Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10,016
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10,016 results for “Observation”
Fig. 3 in Observation of a novel Babesia spp. in Eastern Grey Kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in Australia
Fig. 3. Electron micrographs of Babesia spp. (Case 2) within an erythrocyte. Nucleus (N); host cytoplasm (HC); endoplasmic reticulum (ER); ribosome (RI); mitochondria (MC), and invagination (I). Bar = 0.5 µm.
Fig. 2 in Observation of a novel Babesia spp. in Eastern Grey Kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in Australia
Fig. 2. Photomicrograph of blood smears stained with Diff-Quik (A) and Giemsa (B–F) from eastern grey kangaroos (Cases 2 and 3) showing diverse forms of Babesia including paired merozoites (2A), multiple ring-shaped trophozoites with a chromatin dot (2B), a large ring-shaped trophozoite with three chromatin dots (2C), ring-shaped trophozoite with a pair of buds in early dividing stage (2D), two dividing trophozoites with a cytoplasmic bridge (2E), and a clump of diverse forms of extraerythrocytic Babesia (3F). Bar = 10 µm.
Fig. 4 in Observation of a novel Babesia spp. in Eastern Grey Kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in Australia
Fig. 4. Minimum evolution phylogenetic tree based on a 1560 bp 18S rRNA alignment for representatives of the genus Babesia including the new kangaroo-infecting species (in bold and underlined) originating from Cases 1 and 2. Also underlined and in bold are other species sequenced as part of this study. Branch support is shown with a ‡ where all tree building methods (parsimony, distance and likelihood) had at least 70% bootstrap and Bayesian support.
Fig. 528. Observed abnormalities. A in Fig. 4 in Fig. 4 in Fig. 3 in Fig. 21. Sesarmops mora n in Paralbunea dayriti
Fig. 528. Observed abnormalities. A: scoliosis, Barbus lacerta, B: scoliosis, Alburnus sellal, C: lordosis Barbus lacerta, C: abnormal fin ray (black arrow), D: abnormality in barbels of Arabibarbus grypus (normal: green arrow, abnormal: black arrow).
Comparison of observation- and inventory- based CH4 emissions for eight large global emitters
<p>CoCO2 (https://coco2-project.eu/) is a scientific collaborative effort funded by the H2020 European Commissions, grant number 958927.</p> <p>This synthesis has been originally based on data and country specific plots from previous VERIFY project, for the EU27: https://webportals.ipsl.fr/VERIFY/FactSheets, v1.28 and on the WP8 deliverable Reports D8.1 (https://coco2-project.eu/node/333), D8.2 (https://coco2-project.eu/node/360) and D8.3 (https://coco2-project.eu/index.php/node/406) from the CoCO2 project website.</p> <p>This dataset is updated after we received two review comments. Each spreadsheet contains the CH4 data behind the manuscript figures, both as time series, mean values and uncertainties (min, max ranges). Units are mentioned for each figure. For the gridded figures data should be asked directly from the data providers.</p>
Fig. 6. Ectoparasite-host interactions for A in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 6. Ectoparasite-host interactions for A) Antimora rostrata, B) Nezumia bairdii, and C) Synaphobranchus spp. across the region for which the presence or absence of ectoparasites could be confirmed. Circle Size = Number of confirmed ectoparasite-host interactions 10 m —2. Square = No ectoparasites observed. Colors denote habitats.
Fig. 2 in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 2. Example images of ectoparasites infecting various host species. A) Antimora rostrata with a lernaeopodid copepod (1059 m, Alvin Canyon); B) Synaphobranchus sp. with a sphyriid copepod (820 m, open slope); C) Nezumia bairdii with a sphyriid copepod parasitized by eight leeches (1035 m, Phoenix Canyon; D), Black fish, Diaphus sp. with an unknown siphonostomatid copepod (1130 m, cold seep) attached behind dorsal fin; E) N. bairdii with aegid isopod (780 m, open slope); F) Hoplostethus mediterraneus with a cymothoid isopod (744 m, Nygren Canyon); G) Amblyraja radiata with aegid isopod (1010 m, Alvin Canyon); and H) Cottunculus thomsonii with gnathiids (1210 m, Oceanographer Canyon).
Fig. 3 in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 3. Percentage of ectoparasites infecting three common demersal fishes. Unconfirmed observations are not included.
Fig. 1 in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 1. Locations of 43 ROV dives conducted along the northeastern U.S. continental margin and New England Seamount Chain. Circle Size = Number of ectoparasite-host interactions per dive. Square = No ectoparasites observed. Colors denote habitats.
Fig. 5 in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 5. Mean abundance (±SE) of A) Antimora rostrata, B) Nezumia bairdii, and C) Synaphobranchus spp. per habitat (black bars). Mean abundance (±SE) of ectoparasitehost interactions (grey bars) is also included. n = number of dives during which the species was present.
Fig. 4 in Ectoparasitism on deep-sea fishes in the western North Atlantic: In situ observations from ROV surveys
Fig. 4. Mean abundance (±SE) of A) Antimora rostrata, B) Nezumia bairdii, and C) Synaphobranchus spp. per depth zone (black bars). Mean abundance (±SE) of ectoparasite-host interactions (grey bars) also included. n = number of dives during which the species was present.
Рис. 2. ΔоΛговременная Αинамика весенней чисΛенности трех виΑов уток (A — трескунка; B — касатки; C — шиΛохвости) на ΑебеΑинском стационаре Хинганского заповеΑника (показаны уровень значимости и 95-процентный ΑоверитеΛьный интерваΛ) Fig. 2. Long-term spring number dynamics of three duck species at the Lebedinsky Station of Khingansky State Nature Reserve with p-values and 0.95 confidence intervals. A — Gargany; B — Falcated Duck; C — Pintail in The results of long-term observation of waterfowl spring migration in Khingan Nature Reserve, Eastern Russia
Рис. 2. ΔоΛговременная Αинамика весенней чисΛенности трех виΑов уток (A — трескунка; B — касатки; C — шиΛохвости) на ΑебеΑинском стационаре Хинганского заповеΑника (показаны уровень значимости и 95-процентный ΑоверитеΛьный интерваΛ) Fig. 2. Long-term spring number dynamics of three duck species at the Lebedinsky Station of Khingansky State Nature Reserve with p-values and 0.95 confidence intervals. A — Gargany; B — Falcated Duck; C — Pintail
Рис. 1. Регион иссΛеΑований: A — его поΛожение на карте Восточной Азии; B — общий виΑ Буреинско-Хинганской низменности; C — карта-схема ΑебеΑинского стационара Хинганского заповеΑника. УсΛовные обозначения: I — Хинганский заповеΑник (вкΛючает Αва кΛастера); II — заказник «Ганукан». 1 — Антоновское воΑохраниΛище; 2 — оз. ΔоΛгое; 3 — оз. Гусиное; 4 — оз. Третье ΑебеΑиное Fig. 1. Study region: A — study region on the map of the East Asia; B — Burea-Khingan (Arkhara) lowland; C — Lebedinsky Station. Notes: I — two clusters of Khingan Nature Reserve; II — Ganukan Sanctuary. 1 — Antonovskoye Reservoir; 2 — Dolgoye Lake; 3 — Gusinoye Lake; 4 — Lebedinoye Lake in The results of long-term observation of waterfowl spring migration in Khingan Nature Reserve, Eastern Russia
Рис. 1. Регион иссΛеΑований: A — его поΛожение на карте Восточной Азии; B — общий виΑ Буреинско-Хинганской низменности; C — карта-схема ΑебеΑинского стационара Хинганского заповеΑника. УсΛовные обозначения: I — Хинганский заповеΑник (вкΛючает Αва кΛастера); II — заказник «Ганукан». 1 — Антоновское воΑохраниΛище; 2 — оз. ΔоΛгое; 3 — оз. Гусиное; 4 — оз. Третье ΑебеΑиное Fig. 1. Study region: A — study region on the map of the East Asia; B — Burea-Khingan (Arkhara) lowland; C — Lebedinsky Station. Notes: I — two clusters of Khingan Nature Reserve; II — Ganukan Sanctuary. 1 — Antonovskoye Reservoir; 2 — Dolgoye Lake; 3 — Gusinoye Lake; 4 — Lebedinoye Lake
Rawdata for publication: Observation of Transient Prenucleation Species of Calcium Carbonate by DNP-Enhanced NMR
<p>This is the raw data set for the publication:</p> <p>Observation of Transient Prenucleation Species of Calcium Carbonate by DNP-Enhanced NMR</p> <p>by</p> <p>Martins Balodis, Yu Rao, Gabriele Stevanato, Matthias Kellner, Josephine Meibom, Mattia Negroni, Bradley F. Chmelka, Lyndon Emsley .</p> <p>https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01588</p>
Fig. 11 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 11 Rates of chatter calls in different magpie populations and individuals. a Each mark represents average chattering rate for a single bird from five populations indicated by colours. Figures are numbers for the outliers: 1, 2—jankowskii from the mixed population of Argun'; 3, 4, 5—hybrid birds from the hybridogeneous population of Kerulen. b Each mark represents average chattering rate for a series of chatterings of one selected individual representing jankowskii, leucoptera, and hybrid birds, respectively. Green mark—pair #6 jankowskii from Vladivostok; gray—pair #43 leucoptera from Tsasuchei, Transbaikalia; blue—pair #24 hybrids from Kerulen, eastern Mongolia. X-axis—number of elements per second in a total series of chattering; Y-axis— number of elements per second in a series of 5 elements of chattering
Fig. 12 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 12 Violin plot diagram of the chatter call speed (elements per second) of Eurasian magpie populations across regions. X-axis presents a set of populations; Y-axis—elements per second. Box outlines the interquantile range (25%, 75%), whiskers represent range without outliers, central bar is the median, red dot is the mean, and figure shape is the probability density. The brackets on the top denote statistically significant pairwise differences (GamesHowell test, p<0.05)
Fig. 9 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 9 Population genetic structure based on unlinked SNP markers. Scatter plots of principal component analysis (PCA) show individual variation in components one and two (a) and three and four (b). The amount of variance explained by each PC is shown in parentheses. I—leucoptera,
Fig. 7 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 7 Bayesian skyline plots (BSPs) for effective female population sizes for haplogroups, subspecies, and populations of Pica pica. a Comparison of 6 haplogroups, depicted in the network Fig. 4. b Comparison of 6 subspecies. c Comparison of 4 populations of P. p. jankowskii. d Comparison of 3 populations of P. p. leucoptera.
Fig. 6 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 6 Mismatch distribution of nucleotide differences in populations representing different haplogroups as at Figs. 4 and 5. X-axis— number of nucleotide differences; Y-axis—proportion (frequency). Solid lines—expected distributions (under expectation of population growth); dashed lines—observed distributions. a Haplogroup 1:
Fig. 5 in Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations
Fig. 5 Time-calibrated Bayesian tree based on mitochondrial control region sequences of Pica pica. Numbers at the branches indicate Bayesian posterior probability values (left) and bootstrap values of the ML analysis (right, in percent). Triangle widths are proportional to specimen numbers. Blue bars next to nodes indicate 95% credibility intervals for their age estimates. The figures in bold and the time scale below are in million years (Ma) before present
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.