Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2005View details →

Fig. 1 in Use Of Intertidal Mangrove And Sea Wall Habitats By Coral Reef Fishes In The Wakatobi Marine Park, Indonesia

Fig. 1. Map of study sites. The arrow points to Hoga Island off the northeast coast of Kaledupa Island. The entire Tukangbesi Archipelago lies within the Wakatobi National Marine Park.

Figure 7 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 7. – Temporal variation in total species richness in three mangrove habitats for catches (A) and UVC (B).

Figure 3 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 3. – Size frequency distribution of the main species that contributed 59% of the total fish sampled by both methods. Dashed line indicates median value for each method.

Figure 4 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 4. – Relative abundance of the five trophic categories among the three mangrove habitats for fyke-net and visual census.

Figure 6 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 6. – Canonical redundancy analyses (RDA) of fish abundance, environmental variables and sampling months for catches (A) and UVC (B). Species are coded by the two first letters of name of genus and the three first letters of species, these codes are given in table I.

Figure 5 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 5. – Hierarchical clustering analysis showing the spatial repartition of 13 sampling months based on fish abundance data for both methods. Sites are coded according to their abbreviation followed by month number, beginning in April (1) and finishing in April again (13). Clusters are separated using Ward algorithm.

Figure 1 in Are mangroves important for reef fish on Mayotte Island (Indian Ocean)?

Figure 1. – Location of the three sampling sites in the lagoon along the eastern coast and south-western coast of Mayotte Island. The numbers refer to the text where further information is found to describe each location.

FIGURE 4 in Fish assemblage structure related to habitat heterogeneity in rocky reefs in the Mexican Pacific coast

FIGURE 4 | Non-metric multidimensional scaling for fish assemblage data for the California Current (CC) and North Equatorial Current (NEC) in the sample sites: Caleta de chon (CH), Las Gatas (LG), Manzanillo (MZ), and Zacatoso (ZC). Horizontal and vertical scatter bars represent 95% confidence interval.

FIGURE 3 in Fish assemblage structure related to habitat heterogeneity in rocky reefs in the Mexican Pacific coast

FIGURE 3 | Rarefaction curves of species richness for the California Current (CC) and North Equatorial Current (NEC) in the sampled sites: Caleta de chon (CH), Las Gatas (LG), Manzanillo (MZ), and Zacatoso (ZC). Shaded area represents 95% confidence interval.

FIGURE 2 in Fish assemblage structure related to habitat heterogeneity in rocky reefs in the Mexican Pacific coast

FIGURE 2 | Principal component analysis of (A) sea water conditions and (B) heterogeneity components in sampling sites for the California Current (CC) and North Equatorial Current (NEC). Sampled sites: Caleta de chon (CH), Las Gatas (LG), Manzanillo (MZ), and Zacatoso (ZC). Horizontal and vertical scatter bars represent 95% of confidence interval.

FIGURE 1 in Fish assemblage structure related to habitat heterogeneity in rocky reefs in the Mexican Pacific coast

FIGURE 1 | Geographic location of the Ixtapa and Zihuatanejo bays in the Pacific Coast of Mexico and sampling sites.

FIGURE 3 in Water column use by reef fishes of different color patterns

FIGURE 3 | Coloration of reef fish species by their position in the water column (benthic, n = 35; demersal, n = 35; pelagic, n = 30). Homogeneous refers to the presence of a moderately homogenous non-silvering color pattern without large contrasting patches (typical of background matching); patches refer to the presence of contrasting contour breaks patches (typical of disruptive coloration); stripes refer to the presence of highly contrasting regular stripes (e.g., black and white stripes, typical of motion-dazzle strategy), and silvering to fishes with silvery homogenous body coloration.

FIGURE 2 in Water column use by reef fishes of different color patterns

FIGURE 2 | Phylogeny of the 100 species used in this study generated from data in the Open Tree of Life. Branch lengths represent phylogenetic distance and were estimated by the Grafen's method. Color bars denote the water column use (blue shades) and coloration pattern (red shades) we attributed to them.

FIGURE 4 in Water column use by reef fishes of different color patterns

FIGURE 4 | Results of the Bayesian statistical analysis showing the difference in the proportion of coloration types between positions in the water column. Points denote the mode; thick and thin lines denote 67% and 95% credible intervals. Comparisons based on the expected values of the posterior predictive distribution. The analysis indicated that presence of contrasting contour breaks patches is more frequent in benthic than in demersal and pelagic species; and that silvering is more frequent in pelagic species than in demersal and benthic species.

FIGURE 1 in Water column use by reef fishes of different color patterns

FIGURE 1 | Species exemplifying the color patterns used in this study. A. Large contrasting patterns typical of disruptive coloration in Hippocampus reidi (~ 13 cm of total length, TL); B. Silvery bodies in Haemulon aurolineatum Cuvier, 1830 (~ 18 cm TL); C. Contrasting stripes typical of motion-dazzle in Elacatinus figaro Sazima, Moura & Rosa, 1997 (~ 3 cm TL); D. Homogeneous coloration in adult female Parablennius pilicornis (Cuvier, 1829) (~ 6 cm TL). Photographs by Gualter Pedrini.

FIGURE 8 in Rocky reef fish biodiversity and conservation in a Brazilian Hope Spot region

FIGURE 8 | Heniochus acuminatus. A. The SRV frame recorded on MAR 2019 at Redonda Island, inside of the MPA, close to Acanthurus bahianus; B. H. acuminatus photographed in April 2022 (photo by Augusto A. Machado).

FIGURE 4 in Rocky reef fish biodiversity and conservation in a Brazilian Hope Spot region

FIGURE 4 | Elasmobranchs commonly observed on Rio de Janeiro coastal islands rockyreefs: A. Gymnura altavela, B. Myliobatis freminvillei, and C. Zapteryx brevirostris; new records D. Sarda sarda and E. Chromis vanbebberae; and the most common species: F. Diplodus argenteus, G. Cantherhines pullus, and H. Haemulon aurolineatum. Photos: Augusto A. Machado (A–B), Suzana Guimarães (D), Áthila A. Bertoncini (C, E–H).

FIGURE 3 in Rocky reef fish biodiversity and conservation in a Brazilian Hope Spot region

FIGURE 3 | The richest families reported along the coastal islands and surrounding waters of Rio de Janeiro metropolitan region, Brazil.

FIGURE 2 in Rocky reef fish biodiversity and conservation in a Brazilian Hope Spot region

FIGURE 2 | Submersible Rotating Videos "SRV" in operation on Redonda Island. Photo: Áthila A. Bertoncini.

FIGURE 10 in Rocky reef fish biodiversity and conservation in a Brazilian Hope Spot region

FIGURE 10 | Venn diagram representing exclusive and shared species richness recorded in the study areas: large-bold-grey numbers are the total number of species in each area; small numbers represent exclusive species in each area; medium size numbers represent the share between/among areas.