Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,920
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,920 results for “implications”
FIGURE 5 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 5 (g–l). Sensilla of the antennal club of Leptidea morsei. g. Auriculate sensilla ♀ (arrow) and microtrichia (m) (x9.00 k); h. Sc1 sensilla in pairs ♂ (arrows) (x8.00 k); i. Sc2 sensilla in pairs ♂ (arrows) surrounded by m4 (discontinuous arrows) (x6.50 k); j. Rounded opening in the back of the basal antennomere ♀ (arrow). There are a campaniform sensillum (x12.0 k); k. styloconic sensilla without stylus (uniporous) ♂ (arrows) (x9.50 k); l. Styloconic sensilla with stylus (♀ (x16.0 k).
FIGURE 9 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 9 (a–f). Antennal club of the male Leptidea amurensis japona. a. Antennal club (x90); b. Antennomeres of the antennal club (x170); c. Distal antennomere (x250); d. Dorsal view of the club (x110); e. Central sulcus (x750); f. Trichoid sensilla surrounded by m1 (x3.00 k).
FIGURE 13 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 13 (g–l). Sensilla of the antennal club of Leptidea sinapis. g. Chaetic sensilla ♂ (arrow) and microtrichia m2 (m) (x4.00 k); h. Basiconic sensilla ♂ (arrow) (x9.00 k); i. Sc 1 sensilla ♂ (arrows) (x4.50 k); j. Sc1 and sc2 sensilla ♀ (arrows) (x5.50 k); k. Rounded opening on the dorsum of the antennal club ♀ (arrow) (x8.00 k). There is a campaniform sensillum; l. Styloconic sensilla without stylus ♀ (arrow) (x14.0 k).
FIGURE 11 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 11 (a–f). Antennal club of Leptidea juvernica. a. Antennal club ♂ (x140); b. Antennal club ♀ (x150); c. Distal antennomere ♂ (x350); d. Same as c but in ♀ (x370); e. Central sulcus ♀ (x750 k); f. Trichoid sensilla ♂ (arrows), surrounded by microtrichia ml (x3.50 k).
FIGURE 13 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 13 (a–f). Antennal club of Leptidea sinapis. a. Antennal club ♂ (x160); b. Antennal club ♀ (x100); c. Distal antennomere ♂ (x320); d. Same as c but in ♀ (x350); e. Central sulcus ♀ (x750 k); f. Trichoid sensilla ♂ (arrows), surrounded by microtrichia ml (m) (x5.00 k).
FIGURE 10 in Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea Billberg, 1820 (Pieridae: Dismorphiinae: Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 10 (g–l). Sensilla in the antennal club of Leptidea darvazensis. g. Trichoid sensilla ♀ (arrows) and microtrichia ml (m) (x6.00 k); h. Auriculate sensilla (arrow) ♂ and microtrichia m2 (m) (x10.0 k); i. Sc1 sensilla (arrows) ♂ (x5.50 k); j. Sc2 sensilla ♂ (arrow) surrounded by microtrichia m4 (x4.70 k); k. Campaniform sensilla ♂ (arrow) (x9.50 k); l. Styloconic sensilla without stylus ♀ (arrows) (x7.00 k).
Figure 6 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth
Figure 6. Adjusted growth curve (mass in kg as a function of age in years) for Tyrannosaurus rex. Filled circles represent our mass estimates derived from digital modelling; squares represent data points generated using Developmental Mass Extrapolation [42]. The red line represents the best fit curve for modelled data; the black one is for the DME estimate. Stippled lines represent the 95% confidence intervals for the model-based estimates. The MOR specimen is treated as being 16 years old in this plot (see text). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.g006
Fig. 3 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988
Fig. 3. Proposed phylogenetic relationships of Nanotyrannus within Tyrannosauroidea with distribution of the theropod dentary groove on trees indicated with thickened bars. (A) Most parsimonious cladogram proposed by this study placing Nanotyrannus as sister to the Albertosaurinae. (B) Relationship sensu Currie (2003a) placing Nanotyrannus as sister to Tyrannosaurus. This tree requires 5 more independent losses of the dentary groove than the tree proposed in this study. (C) Relationship proposed by Brusatte et al. (2010) placing Nanotyrannus as a juvenile Tyrannosaurus. This tree requires 4 more independent losses than the tree proposed in this study and a loss of the dentary groove through ontogeny in Tyrannosaurus.
Fig. 1 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988
Fig. 1. Lateral views of theropod skulls demonstrating presence or absence of the dentary groove. The dentary groove is present in the primitive theropod (A) Coelophysis bauri (NMMNH P-42200), as well as in the derived theropod (B) Compsognathus longipes (BSP AS I 563). The dentary groove is present in the tyrannosaurids (C) Gorgosaurus libratus (TCM 2001.89.1) and (D) Nanotyrannus lancensis ("Jane"; BMR P2002.4.1). The dentary groove is absent in both (E1) young (LACM 28471) and (E2) adult ("Sue"; FMNH PR2081) Tyrannosaurus rex. Arrows indicate the position of the groove, when present. Scale bars equal 5 cm.
Figure 7 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth
Figure 7. Comparison of torso/body dimensions for the four large Tyrannosaurus rex specimens. Linear measurements from our digital models show how the gleno-acetabular distance (GAD) is anomalously short in the MOR specimen and the chest is anomalously wider in the Sue and Carnegie specimens. Otherwise all four specimens compare fairly wellı considering that the Sue specimen is known to be somewhat larger. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.g007
Fig. 2 in Distribution of the dentary groove of theropod dinosaurs: Implications for theropod phylogeny and the validity of the genus Nanotyrannus Bakker et al., 1988
Fig. 2. Cladogram of Theropoda modifed from Carrano et al. (2012). Thickened branches indicate lineages possessing the dentary groove, thin branches indicate lineages in which the groove is absent. Grayed-out braches marked with dashed lines indicate taxa without a known dentary. Circled numbers indicate sequence of losses of the dentary groove assuming maximum parsimony.
FIGURE 8 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 8. Morphologies of pmx4 and mx1 in Tyrannosaurus rex. A, photo traces of distal right premaxilla and mesial right maxilla in palatal view (AMNH 5027); note differences between the classes. B, Lpm4 and Lmx1 (AMNH 5027) in mesiolabial view. C, mx1 (AMNH 5027) in mesial view; note the mesial carina visible on the lingual edge (circle). Rmx1 of FMNH PR2081 in labial (D) and (E) lingual views; note sizes of mx1 and pm4, the flattened shape of the lingual face of pm4, and the placement of the carinae (circle). F, Rpm4 and Rmx1 of BHI 3033 in mesiolabial view; note size differences, carina placement (arrows), and the slight increase in mesial curvature in mx1 (scale bars equal 1cm). G, the teeth in mesiolingual view (image reflected).
FIGURE 12 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 12. Morphology of d1 in Tyrannosaurus rex. A, first dentary teeth of AMNH 5027 in labial view. B, Rd1 of BHI 3033 in mesial and distal views. C, Rd1 of CM 9380 in mesial view. D, Rd1 of BHI 3033 in occlusal view. E, Ld1 of AMNH 5027 in distolabial view.
FIGURE 16 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 16. Between-taxon comparisons of CBL (A), CBW (B), CH (C), and AL (D) for the theropods examined in this study (data from Smith et al., in press). Units are mm. Error bars equal +/− 1 standard deviation.
FIGURE 1. A in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 1. A, idealized human dental arcade, in palatal view, showing mesial, distal, labial, and lingual directions (modified from Smith and Dodson, 2003). LM1, left upper first molar. B, photo traces of AMNH 5027 Lmx7–8 (bones are schematic), showing mesiodistal orientations of crown long axes (points A–D were defined by Smith et al., 2005). C, photo trace of the premaxilla of AMNH 5027 (teeth are schematic) in palatal view showing labiolingual orientations of the crown long axes. D, Saurornitholestes Sues, 1978, crown in lateral view showing crown height (CH, measured from the apex to the base of the enamel (̴between points G and B)); crown base length (CBL, measured along the mesiodistal axis of the crown at the base of the enamel, ̴between points A and B); apical length (AL, measured between points A and G); crown angle (CA, angle GAB); mesial apical (MA), mesial mid-crown (MC), and mesial basal (MB) denticle densities (measured along the length of the mesial carina); distal apical (DA), distal mid-crown (DC), and distal basal (DB) denticle densities (measured along the length of the distal carina). E, the crown in D in basal view showing CBL and crown base width (CBW, measured perpendicular to CBL). Crown in D redrawn from Currie et al., (1990). Figure concept after Smith et al. (2005).
FIGURE 11 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 11. Maxillary teeth (?5–7) of Tyrannosaurus rex (MOR 008) in apical view; note orientation with respect to lateral side of the bone (crowns are broken; view is of the cross sections of the teeth).
FIGURE 7 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 7. Positional variation in carina placement and orientation of Tyrannosaurus rex. Right maxilla (A) and left dentary (B) in palatal view (composite photo traces of AMNH 5027). C, the mesial right maxillary dentition of LACM 23844 in labial view (arrows indicate distal carinae, which are forming the distal edges of the labial faces of the teeth by mx3). D, the mesial left dentary dentition of FMNH PR2081 in labial view (arrows indicate distal carinae).
FIGURE 15 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 15. Curvature profiles in pm1 and d1 of Tyrannosaurus rex. A, Lpm1 of BHI 3033 in mesial view. B, Ld1 of BHI 3033 in labiodistal view. C, Mesial profiles derived from A and B, scaled to the same size. Scale bars equal 1 cm.
FIGURE 2 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 2. Crown size (in mm) variability profiles, with respect to tooth position, for CBL (A), CBW (B), CH (C), and AL (D) of Tyrannosaurus rex. E, crown size (CBL, CBW, CH, and AL, in mm) comparisons for T. rex tooth classes. See Supplementary Data 1, www.vertpaleo.org/jvp/ JVPcontents.html, for data. Error bars = +/− 1 standard deviation.
FIGURE 10 in Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: Implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions
FIGURE 10. Distal set morphology in Tyrannosaurus rex. A, Rmx5 of AMNH 5027 in mesial view. B, Rmx5 of LACM 23844 in labial view. C, Lmx5–7 of CM 9380 in lingual view. D, Rmx6 of SDSM 12047 in lingual view. E, Lmx7 of MOR 555 in labial view. F, Lmx8 of MOR 555 in mesial view. G, Lmx9 of BHI 3033 in distal view. H, Rmx10–12 of FMNH PR2081 in labial view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.