Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
933
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
933 results for “Phytoseiidae”
Figure 2 in How Spiromesifen affects some biological parameters and switching behavior of predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when feeding on different ratios of mixed preys
Figure 2. Fitted regression equation between the proportion of consumed mite to total preys and preference index (β) of Amblyseius swirskii.
Figure 5 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 5. Survival of ten IG predator larvae of either A. swirskii (above) or N. barkeri (below) in choice experiments with naïve or experienced IG prey females of N. barkeri and A. swirskii, respectively.
Figure 4 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 4. Total oviposition and proportion of eggs laid by experienced or naïve IG prey females N. barkeri (a, b) and A. swirskii (c, d) in risky (black bars) and safe (white bars) patches.
Figure 3 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 3. Effect of experience on patch choice behavior of N. barkeri and A. swirskii IG prey females within choice experiments. Shown are mean fractions (± SE) for residence frequency of either experienced or naïve females in risky patches with IG predator cues and juveniles (black bars) or in safe patches with only spider mites (white bars).
Figure 2 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 2. Comparative survival to adulthood of 20 IG prey eggs of either N. barkeri (black bar, n = 25) or A. swirskii (grey bar, n = 25) on arenas with 5 IG predator females of A. swirskii or N. barkeri, respectively.
Figure 1 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 1. Survival to adulthood (mean number ± SE) of 20 IG prey eggs of either N. barkeri (a) or A. swirskii (b) on arenas with only spider mites (control arenas, white bars) or with spider mites and 5 IG predator females (risky arenas, black and grey bars).
Figure 1 in Functional response and predation rate of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) at three constant temperatures
Figure 1. Functional response of Amblyseius swirskii to eggs of Tetranychus urticae at 25 (A), 30 (B) and 35°C (C).
Figure 6 in Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?
Figure 6. Comparative survivorship of ten IG predator larvae of either A. swirskii or N. barkeri in choice experiments with experienced or naïve IG prey females of N. barkeri or A. swirskii, respectively.
Figure 3 in Suitability of three eriophyid mites as prey for the predatory mite, Typhlodromus athiasae (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
Figure 3. The age-stage reproductive value (vxj) of Typhlodromus athiasae fed on Aceria kenyae, Aceria mangiferae, and Calepitrimerus baileyi.
Figure 1 in Suitability of three eriophyid mites as prey for the predatory mite, Typhlodromus athiasae (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
Figure 1. Age-stage specific survival rates (sxj) of Typhlodromus athiasae fed on Aceria kenyae, Aceria mangiferae, and Calepitrimerus baileyi.
Figure 2 in Suitability of three eriophyid mites as prey for the predatory mite, Typhlodromus athiasae (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-stage specific fecundity (fxj), and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Typhlodromus athiasae fed on Aceria kenyae, Aceria mangiferae, and Calepitrimerus baileyi.
Figure 1 in Biology and life table parameters of Proprioseiopsis lindquisti on three eriophyid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Eriophyidae)
Figure 1. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-stage specific fecundity of female (fxj) and age-specific fecundity rate (mx) of Propriopseiosis lindquisti on three eriophyid mites.
Fig. 6 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 6. Amblyseiulus messor (Wainstein, 1960) ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicera with spermatodactyl.
Fig. 4 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 4. Amblyseiulus jugortus (Athias-Henriot, 1966) (fig. 4) ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicera with spermatodactyl.
Fig. 9 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 9. Amblyseiulus sororculus (Wainstein, I960) ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicera with spermatodactyl.
Fig. 3 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 3. Amblyseiulus bregetovae (Abbasova, 1970) ♀ (1–7): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV.
Fig. 2. Chelaseius valliculosus Kolodochka, 1987 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 2. Chelaseius valliculosus Kolodochka, 1987 ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicera with spermatodactyl; 10 — distitarsus of leg I.
Fig. 1 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 1. Amblyseiella antonii Kolodochka & Omeri, 2010 ♀ (1–9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — genu; 8 — tibia; 9 — tarsus (fragment).
Fig. 5 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 5. Amblyseiulus mauiensis (Prasad, 1968) ♀ (1–7): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV.
Fig. 8 in Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) Of The Fauna Of Ukraine: Redescriptions Of The Species Of Amblyseiella And Chelaseius, With Resurrection Of The Genus Status For Amblyseiulus
Fig. 8. Amblyseiulus ovicinctus (Athias-Henriot, 1961) ♀ (1–7): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal schield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.