Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
201
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
201 results for “Spodoptera”
Fig. 1 in Isolation of native strains of entomopathogenic fungi from agricultural soils of northeastern Mexico and their virulence on Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree reconstructed from internal transcribed spacer sequences of the isolates compared with referenced internal transcribed spacer sequences deposited in the NCBI GenBank. The phylogram size bar represents a 1% sequence divergence. Labelled branches represent referenced internal transcribed spacer sequences.
Fig. 2 in Trichogramma yousufi sp. nov. employed for the management of Spodoptera exigua and Spodoptera litura in Indonesia
Fig. 2. Trichogramma yousufi sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) adult male (A), adult female (B), fore wing (C), RS1 (D), head with antennae (E), and male genitalia (F).
Fig. 1 in Trichogramma yousufi sp. nov. employed for the management of Spodoptera exigua and Spodoptera litura in Indonesia
Fig. 1. Adults of Trichogramma yousufi sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) parasitizing an egg mass of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (A) and a parasitized egg mass (B) in a commercial nursery of Acacia crassicarpa (Fabaceae) in Sumatra, Indonesia.
Fig. 3 in Trichogramma yousufi sp. nov. employed for the management of Spodoptera exigua and Spodoptera litura in Indonesia
Fig. 3. Genitalic difference between adults of Trichogramma chilonis (A) and Trichogramma poliae (B) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).
Fig. 3 in Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) field populations to the Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein
Fig. 3. Mean percentage of mortality and mean percentage of growth inhibition responses of Spodoptera frugiperda for 2012 and 2013 field-collected populations exposed to Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis toxin.
Fig. 1 in Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) field populations to the Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein
Fig. 1. EC50s estimated by nonlinear regression of growth inhibition fitted to a probit model and the 95% confidence intervals of Spodoptera frugiperda neonates field collected in 2012 and exposed to the Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis toxin.
Fig. 2 in Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) field populations to the Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein
Fig. 2. EC50s estimated by nonlinear regression of growth inhibition fitted to a probit model and the 95% confidence intervals of Spodoptera frugiperda neonates field collected in 2013 and exposed to the Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis toxin.
Figure 2 Faxitron X in Description of a bilateral gynandromorph in Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Brazil
Figure 2 Faxitron X-Ray of a gynandromorph adult of the fall armyworm (FAW)Spodoptera frugiperda. A. Faxitron X-Ray of a normal FAW male with a red circle showing the clasper; B. Faxitron X-Ray of a normal FAW female; C.Faxitron X-Ray of a gynandromorph FAW with a red circle with a zoom evidencing the clasper.
Figure 1 in Description of a bilateral gynandromorph in Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Brazil
Figure 1 Gynandromorph adult of the fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda. A.Habitus in dorsal view, with a male left side and a female right side, showing oblicular spot, reniform spot, white patch, and spot at M3 + CuA1; B. Habitus in ventral view; C. Detail of a dimorphism in the antennae, wings, head, and thorax; D. Detail of a dimorphism in the abdomen; E. Last abdominal segment; F. Last abdominal segment of a normal male FAW.
Fig. 3 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Females Can Detect the Sex Pheromone Emitted by Conspecific Females
Fig. 3. Percentage of female and male Spodoptera frugiperda that landed on different concentrations of the extract of the sex pheromone septum. No moths landed on the control (methanol). Bars of the same color with different letters indicate that there is a significant difference, n = 20 (χ2; P <0.05).
Fig. 2 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Females Can Detect the Sex Pheromone Emitted by Conspecific Females
Fig. 2. Percentage of female and male Spodoptera frugiperda that landed on the female glandular extract. Bars of different colors with different letters for the same extract concentrations indicate a significant difference, n = 20 (χ2; P <0.05).
Fig. 5 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Females Can Detect the Sex Pheromone Emitted by Conspecific Females
Fig. 5. Genital structure of female Spodoptera frugiperda. (A) Confocal image of the bursa copulatrix, frontal view. View of spermatophores within the corpus bursae (BC = bursa copulatrix; SI = signum; CB = corpus bursae; BA = bursae appendix; OS = ostium (exit); ESD = exit to a seminal duct; AA = anterior apophysis; AN = antrum; BD = bursal duct). (B) Micrograph of bursa copulatrix in zenith angle, observing the length and width measurements of the structure (length = 5.38 mm; width = 2.066 mm). (C) Stereoscopic image presenting a frontal view of the genital structure (S = spermatophores). (D) Micrograph of the terminal abdominal (PVL = postvaginal lamella; AVL = antevaginal lamella; OS = ostium; AP = anal papilla).
Fig. 1 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Females Can Detect the Sex Pheromone Emitted by Conspecific Females
Fig. 1. (A) Virgin female abdomen 3 to 5 d old Spodoptera frugiperda females, black circle is location of sex pheromone gland; (B) sex pheromone-producing gland in female S. frugiperda.
Fig. 4 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Females Can Detect the Sex Pheromone Emitted by Conspecific Females
Fig. 4. Male (white bars) and female (gray bars) Spodoptera frugiperda caught by traps with sex pheromone septa (Q1 <Median <Q3). Different letters for Trap 1, Trap 2, Trap 3, or Trap 4 indicate significant differences (Mann-Whitney Test U; n = 34; P <0.05).
Fig. 2 in Applications of molecular diagnostics for quality control in rearing of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae for experimental use
Fig. 2. Relative abundance of diversity of viruses found in the metagenomic analysis of dead and healthy larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda.
Fig. 1 in Applications of molecular diagnostics for quality control in rearing of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae for experimental use
Fig. 1. Relative abundance of bacterial diversity found in samples of healthy (LH1 and LH2) and dead larvae (LD1 and LD2) of Spodoptera frugiperda.
Fig. 5 in Approaches for assessing the impact of Zea mays (Poaceae) on the behavior of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Fig. 5. Spodoptera frugiperda moths prefer to oviposit on uninfested Zea mays plants. To test the effect of prior infestation with S. frugiperda (FAW) compared to a non-treated (NT) control plant on S. frugiperda oviposition preference, a pair-wise oviposition assay was performed using 3 independent experiments (Experiments 1–3). In each experiment, 6 uninfested plants and 6 infested plant treatments were used, and egg masses on each plant counted (Table). The total number of egg masses on each treatment was determined and from these data the percent total oviposition (%NT and %infested plant) calculated. The graph shows the mean (± SE) percent parasitism for each treatment,and the treatments were statistically significantly different using a pair-wise t-test: P ≤ 0.05; n = 3.
Fig. 6. Cotesia marginiventris wasps have a in Approaches for assessing the impact of Zea mays (Poaceae) on the behavior of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Fig. 6. Cotesia marginiventris wasps have a marginal preference to oviposit on Spodoptera frugiperda on W22 compared to B104 Zea mays inbred plants. To test the effect of different Z. mays varieties on oviposition preference of C. marginiventris, a pair-wise oviposition assay was performed using 13 independent experiments (Experiments 1–13). In each experiment, the number of S. frugiperda larvae recovered from B104 or W22 genotypes that were parasitized by C. marginiventris (P), not-parasitized (NP), or had died shortly afer collection (D), and the percentage of larvae parasitized was calculated by (P/[P + NP]) × 100 for each plant variety (Table). Experiments that had less than 5 parasitized larvae or more than 15 dead (bold) were discarded. The graph shows mean (± SE) percentage parasitism for each treatment. The treatments were not significantly different using a pair-wise t-test with P ≤ 0.05 and n = 8.
Fig. 3 in Approaches for assessing the impact of Zea mays (Poaceae) on the behavior of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Fig. 3. Stages of Cotesia marginiventris development. Representative images of C. marginiventris adult (A), larva emerging from S. frugiperda host (B) and pupae (C) are shown. Size bars are 20 µm.
Fig. 4 in Approaches for assessing the impact of Zea mays (Poaceae) on the behavior of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Fig. 4. Larval growth assays of Spodoptera frugiperda. Two independent larval growth assays for S. frugiperda on the Zea mays inbred line B104. Graph shows mean larval weights (± SE) from 3 to 7 d afer infestation, n = (35–100). Because these growth assays were done at different times, they were not statistically compared.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.