Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Effect of common ornamental plants on the survivorship and fecundity of the Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)

Fig. 1. Common ornamental plants from urban areas used in survival and fecundity assays of adult Aedes albopictus.

Fig. 6 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 6. Reconstructions of the palaeoscolecid worms Cricicosmia and Tabelliscolex (modified from Huang 2005b). A. Cricocosmia jinningensis; A1, whole animal; A2, typical lateral sclerite of Cricocosmia jinningensis. B. Tabelliscolex hexagonus. C. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov.

Fig. 3 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 3. Element maps of Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 1988 from the Early Cambrian of Chengjiang, China show that the lateral sclerites of Cricocosmia have elevated content of oxygen and ferrum and depleted silicon and aluminium compared with other areas of the trunk. A small amount of phosphorus is present on the surface of the trunk, possibly indicating the presence of apatite. The first image is of the anterior cone−shaped sclerites shown in Fig. 2A2, ELI−0001402.

Fig. 5 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 5. Element maps of Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov. from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. Mapping area is the upper right part in Fig. 4A1, ELI−0001219. Images show that lateral sclerites of Tabelliscolex maanshanensis are composed predominantly of silicon, oxygen, and aluminum, with lesser amounts of iron, potassium, and magnesium.

Fig. 4 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 4. SEM−BSE images of uncoated specimens of Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian of Chengjiang, China. A. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov., ELI−0001219, holotype; A1, molted elongate sclerites; A2, shows the tubercles and the pits on the inner side; A3, showing each pit has a inner circlet of concentric laminae; A4, close−up showing the pit and the inner lamina. B. Tabelliscolex hexagonus Han, Zhang, and Shu, 2003a, ELI−0001218, holotype; B1, two over−lapping plates, one plate showing the tubercles (B2) and another showing the pits (B3); B4, the skeleton of the plate, noting the framboidal pyrites within the skeleton; B5, close−up showing framboidal pyrites replicated by finer minerals (B6); B7, close−up of the pit; B8, some needle−like minerals within the pit in B7.

Fig. 2 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic presentation of the trunk ornamentation in Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 2003 from the Earlyn Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A. ELI−0001402, lateral spines from the anterior trunk (rectangle area in Fig. 1C); A1, one of the plate−shape sclerites with a net structure; the anterior part of the sclerites is broken; A2, one of the cone−shaped sclerites with net−like structure; note the size of the circlet decreases distally; A3, showing the net−like structure; A4, the net−like structure consists of numerous finer spiculate minerals; A5, trunk cuticle surrounding the sclerite consists of bright larger octahedral pyrites, which are also composed of numerous micro−spiculate minerals. B. ELI−0001403, lateral spines from the posterior trunk; B1, the lateral sclerites showing a bright white high−contrast colour with surrounding trunk cuticle (rectangle area in Fig. 1D); B2, a lateral spine consisting of many tubercles; B3, showing the tubercles. C. ELI−0001404, showing the lateral sclerites with tubercles.

Fig. 1. Early Cambrian palaeoscolecid worms from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A–E in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 1. Early Cambrian palaeoscolecid worms from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A–E. Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 1988. A. ELI−0001400, showing the ventral trunk spines (arrow) of Cricocosmia. B. ELI−0001401, showing the ventral trunk spines (arrow); B2 is the rectangle area on B1. C. ELI−0001402; C1, a complete specimen; C2, lateral spines at the anterior portion of the trunk (rectangle area in C1) preserved fine structure; C3, showing the preserved microstructure of the lateral spines, note that sclerites colored black can preserve finer structure than those of yellow, and that sclerites showing finer structures are apparently dislocated probably due to molting. D. ELI−0001403; D1, a complete specimen; D2, posterior portion of the body (rectangle area in D1) with several spines (arrows pointed) bearing fine structures. E. ELI−0001404; E1, a fragmental specimen in burrowing; E2, showing the trunk sclerites (arrows pointed) with a net−like structure; the marginal ridges are evident on these sclerites. F. Tabelliscolex hexagonus Han, Zhang, and Shu, 2003a, ELI−0001218, holotype, showing the general outline. G. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov., ELI−0001219, showing molted trunk sclerites.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Typification of ornamental plants 5: Philadelphus mexicanus (Hydrangeaceae).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Typification of ornamental plants 5: Philadelphus mexicanus (Hydrangeaceae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/ab1d3d82-3c24-454a-9352-0a5450712b50">https://bionomia.net/dataset/ab1d3d82-3c24-454a-9352-0a5450712b50</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/ab1d3d82-3c24-454a-9352-0a5450712b50">https://gbif.org/dataset/ab1d3d82-3c24-454a-9352-0a5450712b50</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

FIG. 15 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 15. — Indian Ocean species of Paralomis White, 1856: A, P. ceres, Macpherson, 1989, holotype š CL 58.1 mm (BMNH 1989.926); B, P. ochthodes Macpherson, 1988, holotype š CL 71.6 mm (USNM-228831); A, B, mid-branchial tubercles, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 3 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 3. — Paralomis erinacea Macpherson, 1988: A, B, ♀ CL 44.87 mm (MNHN Pg-2937); C, D, ♀ CL 59 mm (specimen in collection of Dr Ramos, Vigo), Mauritania, 14.XII.2007; E, F, ♀ CL 83 mm (specimen in collection of Dr Ramos, Vigo), Mauritania, 14.XII.2007; A, carapace, dorsal view; B, dorsal spines, posterior view; C, carapace, dorsal view; D, dorsal spines, posterior view; E, carapace, dorsal view; F, dorsal tubercles, posterior view. Scale bars: A, C, 5 mm; B, F, 2 mm; D, 1 mm; E, 10 mm.

FIG. 2 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 2. — Paralomis cubensis Chace, 1939: A-C, ♀ CL 26 mm (USNM-231310), RV Miss Virginia, 329-366 m, 21.III.1962; D, E, ♀ CL 45.8 mm (USNM-213542), 26°45'N, 84°55'W, 466-732 m, XII.1983; F, G, ♀ CL 79.6 mm (USNM-231312), Amazon River Mouth, 411 m, XI.1957; A, carapace, dorsal view; B, mid-branchial spine, posterio-lateral view; C, mid-branchial spines, posterio-lateral view; D, carapace, dorsal view; E, mid-branchial region, dorsal view; F, carapace, dorsal view; G, mid-branchial region, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, D, 5 mm; B, 1 mm; C, 2 mm; E, G, 4 mm; F, 10 mm.

FIG. 6 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 6. — Paralomis mendagnai Macpherson, 2003: A, B, š CL 11 mm (MNHN Pg-6408), Solomon Islands, 1001-1012 m, 26.IX.2001, SALOMON 1, stn CP 1753; C, D, š CL 36 mm (MNHN Pg-6408), Solomon Islands, 896-912 m, 25.IX.2001, SALOMON 1, stn CP 1752; E, F, holotype š 58.8 mm (MNHN Pg-6408), Solomon Islands, 896-912 m, 25.IX.2001, SALOMON 1, stn CP 1752; A, carapace, dorsal view; B, mid-branchial region, dorsal view; C, carapace, dorsal view; D, mid-branchial region, dorsal view; E, carapace, dorsal view; F, mid-branchial flattened tubercle. Scale bars: A, C, E, 5 mm; B, D, F, 1 mm.

FIG. 7 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 7. — Paralomis multispina Benedict, 1895: A-C, ♀ CL 17 mm (USNM-18591), Sea Lion rocks, WA, 1253 m; D, E, ♀ CL 68 mm (USNM-18589);A, carapace, dorsal view; B, mid-branchial spines, dorsal view; C, typical mid-branchial spine, lateral view; D, carapace, dorsal view; E, typical mid-branchial spine, right lateral view. Scale bars: A, 5 mm; B-E, 1 mm.

FIG. 12 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 12. — South America (west coast) Paralomis White,1856 species:A, P. aspera Faxon,1893, š CL 53 mm (BMNH), Coquimbo,560 m, VI.1971; B, P. phrixa, Macpherson, 1992, holotype ♀ CL 64.6 mm (USNM-259380); C, P. arae Macpherson, 2001, holotype š CL 74.5 mm (MNHN Pg 5945); D, P. otsuae Wilson, 1990, ♀ 73.4 mm (USNM-259219); E, Glyptolithodes cristatipes Faxon, 1893, ♀ CL 71.2 mm (USNM-259216); A, B, mid-branchial spines, postero-lateral view; C-E, mid-branchial region, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 9 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 9. — Paralomis stella Macpherson, 1988: A, B, š CL 24.5 mm (MNHN Pg-4257), Réunion Island, 350-750 m, 28.VIII.1982; C, D, holotype š 71.3 mm (MNHN Pg-4255); A, carapace, dorsal view; B, mid-branchial spines, left lateral view; C, carapace, dorsal view; D, mid-branchial tubercle, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, C, 5 mm; B, 0.5 mm; D, 1 mm.

FIG. 14 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 14. — Central Pacific Paralomis White,1856 species: A, P. seagranti Eldredge,1976, š CL 74.7 mm (MNHN Pg-4265); B, P. dawsoni Macpherson, 2001, ♀ CL 57.3 mm (MNHN Pg-4279); C, P. haigae Eldredge, 1976, š CL 49.9 mm (MNHN Pg-4276); D, P. hirtella de Saint-Laurent & Macpherson, 1997, š CL 47 mm (MNHN Pg-4662); A-D mid-branchial tubercles, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 1 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 1. — Terminology for describing carapace ornamentation in species of Paralomis White, 1856: spines (A) are structures which measure more than 1.5 times as high as wide at the base; tubercles (B-E) are any structures measuring less than 1.5 times high as wide at the base; within this system, tubercles can be conical (B), rounded (C), pedunculate (D) or flattened (E), and have regular (smooth) or irregular surfaces. Conical tubercles differ from rounded tubercles in that they taper towards an acute apex. Flattened tubercles are lower than 0.2 times as high as wide at the base. Numbers represent ratios.

FIG. 13 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 13. — Japan and North Pacific species of Paralomis White, 1856: A, B, P. histrix De Haan, 1844; A, ♀ CL 63.2 mm (BMNH 1985.140); B, š CL 34.9 mm (MNHN Pg 2212); C, P. japonica Balss, 1911, š CL 46.7 mm (MNHN); D, P. makarovi Hall & Thatje, 2009, š CL 23 mm (USNM-1122582); E, P. cristata Takeda & Ohta, 1979, ♀ 76.4 mm (USNM-229721); F, P. verrilli (Benedict, 1894), holotype š CL 78 mm (USNM-18537); A, B, D, mid-branchial spines, lateral view; C, E, F, mid-branchial tubercles, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, 3 mm; B, E, 2 mm; C, D, F, 1 mm.

FIG. 8 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 8. — Paralomis spinosissima Birstein & Vinogradov, 1972: A, B, ♀ CL 17.1 mm (USNM-154634), Drake's Passage, 384-394 m, IX.1963; C, D, ♀ CL 55.6 mm (USNM-231422), South Georgia, 563-598 m, V.1975; A, carapace, dorsal view; B, mid-branchial spines, dorsal view; C, carapace, dorsal view; D, branchial spines, dorso-lateral view. Scale bars: A, C, 5 mm; B, D, 1 mm.

FIG. 10 in King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis

FIG. 10. — Northern and Eastern Atlantic Paralomis White, 1856 species: A, B, P. cristulata Macpherson, 1988, holotype ♀ CL 55 mm (MNHN Pg-3427), Senegal, 650 m; C, P. bouvieri Hansen 1909, š CL 17.7 mm (USNM-231209); D, P. africana Macpherson, 1982, š CL 68.4 mm (USNM-213153); E, P. grossmani Macpherson, 1988, holotype ♀ CL 93.4 mm (USNM-228832); F, P. pectinata Macpherson, 1988, holotype ♀ CL 96.4 mm (USNM-233599); A, B, D-F, mid-branchial tubercles, dorsal view; C, carapace spines, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.