Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedAug 2023View details →

FIGURE 2 in Camellia renshanxiangiae, a synonym of C. punctata (Theaceae)

FIGURE 2. Morphological comparison between Camellia punctata (A–C, G, I–K) and C. renshanxiangiae (D–F, H, L–N). A, D. Young branches and terminal buds; B, E. Adaxial surface of petioles and the base of leaf blades; C, F. Abaxial surface of leaves; G, H. Indistinguishable bracteoles and sepals; I, L. Flower buds; J, M. Abaxial surface of sepals; and K, N. Adaxial surface of sepals.

Fig. 3 in Transcriptome and metabolome profiling unveiled mechanisms of tea (Camellia sinensis) quality improvement by moderate drought on pre-harvest shoots

Fig. 3. Transcriptome analysis of DEGs. (A) Venn diagram of DEGs. (B–D) Biological processes of corresponding DEGs related to differentially accumulated metabolites in groups of CK vs. MI, CK vs. MO, and CK vs. SE.

Fig. 1 in Transcriptome and metabolome profiling unveiled mechanisms of tea (Camellia sinensis) quality improvement by moderate drought on pre-harvest shoots

Fig. 1. Metabolomic analysis of differentially accumulated metabolites. (A) Venn diagram of differentially accumulated metabolites. (B) The top five most abundant categories. A, amino acids and derivatives; F, flavonoids; N, nucleotide and derivatives; L, lipids; O, organic acids. Blue dot, categories with less metabolites. (C) Accumulation tendencies of the five categories under diferent SWCs.. CK, control (21–24% SWC); MI, milder drought (15–18% SWC); MO, moderate drought (12–15% SWC); SE, severe drought (9–12% SWC). (D) KEGG enrichment of group CK vs. MI from metabolic data. (E) KEGG enrichment of group CK vs. MO from metabolic data. (F) KEGG enrichment of group CK vs. SE from metabolic data. Plot: mean with standard deviation (SD). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 6 in Transcriptome and metabolome profiling unveiled mechanisms of tea (Camellia sinensis) quality improvement by moderate drought on pre-harvest shoots

Fig. 6. Regulation of lipid metabolisms under different SWCs. (A) Phospholipid metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, and fatty acid biosynthesis, and the expression tendencies of corresponding differentially accumulated lipids. (B) Connection network of 16 DEGs and 30 differentially accumulated lipids according to PCC> 0.9. Blue dots indicate DEGs, and pink dots denote closely correlated lipids. Colors from green to red in heatmaps represent the relative expression patterns of DEGs; colors from blue to pink represent the accumulated pattern of related metabolites. The compounds index in A and B are referred to in Supplementary Table S6-1. CK, control; MI, mild drought; MO, moderate drought; SE, severe drought. ADH3, alcohol dehydrogenase 3; AFP1-like, ninja-family protein AFP1-like; ALA2_like, phospholipid-transporting ATPase 2; AOS, allene oxide synthase; CIPK5-like, CBL-interacting protein kinase 5-like; DAD1, phospholipase A(1) DAD1; DGK7-like, diacylglycerol kinase 7-like; GDSL-1, GDSL esterase/lipase At5g33370-like; GDSL-2, GDSL esterase/lipase At4g26790-like; GDSL-3, GDSL esterase/lipase 1-like; GDSL-4, GDSL esterase/lipase At1g33811; KCS-12/19-like, 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase 12/19-like; LTP1-like, non-specific lipid-transfer protein 1-like; MGLL, caffeoylshikimate esterase-like, the isozyme gene of monoglyceride lipase; MTACP, acyl carrier protein; PL A1-Ibeta2, phospholipase A1-Ibeta2; PLD1-like, phospholipase D alpha 1-like. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Transcriptome and metabolome profiling unveiled mechanisms of tea (Camellia sinensis) quality improvement by moderate drought on pre-harvest shoots

Fig. 5. Underlying regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis under different SWCs. (A) Expressions of differentially accumulated flavonoids. (B) Underlying regulation mechanism of flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. (C) Connection network of 11 DEGs and 32 differentially accumulated flavonoids according to PCC> 0.9. Blue dots indicate DEGs, and pink dots denote flavonoids. In B and C, the colors from green to red in the heatmap show the relative expression pattern of DEGs, and the colors from blue to pink represent the relative accumulated pattern of closely related metabolites. The compounds index in A and C are referred to in Supplementary Tables S5-1. CK, control; MI, mild drought; MO, moderate drought; SE, severe drought. ANR, anthocyanidin reductase; ANS, anthocyanidin synthase; AS-like, hydroquinone glucosyltransferase-like; C, catechin; DFR, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; EC, epicatechin; ECG, epicatechin gallate; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; FLS, flavonol synthase/flavanone 3-hydroxylase; GC, gallocatechin; LAR, leucoanthocyanidin reductase; PKSB, type III polyketide synthase B; UFGT, anthocyanidin 3-Oglucosyltransferase; UGT83A1, UDP-glycosyltransferase 83A1; UGT94P1, beta-D-glucosyl crocetin beta-1,6-glucosyltransferase-like. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 4 in Transcriptome and metabolome profiling unveiled mechanisms of tea (Camellia sinensis) quality improvement by moderate drought on pre-harvest shoots

Fig. 4. Levels of quality-associated compounds for different SWCs. (A) Total differentially accumulated flavonoids, isoflavonoids, and C- and O- glycosylflavonoids. (B) Levels of catechins, theanine, and theobromine. (C) Levels of glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids, and fatty acids. Plot: mean with SD.

Fig. 5 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 5. Fluorescence of the anthers and fluorescent compounds. (A) Excitation (dashed line) and emission spectra (solid line) of the intrinsic anthers. (B) Area under the curve of emission spectra (AUCEm). Mean ± SD (n = 3 for each). One-way ANOVA, p <0.01. Different letters denote significant differences (p <0.05) in post-hoc test (Tukey–Kramer). (c) Excitation (dashed line) and emission spectra (solid line) of 1-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl anthranilate (1), methyl anthranilate (2), and anthranilic acid (A) in MeOH. [color in online only]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 6 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 6. Chemical structure of the isolated fluorescent compounds. 1-O-β-D- Glucopyranosyl anthranilate (1) and methyl anthranilate (2).

Fig. 7 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 7. Amounts of the fluorescent compounds in the anthers. (A) 1-O-β-D-Glucopyranosyl anthranilate (1). (B) Methyl anthranilate (2). FW, fresh weight. Mean ± SD (n = 3). One-way ANOVA, p <0.01. Different letters denote significant differences (p <0.05) in post-hoc test (Tukey–Kramer). [color in online only]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 1. Photographs of the flowers and anthers. (A, B) Flower of Camellia rusticana and (C, D) its anther; (E, F) flower of C. × intermedia and (G, H) its anther; and (I, J) flower of C. japonica and (K, L) its anther under white light (left) and UV 365 nm (right). Scale bars, 10 mm for (A, E, I) and 1 mm for (C, G, K). [color in online only]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 2 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 2. Flower-visiting behavior of bumblebees to camellias. Bee visits per 10 min in Camellia rusticana vs C. rusticana, C. rusticana vs C. japonica, and C. japonica vs C. japonica. White line, median; whiskers, max and min; circle, outliers. *p <0.01; ns, not significant (p> 0.05) in unpaired t-test (n = 8 for each match). [color in online only]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 3 in Color strategies of camellias recruiting different pollinators

Fig. 3. Reflectance of the camellia flowers. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the petal, anther, and leaf of Camellia rusticana (r) and C. japonica (j). Arrows below the spectra indicate the visible range of bees and UVS-birds. [color in online only]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

CAMELLIA: Anti-CD47 Antibody Therapy in Haematological Malignancies

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02678338. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

publicAug 2019View details →

Data from: Spatial variation in bird pollination and its mitigating effects on the genetic diversity of pollen pools accepted by Camellia japonica trees within a population at a landscape level

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2017View details →

Data from: Transcriptome comparative analysis of two Camellia species reveals lipid metabolism during mature seed natural drying

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2023View details →

Phylogenomic data of Camellia section Paracamellia based on transcriptomes and plastomes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.