Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,849
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,849 results for “Conservancy”
FIGURE 7 in On the distribution and conservation of the South American lizard genus Tropidurus Wied-Neuwied, 1825 (Squamata: Tropiduridae)
FIGURE 7. Distribution of Tropidurus chromatops (red symbols), T. callathelys (yellow star), and T. xanthochylus (pink star) plotted over a biome (left) and an altitudinal map (right) of South America. Stars represent the type localities of the species. TSMBF: Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; TSDBF: Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; TSCF: Tropical and subtropical coniferous forests; TBMF: Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests; TSGSS: Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrublands; TGSS: Temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands; FGS: Flooded grasslands and savannas; MGS: Montane grasslands and shrublands; MFWS: Mediterranean forests, woodlands, and scrubs; DXS: Deserts and xeric shrublands.
FIGURE 2 in On the distribution and conservation of the South American lizard genus Tropidurus Wied-Neuwied, 1825 (Squamata: Tropiduridae)
FIGURE 2. Distribution of Tropidurus montanus (pink symbols), T. erythrocephalus (blue symbols), and T. mucujensis (green star) plotted over a biome (left) and an altitudinal map (right) of South America. Stars represent the type localities of the species. TSMBF: Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; TSDBF: Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; TSCF: Tropical and subtropical coniferous forests; TBMF: Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests; TSGSS: Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrublands; TGSS: Temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands; FGS: Flooded grasslands and savannas; MGS: Montane grasslands and shrublands; MFWS: Mediterranean forests, woodlands, and scrubs; DXS: Deserts and xeric shrublands.
Figure 4 in Conservation genetics of native and European-introduced Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis)
Figure 4. Median-joining network analysis of Cytb haplotypes. Missing haplotypes are represented as black dots. Mutations are represented by hatch marks in connecting vectors and the size of circles is proportional to haplotype frequencies. Colours correspond to the source population. Haplotypes labelled under Unknown and listed by country correspond to the additional sequences taken from Genbank.
Figure 4 in A dark shell hiding great variability: a molecular insight into the evolution and conservation of melanic Daphnia populations in the Alps
Figure 4. Unrooted haplotype networks of European Daphnia pulicaria haplotypes showing disconnections at the 97% parsimony threshold. Different patterns identify the main haplogroups considered in this study (see Fig. 1 for geographical distributions of haplogroups). Circles indicate distinct haplotypes (size proportional to the number of specimens sharing the same haplotype). Bold outlines indicate haplotypes found in our melanic alpine populations. The minimum number of mutational steps required to connect all haplotypes in a single network is also given (dashed double-arrowed lines). Alpine haplotypes are coded as in Fig. 3. Black dots indicate missing (unsampled/extinct) haplotypes.
Figure 8 in Three new species of Callulina (Amphibia: Anura: Brevicipitidae) highlight local endemism and conservation plight of Africa's Eastern Arc forests
Figure 8. Maximum-likelihood phylogenies of Callulina, with new species marked in light-grey boxes, and with holotypes marked in dark grey. Letters above branches refer to bootstrap results (MP, ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Below branches Bremer support values and Templeton test results are given, either rejected (–) or accepted (+), with 0.05 as the cut-off point.
Figure 1 in Three new species of Callulina (Amphibia: Anura: Brevicipitidae) highlight local endemism and conservation plight of Africa's Eastern Arc forests
Figure 1. Map of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania showing the distribution of Callulina. Inset map (bottom left) showing the distribution of South Pare species Callulina stanleyi sp. nov. (elevational range of 1200–1600 m), and Callulina shengena sp. nov. (elevational range of 1920–2100 m).
FIGURE 2. Tragia peltata. A. Flowering branch, B. Abaxial leaf face, C in Unraveling Tragia peltata (Euphorbiaceae): taxonomy, morphology, distribution and conservation
FIGURE 2. Tragia peltata. A. Flowering branch, B. Abaxial leaf face, C. Basal bract of the inflorescence. D. Staminate bract, E‒F. Staminate flowers, G–H. Pistillate flowers, I. Pistillate sepal, detail of the apex and ciliate margins with stipitate glandular trichomes, J. Fruit, K. Seed. Illustrated by Regina Carvalho, from H.F. Talbot s.n. [K 001205063] (A, B), D.A. Folli s.n. [IPA 66670] (C‒K).
FIGURE 6 in Snake fauna of the Andaman Islands, Bay of Bengal-A review of species richness taxonomy, distribution, natural history and conservation status
FIGURE 6. (A) Indotyphlops braminus (South Andaman), (B) Argyrophis oatesii (South Andaman), (C & D) Fowlea tytleri— blotched and striped morphs (South Andaman), (E & F) Adult and juvenile Lycodon hypsirhinoides (Long Island), (G & H) Adult and juvenile Dendrelaphis andamanensis (Long Island)
FIGURE 3 in Mimosa serra (Caesalpinioideae, Fabaceae): conservation insights and its presence in Argentina
FIGURE 3. Grasslands with occurrence of Mimosa serra in Villa Ema (Misiones, Argentina). A) Andropogon lateralis Nees, one of the dominant grass. B) Hedychium coronarium J. Koenig, potentially invasive species; population at the edge of the grassland. C) Satellite image showing the grassland (indicated by the arrow) and proximity to the Paraná River.
Direct Molecular Evidence for an Ancient, Conserved Developmental Toolkit Controlling Posttranscriptional Gene Regulation in Land Plants
<p><em>SRA: </em>SRP250506<br> <em>BioProject: </em><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA608441">PRJNA608441</a></p> <p>miRNA-Seq</p>
FIGURE 5 in Rediscovery of the presumably extinct fairy lantern Thismia kobensis (Thismiaceae) in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, with discussions on its taxonomy, evolutionary history, and conservation
FIGURE 5. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the combined 18S rDNA and atp1 sequences from Thismia kobensis and its related taxa. Node values indicate bootstrap support (1000 replicates) of ≥ 70%. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.
JustConservation - global data of site-level biodiversity conservation and its social-ecological outcomes (1970-2019)
<p>This dataset contains evidence collected from 723 studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals that describe and explore conservation efforts at a single site in 104 countries (1970-2019). The pool of studies was obtained through a keyword search on Web of Science, which returned 69,246 publications, followed by a screening of titles and abstracts using the open access machine-learning assisted software Colandr (11,100 publications screened; cut-off inclusion rate: 3%) and a data extraction phase (1,054 publications), based on the following criteria for inclusion: (1) the study is about biodiversity conservation; (2) the study describes a deliberate intervention; (3) the study provides empirical evidence; (4) the conservation intervention takes place in a specific site through a specific actor or actors; (5) the study identifies a discernible conservation aim, and; (6) the paper identifies a discernible conservation approach.</p> <p>Curated and compiled dataset with the following columns:</p> <ul> <li><strong>study_id</strong>: unique identifier of the study</li> <li><strong>title</strong>: title of the study</li> <li><strong>year</strong>: publication year of the study</li> <li><strong>authors</strong>: authors of the study</li> <li><strong>name_journal</strong>: name of the journal the study was published in</li> <li><strong>author_affiliation_type</strong>: type of institution the lead author of the study works for (University/Academic; NGO; public/state/UN; think thank/research institute; private company; independent; other). Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_affiliation_country: </strong>country of affiliation of the lead author. Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_continent</strong>: country of affiliation of the lead author. Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_north_south</strong>: indicates whether the lead author is affiliated with an institution in the Global North (N) or Global South (S). Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>major_funder_ngo</strong>: are any authors affiliated with a major conservation funder or organisation with an interest in the conservation intervention being researched (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>funding_source</strong>: funding source of the paper (not of the conservation intervention)</li> <li><strong>conflict_of_interest: </strong>overlap between the affiliations of authors, the funding source and the conservation intervention being researched (0 = no; 1 = yes)</li> <li><strong>study_country</strong>: country where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_locality</strong>: locality or region where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_continent</strong>: continent where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_north_south: </strong>indicates whether the conservation intervention was conducted in the Global North (N) or Global South (S)</li> <li><strong>primary_ecosystem_type</strong>: type of ecosystem of the intervention (Forest/Woodland; Savanna/Dry forest; Dryland/Semi-arid; Grassland/Shrubland; Rivers/Wetlands; Coastal/Marine; Mountain; Cultivated; Other)</li> <li><strong>name_primary_intervention</strong>: name of the conservation intervention or program</li> <li><strong>year_primary_intervention</strong>: year the conservation intervention or program started (single year; many years)</li> <li><strong>target_type_ecosystem</strong>: the conservation intervention targets ecosystems or habitats (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_species</strong>: the conservation intervention targets specific species (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_ess</strong>: the conservation intervention targets ecosystem services or processes (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_humans: </strong>the conservation intervention targets humans and livelihoods (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>description_primary_target</strong>: short description of the primary conservation target</li> <li><strong>description_secondary_target: </strong>short description of any additional conservation target (if applicable)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_paca</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through protected areas or conserved areas (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_restoration</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through restoration (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_species_use</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through species protection or sustainable use measures (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_livelihoods_tourism</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through livelihoods support or tourism (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_incentives</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through incentives, compensation schemes, or market instruments (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_education</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through education or capacity building (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_stewardship</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through local/indigenous stewardship (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>description_primary_type</strong>: short description of the primary conservation type</li> <li><strong>description_secondary_type: </strong>short description of any additional conservation types (if applicable)</li> <li><strong>study_covers_governance: </strong>the paper describes governance processes (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>iplc_involved: </strong>indigenous people and/or local communities are involved in the conservation intervention (no; yes, partially; yes, locally-led)</li> <li><strong>description_governance</strong>: short description of the governance process and main actors involved</li> <li><strong>additional_notes: </strong>notes and/or remarks about conservation intervention/governance</li> <li><strong>ecological_outcomes_incl:</strong> study describes ecological outcomes or conservation effectiveness (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>ecological_outcomes: </strong>the reported ecological outcomes are positive, negative, or mixed (positive; negative; mixed; N/A)</li> <li><strong>social_outcomes_incl</strong>: study describes social impacts or outcomes associated with conservation (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>social_outcomes:</strong> the reported social outcomes are positive, negative, or mixed (positive; negative; mixed; N/A)</li> </ul>
FIG. 3 in The Natural History, Distribution, and Conservation of Lonely Rainfrogs, Pristimantis eremitus
FIG. 3.—Amplexus in Pristimantis eremitus within a bromeliad core (A) and on a bromeliad frond (B), as observed along a transect at Reserva Las Gralarias, Pichincha, Ecuador. A color version of this figure is available online.
Figure 6 in Biogeography and conservation of desert warthog Phacochoerus aethiopicus and common warthog Phacochoerus africanus (Artiodactyla: Suidae) in the Horn of Africa
Figure 6: Geographic distribution of desert warthog Phacochoerus aethiopicus and common warthog Phacochoerus africanus in the Horn of Africa relative to mean annual rainfall.
Fig. 3 in Mutagenesis of a Lotus japonicus GSK3β/Shaggy-like kinase reveals functionally conserved regulatory residues
Fig. 3. The chromatogram from the final purification step with the gel filtration column and the corresponding SDS-PAGE. At the y-axis are mAU (absorption milliunits at 280 nm) and at the x axis is the retention volume (number above the axis indicate fractions). At the SDS-PAGE Lane M, indicates protein markers, lane INP the input sample, and lanes 10–27 the output fractions from the column.
FIGURES 58–61 in Wing pattern variation and DNA barcodes defy taxonomic splitting in the New Zealand Pimelea Looper Notoreas perornata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae): the importance of populations as conservation units
FIGURES 58–61. Notoreas perornata live adults settling and nectaring on Pimelea. 58, 59. Female (1a), Glinks Gully ND, 9 Nov 2012, photos by Olivier Ball; 60, 61. Female (2a), Onoke Spit WN, 2 Dec 2020, photos by Eric Edwards.
FIGURES 25–30 in Wing pattern variation and DNA barcodes defy taxonomic splitting in the New Zealand Pimelea Looper Notoreas perornata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae): the importance of populations as conservation units
FIGURES 25–30. Notoreas perornata adults: 25–27. (1e); 28–30. (2a). 25. Female upperside, Castlepoint WA; 26. Female underside (same specimen as Fig. 24); 27. Female underside (same specimen as Fig. 25); 28. Male upperside, L. Kohangapiripiri WN; 29. Male upperside, Titahi Bay WN; 30. Male upperside, Te Humenga Pt WN.
FIGURES 14–18 in Wing pattern variation and DNA barcodes defy taxonomic splitting in the New Zealand Pimelea Looper Notoreas perornata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae): the importance of populations as conservation units
FIGURES 14–18. Notoreas perornata adults (1c). 14. Male upperside, Oeo–Opunake Cliffs TK; 15. Female upperside, Oeo Cliffs TK; 16. Female upperside, Pihama Cliffs TK; 17. Male underside (same specimens as Fig. 14); 18. Female underside (same specimen as Fig. 15).
Supplementary material - Global strategy for the conservation and use of genetic resources of selected millets
<p><strong>Supplementary material for: </strong>Bramel, P., Giovannini, P. and M. Eshan Dulloo. 2022. Global strategy for the conservation and use of genetic resources of selected millets. Global Crop Diversity Trust. Bonn, Germany. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7798294</p>
Osseous Resective Surgery Vs Conservative Surgery with or Without Papilla Preservation Technique
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06663202. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.