Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 2. Analysis of proteins (Left panel) and protein carbonylation by ECL (Right panel) from non-irradiated and 4000 Gy irradiated cells. The samples in the lanes were from non-irradiated cells (NonIR), 4000 Gy irradiated cells (IR), and cells incubated for 12 h after 4000 Gy irradiation (IR incubated). The protein bands and ECL signals were measured and are shown in parentheses for each lane relative to the Non-IR sample.

Fig. 4 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 4. Relative viability of Colpoda vegetative cells, wet cysts, and dry cysts after gamma radiation doses of 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy. The column heights and attached bars are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. Double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.01 (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 3 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 3. Excystment of Colpoda dry cysts, after gamma irradiation at 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy, as a function of time after induction of excystment. The points and bars mark the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. The excystment mean ± SE at 3, 6, 24, and 96 h after the induction of excystment is shown in (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The column heights and attached bars in (a) to (d) are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. Asterisks and double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 1 in Gamma Radiation Tolerance and Protein Carbonylation Caused by Irradiation of Resting Cysts in the Free-living Ciliated Protist Colpoda cucullus

Fig. 1. Excystment of Colpoda wet cysts, after gamma irradiation at 0 (non-irradiated), 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 Gy, as a function of time after the induction of excystment. The points and bars mark the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements at each dose. The excystment mean ± SE at 3, 6, 9, and 36 h after induction of excystment is shown in (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The column heights and attached bars in (a) to (d) are the means and standard errors, respectively, of six measurements. Asterisks and double asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test).

Fig. 1 in Anoxia-conditioning hormesis alters the relationship between irradiation doses for survival and sterility in the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Fig. 1. Fertility (as measured by egg hatch success and time to hatch) of Cactoblastis cactorum treated as adults at 5 levels of irradiation and 2 levels of atmospheric conditions. Means and standard errors are plotted. Letter designations refer to Tukey's post hoc analysis.

Fig. 4 in Anoxia-conditioning hormesis alters the relationship between irradiation doses for survival and sterility in the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Fig. 4. Median longevity (median ± SE) of untreated control (no irradiation or atmospheric treatment) female and male Cactoblastis cactorum adults housed in 3 different conditions; individually in restrictive cups, together in single gen- der cages that allowed movement, and together in mixed gender cages that allowed movement and mating. Letter designations refer to Tukey's post hoc analysis.

Fig. 6 in Anoxia-conditioning hormesis alters the relationship between irradiation doses for survival and sterility in the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Fig. 6. Median longevity (median ± SE) of female and male Cactoblastis cactorum adults treated at 5 levels of irradiation and 2 levels of atmospheric conditions. Asterisks refer to significant differences at the 0.0001 level.

Fig. 3 in Anoxia-conditioning hormesis alters the relationship between irradiation doses for survival and sterility in the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Fig. 3. Success rate (mean ± SE) of neonate Cactoblastis cactorum at building communal webs in the absence of food and water whose parents had been treated at 5 levels of irradiation and 2 levels of atmospheric conditions.

Fig. 5 in Anoxia-conditioning hormesis alters the relationship between irradiation doses for survival and sterility in the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Fig. 5. Survivorship and longevity (mean ± SE) of female and male Cactoblastis cactorum adults treated at 5 levels of irradiation and 2 levels of atmospheric conditions.

Fig. 2 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the vineyard and the pheromone traps positions at the experimental plot where the marked male moths were released.

Fig 1 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the flight assessment cage used to measure the flight responses of Lobesia botrana males to calling females. In the female compartment, 2-day-old virgin females were confined inside a small cylindrical plastic mesh box with a 5% sucrose-wetted wick. Males irradiated either with 150 Gy or with 350 Gy and untreated males differentially marked with variously colored fluorescent powders were introduced into the male compartment. The number of males of each of the 3 kinds that flew through the open slit at the 45 cm height [the 2 lower openings (slits) were sealed] into the female compartment were recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Air was drawn into the female compartment and exhausted from the male compartment.

Fig. 2 in Development, reproduction and sexual competitiveness of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) gamma-irradiated as pupae and adults

Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) mortality of eggs oviposited by Conopomorpha sinensis females involved in 3 different crosses. The upper curve shows the percentage hatch of eggs from the cross, UF × TM in which males were γ-irradiated as mature pupae with doses ranging egg from 50 and 300 Gy. The middle curve shows the corresponding results from the cross, TF × UM, however females irradiated with 200–300 Gy did not oviposit any eggs. The lower curve shows the corresponding results when both parents were irradiated.

Fig. 1 in Development, reproduction and sexual competitiveness of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) gamma-irradiated as pupae and adults

Fig. 1. Fecundity of P generation Conopomorpha sinensis adults that emerged from pupae irradiated at various γ-radiation doses ranging from 50 to 300 Gy. UF = non-irradiated females, TF = treated females, UM = non-irradiated males, TM = treated males. Different letters above bars indicate statistically significant differences within each combination (DMRT, P = 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 2. Numbers of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males recaptured in traps deployed at various distances (m) from the release point in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.

Fig. 1 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. Survival (days) of non-irradiated Conopomorpha sinensis males either dyed with 1 of 3 different fluorescent colors or undyed (control) in the laboratory. Each treatment involved 30 males.

Fig. 3 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 3. Frequency distributions of the dispersal directions of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.

Fig. 6 in Influence of holding temperature and irradiation on field performance of mass-reared Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 6. Comparison of an insectary air-stream coLLection system and postcoLLection chiLLing (8 ± 1 °C) to manuaL coLLection without chiLLing (25 ± 1 °C) on the mean number of male Thaumatotibia leucotreta moths recaptured in pheromone traps afer reLease in a citrus orchard during Jan 13 and Apr 7, 2014.

Fig. 1 in Influence of holding temperature and irradiation on field performance of mass-reared Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 1. Diagram of a 5-ha naveL orange orchard showing the centraL reLease site (X) for Thaumatotibia leucotreta moths and the pheromone trap placement. The distance (m) from the center release site to each trap is listed at the right of the diagram.

Fig. 4 in Influence of holding temperature and irradiation on field performance of mass-reared Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 4. Influence of reLease date on the mean distance (m) flown by maLe Thaumatotibia leucotreta moths recaptured in pheromone traps afer reLease in a citrus orchard during Dec 2013 and Jan 2014.

Fig. 3 in Influence of holding temperature and irradiation on field performance of mass-reared Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 3. Comparison of an insectary air-stream coLLection system and post-coL- Lection chiLLing (8 ± 1 °C) to manuaL coLLection without chiLLing (25 ± 1 °C) on the totaL distance (m) flown by maLe Thaumatotibia leucotreta moths recaptured in pheromone traps afer reLease in a citrus orchard during Dec 2013 and Jan 2014.