Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
143
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
143 results for “intersectionality”
NAVIGATING THE INTERSECTION
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Intersecting Narratives of Resistance: Aimé Césaire's Critique of Colonization in "Notebook of a Return to the Native Land"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND DIGITAL CURRENCIES: NAVIGATING THE INTERSECTION OF INNOVATION AND CYBERSECURITY
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Experience of intersecting stigmas among people with podoconiosis: dataset
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURE 3. A in Is Rosa × archipelagica (Rosaceae, Rosoideae) really a spontaneous intersectional hybrid between R. rugosa and R. maximowicziana? Molecular data confirmation and evidence of paternal leakage
FIGURE 3. A. The ML tree based on plastid data. B. The ML tree based on ITS data.
Graph Representations of Intersectional Identity in Elye Bokher's 'Bovo D'Antona'
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Figure 3 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 3 - A Neighbor-joining tree calculated by BOLD for ITS2 DNA barcode sequences amplified directly from genomic DNA (labels include corresponding collector and GenBank number; see dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-CRATMONO and Table 1 for details). Dashed lines indicate the sectional affinity of the sequences B The corresponding Neighbor-Net network for the cloned ITS2 sequences has three branches representing: (a) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus monogyna, and from its hybrids with both Crataegus suksdorfii and Crataegus punctata; (b) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus suksdorfii and Crataegus ×cogswellii; and (c) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus punctata and Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae (Table 3). The numbers shown are the % bootstrap support for each of the three branches.
Figure 4 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 4 - Geographic distribution of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. and Crataegus monogyna in Ontario. Filled square, holotype of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae; Crosses, TRT specimens of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae; asterisks, Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae specimens cited by Wells and Phipps (1989); stars, specimens of Crataegus monogyna in MT, MTMG, QFA, TRT, and UBC. Crataegus punctata occurs throughout the region depicted (Phipps and Muniyamma 1980; this paper also maps additional records for Crataegus monogyna).
Figure 6 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 6 - Holotype of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. (♀Crataegus monogyna × ♂Crataegus punctata): TRT00002197, CANADA, Ontario, Peel R M, loc. ON22, Don Gould Park and E side of Erin Mills Parkway, 43°35'N, 79°40'W, abandoned fields with extensive hawthorn colonization, 2 Jun 1989, Dickinson D1492.
Figure 5 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 5 - Geographic distribution of Crataegus ×cogswellii K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. and its parental species in the Pacific Northwest. Filled square, holotype of Crataegus ×cogswellii; crosses, TRT specimens of Crataegus ×cogswellii; circles, diploid Crataegus suksdorfii; stars, Crataegus monogyna (specimens in OSC, TRT, UBC, and WTU).
Figure 7 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 7 - Holotype of Crataegus ×cogswellii K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. (♀Crataegus suksdorfii × ♂Crataegus monogyna): TRT00002574, U.S.A., Oregon, Linn Co., Cogswell-Foster Preserve, 44.333082°N, 123.122547°W, 3 Sep 2009, Dickinson & Dickinson 2009-40.
Figure 2 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 2 - A Principal components analysis of 39 Fourier amplitudes for 86 subterminal short shoot leaves from 20 Crataegus individuals at the Cogswell-Foster Preserve in Linn Co., Oregon (one Crataegus suksdorfii (s), seven Crataegus monogyna (m), and 12 putative hybrids (h), Crataegus ×cogswellii). Leaf outlines illustrate the shape contrasts responsible for the ordination: in grey, six subterminal leaves from short shoots of a single individual (OR1–8) B Principal components analysis of 39 Fourier amplitudes averaged for leaves sampled regardless of position on short shoots of 64 herbarium specimens from the Cogswell-Foster Preserve and (circled points) other locations in the Pacific Northwest (Table 1). In both A and B the two PCA axes shown are significant according to the broken-stick criterion (Frontier 1976). In B arrowed point 1 represents the single individual of Crataegus suksdorfii for which individual leaves are represented in A, while arrowed point 2 represents the averaged data for the six leaves of Crataegus monogyna shown in grey in A.
Figure 1 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 1 - Principal components analysis biplot for five morphometric descriptors averaged for each of 41 Crataegus herbarium specimens from the Cogswell-Foster Preserve and other locations in the Pacific Northwest (Crataegus suksdorfii (s), Crataegus monogyna (m), and the putative hybrid, Crataegus ×cogswellii (h)): relX, leaf length above the widest point, scaled by the width; relZ, leaf length below the widest point, scaled by the width; invDI, inverse dissection index = 2(Aπ)1/2/P, where A is the leaf area and P is the leaf perimeter; STAM, number of stamens per flower; STYL, number of styles per flower. Both axes shown account for significant portions of the total variance according to the broken-stick criterion (Frontier 1976).
Complexities of Extremely Shallow Damaging Earthquakes as Evidence for Seismogenic Intersecting Faults in Low Seismicity Regions Unloaded by Erosion
<p>The Seismic data used in this paper for inversion Centroid Moment Tensor and First Motion Mechanism</p>
Initiative for Chinese Sex Workers to Promote Wellbeing and Improve HIV Prevention by Reducing intersEctional Stigma
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07103525. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Reducing Intersectional Stigma Among High-Risk Women in Brazil to Promote Uptake of HIV Testing and PrEP
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04114955. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Clinical Evaluation of the Intersect ENT Sinus Device (ASCEND)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03599271. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Standardized Patients to Measure and Address Intersectional Stigma
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04896216. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Data from: A Flippase-mediated GAL80/GAL4 intersectional resource for dissecting appendage development in Drosophila
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Vehicle trajectory data in Eco-friendly Cooperative Traffic Optimization (EcoTOp) system at signalized intersections
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.