Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 7. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 7. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL, anterior eleven vertebra, ribs and epineurals. B. Taeniamia leai, USNM 306823, 55.0 mm SL, anterior eleven vertebra, ribs and epineurals (not counter stained). C. Taeniamia leai, USMN 306823, 55 mm SL, partial portions of ribs 1–4 enlarged to show narrow flanges on ribs 2–4. D. Kurtus indicus, USNM 267150, 63.0 mm SL, vertebra 3–6, ribs and epineurals (starting on v4 and ending on v6). Epineurals in red and cartilage in blue. Vertebra number on centrum = 1, 3, 5, 11, rib number = R3. Scale = 1 mm.

FIGURE 11. Hyoid series. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 11. Hyoid series. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL, outer right side laterally reversed. B. Kurtus indicus, USNM 267150, 63 mm SL, outer left side. upper hypohyal = UH, lower hypohyal = LH, branchiostegals = BR1–7, = beryciform foramen = BF, anterior ceratohyal = AC, posterior ceratohyal = PC, interhyal = IH. Scale = 1 mm.

FIGURE 4 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 4. Radiographs as positives of the lower mid-section of the body and anterior anal fin elements. A. Archamia bleekeri, NTM S.13958.020 by H. Larson. B. Taeniamia leai, USNM 356277 by Sandra Raredon. C. Kurtus indicus, USNM 372503 by Sandra Raredon. D. Holapogon maximus, BMNH 1889.4.15.22 by T. Fraser. tenth vertebrae = 10, flange = f, ribs = r4–12, proximal-middle radials = mp1–5, nubbin = n, supernumerary spines = S, = serial spine with respect to anteriormost proximal-middle radial = I, homologous positions with respect to serial proximal-middle radials 1 or 2 = s1–2.

FIGURE 10 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 10. Dorsal view of the upper branchial bones, all similarly sized. A. Apogon townsendi AMNH 23513, modified from figure 41B, Rosen and Patterson (1990). B. Taeniamia leai USNM 306823, 55 mm SL, bone stain only. C. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL. D. Kurtus gulliveri, AMNH 43396, modified from figure 46A, Rosen and Patterson (1990). E. Kurtus indicus USNM 267150, 63.0 mm SL. F. Taeniamia buruensis USNM 112112, 62.0 mm SL. second epibranchial = E2, interarcual cartilage = IC, third pharyngobranchial = P3, shaded areas = cartilage stain.

FIGURE 3 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 3. Anterior and mid-dorsal fin elements. A & D. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL. B &E. Taeniamia leai, USNM 306823, 55.0 mm SL, bone stain only. C & F. Kurtus indicus USNM 267150, 63.0 mm SL. supraneurals = S1–3; neural spines = 1–3, 6–9; proximal-middle radial = P1–2, 5–8; distal radial = R; fused radials = FR; dorsal spines = I–III V– VII and IX; shaded areas = cartilage stain. Scale = 1 mm.

FIGURE 2 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 2. Radiographs as positives. A. Apogon bleekeri, RMNH 33905, lectotype, 52.8 mm SL, Indonesia by D. Smith. B. Archamia leai, USNM 356272, 53 mm SL, One Tree I., Australia by S Raredon. C. Holapogon maximus, BMNH 1889.4.15.22, 179 mm SL, Muscat, Oman, by T. Fraser. Insets of each caudal skeleton. Hypurals = 1–5, terminal centrum = tc, tenth vertebrae = Ą, length of anterior supernumerary spine = [.

FIGURE 5 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 5. Lateral views of vertebrae 9–12 with haemal arches and associated ribs, haemal spines and proximal portions of the anal fin pterygiophores. A. Taeniamia macroptera, USNM 171228, 54.0 mm SL. B. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL. C. Kurtus indicus, USNM 267150, 63.0 mm SL. = tenth vertebra = 10, = haemal arch = HA, = haemal spine = HS, ribs = R8−10, inferior foramen = IF, tips of anal fin proximal radials = 1–10, shaded areas = cartilage stain. Scale = 1 mm.

FIGURE 8. Caudal fin elements from third pre-ural centrum. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 in A new genus of cardinalfish (Apogonidae: Percomorpha), redescription of Archamia and resemblances and relationships with Kurtus (Kurtidae: Percomorpha)

FIGURE 8. Caudal fin elements from third pre-ural centrum. A. Archamia bleekeri, USNM 356291, 37.6 mm SL. B. Taeniamia leai, USNM 306823, 55.0 mm SL, only cleared and stained. C. Kurtus indicus, USNM 267150, 63.0 mm SL. D. Kurtus gulliveri, USNM 217309, ~50 mm SL. Numbers refer to upper and lower procurrent (5–14) and principle caudal-fin rays (8–9). terminal centrum = ct, epural = e, = hypural = h, neural crest = nc, = neural spine = ns, parhypural = p, preural centrum = pu, urostylar sheath = us = paired uroneurals = u, fused elements = +, paired uroneurals in solid black, cartilage in gray. Scale = 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedJun 2018View details →

FIGURE 2 in Dario neela, a new species of badid fish from the Western Ghats of India (Teleostei: Percomorpha: Badidae)

FIGURE 2. Dario neela; India: Kerala; A BNHS FWF 612, holotype, male, 31.2 mm SL,slightly oblique lateral view; B BNHS FWF 613–623, paratype, female, 20.6 mm SL, lateral view. Note differences in live colouration between male (A) and female (B) and eggs visible through body cavity in (B).

opennotspecifiedJun 2018View details →

FIGURE 1 in Dario neela, a new species of badid fish from the Western Ghats of India (Teleostei: Percomorpha: Badidae)

FIGURE 1. Dario neela; India: Kerala; A BNHS FWF 612, holotype, male, 31.2 mm SL; B BNHS FWF 613–623, paratype, female, 21.0 mm SL; C BNHS FWF 613–623, paratype, male, 25.8 mm SL; D BNHS FWF 613–623, paratype, female, 16.6 mm SL. Note pelvic-fin rays damaged and not reaching vent in A, but extending beyond anal-fin base in C; and series of dark brown midlateral scale markings in B–D.

FIG. 8 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 8. Lateral view of the noncircumorbital components of the lachrymal saber in composite images of the various specimens of Paracentropogon above (A) and the various specimens of Apistus below (B). The comparisons are shown to illustrate variation in this system between species (e.g., subdivisions and attachment points of the adductor mandibulae). Muscle attachments on removed bones are denoted with pale circles at the interface. Abbreviations: A1 or A2 represent the major subdivisions of the adductor mandibulae; LAP–levator arcus palatini; MP–maxillary protuberance. Illustration by Clara Richardson.

FIG. 5 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 5. Lateral (A), rostral (B), and dorsal (C) views of the lachrymal saber in the Soldierfish (Gymnapistes marmoratus, AMNH 31009). Arrow highlights both the resting and locked lachrymal saber in the various angles.

FIG. 1 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 1. Morphological hypotheses of inter- and intrafamilial relationships of the scorpaenoid lineage and allies: (A) traditional scorpaeniforms (Matsubara, 1943); (B) scorpionfishes and allies (Matsubara, 1943); (C) Scorpaenoidea (Imamura, 2004); (D) Scorpaenoidei (Ishida, 1994).

FIG. 7 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 7. Composite dorsal images of various specimens of Paracentropogon highlighting the morphology of the components of the lachrymal saber with the locked position on the left side and the resting position on the right side. Note that the anteriormost component of the palatine has been made largely transparent in the images to allow for a better examination of the maxilla. The upper image (A) represents the anatomy with all elements marked, and the lower image (B) represents the image with the circumorbitals shadowed to visualize underlying muscles. Muscle attachments on removed bones are denoted with pale circles at the interface. Abbreviations: A1 or A2 represent the major subdivisions of the adductor mandibulae; CO3–circumorbital 3; CO4–circumorbital 4; LAP–levator arcus palatini; MP–maxillary protuberance. Illustration by Clara Richardson.

FIG. 4 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 4. Lateral view of a cleared-and-stained specimen of the synanceiid Paracentropogon, CAS_SU 68769. Images highlight the (A) resting position of the lachrymal saber (arrow) along the side of the waspfish's cheek and the (B) locked-out position where the lachrymal saber extends laterally from the specimen. The rotation of both the first and second circumorbital are visible in the lower image.

FIG. 6 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 6. Skeletal images of the key lachrymal saber components. (A) Lateral image of the lachrymal, second circumorbital (CO2), and third circumorbital (CO3) in Minous quincarinatus, KUI 41397. Circular inset of upper image shows medial view with medial protuberance (PP). (B) Lateral image of the maxilla in Apistus carinatus, KUI 41400. Circular inset of lower image shows closeup of the maxillary protuberance (MP). These two protuberances interact to lock the lachrymal saber.

FIG. 9 in Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber

FIG. 9. Lateral (A and B) and rostral (C) images of Centropogon australis, KUI 41409. (A) Image represents a visible light image of Centropogon with the lachrymal saber in the resting position. (B) Image represents the identical placement of the image in panel A under fluorescent light with GFP filter under the Nikon SMZ-18 microscope. This image shows the bright green biofluorescence visible on the lachrymal saber. (C) Image shows a rostral view of the same individual under NightSea BlueStar flashlight illumination and the light-shading plate from the Nikon SMZ-18, which is not as restricted as the microscope filter. In this image, the green (lachrymal saber) and orange (dorsal surface of head) fluorescent emissions are visible in the waspfish.

opennotspecifiedApr 2013View details →

FIGURE 83 in Phylogenetic systematics of the family Sillaginidae (Percomorpha: order Perciformes)

FIGURE 83. Innervation of fourth spinal nerve in Sillago japonica. SN4, fourth spinal nerve; 1R, first soft pelvic fin ray. Bar = 5mm.

opennotspecifiedApr 2013View details →

FIGURE 72 in Phylogenetic systematics of the family Sillaginidae (Percomorpha: order Perciformes)

FIGURE 72. Ventral view of swimbradder. A. Sillaginodes punctata; B. Sillago (Sillaginopodys) chondropus; C. Sillago (Sillago) parvisquamis; D. Sillago (Parasillago) asiatica; E. S. (P.) aeolus; F. S. (P.) ciliata. AE, anterior extension; ALE, anterolateral extension; DLP, duct-like process; LP, lateral process; PE, posterior extension, PSAE, posterior subextension of anterolateral extension. Bar = 5 mm.