Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in The first recorded activity pattern for the Sunda stink-badger Mydaus javanensis (Mammalia: Carnivora: Mephitidae) using camera traps

Fig. 2. Daily activity patterns of Sunda stink-badger within Lots 5 and 7 of the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, Sabah, Borneo. The grey areas represent an extension of the activity pattern to depict its circular nature, and 'carpet' marks along the x-axis represent individual photographic events. Vertical dashed red lines indicate either the end or beginning of the diurnal phase of the diel (0700–1659 hours). Vertical blue lines indicate either the end or beginning of the nocturnal phase of the diel (1900–0459 hours). Regions between red and blue lines represent the crepuscular regions of the diel (0500–0659 hours and 1700–1859 hours).

Fig. A3 in The first recorded activity pattern for the Sunda stink-badger Mydaus javanensis (Mammalia: Carnivora: Mephitidae) using camera traps

Fig. A3. Co-occurrence of Sunda stink-badger Mydaus javanensis and Malay civet Viverra tangalunga photo-captured in the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo on 13 June 2013.

Fig. A2 in The first recorded activity pattern for the Sunda stink-badger Mydaus javanensis (Mammalia: Carnivora: Mephitidae) using camera traps

Fig. A2. Kernel density modelled activity patterns for the Sunda stink-badger during different periods; overlap between activity patterns is indicated by the shaded regions. Vertical dashed red lines indicate either the end or beginning of the diurnal phase of the diel (0700–1659h). Vertical blue lines indicate either the end or beginning of the nocturnal phase of the diel (1900–0459h). Regions between red and blue lines represent the crepuscular regions of the diel (0500–0659h and 1700–1859h). 'Carpet' marks along the x-axis represent individual photographic events, and are colour co-ordinated to their respective activity pattern. Top (a): Overlap in kernel density modelled activity pattern in the wet season (November–February) compared to the dry season (March–October). Middle (b): Overlap in kernel density modelled activity pattern on full moon nights compared to new moon nights. Bottom (c): Overlap in kernel density modelled activity pattern on 'bright' nights (full moon, waxing gibbous, and waning gibbous) compared to 'dim' nights (new moon, new crescent, and old crescent).

Fig. 1 in The first recorded activity pattern for the Sunda stink-badger Mydaus javanensis (Mammalia: Carnivora: Mephitidae) using camera traps

Fig. 1. Location of the camera trap stations in Lots 5 and 7 of the LKWS along the northern bank of the Kinabatangan River, Sabah, Borneo.

Fig. 4 in Conservation importance of Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, Laos, for small carnivores based on camera trap data

Fig. 4. Distribution of camera-trap records for Mustelidea and Herpestidea in Nakai-Nam Theun NPA from 2006–2011.

Fig. 3 in Conservation importance of Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, Laos, for small carnivores based on camera trap data

Fig. 3. Distribution of camera-trap records for Viverridae and linsang in Nakai-Nam Theun NPA from 2006–2011.

Fig. 2 in Conservation importance of Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, Laos, for small carnivores based on camera trap data

Fig. 2. Total survey effort (in camera trap days) per month over the 2006–2011 survey period (bars) and relative species encounter rate (i.e., total independent photos of small carnivore spp./total camera trap day for the month). Relative encounter rates were highest during the warmest and well-surveyed months—peaks are observed in March (start of the warm season) and October (still within the warm season). Despite high survey effort in January and December (cold season), encounter rates were low.

Fig. 1 in Conservation importance of Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, Laos, for small carnivores based on camera trap data

Fig. 1. Camera-trap sampling effort within Nakai–Nam Theun NPA in 2006–2011 (c.f. Table 1; Johnson et al., 2007) at 10 survey blocks; in chronological order of survey: (1) Khamkeut – Nam San; (2) Nam On – Boualapha; (3) Nam On – Gnomalath; (4) Khamkeut – Thong Pae; (5) Nam Chae – Makfuang; (6) Nam Chae – Navang; (7) Phou Vang – Houay Nam Heuy; (8) Thong Xet; (9) Nam Mon – Thongkacheng; (10) Nam Theun – reservoir.

Fig. 2 in Terrestrial Activity Patterns Of Wild Cats From Camera-Trapping

Fig. 2. Density estimates of daily activity patterns of six felid species in Thailand. Solid lines are kernel-density estimates; dashed lines are trigonometric sum distributions. The short vertical lines above the x-axis indicate the times of individual photographs.

Fig. 1. Camera trap data was collected from 14 in Terrestrial Activity Patterns Of Wild Cats From Camera-Trapping

Fig. 1. Camera trap data was collected from 14 protected areas within Thailand. NP = national park; WS = wildlife sanctuary; NH = non-hunting area.

Fig. 3 in Camera Trapping And Conservation In Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 3. Activity levels (%) of (a) porcupines, (b) bearded pig, and (c) Malay civet based on pooled camera trapping records in LEWS a period of 10 sampling months. Note the different scalings of the vertical axis.

Fig. 4 in Terrestrial Activity Patterns Of Wild Cats From Camera-Trapping

Fig. 4. Daily activity patterns of tigers and leopards in five study areas in Thailand. Individual photograph times are indicated by the short vertical lines above the x-axis. The overlap coefficient is the area under the minimum of the two density estimates, as indicated by the shaded area in each plot.

Fig. 2 in Camera Trapping And Conservation In Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 2. Expected species accumulation curve (—) and 95% CI (– –) for mammalian species in Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary. Relatively high sampling saturation was achieved based on a sampling completeness ratio of 0.79 (observed/expected no. of species).

Fig. 3 in Terrestrial Activity Patterns Of Wild Cats From Camera-Trapping

Fig. 3. Daily activity patterns of and overlap of Asiatic golden cat compared to leopard cat and clouded leopard in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Individual photograph times are indicated by the short vertical lines above the x-axis. The overlap coefficient is the shaded area under the two density estimates.

Fig. 1 in Camera Trapping And Conservation In Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 1. Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary in southern Sarawak bordering Batang Ai National Park. Striped areas show proposed extension on the northwest of the sanctuary.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Camera trapping of terrestrial animals in Tanjung Datu National Park, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 3. Activity pattern for selected species in Tanjung Datu National Park showing Dhat1 as an estimator of overlap (shaded area). Dhat1 compares curves at n.grid (number of points to estimate density for species comparison) and best for small samples. Dhat1 coefficient estimator ranges from 0–1.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Camera trapping of terrestrial animals in Tanjung Datu National Park, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 2. Species accumulation curve in Tanjung Datu National Park indicates that the sampling saturation is almost reaching an asymptote.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Camera trapping of terrestrial animals in Tanjung Datu National Park, Sarawak, Borneo

Fig. 1. Tanjung Datu National Park located at the tip of Borneo bordering Kalimantan, Indonesia with camera trap sites. Map of Sarawak indicating locations of Sarawak's protected areas. Tanjung Datu National Park map adapted from Hazebroek & Abang (2000).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Assessing large mammal and bird richness from camera-trap records in the Hukaung Valley of Northern Myanmar

Fig. 3. Trend lines, correlations and p-values for the relationship between number of camera trap nights per season per area (effort) versus number of species photographed (diversity) in the Core study area (solid line & solid circle) and at and near camera trap locations Outside the Core area (dash line & hollow circle) in the Hukaung Valley, Myanmar (season [= year] data from Naing 2015).