Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

146

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

146 results for “technology assessment”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

PrEP Impact Trial: A Pragmatic Health Technology Assessment of PrEP and Implementation

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03253757. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Proof of Concept Study Assessing Technology-Assisted Respiratory Adherence Prototype Version 3 in Individuals With COPD

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04795323. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Model for the Integral Assessment of Chronic Disease Management Supported in Information Technology and Communication.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02447562. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

To Explore the Value of New MR Technology in Non-invasive Quantitative Assessment of Systemic Metabolism, Disease Status and Prognosis in Patients With Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07149571. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Transcollation Technology to Reduce Bleeding in Lung Surgery

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02631889. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Wearable Technology and Machine Learning for Early Detection and Risk Assessment of Unacceptable Toxicities in a Paediatric Oncology Cohort

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07030998. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Complete Lesion Assessment With ffR and IVUS TechnologY

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01941030. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
geo24/100

The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed

GEO Series GSE16400. Homo sapiens. 179 samples. Type: Genome variation profiling by genome tiling array; Genome variation profiling by SNP array.

openGEO-OpenDec 2009View details →
geo24/100

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (Illumina_HT12)

GEO Series GSE66614. Homo sapiens. 12 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.

openGEO-OpenSep 2015View details →
geo24/100

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (RNA-seq_RiboZero)

GEO Series GSE66590. Homo sapiens. 5 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.

openGEO-OpenSep 2015View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 2 from: Кotvitskа AА, Nemchenko AS, Nazarkina VN (2020) The relevance of training specialists in the Health Technology Assessment in the world and Ukraine. Pharmacia 67(4): 295-301. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.67.e54777

Figure 2 Distribution of academic and training programs in НТА.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: Performance assessment of two whole-lake acoustic positional telemetry systems - is reality mining of free-ranging aquatic animals technologically possible?

Acoustic positional telemetry systems (APTs) represent a novel approach to study the behaviour of free ranging aquatic animals in the wild at unprecedented detail. System manufactures promise remarkably high temporal and spatial resolution. However, the performance of APTs has rarely been rigorously tested at the level of entire ecosystems. Moreover, the effect of habitat structure on system performance has only been poorly documented. Two APTs were deployed to cover two small lakes and a series of standardized stationary tests were conducted to assess system performance. Furthermore, a number of tow tests were conducted to simulate moving fish. Based on these data, we quantified system performance in terms of data yield, accuracy and precision as a function of structural complexity in relation to vegetation. Mean data yield of the two systems was 40 % (Lake1) and 60 % (Lake2). Average system accuracy (acc) and precision (prec) were Lake1: acc = 3.1 m, prec = 1.1 m; Lake2: acc = 1.0 m, prec = 0.2 m. System performance was negatively affected by structural complexity, i.e., open water habitats yielded far better performance than structurally complex vegetated habitats. Post-processing greatly improved data quality, and sub-meter accuracy and precision were, on average, regularly achieved in Lake2 but remained the exception in the larger and structurally more complex Lake1. Moving transmitters were tracked well by both systems. Whereas overestimation of moved distance is inevitable for stationary transmitters due to accumulation of small tracking errors, moving transmitters can result in both over- and underestimation of distances depending on circumstances. Both deployed APTs were capable of providing high resolution positional data at the scale of entire lakes and are suitable systems to mine the reality of free ranging fish in their natural environment. This opens important opportunities to advance several fields of study such as movement ecology and animal social networks in the wild. It is recommended that thorough performance tests are conducted in any study utilizing APTs. The APTs tested here appear best suited for studies in structurally simple ecosystems or for studying pelagic species. In such situations, the data quality provided by the APTs is exceptionally high.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Real-time Soft Tissue Assessment Using a Technologically Advanced pH Monitoring System

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04725604. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Sensor Technology Assessments of Reproductive Target Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06142097. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Refinement and Assessment of New MRI Technologies for Thoracic/ Cardiovascular Exams

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00727792. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Assessment of New Radiation Oncology Technologies and Treatments

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01379872. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Refinement and Assessment of New Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Technologies for Vascular, Abdominal, and Pelvic Exams

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00738712. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Interactive Digital Technology to Assess and Improve Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03746197. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Comparison of Technology-assisted and Face-to-face Assessment in Patients With Low Back Pain

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06405802. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Assessing the Effects of Tretinoin Cream on Human Skin With Optical Imaging Technologies

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02410980. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record