Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

85

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

85 results for “soil biota”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

Sympatric pairings of dryland grass populations, mycorrhizal fungi, and associated soil biota enhance mutualism and ameliorate drought stress

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Sympatric soil biota mitigate a warmer-drier climate for Bouteloua gracilis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Soil biota suppress positive plant diversity effects on productivity at high but not low soil fertility

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Resistance of soil biota and plant growth to disturbance increases with plant diversity

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Synergistic effects of canopy chemistry and autogenic soil biota on a global invader

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2023View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Crops and their wild progenitors recruit beneficial and detrimental soil biota in opposing ways

<p>Aims</p> <p>Conventional agriculture promotes negative feedbacks of soil microbes on crop performance (plant soil feedbacks, PSFs) by stimulating species-specific pathogens. Crop traits, modified by domestication, also influence PSFs. Therefore, we asked if crop cultivars and their wild progenitors promote soil pathogens and mutualists differently, and thus trigger different PSFs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied PSFs in cultivated varieties and wild progenitors of ten crops. In a first season, we grew all genotypes separately in a common soil to obtain genotype-specific soil inocula ('trained soil') for a second season. In season two, we examined the effects of the trained soil on plant interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and with root-feeding nematodes, and on plant performance.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mycorrhizal colonization was lower, and nematode infection rate was higher, in plant roots growing on soils previously trained by domesticated plants. Moreover, domesticated plants showed lower mycorrhizal colonization, and higher nematode infection rates than their wild progenitors, irrespective of previous soil training. The response of plant performance to soil training was species-specific and unrelated to cultivated vs wild status.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Soil legacies differed between cultivated varieties and their wild progenitors, suggesting an impact of domestication on the way rhizosphere organisms are recruited, on the resistance of plants to herbivores, and on their interactions with root mutualists.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Testing the plant growth-defense hypothesis belowground: do faster-growing herbaceous plant species suffer more negative effects from soil biota than slower-growing ones?

According to the growth-defense hypothesis in ecology, faster-growing plant species should suffer more from herbivores and pathogens than slower-growing species. Tests of this hypothesis have focused on aboveground plant tissues, herbivores, and pathogens; however, it should also apply to root defense. To test whether faster-growing species suffer more negatively from soil biota than slower-growing species, we estimated first-season growth rates of 34 herbaceous plant species and used weighted linear regressions to assess the relationship between growth rates and responses to being grown in sterilized versus unsterilized soil (biotic soil effects) and to growing in soil previously occupied by conspecifics versus a mixture of species (conspecific soil effects). We found a negative relationship between relative growth rate and biotic soil effects, with slower-growing species tending to suffer less or even benefit from the presence of soil biota, while faster-growing species were more negatively affected. Biotic soil effects were also negatively related to size-corrected growth rates. These relationships remained negative after accounting for influential species, but a large amount of variation remained unexplained. Moreover, there was no clear relationship between growth rates and conspecific soil effects. A simple relationship between growth and defense aboveground may not be so clearly reflected belowground because of the many interacting antagonistic and mutualistic organisms likely involved.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: McNeill MR, Phillips CB, Robinson AP, Aalders L, Richards N, Young S, Dowsett C, James T, Bell N (2017) Defining the biosecurity risk posed by transported soil: Effects of storage time and environmental exposure on survival of soil biota. NeoBiota 32: 65-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.32.9784

Soil chemistry of the two soil sources :

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: McNeill MR, Phillips CB, Robinson AP, Aalders L, Richards N, Young S, Dowsett C, James T, Bell N (2017) Defining the biosecurity risk posed by transported soil: Effects of storage time and environmental exposure on survival of soil biota. NeoBiota 32: 65-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.32.9784

Plant species common to both soil sources :

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: McNeill MR, Phillips CB, Robinson AP, Aalders L, Richards N, Young S, Dowsett C, James T, Bell N (2017) Defining the biosecurity risk posed by transported soil: Effects of storage time and environmental exposure on survival of soil biota. NeoBiota 32: 65-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.32.9784

Description of the data analysis methods and results :

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Tóth Z, Hornung E, Báldi A (2018) Effects of set-aside management on certain elements of soil biota and early stage organic matter decomposition in a High Nature Value Area, Hungary. Nature Conservation 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.29.24856

Table S3 :

opencc-zeroSep 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 5 from: Tóth Z, Hornung E, Báldi A (2018) Effects of set-aside management on certain elements of soil biota and early stage organic matter decomposition in a High Nature Value Area, Hungary. Nature Conservation 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.29.24856

Map file :

opencc-zeroSep 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Tóth Z, Hornung E, Báldi A (2018) Effects of set-aside management on certain elements of soil biota and early stage organic matter decomposition in a High Nature Value Area, Hungary. Nature Conservation 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.29.24856

Table S2 :

opencc-zeroSep 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 4 from: Tóth Z, Hornung E, Báldi A (2018) Effects of set-aside management on certain elements of soil biota and early stage organic matter decomposition in a High Nature Value Area, Hungary. Nature Conservation 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.29.24856

Table S4 :

opencc-zeroSep 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Tóth Z, Hornung E, Báldi A (2018) Effects of set-aside management on certain elements of soil biota and early stage organic matter decomposition in a High Nature Value Area, Hungary. Nature Conservation 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.29.24856

Table S1 :

opencc-zeroSep 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 7 in Terrestrial Isopods from Spanish Amber (Crustacea: Oniscidea): Insights into the Cretaceous Soil Biota

FIGURE 7. Camera lucida drawings of Autrigoniscus resinicola, new genus and species, family Trichoniscidae (holotype, MCNA 12522, male). A. Lateral habitus, with magnified area showing details of endopod of first pair of pleopods. B. Dorsal habitus, with magnified area showing details of antennule. C. Fifth pereopod in ventral view, with magnified area showing details of modified carpus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm (all panels to the same scale).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 8 in Terrestrial Isopods from Spanish Amber (Crustacea: Oniscidea): Insights into the Cretaceous Soil Biota

FIGURE 8. Detail microphotographs of Autrigoniscus resinicola, new genus and species, family Trichoniscidae (holotype, MCNA 12522, male). A. Head in dorsal view, showing the antennule (arrowhead). B. Semicircular scales and triangular-shaped scale setae in ventral view. C. Carpus of pereopods 5 and 6 in ventral view, showing the distal process (arrowheads). D. Simple dactylus of pereopods 2 and 3 in lateral view. E. Uropods in dorsal view. F. Endopod of first pair of pleopods in lateral view. Figures made with consecutive photographs taken at successive focal planes. Scale bars: A–D, F = 0.05 mm; E = 0.1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Testing the plant growth-defense hypothesis belowground: do faster-growing herbaceous plant species suffer more negative effects from soil biota than slower-growing ones?

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2015View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Effects of plant functional group loss on soil biota and net ecosystem exchange: a plant removal experiment in the Mongolian grassland

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Invasive plants differentially affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere pathways: a meta-analysis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record