Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
861
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
861 results for “data comparison”
Data for: "Considering unique, shared, and dominant brain activation in the VWFA and LOC: A comparison of separate and combined word and picture naming"
<p>FMRI data underlying analyses for Experiments 1 and 2 in "Considering unique, shared, and dominant brain activation in the VWFA and LOC: A comparison of separate and combined word and picture naming".</p>
Text-fig. 5. Size comparison of lion p4 and m1 from Za Hájovnou Cave with close relative forms from European sites (black: Panthera fossilis, grey: Panthera cf. fossilis or Panthera fossilis – spelaea; f = female, old c. = old collection). Data source: Wojtusiak 1953, Thenius 1972, Schütt and Hemmer 1978, Argant 1988, 1991, García 2003, Baryshnikov and Tsoukala 2010). in Panthera Fossilis (Reichenau, 1906) (Felidae, Carnivora) From Za Hájovnou Cave (Moravia, The Czech Republic): A Fossil Record From 1987-2007
Text-fig. 5. Size comparison of lion p4 and m1 from Za Hájovnou Cave with close relative forms from European sites (black: Panthera fossilis, grey: Panthera cf. fossilis or Panthera fossilis – spelaea; f = female, old c. = old collection). Data source: Wojtusiak 1953, Thenius 1972, Schütt and Hemmer 1978, Argant 1988, 1991, García 2003, Baryshnikov and Tsoukala 2010).
FIGURE S2 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE S2. Von Mises stress and strain distributions and the displacement field distribution for Connochaetes Alcelaphus buselaphus when elastic modulus is E=10000 MPa, E=25000 MPa and E=50000 MPa for a non-homogen (case B) when the coloured scale in the legend is the same for the three cases.
FIGURE S1 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE S1. Von Mises stress and strain distributions and the displacement field distribution for Connochaetes taurinus and Alcelaphus buselaphus when elastic modulus is E=10000 MPa, E=25000 MPa and E=50000 MPa for a homogeneous material (case A) when the coloured scale in the legend is the same for the three cases.
FIGURE 3. 3.1 von Mises stresses, 3.2 von Mises strains, 3.3 Displacements, 3.4 von Mises stress relationship with reference value, 3.5 von Mises strain relationship with reference value and 3.6 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE 3. 3.1 von Mises stresses, 3.2 von Mises strains, 3.3 Displacements, 3.4 von Mises stress relationship with reference value, 3.5 von Mises strain relationship with reference value and 3.6 Displacement relationship with reference value in front of variation in the elastic modulus (E) in points P and Q.
FIGURE 2 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE 2. von Mises Stress Distribution, von mises strain distribution and Displacement field distribution for Connochaetes taurinus and Alcelaphus buselaphus when elastic modulus is E=10000 MPa, E=25000 MPa and E=50000 MPa for a homogeneous material (case A).
FIGURE 5. 5.1 von Mises stresses, 5.2 von Mises strains, 5.3 Displacements, 5.4 von Mises stress relationship with reference value, 5.5 von Mises strain relationship with reference value and 5.6 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE 5. 5.1 von Mises stresses, 5.2 von Mises strains, 5.3 Displacements, 5.4 von Mises stress relationship with reference value, 5.5 von Mises strain relationship with reference value and 5.6 Displacement relationship with reference value in front of variation in the elastic modulus (E) in points P and Q.
FIGURE 1 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE 1. Boundary conditions, forces applied in the studied jaws, location of points P and Q and separated regions where the Non-homogeneous properties are applied for the Connochaetes taurinus and Alcelaphus buselaphus.
FIGURE 4 in Insights into the controversy over materials data for the comparison of biomechanical performance in vertebrate
FIGURE 4. von Mises Stress Distribution, von Mises strain distribution and displacement field distribution for Connochaetes taurinus and Alcelaphus buselaphus when elastic modulus is E=10000 MPa, E=25000 MPa and E=50000 MPa for a non-homogeneous material (case B).
Development and Comparison of Model-Based and Data-Driven Approaches for the Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Lattice Structures
<p>This dataset comes from the following paper:</p> <p>Chiara Pasini, Oscar Ramponi, Stefano Pandini, Luciana Sartore, Giulia Scalet, Development and Comparison of Model-Based and Data-Driven Approaches for the Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Lattice Structures, J. of Materi Eng and Perform, 2024. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10199-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10199-x</a></p> <p>It contains:</p> <ul> <li>"Notes.pdf" describing all the files uploaded</li> <li>. m of the neural network</li> <li>. inp of the Abaqus finite element simulations</li> </ul>
Wikidata and DBpedia Space Travel Data Comparison with ABECTO
<p>This is an <a href="https://github.com/fusion-jena/abecto">ABECTO</a> execution plan to compare space travel data from <a href="https://www.wikidata.org">Wikidata</a> and <a href="https://www.dbpedia.org">DBpedia</a> and the according results.</p> <p>The generated result data are derived from the compared knowledge graphs, which are licensed as follows:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.dbpedia.org">DBpedia</a> by DBpedia Association (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License">CC BY-SA 3.0</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://wikidata.org">Wikidata</a> (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">CC0 1.0</a>)</li> </ul>
Data accompanying arXiv:2112.07341, "Euclid: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-Cl estimates. Calculation, comparison to simulations, and dependence on survey geometry"
<p>Data accompanying <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07341">arXiv:2112.07341, "<em>Euclid</em>: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-Cl estimates. Calculation, comparison to simulations, and dependence on survey geometry"</a>.</p> <p>Code available at <a href="https://github.com/robinupham/shear_pcl_cov">https://github.com/robinupham/shear_pcl_cov</a>.</p>
MAX-DOAS tropospheric NO2 column measurements in Islamabad, Pakistan (33°N, 73°E) from 2015 to 2019 and comparisons with OMI and TROPOMI satellite data
<p>This data presents an intercomparison of NO<sub>2</sub> retreival settings using Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) and those based on literature published over last 20 years. Moreover, it presents comparison of NO<sub>2</sub> Vertical Column Densities(VCD) obtained from ground based MAX-DOAS in Islamabad, Pakistan with satellite data from 2015-2019. MAX-DOAS has retrieved data at seven elevation angles i.e., 2, 4, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45. On the other hand, VCDs are in molecules per cm<sup>2</sup>. However, in order to collect NO2 dataset, DOASIS was used was used to obtain data from MAX-DOAS and further analyzed using QDOAS. Then geometric approximation was applied to obtain VCDs that are presented in this data set.</p>
Supplementary data for the manuscript "Comparison of computational and experimental saturation vapor pressures of α-pinene + O3 oxidation products"
<p>COSMO-files of potential ozonolysis products of α-pinene for the manuscript:<br> Hyttinen, N., Pullinen, I., Nissinen, A., Schobesberger, S., Virtanen, A., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Comparison of computational and experimental saturation vapor pressures of α-pinene + O<sub>3</sub> oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-775, in review, 2021.</p>
SASC: A Simple Approach to Synthetic Cohorts. Applying COVID-19 clinical data to generate longitudinal observational patient cohorts and comparison with alternative synthetic cohort approaches as well as real patient data
<p>Subset from COVID-19 Dataset from https://zenodo.org/record/3766350#.YVcfyTFBxgA. Used as reference for a publication dealing with synthetic patient cohort generation.</p>
Comparison of Large Eddy Simulations against measurements from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm - Manuscript data
<p>Time averaged power and farm inflow velocity for the manuscript "Comparison of Large Eddy Simulations against measurements from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm" for publication in the wind energy science journal. Data is uploaded for the 5 simulation cases covered.</p> <p>'Power' files contain average power production for 48 turbines. First row corresponds to LES data, second row corresponds to SCADA data from the Lillgrund wind farm.</p> <p>'Velocity' files contain inflow mean velocity measurements at the 72 range gate locations. First row corresponds to LES inflow data, second row corresponds to LIDAR inflow data from the Lillgrund wind farm.</p>
F-UJI and FAIR Enough tool comparison dataset (European Research Data Landscape study)
<p>Dataset used to compare the assessment results on the levels of Findability, Accessability, Interoperability and Reusability of datasets in a sample of repositories, by means of the F-UJI FAIR data assessment tool and FAIR-Enough assessment tool. Assessment carried out for the European Research Data Landscape study.</p>
Supplementary material for "Including filter-feeding gelatinous macrozooplankton in a global marine biogeochemical model: model-data comparison and impact on the ocean carbon cycle"
<p>Supplementary material for "Including filter-feeding gelatinous macrozooplankton in a global marine biogeochemical model: model-data comparison and impact on the ocean carbon cycle". </p> <p>Clerc, C., Bopp, L., Benedetti, F., Vogt, M., and Aumont, O.: Including filter-feeding gelatinous macrozooplankton in a global marine biogeochemical model: model-data comparison and impact on the ocean carbon cycle, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1282, 2022.</p> <p>Three directories can be downloaded:</p> <p><strong>DataOBS</strong> : AtlantECO [WP2] – Traditional microscopy dataset – Thaliacea (Salpida+Doliolida+Pyromosomatida) abundance and biomass concentration data, presented in Clerc et al. (2022). </p> <p><strong>FigPaper </strong>: Source code and .nc files for the figures presented in Clerc et al. (2022) (https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1282). </p> <p><strong>MY_SRC_PISCES_NEMO_3.6 :</strong> Additional fortran routines for the compilation of PISCES-FFGM, the model developed for Clerc et al. (2022), from NEMO-3.6 (https://www.nemo-ocean.eu)</p>
Supplementary data for the manuscript entitled "Evolution of the convective boundary layer in a WRF simulation nested down to 100 m resolution during a cloud-free case of LAFE 2017 and comparison to observations" (JGR Atmospheres)
<p>This dataset contains additional material to reproduce the simulation and some of the figures of the manuscipt entitled "Evolution of the convective boundary layer in a WRF simulation nested down to 100 m resolution during a cloud-free case of LAFE 2017 and comparison to observations" in the Journal of Geophysical Reasseach - Atmospheres.</p>
Analysis of the Ground Level Enhancement GLE 60 on April 15, 2001, and its Space Weather Effects: Comparison with Dosimetric Measurements - Data
<p>Computed data that was used within the "Analysis of the Ground Level Enhancement GLE 60 on April 15, 2001, and its Space Weather Effects: Comparison with Dosimetric Measurements" paper. Computations of cones were done by OTSO using TSY89 + IGRF13 magnetic field parameters. Contains the atmospheric yield functions used for radiation computation as well as the global radiation map at 35kft for GLE60. Data is provided in .csv format.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.