Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

99

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

99 results for “host preference”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

Colonisation success of a tree-killing bark beetle: Geographic variation and mismatch with host preference

<p><span>The preference–performance hypothesis (PPH) predicts that female insects maximise their fitness by ovipositing on hosts where their offspring perform the best. The preference–performance relationships in bark beetles are complex because before offspring development can occur in the phloem, adult bark beetles must first successfully invade host trees, and then construct galleries beneath the bark. Therefore, a positive correlation between host preference and successful colonisation is necessary for the PPH in bark beetles to hold (i.e., the preference–colonisation hypothesis in bark beetles).<br>In this study, through field choice experiments, I investigated the successful colonisation of the bark beetle,<em> Polygraphus proximus</em>, within four allopatrically distributed Abies species across a distinct biogeographic boundary in Japan.<br>The results of this study showed that the biogeographic boundary did not limit the successful colonisation by<em> P. proximus</em>. I observed that successful colonization was low in <em>A. firma</em>, despite it being an exotic species and the most preferred at the study sites, indicating a mismatch between preference and colonization success. Additionally, I observed that <em>A. sachalinensis</em> had a high colonization success rate, even though it was the least preferred species at the study sites.<br>The results suggest that the host preference of <em>P. proximus</em> has not been adjusted by colonisation success through natural selection. The absence of significant differences in colonisation success across the Tsugaru Strait, and the preference–colonisation mismatches imply that genetic factors do not contribute to host specialisation.</span></p>

opencc-zeroJun 2023View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3 in Ecological fitting: Chemical profiles of plant hosts provide insights on selection cues and preferences for a major buprestid pest

Fig. 3. Average time spent (s ± 1SE) of gravid emerald ash borer females (Agrilus planipennis) in arms of Y-tube olfactometer with foliage emissions of olive (OL, Olea europaea), white fringetree (WF, Chionanthus virginica), green ash (GA, Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Manchurian ash (MA, F. mandshurica) or blank air (BL). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opennotspecifiedAug 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Ecological fitting: Chemical profiles of plant hosts provide insights on selection cues and preferences for a major buprestid pest

Fig. 1. Mean emission rates of volatiles (ng/hour/g/foliage ± 1SE) of black ash (BA, Fraxinus nigra), blue ash (Blue, F. quadrangulata), Manchurian ash (MA, F. mandshurica), olive (OL, Olea europaea), and white fringetree (WF, Chionanthus virginicus), five plant hosts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) collected in summer 2017. a) Overall plant profiles, b) antennally active compounds c) Green leaf volatile (GLV) profiles, d) sesquiterpene profiles, and e) Monoterpene profiles. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opennotspecifiedAug 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Ecological fitting: Chemical profiles of plant hosts provide insights on selection cues and preferences for a major buprestid pest

Fig. 2. Ordination (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) plots of volatiles profiles of black ash (BA, Fraxinus nigra), blue ash (Blue, F. quadrangulata), Manchurian ash (MA, F. mandshurica), olive (OL, Olea europaea), and white fringetree (WF, Chionanthus virginicus), five plant hosts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). a) Overall plant profiles, b) Green leaf volatile (GLV) profiles, c) monoterpene profiles, d) sesquiterpene profiles, and e) antennally active compounds. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opennotspecifiedAug 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: A nonrandom subset of olfactory genes is associated with host preference in the fruit fly Drosophila orena

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Pathogens manipulate the preference of vectors, slowing disease spread in a multi-host system

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Evolution of parasitoid host preference and performance in response to an invasive host acting as evolutionary trap

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Preference, performance, and chemical defense in an endangered butterfly using novel and ancestral host plants

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Beyond preference and performance: host plant selection by monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Innate preference hierarchies coupled with adult experience, rather than larval imprinting or transgenerational acclimation, determine host plant use in Pieris rapae

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Tree diversity reduces risk of bark beetle infestation for preferred conifer species, but increases risk for less preferred hosts

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Genetic variation in host plants influences the mate preferences of a plant-feeding insect

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Standing genetic variation in host preference for mutualist microbial symbionts

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Pervasive effects of Wolbachia on host temperature preference

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Specificity, rank preference and the colonization of a non-native host plant by the Melissa blue butterfly

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2013View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Variation in host plant usage and diet breadth predict sibling preference and performance in the neotropical tortoise beetle Chelymorpha alternans (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Host stress hormones alter vector feeding preferences, success, and productivity

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2016View details →
dryad32/100

Transgenerational inheritance of learned preferences for novel host plant odors in Bicyclus anynana butterflies

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Colonisation success of a tree-killing bark beetle: Geographic variation and mismatch with host preference

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2023View details →
dryad32/100

Aphid-induced phytochemicals in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. afflicting host preference and bionomics of Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.