Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 12. A in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 12. A UPGMA generated dendrogram illustrating the similarity relationships of species richness among the herpetofauna in the 10 physiographic regions of Coahuila (based on the data in Table 6). We calculated the similarity values using Duellman's (1990) Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR).

Fig. 8 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 8. Serranías del Burro. Panoramic view of the Serranías del Burro, in the municipality of Zaragoza. Photo by Daniel Garza- Tobón.

Fig. 11 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 11. Sierras Transversales. Paso de Carneros, Matorral rosetophilous vegetation, with Chocha (Yucca carnerosana) and Lechuguilla (Agave lechuguilla), at Paso de Carneros, in the municipality of Saltillo. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 7 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 7. Pliegues Saltillo-Parras. Vegetation near Parras de la Fuente, in the municipality of Parras. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 4 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Llanuras de Coahuila y Nuevo Leon. Tamaulipas thorn scrub in the municipality of Allende. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 10 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 10. Sierra de la Paila. Vegetation in the Sierra de la Paila, in the municipality of Ramos Arizpe. Photo by Bernardo Marino (http://gransierraplegada.org).

Fig. 1 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Physiographic regions of Coahuila, Mexico. Abbreviations are as follows: BDM = Bolsón de Mapimi; GSP = Gran Sierra Plegada; LCN = Llanuras de Coahuila y Nuevo León; LGM = Laguna de Mayrán; LSV = Llanuras y Sierras Volcánicas; PSP = Pliegues Saltillo-Parras; SLC = Sierras y Llanuras Coahuilenses; SLP = Sierra de la Paila; STR = Sierras Transversales.

Fig. 2 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 2. Bolsón de Mapimí. Vegetation in the Bolsón de Mapimí, in the municipality of the same name in the neighboring state of Durango. Photo by Gabriel Viesca Ramos.

Fig. 3 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Gran Sierra Plegada. Vegetation in the vicinity of Monterreal in the municipality of Arteaga. Photo by Elí García-Padilla.

Fig. 19 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 19. Impact of Roads. Masticophis flagellum dead on the road near El Mimbre, in the municipality of Parras. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 16 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 16. Deforestation for Agricultural Purposes. Monoculture of cotton at San Pedro de las Colonias, in the municipality of the same name, Provincia de Laguna de Mayran. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 17 in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 17. Deforestation for Ranching Purposes. Goats in the vicinity of Estación Marte, in the municipality of General Cepeda. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Fig. 23. Forest Fires. The scene after a in The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 23. Forest Fires. The scene after a forest fire in the vicinity of Arteaga, in the municipality of Arteaga. Photo by Manuel Nevárez de los Reyes.

Figure 9. Sometimes many volunteers are necessary for a in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Figure 9. Sometimes many volunteers are necessary for a project, either digging up a hibernation site (Fig 9a), clearing open areas for sun penetration, or digging up an old septic line to prevent collapses and injuries to snakes.

Fig. 3 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 3. Typical nesting area of Northern Pine Snakes in New Jersey. They require relatively open areas where there is complete sun penetration to the ground to provide sufficient warmth to the incubating eggs (Burger 1989a, 1991a; Burger and Zappalorti 2011a).

Fig. 5 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 5. Pine Snakes hibernate in communal hibernacula that can contain up to 30 or more Pine Snakes (Burger et al. 1988; Burger and Zappalorti 2011a, b, 2015, 2016). Fig. 5a shows the depth hibernation chambers are below ground, a snake in a natural chamber (Fig 5b) and in cement blocks from an old septic chamber (Fig. 5c, Pine Snake on right, Black Racer on left).

Fig. 1 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 1. Northern Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus) hissing when first encountered in the New Jersey Pine Barrens.

Figure 8 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Figure 8. Several Pine Snake females often nest in the same nest. Here we (R. Zappalorti and J. Burger) have removed four clutches (note they are bound together, making it possible to identify the eggs of three different females). Once females lay eggs, they exude a liquid that binds the eggs together. This partly prevents other females from disrupting the clutch and accidentally removing them to the outside while they are digging their own side chambers.

Fig. 7 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 7. Volunteers contribute directly to conservation efforts by helping to remove trees that are obstructing sun penetration to nests or hibernation sites (Fig. 7a), or taking data on snake behavior (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 6 in Stakeholder contributions to conservation of threatened Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus, Daudin, 1803) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens as a case study

Fig. 6. Volunteers of all ages are involved in our Pine Snake research, and the handling and measuring of snakes contributes to their education, and results in their providing information about conservation to their families, friends, classmates, and others. Following hibernation studies, the children (and adults) put the snakes back into their hibernation chambers.