Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Ecophenotypic plasticity versus evolutionary trends-morphological variability in Upper Jurassic bivalve shells from Portugal

Fig. 2. Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Jurassic rock suite in the Lusitanian Basin. Modified from Schneider et al. (2009). All units discussed herein are numbered in squared brackets. Formations and members that are not yet formally established are written in lower case letters. Abbreviations: A., Arisphinctes; As., Aspidoceras; Au., Aulacostephanus; C., Crussoliceras; D., Dichotomoceras; Fm., formation; M., Micracanthoceras; Mb., member; Q., Quenstedtoceras; S., Simoceras; Se., Semiformiceras.

Fig. 1 in Ecophenotypic plasticity versus evolutionary trends-morphological variability in Upper Jurassic bivalve shells from Portugal

Fig. 1. Geographic and geological overview of the Lusitanian Basin. The numbering of localities refers to Table 1, second column.

Fig. 14 in Ecophenotypic plasticity versus evolutionary trends-morphological variability in Upper Jurassic bivalve shells from Portugal

Fig. 14. Lithostratigraphy plot of Eomiodon securiformis. A. Lithostratigraphically arranged groups are displayed as convex hulls. Calculated artificial shell outlines for full number coordinate pairs are plotted to illustrate the morphospace. M, mean artificial shell outline. B. 95% confidence ellipses of group means and corresponding calculated shell outlines for group means are plotted. Numbers in squared brackets refer to Fig. 2.

Fig. 16 in Ecophenotypic plasticity versus evolutionary trends-morphological variability in Upper Jurassic bivalve shells from Portugal

Fig. 16. Left valve of neomiodontid bivalve Eomiodon sp. from Early Tithonian, Arranhó II member, Santa Cruz (GML 25929) in internal (A) and external (B) views.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: A taxonomic review of the genus Diolcogaster Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) in Iran, distribution and morphological variability.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "A taxonomic review of the genus Diolcogaster Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) in Iran, distribution and morphological variability". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/e63bf0e7-dcd8-42a0-858c-606a75e91c0c">https://bionomia.net/dataset/e63bf0e7-dcd8-42a0-858c-606a75e91c0c</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/e63bf0e7-dcd8-42a0-858c-606a75e91c0c">https://gbif.org/dataset/e63bf0e7-dcd8-42a0-858c-606a75e91c0c</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Data from: Juvara-Balş I., Andriollo T., Lehmann-Graber C. (2021). Morphological and morphometric variability in Pergamasus decebali and P. scorilai (Acari: Parasitidae), with comments on other species of the P. crassipes species-group. Revue suisse de Zoologie 128(2): 439-453

Supporting data for: Juvara-Balş I., Andriollo T., Lehmann-Graber C. (2021). Morphological and morphometric variability in Pergamasus decebali and P. scorilai (Acari: Parasitidae), with comments on other species of the P. crassipes species-group. Revue suisse de Zoologie 128(2): 439-453. https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0055 Measurements are separated by semicolums as folows: Nine measurements are provided for females: LI; LE; WEB; st5-st5; LSS; WSS; W/2; t1; t4 Ten measurements are provided for males: LI; AB; AC; EF; GH; al1; al2; pv1; t1; t4

opencc-by-4.0May 2006View details →

Figure 3 in Intraspecific morphological tooth variability and geographical distribution: Application to the Savi's vole, Microtus (Terricola) savii (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)

Figure 3. Canonical discriminant analysis with the distribution of the centroids on the two first axes of 55 populations from the different regions of Italy.

opencc-by-4.0May 2006View details →

Figure 4 in Intraspecific morphological tooth variability and geographical distribution: Application to the Savi's vole, Microtus (Terricola) savii (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)

Figure 4. Canonical discriminant analysis with the distribution of the centroids on the two first axes of 11 geographical groups.

Figure 8 in Morphological variability of the megalopa of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) in Mediterranean and Atlantic populations

Figure 8. Liocarcinus depurator, megalopa. (A, B) Abdomen, lateral and dorsal views, respectively; (C) first pleopod; (D) pleopod 4. Scale bars: 0.3 mm.

Figure 2 in Morphological variability of the megalopa of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) in Mediterranean and Atlantic populations

Figure 2. Liocarcinus depurator, megalopa. (A) Antenna; (B) mandibular palp; (C) maxillule. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 0.2 mm (B, C).

Figure 7 in Morphological variability of the megalopa of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) in Mediterranean and Atlantic populations

Figure 7. Liocarcinus depurator, megalopa. (A–E) Pereiopods 1–5; (F) dactyl of the first pereiopod; (G) dactyl of pereiopod 5; (H) sternum. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figure 1 in Morphological variability of the megalopa of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) in Mediterranean and Atlantic populations

Figure 1. Liocarcinus depurator, megalopa. (A, B) Carapace, lateral and dorsal views, respectively; (C) antennule. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B); 0.2 mm (C).

Figure 3 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figure 3. PCA diagrams for the first two factors using continuous characters as defined in the present study. a) Biplot shows distribution of morphological characters in M of Erythemis. Numbers represent the following ratio characters: 1) Lab/Lecv-clS3, 2) Lab/LcaS3, 3) LFW/Lnpt, 4) Lab/LclS3, 5) Antr /Lar, 6) Lar/Lba, 7) Acd/lban, 8) AnptHW/LoptHW, 9) Lnpt/Anb, 10) LHW/ Acd, 11) Lban/ Lasa-ca, 12) LHW/Lab, 13) Lban/Anb, 14) LHW/LFW, 15) Las/Ddas, 16) Lba/Lban, 17) LclS3/ LcaS3, 18) Lecv-clS3/LcaS3, 19) Las/Anas, 20) Lab/Las. b) Biplot shows distribution of morphological characters in F of Erythemis. Numbers represent the following characters: 1) Lab/ Lecv-clS3, 2) Lab/LcaS3 3) Lab/LclS3, 4) Lab/Las, 5) LHW/Acd, 6) Lban/Anb, 7) Lecv-clS3/LcaS3, 8) Acd/lban, 9) Lar/Lba, 10) Antr/Lar, 11) LFW/Lnpt, 12) AnptHW/LoptHW, 13) LHW/Lab. See above for abbreviations.

Figure 2 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figure 2. Plots of the first two discriminant functions of the discriminant analysis. a) The first two discriminant functions explain 72.5% in males, the cases in where species are overlapped were analyzed by separated in b. b) The first two discriminant functions explain 88.3% in males, and c) The first two discriminant functions explain 83.7% in F. Polygons define the limits of proposed groups.

Figure 1. a in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figure 1. a) Plot showing continuous variation for the character distance between lateral and ventral carinae (dlvc), opposite to meeting point of lateral and medial transverse carinae on S3 (lmt). Numbers represent the following species: 1) E. attala, 2) E. carmelita, 3) E. collocata, 4) E. credula, 5) E. haematogastra, 6) E. mithroides, 7) E. peruviana, 8) E. plebeja, 9) E. simplicicollis, 10) E. vesiculosa. b) S1-3 E. carmelita males showing the measures from Williamson (1923): distance between lateral and ventral carinae (dlvc), divided by the measure of distance between meeting point of lateral and medial transverse carinae and ventral carinae (lmt).

Figures 10–17 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figures 10–17. Discrete characters of vulvar lamina, abdominal appendages, thorax, and femur. Numbers represent the following species: 10) E. peruviana female; 11) E. plebeja female; 12) E. simplicicollis male; 13) E. mithroides male; 14) E. vesiculosa male; 15) E. peruviana female; 16) E. vesiculosa female, 17) E. attala male. Abbreviations indicate the following characters, S 8 -S 9: Abdominal segments 8-9; LV: Vulvar lamina; Pb: Posterior border; Vt: Teeth ventral; Ai: Inferior appendage; As: Antehumeral stripe.

Figures 4–9. Morphometric characters. 4 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figures 4–9. Morphometric characters. 4) S1-3 of E. carmelita male, 5-6) E. simplicicollis male; 7) E. peruviana female; 8) FW of E. vesiculosa male; 9) E. simplicicollis male. Abbreviations indicate the following characters, LFW, LHW: FW or HW length; Lnpt: Nodus-pterostigma length; Antr: Triangle width; Lar: Arculus-second antenodal length; Lba: wing base-arculus length; Lban: Wing base-nodus length; Anpt: Pterostigma width; Lopt: Pterostigma length; Ansbt: Subtriangle width; Acd: HW discoidal field posterior border width; Anb: HW base width; Lasa-ca: Supplementary anal vein-Cu-A crossvein, Lab: Abdomen length; Las: Cercus length; Ddas: reach of teeth on ventral region of cercus; Anas: Anterolateral width of cercus; S: Abdominal segment 3; LclS3: Lateral carina length; LcaS3: 3 Apical carina length; Lecv: Ventral carina length; Lecv-clS3: Basal area between ventral-lateral carinae on S3; Wm: Width medial region of the abdominal segment; S 8: Abdominal segment 8; S 9: Abdominal segment 9; Lal: Female lamina length from base of basal lobe to apex.

Figures 18–25 in Morphological variability and evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Erythemis Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Libellulidae: Sympetrinae)

Figures 18–25. Discrete characters of vesica spermalis. Numbers represent the following species: 18) E. mithroides, dorsal view; 19) E. carmelita, left side view; 20) E. vesiculosa, left side view; 21) E. peruviana, left side view; 22) E. credula, dorsal wiew; 23) E. haematogastra, right side view; 24) E. credula, finger-shaped structures, dorsal view; 25) E. plebeja, dorsal view. Abbreviations indicate the following characters, C: Cornua; L: Lateral lobe; H: Hook; Pb: Posterior border; M: Medial lobe; P: Posterior lobe; NH: Hook not bilobed.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →

FIGURE 1. Scatterplots from multivariate statistical analyses. Ellipses define the 95 in Morphological Variation in a Unisexual Whiptail Lizard (Aspidoscelis exsanguis) and One of Its Bisexual Parental Species (Aspidoscelis inornata) (Reptilia: Squamata: Teiidae): Is the Clonal Species Less Variable?

FIGURE 1. Scatterplots from multivariate statistical analyses. Ellipses define the 95% confidence limits of score distributions. A. Principal component scores of 14 field A. exsanguis, 42 laboratory A. exsanguis of two lineages pooled, and 19 field A. inornata. Axis percentages reflect variance explained by PC1 and PC2 (table 5). B. Canonical variate scores of the same specimens as in A. Axis percentages are relative contributions of CV1 and CV2 to the discrimination (table 5).