Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

117

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

117 results for “competitive interactions”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

Metabolic phenotype mediates the outcome of competitive interactions in a response-surface field experiment

<p>Competition and metabolism should be linked. Intraspecific variation in metabolic rates and, hence, resource demands covary with competitive ability. The effects of metabolism on conspecific interactions, however, have mostly been studied under laboratory conditions.<b> </b>We used a trait-specific response-surface design to test for the effects of metabolism on pairwise interactions of the marine colonial invertebrate, <i>Bugula neritina</i> in the field. Specifically, we compared the performance (survival, growth, and reproduction) of focal individuals, both in the presence and absence of a neighbour colony, both of which had their metabolic phenotype characterised.<b> </b>Survival of focal colonies depended on the metabolic phenotype of the neighbouring individual, and on the combination of both the focal and neighbour colony metabolic phenotypes that were present. Surprisingly, we found pervasive effects of neighbour metabolic phenotypes on focal colony growth and reproduction, though the sign and strength of these effects showed strong microenvironmental variability.<b> </b>Overall, we find that the metabolic phenotype changes the strength of competitive interactions, but these effects are highly contingent on local conditions. We suggest future studies explore how variation in metabolic rate affects organisms beyond the focal organism alone, particularly under field conditions.</p>

opencc-zeroNov 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 5 in Competitive Interactions between Cricket Frogs (Acris blanchardi) and Other Anurans

FIG. 5.—Mean (±1 SE) Cricket Frog mass and time to metamorphosis in Experiment 2 by assemblage type. The CF 20, CF 30, and CF 60 indicate the low, medium, and high-density Cricket Frog controls; CF + TF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Treefrogs; CF + GF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Green Frogs; All Spp indicates the three-species assemblage.

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 4 in Competitive Interactions between Cricket Frogs (Acris blanchardi) and Other Anurans

FIG. 4.—Mean (±1 SE) Cricket Frog (CF) survival from Experiment 2. Filled circles are mean Treefrog survival; Filled squares are mean Green Frog survival. The CF 20, CF 30, and CF 60 indicate the low, medium, and highdensity Cricket Frog controls; CF + TF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Treefrogs; CF + GF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Green Frogs; All Spp indicates the three-species assemblage. *Indicates Cricket Frog survival in CF + GF assemblage was less than in the CF + TF assemblage.

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 3 in Competitive Interactions between Cricket Frogs (Acris blanchardi) and Other Anurans

FIG. 3.—(A) Mean (±1 SE) relative levels of periphyton in Experiment 1 in Cricket Frog (CF) and Bullfrog (BF) assemblages. Both CF 30 and BF 30 indicate low-density, single-species controls; CF 60 and BF 60 indicate highdensity, single-species controls; CF + BF indicates the two-species assemblage. (B) Mean relative levels of periphyton in Experiment 2. The CF 20, CF 30, and CF 60 indicate the low, medium, and high-density Cricket Frog controls; CF + TF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Treefrogs; CF + GF indicates the assemblage with both Cricket Frogs and Green Frogs; All Spp indicates the three-species assemblage.

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 2 in Competitive Interactions between Cricket Frogs (Acris blanchardi) and Other Anurans

FIG. 2.—(A) Mean (±1 SE) growth of Cricket Frogs (CF) and (B) mean growth of Bullfrogs (BF) in Experiment 1. Both CF 30 and BF 30 indicate low-density, single-species controls; CF 60 and BF 60 indicate high-density, single-species controls; CF + BF indicates the two-species assemblage; OWBF indicates the presence of two overwintered bullfrog tadpoles.

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 1 in Competitive Interactions between Cricket Frogs (Acris blanchardi) and Other Anurans

FIG. 1.—(A) Mean (±1 SE) Cricket Frog (CF) survival to metamorphosis and (B) mean Bullfrog (BF) survival to end of the experiment in Experiment 1. Both CF 30 and BF 30 indicate low-density, single-species controls; CF 60 and BF 60 indicate high-density, single-species controls; CF + BF indicates the two-species assemblage.

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Plant genetics and interspecific competitive interactions determine ectomycorrhizal fungal community responses to climate change

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2013View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Does competitive interaction drive species recognition in a house mouse secondary contact zone?

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2016View details →
dryad32/100

The effect of inter-and intraspecific competition on individual and population niche widths – a four-decade study on two interacting salmonids

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: An enemy's enemy is an ally: Competitive indirect interactions mediate coexistence of trees, grasses, and subshrubs in Neotropical Savanna

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Genotype-by-environment interactions for seminal fluid expression and sperm competitive ability

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Asymmetric competitive effects during species range expansion: an experimental assessment of interaction strength between ‘equivalent’ grazer species at their range overlap

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2018View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Food and habitat provisions jointly determine competitive and facilitative interactions among distantly related herbivores

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: The interactive effects of competition and predation risk on dispersal in an insect.

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Foraging modality and plasticity in foraging traits determine the strength of competitive interactions among carnivorous plants, spiders, and toads

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2017View details →
dryad32/100

The effects of novel leaf litter deposition on competitive, predator–prey and host–parasite interactions of American toad larvae

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Interspecific interactions through 2 million years: are competitive outcomes predictable?

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2016View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Consumer interaction strength may limit the diversifying effect of intraspecific competition: a test in alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus).

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2013View details →
dryad32/100

Changes in temperature alter competitive interactions and overall structure of fig wasp communities

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Metabolic phenotype mediates the outcome of competitive interactions in a response-surface field experiment

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2022View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record