Find research datasets worth reusing

Linked collectors and determiners for: On the centipedes (Chilopoda) of the Republic of Macedonia.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "On the centipedes (Chilopoda) of the Republic of Macedonia". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/cc52a34a-874b-4292-94c3-08dc844420f2">https://bionomia.net/dataset/cc52a34a-874b-4292-94c3-08dc844420f2</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/cc52a34a-874b-4292-94c3-08dc844420f2">https://gbif.org/dataset/cc52a34a-874b-4292-94c3-08dc844420f2</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: A new high-altitude species of centipede from the Andes of Ecuador (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Schendylidae).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "A new high-altitude species of centipede from the Andes of Ecuador (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Schendylidae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/c26ef882-a4b3-4d52-9b9a-9613c5d26680">https://bionomia.net/dataset/c26ef882-a4b3-4d52-9b9a-9613c5d26680</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/c26ef882-a4b3-4d52-9b9a-9613c5d26680">https://gbif.org/dataset/c26ef882-a4b3-4d52-9b9a-9613c5d26680</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: On centipedes (Chilopoda) of Albania, 2.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "On centipedes (Chilopoda) of Albania, 2". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/2421e270-cdee-494f-8910-d05c178223fb">https://bionomia.net/dataset/2421e270-cdee-494f-8910-d05c178223fb</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/2421e270-cdee-494f-8910-d05c178223fb">https://gbif.org/dataset/2421e270-cdee-494f-8910-d05c178223fb</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: Millipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Millipedes and centipedes in German greenhouses (Myriapoda: Diplopoda, Chilopoda)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/0ee9877b-755d-4527-923e-5b848ea41eb6">https://bionomia.net/dataset/0ee9877b-755d-4527-923e-5b848ea41eb6</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/0ee9877b-755d-4527-923e-5b848ea41eb6">https://gbif.org/dataset/0ee9877b-755d-4527-923e-5b848ea41eb6</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Figures 4–5 in A fourth account of centipede (Chilopoda) predation on bats

Figures 4–5. Photographs of centipede predation in Texas. 4) Uncoiling of Scolopendra heros from E. fuscus. 5) Injured bat after S. heros had retreated.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Figures 1–3 in A fourth account of centipede (Chilopoda) predation on bats

Figures 1–3. Locations of Scolopendra predations on bats. 1) Western Hemisphere. Star, Palo Duro Canyon. Texas, USA. Dot, cave in Venezuela. Square/Triangle, Brazilian sites. 2) Location of Palo Duro Canyon in Texas. 3) Photo of the slot canyon where the Texas incident occurred.

Figure 20 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figure 20. Elongation of antennal article XIV in representative specimens of E. pinguis (Brölemann, 1898). The ratio between the length of article XIV and the total length of the previous two articles is plotted against head width as a measure of the body size. A black circle marks the only specimen putativily representative of the nominal species Chalandea scheerpeltzi.

Figure 19 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figure 19. Geographical occurrence of Eurygeophilus multistiliger (Verhoeff, 1899) (white symbols) and Eurygeophilus Europe generally; (b) the Pyrenees; and (c) the Alps. Type localities are indicated with diamonds, other published Localities of the specimens directly examined by us are indicated with dotted symbols. All published records of E.

Figures 14–18 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figures 14–18. Eurygeophilus pinguis (Brölemann, 1898), female, 27 mm long, M. La Marzola (Alps). (14) Head, dorsal (right antenna and setae not drawn). (15) Head, ventral (antennae not drawn). (16) Forcipular segment, ventral. (17) Sternum of leg-bearing segment V, ventral. (18) Last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments, ventral (right telopodite and setae on the relevant coxopleuron not drawn).

Figures 5–8 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figures 5–8. Eurygeophilus multistiliger (Verhoeff, 1899), female, 32 mm long, Coimbra (Iberian Peninsula), holotype, mounted on a slide. (5) Forcipular segment, ventral. (6) Calyx inside the left forcipule, ventral. (7) Sternum of leg-bearing segment XII. (8) Last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments, ventral. Images from light microscopy. Scale bars: 200 Mm (5); 100 Mm (6, 8); 50 Mm (7).

Figures 9–13 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figures 9–13. Eurygeophilus multistiliger (Verhoeff, 1899), female, 24 mm long, Campu Omo (Sardinia). (9) Head, dorsal (right antenna and setae not drawn). (10) Head, ventral (antennae not drawn). (11) Forcipular segment, ventral. (12) Sternum of leg-bearing segment V, ventral. (13) Last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments, ventral (right telopodite and setae on the relevant coxopleuron not drawn).

Figures 1–4 in The European centipedes hitherto referred to Eurygeophilus, Mesogeophilus, and Chalandea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): taxonomy, distribution, and geographical variation in segment number

Figures 1–4. (1–3) Eurygeophilus pinguis (Brölemann, 1898), female, 33 mm long, M. La Marzola (near Trento, Alps). (1) Distal articles of the left antenna, ventral. (2) Left claw of the second maxillae, ventral. (3) Right part of the forcipular coxosternum, ventral. (4) Geophilus linearis C. L. Koch, 1835, male, 34 mm long, Cologna Veneta (near Verona, Italy): right part of the forcipular coxosternum, ventral. Arrows indicate the putative position of the forcipular chitin-lines. Micrographs from ESEM Philips XL30. Scale bars: 20 Mm (1, 2); 50 Mm (3, 4).

Figure 14 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 14. Outline shape models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 13 projected into the space of the extended eigenshapes. Outlines are overlain at the landmark from which digitization started in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change. See text for discussion.

Figure 10 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 10. Outline shape models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 9 projected into the space of the extended eigenshapes. Outlines are overlain at the landmark from which digitization started in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change.

Figure 11 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 11. Canonical variates ordination of gonopod shape data for two Allothereua serrulata subspecies as assessed by landmark data and relative warps analysis. As there are only two groups the first canonical variate axes account for all of the observed between-groups shape variation. Nevertheless, higher canonical variates exist (see MacLeod, 2007) and the second canonical variate axis is shown here in order to illustrate aspects of the overall ordination in the discriminant space. Cross-tabulation analysis of these results using only the distribution along the first axis (Table 5) indicated that almost 85% of the sample can be assigned to the correct subspecies.

Figure 9 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 9. Canonical variates ordination of outline semi-landmark data for the gonopod mesarthra of three Allothereua species as assessed by extended eigenshape analysis. Only the first two of the five possible canonical variate axes are shown. As there are only three groups these two canonical variate axes account for 100.00% of the observed betweengroups shape variation. Cross-tabulation analysis (Table 4) indicated that almost 75% of the sample can be assigned to the correct species.

Figure 8 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 8. Thin-plate spline models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 7 projected into the space of the relative warps. Landmark positions are overlain with one another in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change.

Figure 5 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 5. Canonical variates ordination of outline semi-landmark data for the gonopod mesarthra for genera as assessed by extended eigenshape analysis. Only the first two of the five possible canonical variate axes are shown. This analysis was based on seven extended eigenshape variables which together accounted for 93.7% of the observed outline shape variation. Cross-tabulation analyses of these results (Table 2) indicated that over 90% of the sample can be assigned to the correct genus.

Figure 4 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 4. Thin-plate spline models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 3 projected into the space of the relative warps. Landmark positions are overlain with one another in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change. See text for discussion.

Figure 2 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)

Figure 2. Map of the distributions of the different species and subspecies of Allothereua in south-eastern Australia (using only geographical data for the specimens in this analysis).