24 Male genitalia. Hypandrium. A in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 24 Male genitalia. Hypandrium. A) Merodon longisetus sp. n., lateral view, B) Merodon longisetus sp. n., ventral view, C) Merodon toscanus, lateral view, D) Merodon toscanus, ventral view. Scale: 0.5 mm. l–lingual, s–lateral sclerite of aedeagus, th–subapical thorn on ventral margin.
FIGURE 2 in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 2 Strict consensus tree of two most parsimonious trees from the analysis of combined COI mitochon- drial and 28S nuclear genes sequences. Length 2116 steps, Consistency Index (CI) 37, Retention Index (RI) 44. Bootstrap support values are depicted near nodes (≥50). Numbers and letters after the species name referred to the DNA labcode IDs. Four lineages observed in genus Merodon, as well as two groups of avidus-nigritarsis lineage are marked on the tree.
FIGURE 23 Male genitalia. Epandrium. A in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 23 Male genitalia. Epandrium. A) Merodon longisetus sp. n, lateral view, B) Merodon longisetus sp. n., ventral view of surstyle lobe, C) Merodon toscanus, lateral view. Scale: 0.5 mm. al–anterior surstyle lobe, c–circus, i–incision, pl–posterior surstyle lobe. Downloaded from Brill.com08/29/2023 05:43:36PM via free access
FIGURE 22 Sternum 4. Ventral view, A in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 22 Sternum 4. Ventral view, A) Merodon longisetus sp. n., male, B) Merodon nigritarsis, male, C) Merodon obstipus sp. n., male, D) Merodon femoratoides, male, E) Merodon obstipus sp. n., female (central longitudinal suture marked with arrow), F) Merodon cohurnus sp. n., male, G) Merodon rutitarsis sp. n., male, H) Merodon avidus, male. Scale: 1 mm. cf–central notch, p– Downloaded posterolateralfrom Brill. corner com.08/29/2023 05:43:36PM via free access
FIGURE 19 in Systematic position and composition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverfLies species
FIGURE 19 Head of Merodon longisetus sp. n. A) male, lateral view, B) female, lateral view, C) male, dorsal view; D) female, dorsal view. Scale: 1 mm.
Data from: The systematic position of the stonefly †culonga Sinitshenkova, 2011 (Plecoptera: Leuctrida) reassessed using Reflectance Transforming Imaging and cladistic analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A systematic spatial bias in microarray hybridizations caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion
GEO Series GSE26275. Pseudodesulfovibrio halophilus; Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila UWE25. 34 samples. Type: Other.
Decoupling epigenetic and genetic effects through systematic analysis of gene position
GEO Series GSE42554. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 18 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Data from: Comparison of methodological quality of positive versus negative comparative studies published in Indian medical journals: a systematic review
Objectives: Published negative studies should have the same rigour of methodological quality as studies with positive findings. However, the methodological quality of negative versus positive studies is not known. The objective was to assess the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies published in Indian medical journals. Design: A systematic review (SR) was performed of all comparative studies published in Indian medical journals with a clinical science focus and impact factor >1 between 2011 and 2013. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The results were considered positive if the primary outcome was statistically significant and negative otherwise. When the primary outcome was not specified, we used data on the first outcome reported in the history followed by the results section. Differences in various methodological quality domains between positive versus negative studies were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Results: Seven journals with 259 comparative studies were included in this SR. 24% (63/259) were RCTs, 24% (63/259) cohort studies, and 49% (128/259) case–control studies. 53% (137/259) of studies explicitly reported the primary outcome. Five studies did not report sufficient data to enable us to determine if results were positive or negative. Statistical significance was determined by p value in 78.3% (199/254), CI in 2.8% (7/254), both p value and CI in 11.8% (30/254), and only descriptive in 6.3% (16/254) of studies. The overall methodological quality was poor and no statistically significant differences between reporting of methodological quality were detected between studies with positive versus negative findings. Conclusions: There was no difference in the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies. However, the uneven reporting of positive versus negative studies (72% vs 28%) indicates a publication bias in Indian medical journals with an impact factor of >1.
Figure 5 from: Makarov KV, Matalin AV (2021) The preimaginal stages of Galerita ruficollis Dejean, 1825 and the position of the tribe Galeritini in the classification of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 527-561. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63085
Figure 5 Habitus of G. ruficollis larvae A first instar B second instar C third instar.
Figure 11 from: Makarov KV, Matalin AV (2021) The preimaginal stages of Galerita ruficollis Dejean, 1825 and the position of the tribe Galeritini in the classification of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 527-561. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63085
Figure 11 Pupa of G. ruficollisA ventral view B dorsal view C left lateral view.
Figure 11 from: Mey W (2011) On the systematic position of Baltimartyria Skalski, 1995 and description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae). ZooKeys 130: 331-342. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1480
Figure 11 - Male holotype of Baltimartyria rasnitsyni sp. n. Antenna, scale bar 1 mm.
Figures 1-2 from: Mey W (2011) On the systematic position of Baltimartyria Skalski, 1995 and description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae). ZooKeys 130: 331-342. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1480
Figures 1-2 - Baltimartyria rasnitsyni sp. n. 1 wing venation 2 reconstructed wing pattern.
Figure 10 from: Mey W (2011) On the systematic position of Baltimartyria Skalski, 1995 and description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae). ZooKeys 130: 331-342. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1480
Figure 10 - Male holotype of Baltimartyria rasnitsyni sp. n. Details of head, scale bar 1 mm.
Figure 12 from: Mey W (2011) On the systematic position of Baltimartyria Skalski, 1995 and description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae). ZooKeys 130: 331-342. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1480
Figure 12 - Presumed phylogenetic relationships within Micropterigidae based on Gibbs (2010).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.