Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Meerkats (Suricata suricatta), a new definitive host of the canid nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum

Fig. 1. Angiostrongylus vasorum first stage larva isolated by the Baermann technique from a collective faecal sample of a meerkat group. Average size: 332 μm in length and 14.1 μm in width.

Fig. 2 in Meerkats (Suricata suricatta), a new definitive host of the canid nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum

Fig. 2. Sequence alignment of part of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 2-region (78 bp) of Angiostronglus vasorum (GenBank accession no. KF270683), of DNA isolated from A. vasorum first stage larvae obtained from meerkats and from one slug.

Fig. 2 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the ITS-1 (445 bp) and ITS-2 regions sequences (290 bp) of select avian-infecting Babesia lineages. Sequences identified in this study are emphasized in red, and those of other avian-infecting lineages are shown in blue. For each sequence, the following information is provided: morphospecies (individual identification or Genbank code) host species. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale bar shown corresponds to both trees). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 3. Distribution of the phylogenetic groups of avian piroplasmids (based on the 18S rRNA gene) in relation to the phylogeny of avian orders (based on multiple nuclear genes). Avian orders investigated in this study are shown in red, and other avian orders known to host piroplasmids are shown in blue. Avian phylogeny was adapted from Yuri et al. (2013). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 18S rRNA gene sequences (1450 bp) of the studied Babesia lineages. Sequences obtained in this study are emphasized in red, and those of other avian-infecting lineages are shown in blue. For each sequence, the following information is provided: morphospecies (individual identification or GenBank code) host species. For avian-infecting lineages, the host order is indicated with colored circles (see legend). Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Ectoparasitic copepod infestation on a wild population of Neotropical catfish Sciades herzbergii Bloch, 1794: Histological evidences of lesions on host

Fig. 5. Transverse section of S. herzbergii skin parasitized by copepods. (Hematoxylineosin staining). a. Detail of the outer and middle layer of the epidermis (hyperplasia and hypertrophy) (100X). b. Sacciforme cell (400X).

Fig. 4 in Ectoparasitic copepod infestation on a wild population of Neotropical catfish Sciades herzbergii Bloch, 1794: Histological evidences of lesions on host

Fig. 4. Cross section of healthy skin of S. herzbergii. Detail of the epidermis and dermis (staining with hematoxylin-eosin) (400X).

Fig. 2 in Ectoparasitic copepod infestation on a wild population of Neotropical catfish Sciades herzbergii Bloch, 1794: Histological evidences of lesions on host

Fig. 2. Hemorrhagic cutaneous lesions caused by the infestation of copepods on S. herzbergii. a. Ventral view. b. Pectoral fins and mouth.

Fig. 3 in Ectoparasitic copepod infestation on a wild population of Neotropical catfish Sciades herzbergii Bloch, 1794: Histological evidences of lesions on host

Fig. 3. Cross section of healthy skin of S. herzbergii, showing the different layers that make it up (Hematoxylin-eosin staining) (100X).

Fig. 3 in Co-introduction of ancyrocephalid monogeneans on their invasive host, the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepedé, 1802) in South Africa

Fig. 3. Onchocleidus principalis (Mizelle, 1936) haptoral hooks (A), membrane on ventral bar (B); male copulatory organ (C); Syncleithrium fusiformis (Mueller, 1934) haptoral hooks (D) male copulatory organ (E). Scale: A, C—E: 50 Mm; B: 10 Mm.

Fig. 2 in Co-introduction of ancyrocephalid monogeneans on their invasive host, the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepedé, 1802) in South Africa

Fig. 2. Clavunculus bursatus (Mueller, 1936) haptoral hooks (A), male copulatory organ (B); Onchocleidus dispar (Mueller, 1936) haptoral hooks (C); male copulatory organ (D); Onchocleidus furcatus (Mueller, 1937) haptoral hooks (E); male membrane on ventral bar (F), copulatory organ (G), vagina (H). Scale: A—E, G—H: 50 Mm; F: 10 Mm.

Fig. 1 in Co-introduction of ancyrocephalid monogeneans on their invasive host, the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepedé, 1802) in South Africa

Fig. 1. Map of the sampling localities in the Eastern Cape, Kwazulu-Natal and North West Provinces of South Africa.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Рис. 1. ФиΛогенетические Αеревья хантавируса AMRV и его прироΑного носитеΛя восточноазиатской мыши Apodemus peninsulae Thomas, 1906. А. ФиΛогенетическое Αерево восточноазиатской мыши Apodemus peninsulae, построенное метоΑом «максимаΛьного правΑопоΑобия» (ML) и поΛученное на основе анаΛиза участка гена цитохрома b мтΔНК (744 п.н.). В узΛах ветвΛения указаны бутстреп-поΑΑержки, рассчитанные ΑΛя 1000 повторов. Цветными Λиниями обозначены фиΛогенетические Λинии: Αве Китайские (зеΛеный), Корейская «Korea» (синий), Амурская «Amur» (красный). ПоΛужирным шрифтом выΑеΛены собственные образцы. Названия образцов из GenBank/NCBI быΛи сокращены; B. ФиΛогенетическое Αерево из работы Α. Н. Яшиной с ΑопоΛнениями, построенное метоΑом «бΛижайшего сосеΑа» (NJ) на основе посΛеΑоватеΛьностей фрагмента М-сегмента (2737–2980 н.п.) генома хантавирусов. В узΛах ветвΛения указаны бутстреппоΑΑержки, рассчитанные ΑΛя 1000 повторов. Жирным выΑеΛены иссΛеΑованные РНК изоΛяты (Яшина 2012; Яшина и Αр. 2019) Fig. 1. Phylogenetic trees of AMRV and its natural reservoir host — the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae Thomas, 1906. A. Phylogenetic tree of the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae constructed by the "maximum likelihood" method (ML). The data are obtained from the analysis of the cytochrome b mtDNA gene fragments (744 bp). Bootstrap supports calculated for 1,000 repeats are indicated in the branching nodes. Colored lines indicate phylogenetic lines: two Chinese (green), Korea (blue), and Amur (red). Own samples are highlighted in bold. The names of the samples from GenBank/NCBI have been shortened; B. Phylogenetic tree from L. N. Yashina's work with additions constructed by the neighbour joining method (NJ). It is based on the sequences of an M-segment fragment (2737–2980 bp) of the hantavirus genome. Bootstrap supports calculated for 1,000 repeats are indicated in the branching nodes. The researched RNA isolates are highlighted in bold (Yashina 2012; Yashina et al. 2019) in Variability of the gene cyt b in the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae Thomas, 1906 - a reservoir host of AMRV in the Khasansky District of Primorsky Krai

Рис. 1. ФиΛогенетические Αеревья хантавируса AMRV и его прироΑного носитеΛя восточноазиатской мыши Apodemus peninsulae Thomas, 1906. А. ФиΛогенетическое Αерево восточноазиатской мыши Apodemus peninsulae, построенное метоΑом «максимаΛьного правΑопоΑобия» (ML) и поΛученное на основе анаΛиза участка гена цитохрома b мтΔНК (744 п.н.). В узΛах ветвΛения указаны бутстреп-поΑΑержки, рассчитанные ΑΛя 1000 повторов. Цветными Λиниями обозначены фиΛогенетические Λинии: Αве Китайские (зеΛеный), Корейская «Korea» (синий), Амурская «Amur» (красный). ПоΛужирным шрифтом выΑеΛены собственные образцы. Названия образцов из GenBank/NCBI быΛи сокращены; B. ФиΛогенетическое Αерево из работы Α. Н. Яшиной с ΑопоΛнениями, построенное метоΑом «бΛижайшего сосеΑа» (NJ) на основе посΛеΑоватеΛьностей фрагмента М-сегмента (2737–2980 н.п.) генома хантавирусов. В узΛах ветвΛения указаны бутстреппоΑΑержки, рассчитанные ΑΛя 1000 повторов. Жирным выΑеΛены иссΛеΑованные РНК изоΛяты (Яшина 2012; Яшина и Αр. 2019) Fig. 1. Phylogenetic trees of AMRV and its natural reservoir host — the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae Thomas, 1906. A. Phylogenetic tree of the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae constructed by the "maximum likelihood" method (ML). The data are obtained from the analysis of the cytochrome b mtDNA gene fragments (744 bp). Bootstrap supports calculated for 1,000 repeats are indicated in the branching nodes. Colored lines indicate phylogenetic lines: two Chinese (green), Korea (blue), and Amur (red). Own samples are highlighted in bold. The names of the samples from GenBank/NCBI have been shortened; B. Phylogenetic tree from L. N. Yashina's work with additions constructed by the neighbour joining method (NJ). It is based on the sequences of an M-segment fragment (2737–2980 bp) of the hantavirus genome. Bootstrap supports calculated for 1,000 repeats are indicated in the branching nodes. The researched RNA isolates are highlighted in bold (Yashina 2012; Yashina et al. 2019)

Fig. 4 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 4 Relationship between the size of bat maternity aggregation (a), percentage of forest cover (b), body condition index (c), and parasite infection of the examined bats in the Carpathians Mountains (2007).

Fig. 1 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 1 Distribution of greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) maternity aggregations (grey circles) and single founding individuals (black dots) in the Beskids (Carpathian Mountains, Poland). Data pooled from Kozakiewicz (2003), Szkudlarek et al. (2008), and our data. For the investigated maternity colonies, forested areas within a 10-km radius is shown

Fig. 3 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 3 Proportions of protonymph (PN), deutonymph (DN), and adult (AD) stages of S. myoti mites, collected from Myotis myotis (bars), and the sex ratios of deutonymph and adult mites (circles)

Fig. 2 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 2 Micrograph of the adult female Spinturnix myoti, dorsal view. Scanning electron microscopy image, original magnification ×40

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in The subnivium, a haven for Trichinella larvae in host carcasses

Fig. 3. Fox carcasses preserved above the snow (on the left) and beneath the snow (on the right) after 112 days.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Differential patterns of definitive host use by two fish acanthocephalans occurring in sympatry: Pomphorhynchus laevis and Pomphorhynchus tereticollis

Fig. 3. Relative flow rates of P. tereticollis and P. laevis in their hosts in the Ouche (a) and Vingeanne (b) localities, taking into account the abundance of adult intestinal parasites and the relative abundance of each fish host species in the local community. The thickness of arrows and percentages indicate the estimated relative value of each fish species as a resource for each Pomphorhynchus species.