Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Paleocene of Menat Formation, France, reveals an extraordinary diversity of orthopterans and the last known survivor of a Mesozoic Elcanidae

Fig. 3. Habitus of Ensifera from Paleocene of Menat, France. A. Prophasgonura lineatocollis Piton, 1940, holotype, MNHN.F.R07050. B. Conocephalus martyi Piton, 1940, holotype, MNHN.F.R07019.

Fig. 8 in Paleocene of Menat Formation, France, reveals an extraordinary diversity of orthopterans and the last known survivor of a Mesozoic Elcanidae

Fig. 8. Tegmen of Elcanid orthopteran Cenoelcanus menatensis gen. et sp. nov., holotype, MNHN.F.A71198 from Paleocene of Menat, France. Photograph (A1), reconstruction (A2). Abbreviations: CuA/P, cubitus anterior/posterior; CuPaα, most anterior branch of CuP; M, median vein; RA/P, radius anterior/posterior; ScP, subcostal posterior.

Fig. 2 in Paleocene of Menat Formation, France, reveals an extraordinary diversity of orthopterans and the last known survivor of a Mesozoic Elcanidae

Fig. 2. Grylloidean orthopteran Menatgryllus longixiphus gen. et sp. nov., holotype, MNT-1053 from Paleocene of Menat, France. Photograph of habitus A1), reconstruction of hind tibiae and tarsus (A2, left; A3, right).

Fig. 1 in Paleocene of Menat Formation, France, reveals an extraordinary diversity of orthopterans and the last known survivor of a Mesozoic Elcanidae

Fig. 1. Orthopteran Grylloidea sp., MNT NEL 1681 from Paleocene of Menat, France. A. Habitus. B. Apex of hind tibia.

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomic notes and new species of Burmomiles and Sanaungulus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from northern Myanmar during the late Mesozoic

FIGURE 1 Sanaungulus marginalis sp. nov. (MHBU, No. BU-COL-CAN0013): A. habitus, dorsal view; B. head, pronotum and antennae, dorsal view; C. habitus, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–B: 1.0 mm; C: 2.0 mm.

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomic notes and new species of Burmomiles and Sanaungulus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from northern Myanmar during the late Mesozoic

FIGURE 2 Sanaungulus longicornis sp. nov. (MHBU, No. BU-COL-CAN0014): A. habitus, dorsolateral view; B. habitus, ventrolateral view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. Downloaded from Brill.com 06/21/2024 06:10:25PM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

FIGURE 7 in Taxonomic notes and new species of Burmomiles and Sanaungulus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from northern Myanmar during the late Mesozoic

FIGURE 7 The correlation between antennal surface area and elytron/ body length in Burmite cantharids. Downloaded from Brill.com 06/21/2024 06:10:25PM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

FIGURE 6 in Taxonomic notes and new species of Burmomiles and Sanaungulus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from northern Myanmar during the late Mesozoic

FIGURE 6 Sanaungulus undecimus sp. nov. (MHBU, No. BU-COL-CAN0016): A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Head, dorsal view; C. left antennae, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomic notes and new species of Burmomiles and Sanaungulus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from northern Myanmar during the late Mesozoic

FIGURE 4 Sanaungulus elongaticollis sp. nov. (MHBU, No. BU-COL-CAN0015): A. habitus, right-lateral view; B. habitus, left-lateral view; C. head and pronotum, left-lateral view; D. right antenane, left-lateral view; E. terminal two segments, left-lateral view. Scale bars: A–C: 1.0 mm; D–E: 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 5 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 5. Comparative anatomy of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. Skull of †W. giganteus (A) compared to other species of coelacanths from the Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic of North America, including (B) †Whiteia spp. (after Schaeffer et al., 1976), (C) †Diplurus newarki (personal observation of YPM VPPU 14944), and (D) †Chinlea sorenseni (after Schaeffer, 1967). All drawings are traces over photographs. 1 = elongated preorbital region, 2 = lachrymojugal with straightened anterior process, 3 = opercle with rounded dorsal and posterior margins and pointed ventral apex. 1* = large angular foramina row, 2* = strongly angled lachrymojugal below orbit. Numbers indicate apomorphies of †Whiteia, numbers with asterisks indicate autapomorphies of the new species.

FIGURE 6 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic position of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. Strict consensus topology derived from phylogenetic analysis of the 59 OTU, 110-character-dataset in the parsimony program TNT v. 1.5. Numbers indicate bootstrap support values.

FIGURE 4 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 4. Anatomy of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. YPM VP 3928 in (a) left lateral view, showing detail of mandible.

FIGURE 1 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 1. Anatomy of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. YPM VP 3928 in (A) left lateral, (B) right lateral, (C) dorsal, and (D) ventral views.

FIGURE 2 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 2. Anatomy of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. YPM VP 3928 in left lateral view, showing detail of rostrum.

FIGURE 3 in A large coelacanth, †Whiteia giganteus sp. nov., from the Triassic of Texas, USA, establishes a Pangean radiation of early Mesozoic actinistians

FIGURE 3. Anatomy of †Whiteia giganteus gen. et sp. nov. YPM VP 3928 in right lateral view, showing detail of exposed palate.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2009View details →

Text-fig. 2. Main geological structures of the eastern slope of the Sikhote-Alin' ridge and main plant-bearing localities of the Cenozoic floras. I – Mesozoic folded basement; II – East Sikhote-Alin' Volcanic Belt (Late Cretaceous–Early Palaeocene); III – Near-Shore Basaltic Volcanic Belt (Eocene–Early Miocene); IV – Udyl Basin (Cenozoic); V – Late Neogene to Quaternary plateaubasalts; Va – Sovgavan plateau; Vb – Samarga plateau; Vc – Bikin plateau. 1 – Malo-Mikhaylovka; 2 – Siziman; 3 – Sjurkum; 4 – Botchi; 5 – Dembi; 6 – Bui; 7 – Sonje; 8 – Takhobe; 9 – Amgu; 10 – Velikaya Kema; 11 – Zerkal'naya (former Tadushi). in Mid-Latitude Palaeogene Floras Of Eurasia Bound To Volcanic Settings And Palaeoclimatic Events - Experience Obtained From The Far East Of Russia (Sikhote-Alin') And Central Europe (Bohemian Massif)

Text-fig. 2. Main geological structures of the eastern slope of the Sikhote-Alin' ridge and main plant-bearing localities of the Cenozoic floras. I – Mesozoic folded basement; II – East Sikhote-Alin' Volcanic Belt (Late Cretaceous–Early Palaeocene); III – Near-Shore Basaltic Volcanic Belt (Eocene–Early Miocene); IV – Udyl Basin (Cenozoic); V – Late Neogene to Quaternary plateaubasalts; Va – Sovgavan plateau; Vb – Samarga plateau; Vc – Bikin plateau. 1 – Malo-Mikhaylovka; 2 – Siziman; 3 – Sjurkum; 4 – Botchi; 5 – Dembi; 6 – Bui; 7 – Sonje; 8 – Takhobe; 9 – Amgu; 10 – Velikaya Kema; 11 – Zerkal'naya (former Tadushi).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →

Figs. 1-6 in Checklist of Mesozoic Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) with description of new taxa

Figs. 1-6. Curculionoidea gen. spp.: 1 – Buryatnemonyx gratshevi (PIN ¹ 5026/41), 2 – Oxycorynoides gurvanensis (PIN ¹ 3149/980), 3 – Archaralites zherichini (PIN ¹ 2055/34), 4 – Selengarhynchoides sharyngolensis (PIN ¹ 4306/2), 5 – Cretoxenoides erdeniensis (PIN ¹ 4300/1), 6 – Gobicar ulugeiensis (PIN ¹ 4288/362). Scale 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in The completeness of the fossil record of plesiosaurs, marine reptiles from the Mesozoic

Fig. 1. Two of the three different morphotypes used in Plesiosauria in this analysis, demonstrating the different regions used in skeletal completeness metrics. A. Cryptoclidus, a "plesiosauromorph". B. Liopleurodon, a "pliosauromorph". Skeletal regions: i, skull and mandible; ii, cervical vertebrae and ribs; iii, dorsal and sacral vertebrae and ribs; iv, pectoral girdle; v, fore limbs; vi, pelvic girdle; vii, hind limbs; viii, caudal vertebrae and ribs. Outlines modified from O'Keefe (2002). Not to scale.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Fig. 5 in The completeness of the fossil record of plesiosaurs, marine reptiles from the Mesozoic

Fig. 5. Box-and-whisker plots showing the distribution of CCM2 and SCM2 data for several major clades of Mesozoic tetrapods. A. Comparison of SCM2 and CCM2 data for plesiosaurs. B. Comparison of CCM2 data for plesiosaurs, sauropodomorphs (from Mannion and Upchurch 2010), birds (from Brocklehurst et al. 2012), and pterosaurs (from Dean et al. 2016). C. Comparison of SCM2 data for plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs (from Cleary et al. 2015), and sauropodomorphs (from Mannion and Upchurch 2010). All silhouettes are from phylopic.org, and are credited to Adam Stuart Smith (Plesiosaurus), Scott Hartman (Brachiosaurus), T. Michael Keesey (Archaeopteryx), and Gareth Monger (Pterodactylus, Ichthyosaurus). Abbreviations: CCM, character completeness metric; SCM, skeletal completeness metric (for detailed explanation of terms see Completeness metrics in Methods section).