Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,074
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,074 results for “invasive species”
Figure 2 from: Rakhshani E, Saval JM, Pérez Hidalgo N, Pons X, Kavallieratos NG, Starý P (2020) Trioxys liui Chou & Chou, 1993 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae): an invasive aphid parasitoid attacking invasive Takecallis species (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in the Iberian Peninsula. ZooKeys 944: 99-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.944.51395
Figure 2 Trioxys liui – female A head, frontal view B maxillary and labial palps C antenna D mesonotum and scutellum, dorsal view E forewing F propodeum G petiole, dorsal view H genitalia, lateral aspect.
Figure 1 from: Rakhshani E, Saval JM, Pérez Hidalgo N, Pons X, Kavallieratos NG, Starý P (2020) Trioxys liui Chou & Chou, 1993 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae): an invasive aphid parasitoid attacking invasive Takecallis species (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in the Iberian Peninsula. ZooKeys 944: 99-114. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.944.51395
Figure 1 General scheme of the sampling localities in the Iberian Peninsula A patch of Phyllostachys aurea in the Arboretum of Lleida B street garden with rows of bamboo (Phyllostachis sp.) in Barcelona.
Data from: Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritise the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe
<p>Prioritising the management of invasive alien species (IAS) is of global importance and within Europe integral to the EU IAS regulation. To prioritise management effectively the risks posed by IAS need to be assessed, but so too does the feasibility of their management. While risk of IAS to the EU has been assessed, the feasibility of management has not. We assessed the feasibility of eradicating 60 new (not yet established) and 35 emerging (established with limited distribution) species that pose a threat to the EU, as identified by horizon scanning. The assessment was carried out by 34 experts in invasion management from across Europe, applying the Non-Native Risk Management scheme to defined invasion scenarios and eradication strategies for each species, assessing the feasibility of eradication using seven key risk management criteria. Management priorities were identified by combining scores for risk (derived from horizon scanning) and feasibility of eradication. The results show eradication feasibility score and risk score were not correlated, indicating that risk management evaluates different information than risk assessment. Seventeen new species were identified as particularly high priorities for eradication should they establish in the future, while fourteen emerging species were identified as priorities for eradication now. A number of species considered highest priority for eradication were terrestrial vertebrates, a group that has been the focus of a number of eradication attempts in the EU. However, eradication priorities also included a diverse range of other taxa (plants, invertebrates and fish) suggesting there is scope to broaden the taxonomic range of attempted eradication in the EU. We demonstrate that broad scale structured assessments of management feasibility can help prioritise IAS for management. Such frameworks are needed to support evidence based decision making.</p>
Supplementary material 3 from: Hill KGW, Nielson KE, Tyler JJ, McInerney FA, Doubleday ZA, Frankham GJ, Johnson RN, Gillanders BM, Delean S, Cassey P (2020) Pet or pest? Stable isotope methods for determining the provenance of an invasive alien species. NeoBiota 59: 21-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.59.53671
Figure S1. Results from a carbon decision tree
Supplementary material 4 from: Hill KGW, Nielson KE, Tyler JJ, McInerney FA, Doubleday ZA, Frankham GJ, Johnson RN, Gillanders BM, Delean S, Cassey P (2020) Pet or pest? Stable isotope methods for determining the provenance of an invasive alien species. NeoBiota 59: 21-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.59.53671
Table S4.1. Determining confidence in status assignment
Figure 1 from: Seifert B (2020) Revision of the Plagiolepis schmitzii group with description of Pl. invadens sp. nov. – a new invasive supercolonial species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 67(2): 183-196. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.53199
Figure 1 Surface of posterior part of 1st gaster tergite of a worker of Plagiolepis taurica ( a) and Pl. schmitzii (b).
Figure 5 from: Seifert B (2020) Revision of the Plagiolepis schmitzii group with description of Pl. invadens sp. nov. – a new invasive supercolonial species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 67(2): 183-196. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.53199
Figure 5 Results of four variants of NC-clustering: NC-Ward (hierarchical, tree shown), NC-part.hclust (hierarchical), NC-part.kmeans (iterative vector-quantisation), NC-NMDS (non-metric scaling) ; 21 nest samples of Plagiolepis schmitzii (grey bars) and of 20 nest samples of Pl. atlantis (black bars). Outliers in NC-part.hclust are given by the white gap.
Figure 3 from: Seifert B (2020) Revision of the Plagiolepis schmitzii group with description of Pl. invadens sp. nov. – a new invasive supercolonial species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 67(2): 183-196. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.53199
Figure 3 Lateral aspect of a worker of Plagiolepis schmitzii (image from AntWeb, 2020: CASENT0906252, photographer E. Ortega).
Figure 4 from: Seifert B (2020) Revision of the Plagiolepis schmitzii group with description of Pl. invadens sp. nov. – a new invasive supercolonial species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 67(2): 183-196. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.53199
Figure 4 Dorsal aspect of a worker of Plagiolepis schmitzii (image from AntWeb 2020: CASENT0906252, photographer E. Ortega).
Figure 2 from: Seifert B (2020) Revision of the Plagiolepis schmitzii group with description of Pl. invadens sp. nov. – a new invasive supercolonial species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 67(2): 183-196. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.53199
Figure 2 Head of a worker of Plagiolepis schmitzii (image from AntWeb, 2020: CASENT0906252, photographer E. Ortega).
Figure 1 from: Li Z, Yao T, Xu Z, Meng L, Li B (2020) A new species of Cheiloneurus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) as a hyperparasitoid of the invasive cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, in China. ZooKeys 974: 23-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.974.55528
Figure 1 Cheiloneurus nankingensis sp. nov. (female, holotype) A mesosoma, dorsal view B metasoma, dorsal view C antennae D mandibles E fore wing F head, front view G head, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.10 mm.
Figure 2 from: Li Z, Yao T, Xu Z, Meng L, Li B (2020) A new species of Cheiloneurus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) as a hyperparasitoid of the invasive cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, in China. ZooKeys 974: 23-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.974.55528
Figure 2 Cheiloneurus nankingensis sp. nov. (male) A fore wing B antennae C head, front view D head, ventral view E mesosoma, dorsal view F metasoma, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.10 mm.
Supplementary material 2 from: Bertolino S, Ancillotto L, Bartolommei P, Benassi G, Capizzi D, Gasperini S, Lucchesi M, Mori E, Scillitani L, Sozio G, Falaschi M, Ficetola GF, Cerri J, Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Loy A, Monaco A (2020) A framework for prioritising present and potentially invasive mammal species for a national list. In: Wilson JR, Bacher S, Daehler CC, Groom QJ, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Robinson TB, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. NeoBiota 62: 31-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52934
This is the R-script and the output of the analyses
Supplementary material 1 from: Bertolino S, Ancillotto L, Bartolommei P, Benassi G, Capizzi D, Gasperini S, Lucchesi M, Mori E, Scillitani L, Sozio G, Falaschi M, Ficetola GF, Cerri J, Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Loy A, Monaco A (2020) A framework for prioritising present and potentially invasive mammal species for a national list. In: Wilson JR, Bacher S, Daehler CC, Groom QJ, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Robinson TB, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. NeoBiota 62: 31-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52934
This is the database produced during the research
Supplementary material 3 from: Bertolino S, Ancillotto L, Bartolommei P, Benassi G, Capizzi D, Gasperini S, Lucchesi M, Mori E, Scillitani L, Sozio G, Falaschi M, Ficetola GF, Cerri J, Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Loy A, Monaco A (2020) A framework for prioritising present and potentially invasive mammal species for a national list. In: Wilson JR, Bacher S, Daehler CC, Groom QJ, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Robinson TB, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. NeoBiota 62: 31-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52934
Complete ranking of the species
Data from: The value of the species interaction-abiotic stress hypothesis (SIASH) for invasion biology: using native latitude to explain non-native latitudinal range sizes
<p>Establishment and spread of introduced species are difficult to predict because they are subject to a myriad of factors. A hypothesis which integrates multiple ecological processes, such as the species interaction-abiotic stress hypothesis (SIASH), may improve our ability to predict introduction success (i.e. establishment and spread). SIASH postulates that, along an environmental gradient, species' range limits are set by abiotic stress at the environmentally harsh end of that gradient and by species interactions at the environmentally benign end of the gradient. Given that species richness increases nearer the equator and that climate becomes harsher (colder) nearer the poles, latitude represents a useful gradient with which to test simple predictions of SIASH. In order to test whether non-native ranges conform to the predictions of SIASH, we evaluated non-native latitudinal range size data for 195 cross-continental, naturalized introductions of 140 animal and plant species. Median latitude of native range was positively related to range size in the introduced zone, such that species native to high latitudes occupied larger introduced ranges than species native to low latitudes. Furthermore, temperate native species occupied larger latitudinal ranges when introduced to tropical and subtropical zones than did tropical native species introduced to temperate zones. Our results suggest that where a species originates is as important as where it is introduced for predicting introduction success. Abiotic stress from cold more strongly constrains the range extents of introduced species than species interactions, which is particularly pronounced for species originating from tropical regions. Future work should determine how species interactions and abiotic stress jointly explain other components of non-native species' success across different spatial gradients to better integrate SIASH into invasion biology.</p>
Figure 3 from: Kozuharova E, Benbassat N, Ionkova I (2020) The invasive alien species Amorpha fruticosa in Bulgaria and its potential as economically prospective source of valuable essential oil. Pharmacia 67(4): 357-362. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.67.e51334
Figure 3 The bottom of reservoir Ivailovgrad drained for less than three months, spackled with grass and seedlings of Amorpha fruticosa; The banks densely covered with a belt of adult, generative A. fruticosa shrubs.
Figure 2 from: Kozuharova E, Benbassat N, Ionkova I (2020) The invasive alien species Amorpha fruticosa in Bulgaria and its potential as economically prospective source of valuable essential oil. Pharmacia 67(4): 357-362. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.67.e51334
Figure 2 Infrutescences of Amorpha fruticosa at early maturing stage. Shrubs at Ivaylovgrad reservoir bank on 14th of August 2019.
Supplementary material 2 from: Bustamante RO, Alves L, Goncalves E, Duarte M, Herrera I (2020) A classification system for predicting invasiveness using climatic niche traits and global distribution models: application to alien plant species in Chile. NeoBiota 63: 127-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.50049
Table S2. Basic information obtained for 49 exotic plants in Chile
Supplementary material 3 from: Bustamante RO, Alves L, Goncalves E, Duarte M, Herrera I (2020) A classification system for predicting invasiveness using climatic niche traits and global distribution models: application to alien plant species in Chile. NeoBiota 63: 127-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.50049
Map of the species
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.