Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38,743
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38,743 results for “efficacy”
Figure 3 in Testing the Attractiveness and Efficacy of Baits for the Monitoring and Control of the Thief Ant, Solenopsis papuana
Figure 3. Percent of baits occupied by S. papuana at Lyon (top) and Pahole (bottom) over the course of three hours.
Figure 1 in Testing the Attractiveness and Efficacy of Baits for the Monitoring and Control of the Thief Ant, Solenopsis papuana
Figure 1. Layout of 5 x 5 m pesticide bait efficacy plots. Each plot contained nine bait stations and 25 monitoring points, whose positions were as indicated except on occasions when bait stations were shifted (see text). Monitoring points were either 0 m, 1.25 m, or 1.8 m from bait stations.
Figure 5 in Exploring the efficacy of RNAi-mediated gene knock-down via oral delivery of dsRNA in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say)
Figure 5. Effect of dsRNA feeding on leaf consumption was assessed in L. decemlineata larvae at different instars: (a) third instar and (b) fourth instar, following the feeding assay. Bars indicate standard error (SE) on columns. Different letters on the columns denote significant differences determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test at a 5% significance level.
Figure 4 in Exploring the efficacy of RNAi-mediated gene knock-down via oral delivery of dsRNA in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say)
Figure 4. Influence of dsRNA ingestion on weight gain was calculated in the L. decemlineata larvae at different instars: (a) third instar and (b) fourth instar, following the feeding assay. Bars indicate standard error (SE) in columns. Different letters on the columns denote significant differences determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test at a 5% significance level.
Figure 3 in Exploring the efficacy of RNAi-mediated gene knock-down via oral delivery of dsRNA in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say)
Figure 3. Effect of the dsRNA feeding on the V-ATPase expression levels in the L. decemlineata larvae at different instar stages: (a) First instar, (b) second instar, (c) third instar, and (d) fourth instar. Bars indicate the standard error (SE) in the columns. Different letters on the columns denote significant differences determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test at a 5% significance level.
Figure 2. Mortality percentages after feeding the L in Exploring the efficacy of RNAi-mediated gene knock-down via oral delivery of dsRNA in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say)
Figure 2. Mortality percentages after feeding the L. decemlineata larvae dsRNA-treated leaves at different instars. (a) First instar, (b) second instar, (c) third instar, and (d) fourth instar. The percent mortality was compared in the larvae fed potato leaves pretreated with E. coli HT115 (DE3) cells expressing dsV-ATPase compared to the two controls, E. coli HT115 (DE3) cells with empty L4440 plasmid (dsEmp) and E. coli HT115 expressing dsGFP. Different letters on the data points denote significant differences determined by ANOVA followed by the Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) test at a 5% significance level.
Fig. 9 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 9. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Thai bait.
Fig. 8 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 8. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Pinnacle bait.
Fig. 5 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 5. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in angled luffa plots treated with Pinnacle bait.
Fig. 4 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 4. Percentage of infested fruits of bitter gourd in plots treated with Pinnacle, Thai baits and untreated. (Only Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. tau were found.)
Fig. 1 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 1. Funnel trap for dead fruit flies collecting in plots treated with baits (1=waxed cardboard funnel; 2=plastic basket; 3=plastic glass, 4=formalin (5%), 5=string and 6=post).
Fig. 6 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 6. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter guard plots treated with Pinnacle and the Thai baits (Both sexes were collected).
Fig. 7 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 7. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in angled luffa plot treated with Pinnacle bait.
Fig. 2 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 2. Number of fruit flies collected from fallen flowers of angled luffa in plots treated with Pinnacle bait and untreated. (Only Bactrocera diversa was found.)
Fig. 2. Adult spotted wing drosophila emergence from berries 2 in Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungal products for biological control of spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) under laboratory conditions
Fig. 2. Adult spotted wing drosophila emergence from berries 2 wk afer re- moval from the arenas. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P> 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Fig. 1 in Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungal products for biological control of spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) under laboratory conditions
Fig. 1. Percent mortality of spotted wing drosophila afer 24, 48, 72, and 168 h in each treatment (Untrt = deionized water treated control, BotL = BotaniGard low rate, BotH = BotaniGard high rate, PFRL = PFR 97 low rate, and PFRH = PFR 97 high rate). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P> 0.05). N. S. = no significant differences (P> 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Fig. 4 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 4. LC50 values (± 95% confidence interval) for 7 AIs screened against a known-susceptible lab colony and 3 field-collected populations of Tetranychus urticae. When present, the dashed line indicates the amount of AI in the maximum labelled field rate. This value also is indicated in each graph by "FR=". The resistance ratio of each AI × population is written above each data point.
Fig. 1 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 1. Mean (± SE) spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) counts per tomato leaflet in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant. The dotted line represents the action threshold for spider mites in tomato (2 per leaflet).
Fig. 2 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) cumulative mite d of Tetranychus urticae in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant.
Fig. 2 in Endoparasite loads and the efficacy of conventional anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodes in captive European bison
Fig. 2. Mean (±SE) number of Eimeria species in European bison without ungulate neighbors (N0) and kept near other ungulates (YES) for seasons, calculated in a generalized linear model. Differences were statistically significant in the pairwise comparison for autumn and winter (p values shown above the bars).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.