Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 16 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 16. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Danish (Copenhagen) and Spanish (Madrid) collections: A-C, ZMUC P2395309 (Entry 58); D, MNCN_ICTIO 15286 (Entry 60); E, MNCN_ICTIO 15287 (Entry 61); F, MNCN_ICTIO 15288 (Entry 62).

FIG. 5 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 5. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Argentinian (Buenos Aires) collections: A-C, CFA–IC–9219 (Entry 234); D, E, MACN unregistered (Entry 2).

FIG. 10 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 10. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Belgian (Brussels) collections (continuation): A, IRSCNB Register; B, IRSCNB 64 (Entry 15); C, D, IRSNB 2224 (Entry 16); E, F, IRSNB 2224B (Entry 17); G, H, IRSNB 2224C (Entry 18); I, J, IRSNB 2225 (Entry 19); K, IRSNB 24897 (Entry 20).

FIG. 2 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 2. — Distribution map of natural history collections that include one or more entries of Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788): A, global; B, Europe.

FIG. 7 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 7. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Australian (Sydney) collections: A-F, AMS B.6711 (Entry 6).

FIG. 11 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 11. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Brazilian (Rio Grande) collections: A-D, FURG CC00173 (Entry 30); E, FURG MO 189 (Entry 31); F, FURG MO 190 (Entry 32); G, FURG MO 268 (Entry 33).

FIG. 1 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 1. — Number of entries of Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in natural history collections. Total number of entries equals 234; total number of collections equals 80; category 'OTHERS' represents 41 distinct collections that include a single entry only. Colours according to the legend of the distribution map in Figure 2. For institutional abbreviations see Appendix 1.

FIG. 9 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 9. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Belgian (Bonheiden) collections (continuation): A-C, ERB 1206 (Entry 11); D, E, ERB* 1286 (ex R.397) (Entry 14).

FIG. 8 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 8. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Australian (Melbourne) collections (continuation): A, NMV 51369 (Entry 7); B, C, NMV A15734 (Entry 8).

FIG. 17 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 17. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in French (Ergué-Gabéric and Bayonne) collections: A, GAB-MOO unregistered (Entry 64); B, MHNB 2013.0.162 (Entry 65).

FIG. 6 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 6. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in Austrian (Vienna) collections: A-C, NMW 3065 (Entry 3); D-G, NMW 50137 (Entry 4); H-J, NMW 85158 (Entry 5).

FIG. 15 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 15. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in German (Stuttgart, Berlin and Hamburg) collections: A, SMNS 16252 (Entry 48); B-D, ZMB 4536 (Entry 50); E, ZMB 12541 (Entries 51-52); F, G, ZMB 34908 (Entry 53); H, I, ZMB 34909 (Entry 54); J, ZMB 34910 (Entry 55); K, L, ZMH 26192 (Entry 57).

FIG. 4 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 4. — Numbers of individual Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in natural history collections worldwide, dated and grouped per decade (this survey, n = 157): A, Global waters (the Atlantic Ocean); B, European waters, including the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea; C, American waters, including the north-western and the south-western Atlantic Ocean; D, African waters, including the eastern and the south-eastern Atlantic Ocean.

FIG. 20 in An inventory of Bramble sharks Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) (Elasmobranchii, Echinorhinidae) in natural history collections worldwide for conservation status assessment

FIG. 20. — Echinorhinus brucus (Bonnaterre, 1788) in French (Nantes) collections (continuation): A-E, MHNN.Z.019419 (Entry 73).

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

Worldwide Unified Wildland-Urban Interface (WUWUI) database

This is the Worldwide Unified Wildland-Urban Interface (WUWUI) database developed by the study entitled "Global Expansion of Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) and WUI fires: Insights from a Multiyear Worldwide Unified Database (WUWUI)" published on Environmental Research Letters (DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ad31da). Please use the latest version.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

External Stakeholders Survey Results - The Future of Aquaculture The impact of 4.0 technologies worldwide

Aquaculture 4.0 technologies have landed and are very likely to stay, aiming to play a major role within the implementation of new Circular Bioeconomy approaches. In this context, European aquaculture has been recently applying innovative and disruptive technologies to transform fishery management strategies. The so-called “4th industrial revolution” is projected to allow a 15-20% increase in the sector by the year 2030. In addition to the growth the revolution can provide, the benefits of Industry 4.0 include improved productivity, efficiency and reduced costs. Companies will be able to produce more, in less time, while allocating resources more effectively, due to a smooth adoption of interconnectivity through the Internet of Things (IoT), access to real-time data, and the introduction of cyber-physical systems. According to FAO data, the estimated production volume of fish from European aquaculture in 2028 will increase to approximately 1.4 million tons, needing more circular, digitized solutions to cover end user demand. This data was collected from a survey investigating the Future of Aquaculture The impact of 4.0 technologies worldwide. The results of this survey were used to understand the main challenges faced within the Aquaculture 4.0 market concerning usage experience and level of awareness, in order to identify barriers for implementation and key drivers to encourage adoption of innovative technologies within their businesses. The insights gathered will help us to improve our concept and ultimately the whole value chain of the Aquaculture 4.0 market.

Figures 9–17 in Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (Gelidiellaceae, Rhodophyta) from Veracruz, Mexico, in the context of the worldwide distribution of G. acerosa

Figures 9–17: Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (9) UAMIZ-1438. Detail of main axis and branchlets showing darkened tips. Scale bar = 3 mm. (10) UAMIZ-1433. Fresh specimen showing detail of basal region of main axis with papillose bumps (arrows). Inset, enlargement of a bump. Scale bar = 1.5 mm. (11) UAMIZ-1432. Cross section of basal portion of main axis showing a papilla with depressed apex (arrow). Scale bar = 130 µm. (12) UAMIZ-1436. Cross section of basal portion of main axis showing development of papilla without evident apical cell, with blunt apex. Scale bar = 66 μm. (13) UAMIZ-1437. Cross section of main axis showing outer cortical cells (arrowheads), inner cortical cells (blue arrows) and medullary cells (black arrows). Scale bar = 15 µm. (14) UAMIZ-1433. Detail of fertile branch showing swollen stichidia at apices of branchlets (arrows). Scale bar = 1 mm. (15) UAMIZ-1432. Cross section through middle portion of fertile branchlet showing arrangement of tetrasporangia (arrows). Scale bar = 110 µm. (16) UAMIZ-1433. Cross section of fertile branchlet showing immature tetrasporangia arising from inner cortical cells (arrows) and premature development of tetrasporangia (arrowheads). Scale bar = 30 µm. (17) UAMIZ-1432. Cross section through middle portion of fertile branchlet showing mature tetrasporangia. Scale bar = 30 µm.

Figures 3–8 in Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (Gelidiellaceae, Rhodophyta) from Veracruz, Mexico, in the context of the worldwide distribution of G. acerosa

Figures 3–8: Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (3) Holotype specimen, tetrasporic plant. UAMIZ-1432. Scale bar = 1 cm. (4) UAMIZ-1435. Fresh specimen of tetrasporic plant showing general appearance of the thallus. Scale bar = 5 mm. (5) UAMIZ-1437. Vegetative plant showing branching pattern in erect axes arising from a decumbent stolon. Scale bar = 1 cm. (6) UAMIZ-1437. Cross section through middle part of an erect axis. Scale bar = 130 µm. (7) UAMIZ-1432. Tip of branchlet showing numerous superficial cortical hairs (arrows). Scale bar = 700 µm. (8) UAMIZ-1432. Detail of young branchlet showing apical cell (arrow). Scale bar = 200 µm.

Figure 2 in Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (Gelidiellaceae, Rhodophyta) from Veracruz, Mexico, in the context of the worldwide distribution of G. acerosa

Figure 2: Bayesian inference (BI) topology based on rbcL sequence data. BI values (left) followed by maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap (right) on branches. Asterisks indicate full support (ML = 100 %, BI = 1.0 %), hyphens indicate values below 70 %. Vertical bars on right indicate results of three species delimitation methods: automatic barcoding gap detection (ABGD), the Bayesian variant of Poisson trees processes model (bPTP)and the general-mixed-Yule-coalescent (GMYC). SCI and SCII indicate the two subclades (subclade I and subclade II), G1-G6 indicates the genetic groups within Gelidiella acerosa. Sequences generated in this study are in bold type. S.P.S. = substitutions per site.

Figure 1 in Gelidiella papillosa sp. nov. (Gelidiellaceae, Rhodophyta) from Veracruz, Mexico, in the context of the worldwide distribution of G. acerosa

Figure 1: Bayesian inference (BI) topology based on COI-5P sequence data. BI values (left) followed by maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap (right) on branches. Asterisks indicate full support (ML = 100 %, BI = 1.0 %), hyphens indicate values below 70 %. Vertical bars on right indicate results of three species delimitation methods: automatic barcoding gap detection (ABGD), the Bayesian variant of Poisson trees processes model (bPTP) and the general-mixed-Yule-coalescent (GMYC). SCI and SCII indicate two subclades (subclade I and subclade II), G1-G6 indicates genetic groups within Gelidiella acerosa. Sequences generated in this study are in bold type. S.P.S. = substitutions per site.