Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 3 in Description of Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov. (Amphipoda: Hyalidae) from the Bahía Blanca estuary, Argentina, including a key to all valid Ptilohyale species

FIGURE 3 Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov., male holotype: a gnathopod 1; b gnathopod 2; c pereopod 3; d pereopod 4; e pereopod 5; f pereopod 6; g pereopod 7. Scale bars: 200 µm.

FIGURE 4 in Description of Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov. (Amphipoda: Hyalidae) from the Bahía Blanca estuary, Argentina, including a key to all valid Ptilohyale species

FIGURE 4 Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov., male holotype: a pleopod 1; b pleopod 2; c pleopod 3. Scale bars: 200 µm.

FIGURE 2 in Description of Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov. (Amphipoda: Hyalidae) from the Bahía Blanca estuary, Argentina, including a key to all valid Ptilohyale species

FIGURE 2 Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov., male holotype: a habitus, lateral; b antenna 1; c antenna 2; d upper lip; e left mandible; f right mandible; g lower lip; h maxilla 1; i maxilla 2; j maxilliped. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 200 µm (b–c, e–j), 100 µm (d).

FIGURE 1 a in Description of Ptilohyale corinne sp. nov. (Amphipoda: Hyalidae) from the Bahía Blanca estuary, Argentina, including a key to all valid Ptilohyale species

FIGURE 1 a Map of Argentina with Buenos Aires Province in gray and Bahía Blanca estuary indicated by an arrow; b Map of Bahía Blanca estuary showing Arroyo Pareja (type locality), water in gray.

opennotspecifiedOct 2019View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. R d. denti Thomas, 1904 - SW Angola, N Namibia, NW & SW Botswana, and N South Africa (Northern Cape Province). There is an unconfirmed record from SW Republic of the Congo. R d. knorri Eisentraut, 1960 - scattered records across W Africa in SE Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, W Guinea, N Sierra Leone, N Ivory Coast (but possibly representing Lander's Horseshoe Bat, R landeri), NE Ghana, S Burkina Faso, and Nigeria. There is apparently a specimen from S South Sudan that might represent this subspecies, although its identity needs to be validated. in Rhinolophidae

Subspecies and Distribution. R d. denti Thomas, 1904 - SW Angola, N Namibia, NW & SW Botswana, and N South Africa (Northern Cape Province). There is an unconfirmed record from SW Republic of the Congo. R d. knorri Eisentraut, 1960 - scattered records across W Africa in SE Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, W Guinea, N Sierra Leone, N Ivory Coast (but possibly representing Lander's Horseshoe Bat, R landeri), NE Ghana, S Burkina Faso, and Nigeria. There is apparently a specimen from S South Sudan that might represent this subspecies, although its identity needs to be validated.

FIGURE 21 in Description of Pallisentis thapari n. sp. and a re-description of Acanthosentis seenghalae (Acanthocephala, Quadrigyridae, Pallisentinae) using morphological and molecular data, with analysis on the validity of the sub-genera of Pallisentis

FIGURE 21. Single phylogenetic tree produced by the parsimony analysis of 18s rDNA sequences including the sequence of Pallisentis thapari n. sp., Acanthosentis seenghalae Chowhan, Gupta, Khera, 1988, and the sequences of the taxa downloaded from GenBank: names of species associated with sequences in the present work are included (see Table 1 for the taxon names given in GenBank). Putative sub-genera (sensu Amin et al. 2000) indicated in color.

FIGURES 1–8 in Description of Pallisentis thapari n. sp. and a re-description of Acanthosentis seenghalae (Acanthocephala, Quadrigyridae, Pallisentinae) using morphological and molecular data, with analysis on the validity of the sub-genera of Pallisentis

FIGURES 1–8. Drawing of specimens of Pallisentis thapari n. sp.: 1. Male worm; 2. Posterior part of male; 3. Proboscis; 4. Hooks of the proboscis; 5. Trunk spines with optically dense Y-shaped core; 6. Female worm containing ovarian balls; 7. Posterior end and gonopore with ovarian balls shown in uterine bell; 8. Eggs. Scale bars: 1, 2 and 6 = 1.0 mm; 3, 4, 5 and 7 = 100 µm; 8 = 10 µm.

FIGURES 15–20 in Description of Pallisentis thapari n. sp. and a re-description of Acanthosentis seenghalae (Acanthocephala, Quadrigyridae, Pallisentinae) using morphological and molecular data, with analysis on the validity of the sub-genera of Pallisentis

FIGURES 15–20. Scanning electron micrographs: 15. Proboscis of Pallisentis thapari n. sp. showing hooks that decrease in size from anterior to posterior rings; 16. Trunk spines of P. thapari n. sp. with optically dense Y-shaped core and conical exterior; 17. Hooked point of a collar spine of P. thapari n. sp; 18. Bursa of a male worm of P. thapari n. sp.; 19. Trunk spines of a specimen of Acanthosentis seenghalae; 20. Proboscis of a male worm of A. seenghalae. Scale bars: 15 = 50 µm; 16, 18 and 19 = 100 µm; 17 = 10 µm; 20 = 20 µm.

FIGURE 29 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 29. Flying fish Cypselurus olpar (16 mm SL, WAM P.25191-001, Fremantle). (A)—lateral view; (B)—ventral view.

FIGURE 27 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 27. Pectoral (A–C) and pelvic (D–F) fins in flying fish Cypselurus bosha. (A)—44 mm SL, USNM 294589, Kenya, Formosa Bay; (B)—151 mm SL, IORAS 03403, 13°14'N 42°59'E; (C)—163 mm SL, IORAS 03384, China (Yentai?); (D)— 31.5 mm SL, CAS 82119, Mouth of Iloilo R.; (E)—70 mm SL, CAS 82122, Indo-West Pacific, Gulf of Thailand (?); (F)—85 mm SL, USNM 294589, Kenya, Formosa Bay.

FIGURE 22 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 22. Distribution of flying fishes Cheilopogon katherinae (Δ), Cypselurus bosha (□) and C. olpar (○). Filled symbols indicate capture location for fishes ≤100 mm SL, open symbols indicate capture location for fishes>100 mm SL.

FIGURE 7 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 7. Pelvic fin pigmentation in flying fish Cheilopogon formosus pseudospilopterus. (A)—56 mm SL, ZMUC uncat., Galathea Sta. 383, 7°57'N 102°32'E; (B)—81.5 mm SL, IORAS 03406, 4°28'N 112°51'E; (C)—101 mm SL, SIO 65-40, Gulf of Thailand; (D)—125 mm SL, CAS 81221, 7°15'N 103°06'E.

FIGURE 5 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 5. Flying fish Cheilopogon formosus pseudospilopterus. (A)—25.5 mm SL, ZMUC uncat., Galathea, Sta. 383, 7°57'N 102°32'E; (B)—28 mm SL, ZMUC uncat., Galathea, Sta. 383, 7°57'N 102°32'E; (C)—36.5 mm SL, IORAS 03407 (paratype), 1°58'N 105°53'E; (D)—48 mm SL, IORAS 03407 (paratype), 1°58'N 105°53'E; (E)—81.5 mm SL, IORAS 03406, 4°28'N, 112°51'E; (F)—154 mm SL, CAS 81208, 9°05'N 100°48'E; (G)—150.5 mm SL, CAS 81203, 12°11'N 100°41'E, close-up of jaws.

FIGURE 12 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 12. Size variation of morphometric characters in Cheilopogon marisrubri (+) and Ch. formosus (○). (A)—length of pectoral fin (lP); (B)—length of the first pectoral fin ray (lP1); (C)—length of pelvic fin (lV); (D)—height of anal fin (HA); (E)—distance from the head rear margin to the base of pelvic fins divided by postventral distance (index cV/pV); (F)—length of pectoral fin divided by length of pelvic fin (index lP/lV). Note: for Ch. formosus data from Kotthaus (1969) are included.

FIGURE 11 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 11. Flying fish Cheilopogon marisrubri. (A)—33 mm SL, IORAS 03418, 17°43'N 39°20'E; (B)—39 mm SL, IORAS 03418, same place; (C)—53 mm SL, IORAS 03418, same place; (D)—94.5 mm SL, IORAS 03415, Gulf of Aden; (E)—106.5 mm SL, IORAS 03420, Red Sea, ~ 25°N; (F)—139.5 mm SL, ZMMU P-24080 (holotype), 14°05'N 42°20'E.

FIGURE 4 in A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 1. Revision of the subgenus Zonocypselurus Parin and Bogorodsky, 2011 with descriptions of one new subgenus, four new species and two new subspecies and reinstatement of one species as valid

FIGURE 4. Holotype of the flying fish Cheilopogon formosus pseudospilopterus (108 mm SL, ZMMU P-24078, 7°32'N 116°37'E). (A)—lateral view; (B)—pectoral fin; (C)—pelvic fin.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988

Fig. 3. Proposed phylogenetic relationships of Nanotyrannus within Tyrannosauroidea with distribution of the theropod dentary groove on trees indicated with thickened bars. (A) Most parsimonious cladogram proposed by this study placing Nanotyrannus as sister to the Albertosaurinae. (B) Relationship sensu Currie (2003a) placing Nanotyrannus as sister to Tyrannosaurus. This tree requires 5 more independent losses of the dentary groove than the tree proposed in this study. (C) Relationship proposed by Brusatte et al. (2010) placing Nanotyrannus as a juvenile Tyrannosaurus. This tree requires 4 more independent losses than the tree proposed in this study and a loss of the dentary groove through ontogeny in Tyrannosaurus.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988

Fig. 1. Lateral views of theropod skulls demonstrating presence or absence of the dentary groove. The dentary groove is present in the primitive theropod (A) Coelophysis bauri (NMMNH P-42200), as well as in the derived theropod (B) Compsognathus longipes (BSP AS I 563). The dentary groove is present in the tyrannosaurids (C) Gorgosaurus libratus (TCM 2001.89.1) and (D) Nanotyrannus lancensis ("Jane"; BMR P2002.4.1). The dentary groove is absent in both (E1) young (LACM 28471) and (E2) adult ("Sue"; FMNH PR2081) Tyrannosaurus rex. Arrows indicate the position of the groove, when present. Scale bars equal 5 cm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988

Fig. 2. Cladogram of Theropoda modifed from Carrano et al. (2012). Thickened branches indicate lineages possessing the dentary groove, thin branches indicate lineages in which the groove is absent. Grayed-out braches marked with dashed lines indicate taxa without a known dentary. Circled numbers indicate sequence of losses of the dentary groove assuming maximum parsimony.