Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

185

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

185 results for “Serology”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Serological testing of blood donors to characterise the impact of COVID-19 in Melbourne, 2020

<p>Results of population-based age-stratified&nbsp;seroepidemiological investigation in Melbourne, Australia.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 in Serological prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Mardan district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Figure 2. Typical gel photograph of HBV amplified products. Lane 1= 1 Kb molecular marker; Lane 2-7 positive samples for active HBV showing 180 bp band of hepatitis B virus; Lane = 8 negative control.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Comparative evaluation of select serological assays for Zika virus using blinded reference panels

<p>The aim of this study was to compare assays for detection of immunoglobulin M and/or G (IgM or IgG) from multiple manufacturers. Panels of specimens for testing IgM and IgG assays were built using longitudinal samples collected from blood donors with viral RNA confirmed infections with ZIKV, dengue virus (DENV) and West Nile virus (WNV), respectively. Specimens IgM- or IgG-positive against chikungunya virus (CHIKV), of the genus <em>alphavirus</em> were also included, together with ZIKV-negative samples from endemic (Puerto Rico) and non-endemic (continental USA) regions. Panels were compiled, blinded, and sent to manufacturers for testing. Seven IgM and five IgG assays from four manufacturers were evaluated.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Flow chart on the selection of patients with positive serological tests for dengue in the 20 regions of the country during the period 2016 - 2022.

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Comparison of serological and molecular assays for Bartonella species in dogs with hemangiosarcoma

<p>Currently, a gold standard diagnostic test for <i>Bartonella </i>infection in dogs is lacking. This represents a critical limitation for the development and evaluation of new diagnostic tests, as well as for the diagnosis of, and research on, bartonellosis in dogs. This retrospective observational study aims to compare the results of commonly performed and newly-reported <i>Bartonella</i> spp. diagnostic tests in banked clinical specimens from 90 dogs with hemangiosarcoma (HSA) using composite reference standard (CRS) and random effects latent class analysis (RE-LCA) techniques. Samples from each dog were tested using six serological or molecular diagnostic assays, including indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) and Western blot (WB) for the detection of antibodies in serum, and qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in blood and fresh frozen tissue biopsy samples (mainly splenic HSA tumors and histopathologically normal spleen or skin/adipose tissue). <i>Bartonella </i>infection prevalence was estimated to be 78% based on the CRS (parallel testing with all six assays), and 64% based on the RE-LCA model. The assay with the highest diagnostic accuracy was qPCR performed on fresh frozen tissue biopsy samples (sensitivity: 94% by RE-LCA and 80% by CRS; specificity: 100%). When comparing newly-reported to traditional <i>Bartonella </i>diagnostic assays, ddPCR was more sensitive for the detection of <i>Bartonella </i>DNA than qPCR when testing blood samples (36% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Dogs that were positive on serological assays alone with negative molecular assays were highly unlikely (&lt;3%) to be classified as infected by the RE-LCA model. These data indicate that <i>Bartonella</i> spp. DNA can be PCR amplified from fresh frozen tissues from a majority of dogs with HSA using both qPCR and ddPCR, supporting the use of these methods for future controlled studies comparing the prevalence of <i>Bartonella </i>spp. DNA in the tissue of dogs with HSA to that of unaffected controls.</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

A large-scale serological survey in pets from October 2020 through June 2021 in France shows significantly higher exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats

<p>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can infect many animals, including pets such as dogs and cats. Many studies have documented infection in companion animals by bio-molecular and serological methods. However, only a few have compared seroprevalence in cats and dogs from the general population, and these studies were limited by small sample sizes and collections over short periods. Our goal was to obtain a more accurate evaluation of seroprevalence in companion animals in France and to determine whether cats and dogs differ in their exposure to SARS-CoV-2. For this purpose, we conducted an extensive SARS-CoV-2 serological survey of 2036 cats and 3577 dogs sampled by veterinarians during medical examinations in clinics throughout France. Sampling was carried out from October 2020 through June 2021, a period encompassing the second and third waves of SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans in the country. Using a microsphere immunoassay targeting receptor binding domain and trimeric spike protein, we found 7.1% seroprevalence in pets, in a subset of 308 seropositive samples, 26.3% had neutralizing antibodies. We found that cats were significantly more likely to test positive than dogs, with seropositivity rates of 9.3% and 5.9% in cats and dogs, respectively. Finally, data for both species showed that seroprevalence was lower in older animals and was not associated with the date of sampling or the sex of the animal. Our results show that cats are significantly more sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 than dogs, in line with experimental studies showing that cats are more susceptible than dogs. This study reinforces that pets are commonly infected or exposed to SARS-CoV-2, emphasizing the importance of a One-Health approach to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and raising the question of vaccination of companion animals in close contact with humans.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serologic Assay Validation and Proficiency Testing of HIL-214 in Adults

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05972733. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Elotuzumab Plus Lenalidomide (Elo/Rev) for Serologic Relapse/Progression While on Lenalidomide

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03411031. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

COVID-19 Serologic Strategies for Skilled Nursing Facilities

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05270980. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

COVID-19 Serology in People Living with HIV in Hong Kong

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05028881. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serological Evaluation of 77A/G and 11A/12A Gene of MMP-13 in Periodontitis Affected and Healthy Individuals

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02423304. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serologic Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in a Prospective Cohort of Health Care Workers

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04387890. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 14.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serological Response to Porcine Circovirus Type 1 (PCV-1) and PCV-1 DNA in Stools of Infants Following Administration of Rotarix™

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01511133. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

HSS Covid-19 Antibody Serology Among Surgeons & Anesthesiologists

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04389294. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serologic Response to Porcine Circovirus Type 1 (PCV-1) in Infants Following Administration of Rotarix™

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02153333. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Serologic Response to SHINGRIX Vaccine in Patients With CLL and WM Treated With BTK Inhibitors

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03771157. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Open-label Study of Epratuzumab in Serologically-positive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With Active Disease

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00660881. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 11. Publications: 2.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Comparison of Clinical and Serological Differences Among Juvenile, Adult, and Late-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05724940. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Comparison of serological and molecular assays for Bartonella species in dogs with hemangiosarcoma

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2021View details →
geo24/100

Common asymptomatic and submicroscopic malaria infections in Western Thailand revealed in longitudinal molecular and serological studies: a challenge to malaria elimination.

GEO Series GSE75593. Plasmodium falciparum; Plasmodium vivax; Homo sapiens. 397 samples. Type: Protein profiling by protein array.

openGEO-OpenFeb 2016View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record