Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Figure 1 in The first Fulgoridae (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) from the Eocene of the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the specimen. (a) Location of the Lunpola Basin within the Tibetan Plateau terranes. BNS, Bangong– Nujiang suture; JS, Jinshajiang suture; YZS, Yalu–Zangbo suture. Map data provided by SRTM data V4 (Jarvis et al., 2008). (b) Schematic lithologic log of the Dayu section showing stratigraphic positions of radiogenic dating samples and Fulgoridae fossil of the Niubao Formation. Modified from Fang et al. (2020). (c) The specimen was collected from fossil sites DY1 in Lunpola Basin.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Figure 3 in The first Fulgoridae (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) from the Eocene of the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Figure 3. Head, thorax, and legs. (a) Thorax of the part and the counterpart. (b) Preserved part of the head. (c) Prolegs. (d) Metalegs. (e, f) Tarsi of the metalegs. (g) Metatibia of the counterpart. (h) Show the spine in (g). amm, anterior margin of mesonotum; as, apical spines; c, carinae; cl, claw; ls, lateral spines; lt, lateral teeth; mt, median teeth; p, pronotum; pf, profemurs; s, scape; sc, scutellum; te, tegula; ts, tarsomere; v, vertex; w, wrinkles. The specimen was immersed into alcohol except in (a).

Fig. 5 in Phylogeography of (Nemacheilidae): Responded to the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 5. Bayesian Skyline Plot (BSP) of the Tibetan stone loaches, T. stenura based on mtDNA (COI, Cyt b). The maximum time is set to the upper 95% HPD of the root height. The median estimate (solid line) and 95% HPD limits (Color area) are indicated. (a) Yangtze River populations (clade 4); (b) Subansiri River population (clade 3); (c) Nu River populations (clade 2); (d) the southwestern and central QTP populations (clade 1).

Fig. 3 in Phylogeography of (Nemacheilidae): Responded to the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 3. Bayesian estimates of divergence time for the lineages of T. stenura based on the mitochondrial genes (COI, Cyt b) data set. Dusty purple bars represent 95% highest posterior density for divergence estimates. The numbers on the nodes are million years ago (Mya).

Fig. 2 in Phylogeography of (Nemacheilidae): Responded to the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 2. ML tree for T. stenura on QTP and in its adjacent drainages based on a combination of genes including two mitochondrial genes (COI, Cyt b) and recombination activating protein 1 gene (Rag1-701 bp). Clade credibility values of major lineages are given for nodes with bootstrap support for ML (above branch) and posterior probability for Bayesian inferences (below branch). Major clades referred to in the text are listed to the right. Different colors were assigned for each clade: Clade 1, green; Clade 2, red; Clade 3, black; Clade 4, blue; Outgroups, black.

Fig. 4 in Phylogeography of (Nemacheilidae): Responded to the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 4. TCS network generated by Popart based on cytochrome b haplotypes for the T. stenura in QTP. Numbers in the networks represent haplotype designations and the areas of the circles are proportional to haplotype frequency; Black dots represent missing intermediate haplotypes.

Fig. 1 in Phylogeography of (Nemacheilidae): Responded to the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Fig. 1. Map of the study area and geographical distribution of sampling sites in this study. The sites are numbered according to table 1.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Novel genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi detected in plateau zokors (Myospalax baileyi) from the Tibetan Plateau

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of E. bieneusi genotypes identified in the present study and other known genotypes deposited on GenBank was inferred by a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences using the Tamura 3-parameter model with 500 replicates. The Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (GenBank: KR021167.1) was used as the outgroup. The blue triangle and squares indicate the novel genotypes identified in this study, respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Novel genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi detected in plateau zokors (Myospalax baileyi) from the Tibetan Plateau

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium sp. genotypes identified in the present study and other known genotypes and species on GenBank was inferred by a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis of SSU rRNA gene sequences using the Tamura 3-parameter model and with 500 replicates. The Eimeria (GenBank: U40264.1) were used as the outgroup. The red circles and squares indicate the novel genotypes identified in this study. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 1 in First report on the molecular detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in livestock and wildlife around Qinghai Lake in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area, China

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of E. bieneusi isolates and reference based on ITS region sequence of small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes.

Fig. 17. Meiosis metaphase I in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 17. Meiosis metaphase I from testes of Helophorus (Lihelophorus) species from Qinghai: Zuimatan. a – H. lamicola Zaitzev, 1908; b – H. ser Zaitzev, 1908; c – H. yangae sp. nov.

Fig. 16 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 16. Mitotic chromosomes from mid-gut cells of males of Helophorus (Lihelophorus) species from Qinghai: Zuimatan, arranged as karyotypes. a–b – H. lamicola Zaitzev, 1908 (a – plain (Giemsa stained); b – same nucleus, C-banded). c–d – H. ser Zaitzev, 1908 (c – plain; d – same nucleus, C-banded). e–h – H. yangae sp. nov. (e – plain; f – same nucleus, C-banded; g – plain; h – same nucleus, C-banded). The y chromosome is missing from the preparation shown in c and d and in d the y chromosome from a different C-banded preparation with a similar degree of chromosomal condensation has been inserted.

Fig. 12 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 12. Labroclypeus and epistome of larvae of Lihelophorus and Helophorus s.str. a–b – H. (H.) liguricus Angus, 1970 (a – dorsal view; b – ventral view); c–d – H. (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. (c – dorsal; d – ventral); e–f – H. (Lihelophorus) lamicola Zaitzev, 1908 (e – dorsal; f – ventral).

Fig. 10 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 10. Head capsule of the first instar larva of Helophorus (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. a – ventral view; b – dorsal view; c – lateral view.

Fig. 9 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 9. Association of reared larvae and field-collected adults of Helophorus (Lihelophorus) based on cox1 sequences. a – Bayesian inference of newly obtained and available GenBank sequences; b–c – habitus of reared larvae (b – H. yangae sp. nov.; c – H. lamicola Zaitzev, 1908).

Fig. 6 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 6. Aedeagophores of Helophorus (Lihelophorus) species. a–e – H. (L.) ser Zaitzev, 1908 (a – lectotype, Qinghai: valley of Alag Hu lake; b–c – Xizang: valley SE of Dong La pass; d – Qinghai: Golo, 20 km E of Maduo; e – Qinghai: Zuimatan). f–j – H. (L.) lamicola Zaitzev, 1908 (f – lectotype, Qinghai: Djarin Nor; g–i – Qinghai: Zuimatan; j – paralectotype, Xizang: S of Arka-tagh, 5073 m a.s.l., lgt. S. Hedin). k–o – H. (L.) yangae sp. nov. (k – holotype, Qinghai: Zuimatan; l–m – paratypes, same locality; n – Qinghai: Golo, Yematan; o – Xizang: Gongbujiangda).

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 5. Details of the head and pronotum of the Helophorus (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. (a – Xizang: 90 km W of Amdo; b,d – Qinghai: Golo; c – Xizang: 25 km W of Amdo; e – India: Kar Tso (Orchymont coll.). Not to scale.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 2. Adult morphology of Helophorus (Lihelophorus). a–f – details of left half of pronotum (a,c,e) and base of left elytron (b, d, f): a–b – H. yangae sp. nov.; c–d – H. ser Zaitzev, 1908; e–f – H. lamicola Zaitzev, 1908; arrow in (a) shows remnants of pronotal granulations, arrows in (b, d, f) show scutellary stria. g–h – prothoracic hypomeron and 'suprapleural area' (g – H. yangae sp. nov.; h – H. ser). i – detail of posterior margin of abdominal ventrite 5 of H. ser, showing the irregular denticulation. j – ventral view of the thorax of H. ser. k – dorsolateral portion of left elytron of H. lamicola. Abbreviations: ep – epipleuron; li – last elytral interval. Not to scale.

Fig. 15 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 15. Thorax and abdomen of Lihelophorus and Helophorus s.str. a–d – metathoracic legs (a – H. (H.) liguricus Angus, 1970, frontal view; b–c – H. (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. (b – frontal; c – posterior); d – H. (Lihelophorus) lamicola Zaitzev, 1908). e–f – thorax and first abdominal segments of H. (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. (e – lateral view; f – dorsal view). g–h – abdominal segments (dorsal and ventral views): g – H. (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov.; h – H. (Lihelophorus) lamicola Zaitzev, 1908. i–j – abdominal segment 9 and urogomphi: i – H. (H.) liguricus Angus, 1970; j – H. (Lihelophorus) yangae sp. nov. Abbreviations: abd1 – abdominal segment 1; msth – mesothorax; mtth – metathorax; pth – prothorax; sp – spiracle.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea)

Fig. 1. Adult morphology of Helophorus (Lihelophorus). a–b – H. yangae sp. nov. (a – ventral view of the head; b – detail of mentum and labial palps); c–d – maxillary galea and lacinia (c – H. yangae sp. nov.; d – H. ser Zaitzev, 1908); e–f – mandible (e – H. yangae sp. nov.; f – H. ser); g – labial palpus of H. ser; h–l – hind legs in dorsal view (h – H. yangae sp. nov.; i – H. ser; j – H. lamicola Zaitzev, 1908; k – detail of apex of tibia and base of tarsus of H. lamicola; l – detail of tarsomere 5 and claw of H. ser). Abbreviations: sh – swimming hairs. Not to scale.