Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
81
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
81 results for “generic delimitation”
Figure 3 from: Košuthová A, Westberg M, Otálora MAG, Wedin M (2019) Rostania revised: testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes). MycoKeys 47: 17-33. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.47.32227
Figure 3 Ascospores: ARostaniaoccultatavar.populina (Llop 56060303, S), cubic spores BRostaniaceranisca (Westberg L271_PL433, UPS), oblong spores; ascus (red line) with only four mature spores visible but remnants of four aborted spores can be seen (arrows) CRostaniacallibotrys (Sipman 2049, GZU), oblong spores. Scale bar: 10 µm.
Figure 2 from: Duan L, Yang X, Liu P, Johnson G, Wen J, Chang Z (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Caraganeae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) reveals insights into new generic and infrageneric delimitations. PhytoKeys 70: 111-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.70.9641
Figure 2 - Bayesian tree of the concatenated plastid data of matK, trnL-F and psbA-trnH sequences, showing genera in subtribes Caraganinae, Chesneyinae and their close relatives. The labeled sections of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia followed Tsui (1979) and Zhu (2005a), respectively. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) and maximum likelihood bootstrap (LBS ≥ 70%) are given above and below branches, respectively. The asterisk indicates the type species of Chesneya.
Figure 3 from: Duan L, Yang X, Liu P, Johnson G, Wen J, Chang Z (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Caraganeae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) reveals insights into new generic and infrageneric delimitations. PhytoKeys 70: 111-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.70.9641
Figure 3 - Distribution (A) and representative plants (B–H) of genera in Chesneyinae. A red – Chesneya, green – Chesniella, blue – Gueldenstaedtia and yellow – Tibetia B Chesneya acaulis C Chesneya spinosa D Chesneya nubigena E Chesniella macrantha F Chesniella ferganensis G Gueldenstaedtia verna H Tibetia yadongensis.
Figure 1 from: Duan L, Yang X, Liu P, Johnson G, Wen J, Chang Z (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Caraganeae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) reveals insights into new generic and infrageneric delimitations. PhytoKeys 70: 111-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.70.9641
Figure 1 - Bayesian tree of the nrDNA ITS data, showing relationships of genera in subtribes Caraganinae, Chesneyinae and their close relatives. The labeled sections of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia followed Tsui (1979) and Zhu (2005a), respectively. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP ≥ 0.95) and maximum likelihood bootstrap (LBS ≥ 70%) are given above and below branches, respectively. The asterisk indicates the name of Chesneya macrosperma has not been published, its voucher was storied in LE (details see Zhang et al. 2015b).
Supplementary material 1 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Table S1: List of primers used in this study :
Figure 7 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 7 Neoprotoparmeliacapensis, holotype Crespo, Divakar, Hawksworth, Amo & Lumbsch 63f (MAF-Lich. 19584). a Habit b Section through centre of apothecium, showing cupular proper exciple (arrow) c Ascus d Spores, showing setae (arrow). Scale bars: 2 mm (a), 100 µm (b), 10 µm (c), 5 µm (d).
Figure 8 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 8 Neoprotoparmeliacorallifera (type species Neoprotoparmelia), sample Papong 7100. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 12 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 12 Neoprotoparmeliaplurisporibadia, holotype Cáceres & Aproot 22130 (ABL). a Habitus b ascus with ascospores. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 10 micron (b).
Figure 6 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 6 Neoprotoparmeliabrasilisidiata, holotype Cáceres & Aproot 21684 (ISE). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 3 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 3 Maroninaaustraliensis (type species of Maronina), holotype Hafellner 17823 & Rogers (GZU). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 11 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 11 Neoprotoparmeliapauli, holotype Kirika & Lumbsch 3821 (EA) a Habit b Centre of apothecia section, showing cupular proper exciple (arrow). Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 20 µm (b).
Figure 1 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 1 Phylogeny of Protoparmelioideae based on maximum likelihood analysis of ITS rDNA sequences of Protoparmelia and Neoprotoparmelia (Maronina s.l.). Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap support. Terminal clades were collapsed at the species level for clarity of presentation. The length of the triangle corresponds to branch lengths. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of specimens included in collapsed clade. Voucher information of each specimen in a clade is given in Table 1; New Neoprotoparmelia species are marked in red and bold.
Figure 2 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 2 Boxplot showing the intra- and interspecific genetic distances of Neoprotoparmelia species and the overall intraspecific distances from all species and pairwise interspecific distances. New species described in this study are marked in red.
Figure 9 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 9 Neoprotoparmeliacrassa Elix39818. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 4 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 4 Neoprotoparmeliaamerisidiata, holotype Lendemer 20995 (NY). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 13 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 13 Neoprotoparmeliasiamisidiata, v.d. Boom 46872 (Hb. v.d. Boom). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 5 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 5 Neoprotoparmeliaaustralisidiata, holotype Kantvilas 289/07 (HO 545660). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 10 from: Singh G, Aptroot A, Rico VJ, Otte J, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Cáceres ME da S, Lumbsch HT, Schmitt I (2018) Neoprotoparmelia gen. nov. and Maronina (Lecanorales, Protoparmelioideae): species description and generic delimitation using DNA barcodes and phenotypical characters. MycoKeys 44: 19-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29904
Figure 10 Neoprotoparmeliaisidiata, holotype Aptroot 31494 (BR). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figs. 16–30. 16 in A cladistic approach for generic delimitation of Paracloeodes Day, Rivudiva Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty, and Varipes Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)
Figs. 16–30. 16, detail of forefemur concave setae on dorsal margin (Paracloeodes atroari) Char. 77; 17, detail of forefemur, black arrow indicates the FLRNDM = forefemur longitudinal row of setae near dorsal margin on anterior surface (Paracloeodes eurybranchus) Char. 80; 18, detail of forefemur, black arrow indicates the FLRNML = forefemur longitudinal row of setae at middle on anterior surface (Paracloeodes sp.) Char. 82; 19, anterior surface of forefemur, black arrow indicates the vestigial row of setae, (Rhopyscelis singuil comb. n.) Char. 85 and 86; 20, anterior surface of hind femur, black arrow indicates the transversal row of setae, (Rhopyscelis singuil comb. n.) Chars 89 and 90; 21, anterior surface of forefemur, black arrow indicates the vestigial row of setae, (Rhopyscelis caldensis comb. n.) Chars 85 and 86; 22, anterior surface of hind femur, black arrow indicates the transversal row of setae, (Rhopyscelis caldensis comb. n.) Chars 89 and 90; 23, detail of transversal row of setae on hind femur, (Rivudiva trichobasis) Chars 89 and 91; 24, detail of transversal row of setae on hind femur, (Varipes helenae) Chars 89 and 91; 25, foreclaw, black arrow indicates the denticles apically directed (Rhopyscelis singuil comb. n.) Chars 96–101; 26, foreclaw, black arrow indicates the denticles apically directed (Rhopyscelis caldensis comb. n.) Chars 96–101; 27, hind claw, black arrow indicates the denticles apically directed (Rhopyscelis caldensis comb. n.) Chars 96– 101; 28, hind claw, black arrows indicate the regularity of row of denticles, (Rivudiva trichobasis) Chars 99 and 102; 29, foreclaw, black arrow indicates the absence of denticles on base, red arrow indicates the conical and apical denticles, (Varipes lasiobrachius) Chars 106 and 107; 30, detail of foreclaw, black arrow indicates apical denticles on claw extremely higher than the others (Gen. A.) Char. 104.
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic hypotheses with k in A cladistic approach for generic delimitation of Paracloeodes Day, Rivudiva Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty, and Varipes Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic hypotheses with k = 4 using collapsing rules: min. length = 0. Black circles indicate synapomorphies, white circles represent non-unique changes in the tree, either forward or reverse; above are the character numbers and below are the character states. The values below branches correspond to GC (left)/Relative Bremer (right).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.