Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
98
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
98 results for “grove”
Disentangling the seasonal effects of agricultural intensification on birds and bats in Mediterranean olive groves
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Subspecies and Distribution. B. a. arnee Kerr, 1792 — E Peninsular India and S Nepal. B. a. fulvus Blanford, 1891 — NE India & N Myanmar. B. a. migona Deraniyagala, 1952 — S Sri Lanka. B. a. theerapati Groves, 1996 — W Thailand and EC Cambodia. in Bovidae
Subspecies and Distribution. B. a. arnee Kerr, 1792 — E Peninsular India and S Nepal. B. a. fulvus Blanford, 1891 — NE India & N Myanmar. B. a. migona Deraniyagala, 1952 — S Sri Lanka. B. a. theerapati Groves, 1996 — W Thailand and EC Cambodia.
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.
Subspecies and Distribution. S.v.verrucosusBoie,1832—W&CJava;extinctonMaduraI. S. v. bloucht Groves, 1981 — Bawean I. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. S.v.verrucosusBoie,1832—W&CJava;extinctonMaduraI. S. v. bloucht Groves, 1981 — Bawean I.
FIGURE 2 in Review of the millipede genus Propyrgodesmus Silvestri, 1920, with the description of a new species from a sacred grove in Kerala, India (Diplopoda: Polydesmida Pyrgodesmidae)
FIGURE 2. Propyrgodesmus bulbogonopus sp. nov., paratype ♂ (CATE-5503B). A, B. Anterior part of body, ventral and dorsal views, respectively. C. Right antenna, anterior view. D–F. Posterior part of body, ventral, dorsal and lateral views, respectively. G. Right midbody leg, anterior view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A, B, E), 0.4 mm (D), 0.2 mm (C), 0.1 mm (F, G).
FIGURE 4. Propyrgodesmus spp. A–C. Propyrgodesmus lobulatus Silvestri, 1920 in Review of the millipede genus Propyrgodesmus Silvestri, 1920, with the description of a new species from a sacred grove in Kerala, India (Diplopoda: Polydesmida Pyrgodesmidae)
FIGURE 4. Propyrgodesmus spp. A–C. Propyrgodesmus lobulatus Silvestri, 1920, holotype ♀ after Silvestri (1920). A, B. Anterior and posterior parts of the body, dorsal and lateral views, respectively. C. Right antenna, anterior view. D–F. Propyrgodesmus frater Carl, 1932 syntype ♂, after Carl (1932). D, E. Gonopods, anterior and posterior views, respectively. F. Antenna. G. Propyrgodesmus bulbogonopus sp. nov., holotype ♂ (CATE-5503A), right antenna, anterior view. Not to scale.
FIGURE 1 in Review of the millipede genus Propyrgodesmus Silvestri, 1920, with the description of a new species from a sacred grove in Kerala, India (Diplopoda: Polydesmida Pyrgodesmidae)
FIGURE 1. Propyrgodesmus bulbogonopus sp. nov., habitus. A, C. Holotype ♂ (CATE-5503A), dorsal and ventral views, respectively. B. Female paratype (CATE-5503C), dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.
FIGURE 3 in Review of the millipede genus Propyrgodesmus Silvestri, 1920, with the description of a new species from a sacred grove in Kerala, India (Diplopoda: Polydesmida Pyrgodesmidae)
FIGURE 3. Propyrgodesmus bulbogonopus sp. nov., paratype ♂ (CATE-5503B). A. Left gonopod, posterior view. B. Right gonopod, anterior view. C, D. Both gonopods, posterior and anterior views, respectively. Abbreviations: b: medial branch; cx: coxite; h: hook like structure of telopodite; sph: solenophore; sl: solenomere. Scale bar: 0.2 mm (for C and D). A, B not to scale.
Subspecies and Distribution. P. b. bengalensis Kerr, 1792 — Indian and Indochinese region and Malay Peninsula. P.b. alleni Sody, 1949 — Hainan I. P. b. borneoensis Brongersma, 1935 — Borneo. P. b. chinensis Gray, 1837 — China, except for NE, and Taiwan. P. b. euptilurus Elliot, 1871 — Manchurian region, Korean and Russian Far East. P. b. heaneyi Groves, 1997 — the Philippines (Palawan). P. b. horsfieldi Gray, 1842 — Sub-Himalayan region E of Indus River. P. b. iriomotensis Imaizumi, 1967 — Japan (Iriomote I). P. b. javanensis Desmarest, 1816 — Java and Bali. P. b. rabori Groves, 1997 — the Philippines (Negros, Cebu & Panay). P. b. sumatranus Horsfield, 1821 — Sumatra and Nias I. P. b. trevelyani Pocock, 1939 — Kashmir. in Felidae
Subspecies and Distribution. P. b. bengalensis Kerr, 1792 — Indian and Indochinese region and Malay Peninsula. P.b. alleni Sody, 1949 — Hainan I. P. b. borneoensis Brongersma, 1935 — Borneo. P. b. chinensis Gray, 1837 — China, except for NE, and Taiwan. P. b. euptilurus Elliot, 1871 — Manchurian region, Korean and Russian Far East. P. b. heaneyi Groves, 1997 — the Philippines (Palawan). P. b. horsfieldi Gray, 1842 — Sub-Himalayan region E of Indus River. P. b. iriomotensis Imaizumi, 1967 — Japan (Iriomote I). P. b. javanensis Desmarest, 1816 — Java and Bali. P. b. rabori Groves, 1997 — the Philippines (Negros, Cebu & Panay). P. b. sumatranus Horsfield, 1821 — Sumatra and Nias I. P. b. trevelyani Pocock, 1939 — Kashmir.
Subspecies and Distribution. F.m. margarita Loche, 1858 — Sahara. F. m. harrisoni Hemmer, Grubb & Groves, 1976 — Egypt, Israel, Arabian Peninsula. F. m. scheffeli Hemmer, 1974 — Pakistan. F.m. thinobia Ognev, 1926 — deserts E of the Caspian Sea. in Felidae
Subspecies and Distribution. F.m. margarita Loche, 1858 — Sahara. F. m. harrisoni Hemmer, Grubb & Groves, 1976 — Egypt, Israel, Arabian Peninsula. F. m. scheffeli Hemmer, 1974 — Pakistan. F.m. thinobia Ognev, 1926 — deserts E of the Caspian Sea.
Subspecies and Distribution. B.a.arneeKerr,1792—EPeninsularIndiaandSNepal. B.a.fulvusBlanford,1891—NEIndia&NMyanmar. B.a.migonaDeraniyagala,1952—SSriLanka. B. a. theerapati Groves, 1996 — W Thailand and EC Cambodia. in Bovidae
Subspecies and Distribution. B.a.arneeKerr,1792—EPeninsularIndiaandSNepal. B.a.fulvusBlanford,1891—NEIndia&NMyanmar. B.a.migonaDeraniyagala,1952—SSriLanka. B. a. theerapati Groves, 1996 — W Thailand and EC Cambodia.
Subspecies and Distribution. R. d. duvaucelii G. Cuvier, 1823 — N India, S Nepal. R. d. branderi Pocock, 1943 — C India. R. d. ranpitsinhi Groves, 1982 — NE India. in Cervidae
Subspecies and Distribution. R. d. duvaucelii G. Cuvier, 1823 — N India, S Nepal. R. d. branderi Pocock, 1943 — C India. R. d. ranpitsinhi Groves, 1982 — NE India.
Subspecies and Distribution. M.m.muntjakZimmermann,1780—PeninsularMalaysia,Sumatra,Java,Bali,Borneoandseveralassociatedsmallerislands. M.m.annamensisKloss,1928—SLaos,SVietnam,andCambodia. M.m.aureusC.H.Smith,1826—Pakistan,N&CIndia. M.m.curvostylisGray,1872—Myanmar,Thailand. M.m.malabaricusLydekker,1915—SIndiaandSriLanka. M.m.menglalisWang&Groves,1988—SChina(SYunnan);possiblyalsoinneighboringMyanmar,Laos,andVietnam. M.m.montanusRobinson&Kloss,1918—Sumatranhighlands. M.m.nigripesG.Allen,1930—HainanI. M.m.vaginalisBoddaert,1785—Nepal,Bhutan,NEIndia,andBangladesh. M. m. yunnanensis Ma & Wang, 1988 — S China (from C & N Yunnan and S Sichuan to S Fujian & Guangdong). Forms from mainland Asia have been introduced into the Andaman Is. in Cervidae
Subspecies and Distribution. M.m.muntjakZimmermann,1780—PeninsularMalaysia,Sumatra,Java,Bali,Borneoandseveralassociatedsmallerislands. M.m.annamensisKloss,1928—SLaos,SVietnam,andCambodia. M.m.aureusC.H.Smith,1826—Pakistan,N&CIndia. M.m.curvostylisGray,1872—Myanmar,Thailand. M.m.malabaricusLydekker,1915—SIndiaandSriLanka. M.m.menglalisWang&Groves,1988—SChina(SYunnan);possiblyalsoinneighboringMyanmar,Laos,andVietnam. M.m.montanusRobinson&Kloss,1918—Sumatranhighlands. M.m.nigripesG.Allen,1930—HainanI. M.m.vaginalisBoddaert,1785—Nepal,Bhutan,NEIndia,andBangladesh. M. m. yunnanensis Ma & Wang, 1988 — S China (from C & N Yunnan and S Sichuan to S Fujian & Guangdong). Forms from mainland Asia have been introduced into the Andaman Is.
Subspecies and Distribution. S.c.celebensisGray,1858—C,SE&SWSulawesi,includingMunaI. S. c. feileri Groves, 1987 — N Sulawesi. in Phalangeridae
Subspecies and Distribution. S.c.celebensisGray,1858—C,SE&SWSulawesi,includingMunaI. S. c. feileri Groves, 1987 — N Sulawesi.
Subspecies and Distribution. D.m.mueller:Schlegel,1866—lowlandsofBird'sHead(=Vogelkop)Peninsula,NWNewGuinea. D. m. lorentziiJentink, 1908 — lowlands of SW New Guinea. D.m.mysoliaeThomas,1913—MisoolI,inWestPapuanIs. D. m. yapeni Groves & Flannery, 1989 — Yapen I, in Cenderawasih (= Geelvink) Bay, NW New Guinea. Population on Salawati I, West Papuan Is, may represent an additional subspecies. in Macropodidae
Subspecies and Distribution. D.m.mueller:Schlegel,1866—lowlandsofBird'sHead(=Vogelkop)Peninsula,NWNewGuinea. D. m. lorentziiJentink, 1908 — lowlands of SW New Guinea. D.m.mysoliaeThomas,1913—MisoolI,inWestPapuanIs. D. m. yapeni Groves & Flannery, 1989 — Yapen I, in Cenderawasih (= Geelvink) Bay, NW New Guinea. Population on Salawati I, West Papuan Is, may represent an additional subspecies.
Crop Diversification Effects on Soil Aggregation and Aggregate-Associated Carbon and Nitrogen in Short-Term Rainfed Olive Groves under SemiaridMediterranean Conditions
<p>Soil particle aggregation and their associated carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content can<br> provide valuable diagnostic indicators of changes in soil properties in response to the implementation<br> of different agricultural management practices. In this sense, there is limited knowledge regarding the<br> impact of intercropping on soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) pools in aggregates. This<br> study aimed to evaluate the short-term effect (4 years) of three crop diversifications in rainfed olive<br> orchards on soil aggregation, SOC and TN concentration and SOC stocks (SOC-S) under semi-arid<br> Mediterranean conditions. Olive orchards were diversified with Crocus sativus (D-S), Vicia sativa and<br> Avena sativa in rotation (D-O) and Lavandula x intermedia (D-L) and compared with monocropping<br> system (CT). Soil samples were collected at two depths (0–10 and 10–30 cm) and analysed for soil<br> aggregate mass, SOC and TN content in aggregate-size fractions obtained by the wet-sieving method.<br> Changes caused by crop diversifications on SOC-S were also determined. Overall, after 4 years,<br> a reduction in aggregation values was observed. However, D-S increased the macroaggregates<br> (>250 m) percentage, Mean Weigh Diameter values, and Geometric Mean Value in the 0–10 cm.<br> Across treatments, aggregate-associated C in 0–10 cm was higher in the D-S treatment, while in<br> the 10–30 cm soil layer, the greatest values were found in CT. Regarding the SOC-S, after 4 years,<br> significant losses were recorded under CT management in 0–10 cm (1.21 Mg ha1) and 10–30 cm<br> (0.84 Mg ha1), while D-O and D-L showed similar values to those obtained at the beginning of the<br> study. The highest increases in SOC-S were found in D-S, with an increase of 5.88% in the 0–10 cm<br> and 14.47% in the 10–30 cm. Our results showed the high potential of the diversified cropping system<br> to increase soil stability and SOC sequestration.</p>
Distribution. Now restricted to the Channel Country of SW Queensland and the Lake Eyre Basin in NE South Australia. Descriptive notes. Head-body 95-120 mm, tail 105-160 mm, ear 23-29 mm, hindfoot 32-37 mm; weight 30-50 g. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has body form typical of hopping mice, with very long hindfeet, long tail with distal brush of longer hairs, very long ears, and large protruberant eyes. Dorsal fur is of variable color, from pale pinkish fawn to gray; ventral fur white. Unlike most other hopping mice, it has no throat pouch, but males have a glandular area of naked skin on the chest. Habitat. Occurs in low shrublands and tussock grasslands on stony ("gibber") plains and claypans. Shows marked habitat segregation from the Dusky Hopping Mouse (N. fuscus), which is closely associated with sandy substrates. Food and Feeding. The Fawn Hopping Mouse is mostly granivorous, but also eats other plant material (stems, leaves) and occasionally invertebrates. It uses succulent, salt-adapted plants around edges of claypans as a source of water. Breeding. Reproduction is probably largely opportunistic and aseasonal, with high reproductive output from near-continuous breeding after periods of high rainfall; reported littersize is 1-5, most commonly three; gestation period 38-43 days for nonlactating females. Females may mature later than other hopping mice, with reproductive maturity reached at about six months. Activity patterns. Terrestrial and nocturnal. Fawn Hopping Mice shelter during day in burrow systems that are typically simpler and shallower than those of other hopping mice. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Fawn Hopping Mice generally live singly or in small groups; typically uncommon within range, but population density may increase by an order of magnitude following periods of high rainfall. Status and Conservation. Classified as Near Threatened on The IUCN Red List. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has shown marked decline in range (estimated at greater than 50%), and presumably population size, since European settlement of Australia. This is mostlikely due to predation by the introduced house cat and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), and to habitat degradation associated with pastoralism. Bibliography. Brazenor (1934), Burbidge et al. (2008), Finlayson (1939), Gould (1853), Jackson & Groves (2015), Murray et al. (1999), Ogilby (1892), Thomas (1921h), Van Dyck & Strahan (2008), Waite (1898), Watts & Aslin (1981), Woinarski et al. (2014), Wood Jones (1925). in Muridae
Distribution. Now restricted to the Channel Country of SW Queensland and the Lake Eyre Basin in NE South Australia. Descriptive notes. Head-body 95-120 mm, tail 105-160 mm, ear 23-29 mm, hindfoot 32-37 mm; weight 30-50 g. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has body form typical of hopping mice, with very long hindfeet, long tail with distal brush of longer hairs, very long ears, and large protruberant eyes. Dorsal fur is of variable color, from pale pinkish fawn to gray; ventral fur white. Unlike most other hopping mice, it has no throat pouch, but males have a glandular area of naked skin on the chest. Habitat. Occurs in low shrublands and tussock grasslands on stony ("gibber") plains and claypans. Shows marked habitat segregation from the Dusky Hopping Mouse (N. fuscus), which is closely associated with sandy substrates. Food and Feeding. The Fawn Hopping Mouse is mostly granivorous, but also eats other plant material (stems, leaves) and occasionally invertebrates. It uses succulent, salt-adapted plants around edges of claypans as a source of water. Breeding. Reproduction is probably largely opportunistic and aseasonal, with high reproductive output from near-continuous breeding after periods of high rainfall; reported littersize is 1-5, most commonly three; gestation period 38-43 days for nonlactating females. Females may mature later than other hopping mice, with reproductive maturity reached at about six months. Activity patterns. Terrestrial and nocturnal. Fawn Hopping Mice shelter during day in burrow systems that are typically simpler and shallower than those of other hopping mice. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Fawn Hopping Mice generally live singly or in small groups; typically uncommon within range, but population density may increase by an order of magnitude following periods of high rainfall. Status and Conservation. Classified as Near Threatened on The IUCN Red List. The Fawn Hopping Mouse has shown marked decline in range (estimated at greater than 50%), and presumably population size, since European settlement of Australia. This is mostlikely due to predation by the introduced house cat and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), and to habitat degradation associated with pastoralism. Bibliography. Brazenor (1934), Burbidge et al. (2008), Finlayson (1939), Gould (1853), Jackson & Groves (2015), Murray et al. (1999), Ogilby (1892), Thomas (1921h), Van Dyck & Strahan (2008), Waite (1898), Watts & Aslin (1981), Woinarski et al. (2014), Wood Jones (1925).
Laurel Grove Cemetery Bird Marker
Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
FIGURE 11 in Pterostichus neilgaimani sp. nov., a new species of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from relict sacred grove in Eastern Georgia
FIGURE 11. Forest close to Sacred Grove of Khevsha, type locality of Pterostichus neilgaimani sp. nov.
FIGURE 10 in Pterostichus neilgaimani sp. nov., a new species of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from relict sacred grove in Eastern Georgia
FIGURE 10. Map of Georgia showing location of Khevsha, type locality of Pterostichus neilgaimani sp. nov.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.