Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig 5 in Taxonomic Position Of Anastrangalia Reyi And A. Sequensi (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Based On Molecular And Morphological Data

Fig 5. Male aedeagi (A–D) and parameres (E–H) of A. reyi (A, E), A. sequensi (B, F), A. dubia (C, G) and A. sanguinolenta (D, H).

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic Position Of Anastrangalia Reyi And A. Sequensi (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Based On Molecular And Morphological Data

Fig. 1. Distribution of nucleotide substitutions within haplogroups: A — A. reyi (ArEu) (KJ964792); B — A. sequensi (AsFe) (KY683642); C — A. dubia (AdAl) (KM439943); D — A. dubia (AdPy) (KM285974). The unic nucleotide substitutions are red circled; the common substitutions are blue marked.

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic Position Of Anastrangalia Reyi And A. Sequensi (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Based On Molecular And Morphological Data

Fig. 3. Detailed phylogenetic subtree for the dubia group (hybrids of A. reyi and A. dubia are indicated by arrows).

Fig. 46–53 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 46–53. Geloemyia cockerelli, non-type ♀ from Malay Peninsula (46, 49, 52) (BMNH) and Borneo (47, 48, 50, 51, 53) (BBM): 46, 47 — habitus; 48 — head left; 49, 50 — wing; 51 — mid femur, dorsal view; 52, 53 — labels. Scale bar 2 mm. Arrows indicate femoral organ.

Fig. 67–76 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 67–76. Geloemyia quadriseta: holotype ♀ (67–70, 75), holotype ♂ of G. nigrofasciata (71–73, 76) (USNM) and non-type ♀ (74) (MHNP): 67, 71, 74 — habitus, lateral view; 68 — head, dorsal view; 69 — mid femur, anterior view; 70, 73 — wing; 72 — habitus, dorsal view; 75, 76 — labels.

Fig. 11–22 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 11–22. Geloemyia ♀, three apical right fore tarsomes, dorsal view (11–16) and apex of oviscape, left view (17–22): 11, 17 — G. namibica Korneyev, sp. n.; 12 — G. trifasciata; 13, 18 — G. cockerelli; 14, 19 — G. stylata; 15, 20 — G. cheni, sp. n.; 16, 21 — G. quadriseta; 22 — G. wonjuensis.

Fig. 23–28 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 23–28. Geloemyia cheni, sp. n., paratype ♀ (SIZK): 23 — habitus, lateral view; 24 — mid femur and tibia, anterior view; 25–26 — head (25 — anterior, 26 — lateral view); 27 — wing; 28 — label.

Fig. 100–106 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 100–106. Geloemyia wonjuensis, paratype ♀ (SIZK): 100 — habitus; 101 — head, lateral view; 102 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 103 — wing; 104 — oviscape and eversible membrane; 105 — same, apex, enlarged; 106 — labels. Scale bar 2 mm.

Fig. 77–87 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 77–87. Geloemyia stylata: holotype ♀ (NHMW): 77 — habitus; 78 — head, anterolateral view; 79 — antennae, lateral view; 80 — right wing, ventrally; 81 — left wing, ventrally; 82 — postgena, proepisternum and fore femur, posterior view; 83 — mid femur, anterior view; 84 — hind femur, anterior view; 85 — scutellum; 86 — abdomen, lateral view; 87 — labels.

Fig. 62–66 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 62–66. Geloemyia namibica, sp. n., paratype ♂ (62–64) (MNKB) and ♀ (65–66) (SIZK): 62 — abdomen, ventral view; 63 — epandrium, lateral view; 64 — glans of phallus; 65 — aculeus; 66 — spermatheca (one of the three).

Fig. 54–61 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 54–61. Geloemyia namibica, sp. n., paratype ♀ (SIZK): 54 — habitus; 55–58 — head (55 — lateral, 56 — anterolateral, 57 — dorsal, 58 — anteroventral view); 59 — wing; 60 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 61 — labels.

Fig. 1–10 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 1–10. Geloemyia wings: 1 — G. namibica Korneyev, sp. n.; 2 — G. wonjuensis; 3–4 — G. trifasciata (3 — ♀, 4 — ♂); 5 — G. cockerelli; 6 — G. trifasciata holotype ♀; 7 — G. cheni Kim, Han & Korneyev, sp. n. paratype ♀; 8–9 — G. quadriseta (8 — syntype ♀ G. quadriseta, syntype ♀ G. ornata); 10 — G. nigrofasciata holotype ♀; dm — discomedial cel; cua — anterior cubital cell; dm-cu — discal mediocubital crossvein; cua — anterior cubital cell; arrows indicate spurious vein.

Fig. 88–99 in Review Of The Genus Geloemyia (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Discussion Of Its Taxonomic Position

Fig. 88–99. Geloemyia trifasciata: non-type ♀ (88, 90–96) and ♂ (89, 97–99) (SIZK): 88, 89 — habitus, left; 90, 91 — head (90 — lateral, 91 — anterior view); 92 — right wing, dorsally; 93 — apex of oviscape and eversible membrane, lateral view; 94 — aculeus, ventrally; 95 — same, apex, enlarged; 96 — spermathecae; 97 — epandrium and hypandrium, right view; 98, 99 — phallus glans (98 — ventral, 99 — lateral view).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Cross section shape: circular elliptical unknown Siphuncle position: central marginal unknown Fig. 4 Morphometrics of orthoconic cephalopods from the Besano Formation. Measurements are compared with discrete characters of the shell. Orange circles represent definite and orange crosses likely orthoceratoids, while blue triangles represent definite and blue crosses likely coleoids. Black crosses are indeterminable. A Apical angle, calculated from length and diameters of the specimens. B Maximum diameter in Orthoceratoid and coleoid cephalopods from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland with an updated taxonomic framework for Triassic Orthoceratoidea

Cross section shape: circular elliptical unknown Siphuncle position: central marginal unknown Fig. 4 Morphometrics of orthoconic cephalopods from the Besano Formation. Measurements are compared with discrete characters of the shell. Orange circles represent definite and orange crosses likely orthoceratoids, while blue triangles represent definite and blue crosses likely coleoids. Black crosses are indeterminable. A Apical angle, calculated from length and diameters of the specimens. B Maximum diameter

Fig. 7 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 7. Pachydomid bivalves from the Guadalupian (Permian), Teresina and Serra Alta formations, respectively, Paraná Basin, Brazil. A. Holdhausiella elongata (Holdhaus, 1918), DZP-20441, silicified shell, left valve, note the pointed anterior margin of the shell. B. Anhembia gigantea (Mendes, 1949), DGP/7-91, composite mold, left valve; B1, detail of a well-developed rostrum, B2, general view. Scale bars 5 mm.

Fig. 6 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 6. Drawing of the pachydomid bivalve Leinzia similis (Holdhaus, 1918) (sensu stricto) showing the general morphology. The hinge area and anterior muscles scars are highlighted. Abbreviations: aa, anterior adductor muscle scar; app, anterior pedal protractor muscle scar; apr, anterior pedal retractor muscle scar; sck, socket; th, tooth.

Fig. 8 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 8. Ontogenetic series of the pachydomid bivalve Leinzia sp. (sensu lato) from the Serrinha Member, Rio do Rasto Formation after Runnegar and Newell (1971: fig. 24). Sketches based on external comarginal ornamentation (rugae and growth lines) of individual shells. A, B, based on Runnegar and Newell 1971: fig. 24j, f, respectively. Note the differences in the shell shape of both specimens and those illustrated in Fig. 9; also, note the ubiquitous rostrum in the specimen in Fig. 9B.

Fig. 5 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 5. Pachydomid bivalve Leinzia similis (Holdhaus, 1918) (sensu stricto), Rio do Rasto Formation, Guadalupian (Permian), Paraná Basin, Brazil. A. DGP/7-88, right valve, detail of the cardinal margin showing a strongly deformed rostrum (arrowed). B. DGP/7-85, external mold, left valve; B1, the comarginal rugae on the anterior rostrum (arrow); B2, general view of the shell with well-preserved anterior rostrum. Scale bars A, B1, 1 mm; B2, 5 mm.

Fig. 9 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 9. Ontogenetic series of pachydomid bivalves Leinzia similis (sensu lato) (A) from the Yaguari Formation (after Morton and Herbst 1990) and Leinzia similis (sensu stricto) DGP/7-85 (B) from the Serrinha Member, Rio do Rasto Formation. Sketches based on external comarginal ornamentation (rugae and growth lines) of individual shells. Note the differences in the shell shape of both specimens: double posterior carina (A), the anterior rostrum developed since the early ontogenetic stages (B).

Fig. 3 in Morphology and taxonomic position of the bizarre Permian pachydomid bivalve Leinzia from Western Gondwana

Fig. 3. Pachydomid bivalve Leinzia similis (Holdhaus, 1918) (sensu stricto), composite molds, Rio do Rasto Formation, Guadalupian (Permian), Paraná Basin, Brazil. A. DGP/7-88, left valve (A1) with well-defined, forwardly inclined, triangular socket (arrowed); right valve (A2), note the deformed anterior rostrum margin of the shell (arrowed); splayed open valves (A3). B. DZP-20417, right valve, note the well-developed triangular blunt tooth (arrowed). C. DZP-20416A, right valve showing well-defined escutcheon (arrowed). D. DGP/7-86, a slightly deformed specimen with articulated valves and broken anterior margin, note the straight slightly curved posterior margin of the shells. Scale bars 5 mm.