Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 13. Rhamdiopsis krugi, 32.5 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 13. Rhamdiopsis krugi, 32.5 mm SL, adult, live specimen photographed in aquarium on July 16th, 2008, unpreserved; Poço Encantado cave, left margin of the rio Una, Municipality of Itaetê, State of Bahia, Brazil. Courtesy of Adriano Gambarini.

Fig. 9 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 9. Basal region of left pectoral fin and proximate portions of pectoral girdle of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype.Ventralview. AP) articularcleithralprocess; CB) posterior complex bone of pectoral girdle (scapula, coracoid, and mesocoracoid fused); CK) coracoid keel; CL) cleithrum; DC) complex distal radial; DR1) distal radial 1; DR2a-c) pieces of distal radial 2; MA) mesocoracoid arch; PP) postcleithral process; and PR1-2) proximalradials 1 and 2. Scalebar = 0.7 mm.

Fig. 8 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 8. Pectoral girdle and fins of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. AP) articular cleithral process; CB) posterior complex bone of pectoral girdle (scapula, coracoid, and mesocoracoid fused); CL) cleithrum; DR2b) main posterior piece of distal radial 2; MA) mesocoracoid arch; PP) postcleithral process; PR2) proximal radial 2; RR1) rigid part of pectoral-fin ray 1; and SR1) soft part of pectoral-fin ray 1. Scale bar = 2 mm.

Fig. 5 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 5. Left suspensorium and opercular series of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Lateral view. EN) entopterygoid; HFen) foramen for entrance of ramus hyoideus of hyomandibular nerve trunk; HMex) foramen for exit of hyomandibular nerve trunk; HY) hyomandibula; IF) foramen for exit of infraorbital trunk nerve; IO) interopercle; MFen) foramen for entrance of ramus mandibularis externus facialis of hyomandibular nerve trunk; MT) metapterygoid; OP) opercle; pm8-11) preoperculomandibular sensory branches 8 to 11; PO) preopercle; and QU) quadrate. Scale bar = 1.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 2. Anterior portion of the body of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5929, 37.1 mm SL, holotype. Arrows indicate the limits of the pseudotympanum.

Fig. 12 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 12. Rhamdiopsis krugi, ca. 30.0 mm SL, adult, live specimen photographed in the nature in August, 1991, not collected; Poço Encantado cave, ca. 7 km from left margin of the rio Una, Municipality of Itaetê, State of Bahia, Brazil.

Fig. 7 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 7. Anterior vertebrae of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. AB) anterior branch of transverse process 4; AP) accessory process of vertebra 7; ll1-3) lateral line sensory branches 1 to 3; NL) neural lamina (neural arches of vertebrae 3 and 4); NS4) neural spine of vertebra 4; PB) posterior branch of transverse process 4; SB) swimbladder; TP4) transverse process 4; and TP5) transverse process 5. Arrow indicates osseous bridge joining anterior and posterior branches of transverse process 4. Scale bar = 2 mm.

Fig. 4 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 4. Cranium of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. a) dorsal view; b) ventral view. Abbreviations: AF) anterior fontanel; AN) antorbital; AP) autopalatine; AT) antorbital tubule; BL) Baudelot's ligament; BO) basioccipital; EC) ethmoidean cartilage; EP) epioccipital; ES) extrascapula; EX) exoccipital; FR) frontal; HF) hyomandibular facet; i1-6) infraorbital sensory branches 1 to 6; LE) lateral ethmoid; ME) mesethmoid; MX) maxilla; NA) nasal; OF) optic foramen (rudiment); OS) orbitosphenoid; PA) parasphenoid; PF) posterior fontanel; PM) premaxilla; PO) prootic; po1-3) postotic sensory branches 1 to 3; PT) pterotic; PS) pterosphenoid; s1-3) supraorbital sensory branches 1 to 3; s6) supraorbital sensory branch 6 (epiphyseal branch); s7) supraorbital sensory branch 7 (postorbital branch); s8) supraorbital sensory branch 8 (parietal branch); SC) supracleithrum; SP) sphenotic; ST1-4) suborbital tubules 1 to 4; SU) supraoccipital; TF) trigeminofacial foramen; VL) ventrolateral limb of supracleithrum; VM) ventromedial limb of supracleithrum; and VO) vomer. Scale bars = 1.5 mm.

Fig. 6 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 6. Gill arches of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. Gill rakers and dorsal elements of left gill arches not shown. AN) accessory cartilaginous nodule; BB2-4) basibranchials 2 to 4; CB1-5) ceratobranchials 1 to 5; EB1-5) epibranchials 1 to 5; HB1-3) hypobranchials 1 to 3; PB3-4) pharyngobranchials 3 and 4; TP) tooth plate; and UP) uncinate process. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 3. Anterior portion of the body of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5929, 37.1 mm SL, holotype, showing laterosensory canal system. a) lateral view; b) dorsal view; c) ventral view. i1) infraorbital sensory branch 1; i2) infraorbital sensory branch 2 (antorbital branch); i3-6) infraorbital sensory branches 3 to 6; ll1) lateral line sensory branch 1; ll2-11) lateral line sensory branches 2 to 11; pm1-11) preoperculomandibular sensory branches 1 to 11; po1) postotic sensory branch 1; po1+pm11) postotic-preoperculomandibular complex sensory branch (postotic sensory branch 1 + preoperculomandibular sensory branch 11); po2) postotic sensory branch 2 (pterotic or temporal branch); po3) postotic sensory branch 3; s1-3) supraorbital sensory branches 1 to 3; s6) supraorbital sensory branch 6 (epiphyseal branch); and s8) supraorbital sensory branch 8 (parietal branch). Scale bar = 3 mm.

Fig. 10 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 10. Pelvic girdle of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. BS) basipterygium; EP) external anterior process (or anterolateral arm); IP) internal anterior process (or anteromedial arm); LP) lateral process; NF) neural foramen; and PP) posterior process. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 14 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 14. Geographic distribution of Rhamdiopsis krugi. a) Eastern Brazil; b) detail of the upper rio Paraguaçu. Legends: 1) rio Paraguaçu; 2) rio São Francisco; 3) rio Una; i) Poço Encantado; ii) Lapa do Bode; and iii) Gruta Natal. Symbol (star) in map a represents the three localities.

Fig. 15 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 15. View of the type-locality of Rhamdiopsis krugi, Poço Encantado cave (12º56'37''S 41º06'05''W), Municipality of Itaetê, Bahia, northeastern Brazil, taken in 2008. Courtesy of Adriano Gambarini.

Fig. 5 in Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela

Fig. 5. Principle Components Analysis of species of Neblinichthys. Most strongly loading measurements and their directions indicated. PC2 represents 6.3% of the total variation and PC5, 1.6% (note, most variation, 81.7% is in PC1, which represents overall size). Barbel length was excluded because of extreme variance and interorbital width was excluded because it was not measured the same throughout the study.

Fig. 2 in Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela

Fig. 2. Dorsal, lateral, and ventral views of Neblinichthys peniculatus, holotype, male, MBUCV V-35680, 78.8 mm SL, Venezuela, Bolivar, río Paragua drainage, río Carapo at first rapids along right bank.

Fig. 4 in Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela

Fig. 4. Dorsal, lateral, and ventral views of Neblinichthys peniculatus, female, paratypes, AMNH 91020, 78.8 mm SL.

Fig. 1 in Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela

Fig. 1. Distribution of Neblinichthys. Main drainages where the species are located indicated. Symbols may represent multiple localities.

opencc-zeroJul 2024View details →

FIG. 11 in A revision of the late early Eocene mammal faunas from Mas de Gimel and Naples (Montpellier, Southern France) and the description of a new theridomorph rodent

FIG. 11. — Distribution in percent of specimens by order and species from Mas de Gimel and Naples elaborated from data of Tables 2 and 3: A, color pie chart of Mas de Gimel collection; B, color pie chart of Naples collection. White sections correspond to specimens of indeterminate order or, within an order, of indeterminate specific attribution. Each identified species presents a color variation of the order color section. Percentage number are indicated when superior to one.

opencc-zeroJul 2024View details →

FIG. 9 in A revision of the late early Eocene mammal faunas from Mas de Gimel and Naples (Montpellier, Southern France) and the description of a new theridomorph rodent

FIG. 9. — Upper deciduous (DP4), premolar (P4) and molars (M1-2-3) of Hartenbergeromys pailladensis n. sp. from the two closely related localities: MGL, Mas de Gimel (Hérault), and NAP, Naples (Hérault): A, UM-MGL-647, right DP4; A1, occlusal view; A2, lingual view; B, UM-NAP-57, enamel cover of a left DP4, unworn: B1, lingual view; B2, occlusal view; C, UM-NAP-59, left P4: C1, occlusal view; C2, labial view; D, UM-NAP-58, left P4, occlusal view; E, MicroCTScan of UM-MGL-601, holotype, unworn left M1: E1, occlusal view; E2, lingual view; E3, labial view; E', same as E (UM-MGL-601), but drawings, to compare both figurations; F, UM-MGL-639, worn right M1: F1, occlusal view; F2, lingual view; G, UM-NAP-47, unworn left M1: G1, occlusal view; G2, lingual view; H, UM-NAP-55, right M1-2, moderately worn, roots partially preserved, occlusal view; I, UM-NAP-48, left M2, moderately worn, roots partially preserved: I1, occlusal view; I2, lingual view; I3, labial view; J, UM-NAP-56, left M3, weakly worn, roots broken; J1, occlusal view; J2, lingual view; J3, labial view; K, UM-NAP-52, right M3, nearly unworn: K1, occlusal view; K2, lingual view; K3, labial view; L, UM-NAP-64, right M3, nearly unworn, roots absent, occlusal view. Scale bar: 1 mm. The background of the profiles is greyed out. On Fig. F open cracks are filled with horizontal stripes.