Find research datasets worth reusing

Table 6 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 6. Distribution of polymorphic sites in the 28S DNAr region (C1–D2 domain) for four specimens of L. (W.) hawaiiana, one from Hawaii (Vicente et al. 2020) and three from the Mexican Pacific (this study)<table><tbody><tr><th>L. (W.) hawaiiana</th><th></th><th></th><th>Positions of mutations</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Specimens</th><td>Locality</td><td>GenBank accession number</td><td>566</td><td>608</td><td>633</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2441</th><td>Playa la Concha, Baja California Sur</td><td>OP704020</td><td>T</td><td>-</td><td>T</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2447</th><td>Playa la Concha, Baja California Sur</td><td>OP704019</td><td>T</td><td>-</td><td>T</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-3055</th><td>La Entrega, Oaxaca</td><td>OP704021</td><td>T</td><td>-</td><td>T</td></tr><tr><th>UF 3804</th><td>Hawaii</td><td>MT452537</td><td>C</td><td>G</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 1 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 1. List of references and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in molecular analysis. The species names are referred to through the accession number in the tree topologies. Sequences generated in the present study are in bold<table><tbody><tr><th>Reference</th><th>GenBank accession number</th><th></th></tr><tr><th>28S</th><th>COI</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Belinky et al. 2012</th><td></td><td>HE591461</td></tr><tr><th>Erpenbeck et al. 2007</th><td></td><td>EF519638, EF519639, EF519643, EF519640, EF519641</td></tr><tr><th>Hestetun et al. 2016</th><td>LN870644</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Idan et al. 2018</th><td></td><td>KX866766</td></tr><tr><th>Medina et al. 2001</th><td>AY026376</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Morrow et al. 2012</th><td>Hº379226, Hº379228, Hº379229, Hº379230, Hº379231</td><td>JF440339</td></tr><tr><th>Morrow et al. 2019</th><td>KF017189</td><td>KF017195</td></tr><tr><th>Nichols 2005</th><td>AY561883</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Núñez et al. 2017</th><td></td><td>KY565309</td></tr><tr><th>Pérez et al. 2006</th><td>Dº241773</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Regueiras et al. 2019</th><td></td><td>KY492550, KY492536, KY492520</td></tr><tr><th>Riesgo et al. 2013</th><td></td><td>JX999092, JX999090</td></tr><tr><th>Rossi et al. 2019</th><td></td><td>MK803199</td></tr><tr><th>Thacker et al. 2013</th><td>KC869522, KC869546, KC869556, KC869564, KC869447, KC869468, KC869537, KC869541, KC869613, KC869624, KC869629, KC869449, KC869501, KC869603, KC869597, KC869478, KC869489, KC869512, KC869608, KC869561, KC869479, KC869529, KC869506, KC869649, KC869548, KC869515, KC869627, KC869509</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Vargas et al. 2012</th><td></td><td>HE611618, HE611608</td></tr><tr><th>Vargas et al. 2015</th><td></td><td>LN850204, LN850229, LN850210, LN850247, LN850251, LN850248</td></tr><tr><th>Vicente et al. 2020</th><td>MT452537</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Wulff 2006</th><td></td><td>Dº133901, Dº133897</td></tr><tr><th>Present study</th><td>OP740700, OP740709, OP740710, OP704019, OP704020, OP704021</td><td>OP715763</td></tr><tr><th>GenBank direct submission</th><td></td><td>KJ620400, LT160711, AJ843890, LR655634, LR655638</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 2 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 2. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of the genus Celtodoryx, shass length × width; head diameter are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and oxychaetes.Values in parentheses are means<table><tbody><tr><th>Celtodoryx species</th><th>Diactinal megascleres tylotes and strongyles (and derivates)</th><th>Arcuate isochelae</th><th>Oxychaetes</th></tr><tr><th>Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.</th></tr><tr><th>Holotype</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-144</th><td>TYa: 195–(213.8)–225 × 2–(2.65)–3; 2.5–(3.8)–5</td><td>20–(28)–32.5</td><td>51–(65.5)–95</td></tr><tr><td>STb: 213–(243.5)–273 × 2.5–(4.3)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Paratypes</th></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-161</th><td>TY: 197.5–(231.7)–261.5 × 3–(4.2)–5; 4.5–(5.4)–6.3</td><td>25–(28)–30</td><td>55–(71.3)–100</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 215–(264)–287.5 × 5.5–(7.1)–8</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-172</th><td>TY: 180–(206)–237.5 × 2.5–(3)–4.5; 3–(4)–5</td><td>20–(25.8)–30</td><td>30–(62.8)–90</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 187.5–(226)–287.5 × 3.7–(5.5)–8</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-260</th><td>TY: 150–(238.5)–275 × 2.5–(4.8)–5; 3.8–(5)–7.5</td><td>22.5–(24.3)–27.5</td><td>47.5–(64.8)–78</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 235–(248.2)–287.5 × 5–(6.4)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-292</th><td>TY:190–(221.6)–250 × 2.5–(2.9)–5; 3.7–(4.9)–7</td><td>20–(23.6)–25</td><td>40–(67)–80</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 220–(230)–252.5 × 5–(6.4)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-618</th><td>TY:210–(225)245 × 2.5–(3.3)–5; 3–(4.8)–6.3</td><td>22.5–(24.2)–7</td><td>57.5–(69)–77.5</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 212.5–(228.3)–250 × 3–(3–8)–5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-740</th><td>TY: 187.5–(216)–237.5 × 2.5(3.4)–4.5; 1.3–(4)–6.3</td><td>21.3–(25.2)–27.5</td><td>30–(75.5)–90</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 207–(231)–270 × 5(5.5)–7</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-797</th><td>TY: 180–(213)–240 × 2.5–(2.8)–3.8; 3–(3.5)–5</td><td>20–(21.5)–25</td><td>45–(65.5)–77.5</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 232.5–(248.3)–265 × 2–(4.2)–5.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-850</th><td>TY: 180–(237.8)–257.5 × 2–(3.7)–4.5; 3–(4.8)–7.5</td><td>20–(22.5)–25</td><td>62–(71)–75</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 207.5–(251)–297.5 × 2.5–(3.8)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Celtodoryx ciocalyptoides (Burton, 1935) for comparison</th></tr><tr><th>Lectotype ZIN 10844e</th><td>SETYc: 170–(208)–290 × 1.5–(4.5)–6.5; 1.5–(5.7)–7.2</td><td>I: 48–(51)–56</td><td>62–(67)–72</td></tr><tr><td>AnSTd: 190–(273)–305 × 3.2–(8)–10.4</td><td>II: 22–(25)–30</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Paratype (MNHN D JV 93) of Celtodoryx girardae e</th><td>AnST: 165–(268)–320 × 5.8–(8.9)–12</td><td>I: 40–(48)–54</td><td>65–(74)–87</td></tr><tr><td>SETY:: 125–(195)–220 × 1.6–(4.2)–5.6, 2.4–(4.3)–6.4</td><td>II: 19–(23)–27</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>aTY,Smooth tylotes, bST, Smooth strongyles, cSETY,spined ends tylotes, dAnST,spined ends anisostrongyles, eSpicule measures from Henkel and Janussen 2011.

Table 4 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 4. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of L. (L.) albemarlensis and L. (L.) isodictyalis. Shass length × width; head diameter are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and sigmas. Values in parentheses are means<table><tbody><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis material examined</th><th>Styles</th><th>Tylotes</th><th>Arcuate isochelae</th><th>Sigmas</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>AHF-1736-49</th><td>150–(161.5)–175 × 2.5–(3.4)–5</td><td>165–(175.1)–185 × 2.5–(2.5)–5; 4.5–(5.5)–7</td><td>17.5–(24.8)–30</td><td>15–(26.3)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>AHF-608-36</th><td>160–(169.2)–180 × 2.5–(3.5)–5</td><td>180–(193.3)–205 × 2.5–(3.1)–5</td><td>17.5–(21.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(18.5)–25</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-27</th><td>150–(169.5)–185 × 2.5–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>125–(178.6)–200 × 2.5–(3)–5; 3.8–(5)–6.3</td><td>11.3–(20.5)–32</td><td>15–(28.2)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-183</th><td>142.5–(159.5)–180 × 2.5–(4.2)–6.3</td><td>155–(170.3)–205 × 2.5–(4)–6.3; 5–(5.9)–7.5</td><td>20–(27)–30</td><td>20–(26.6)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-190</th><td>150–(166)–187.5 × 2.5–(4.9)–8.8</td><td>153.8–(172.5)–185 × 2.5–(3.6)–5; 3.8–(6)–8.8</td><td>12.5–(18.3)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(25.9)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-191</th><td>142.5–(172.2)–185 × 1.3–(5.2)–8.8</td><td>162–(178.8)–195 × 2.5–(3.5)–5; 5–(5.9)–7</td><td>12.5–(17.2)–27.5</td><td>15–(26)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-193</th><td>135–(157.5)–185 × 1.3–(4.3)–6.3</td><td>150–(174)–190 × 2.5–(3.9)–5; 5–(5.7)–6.3</td><td>22.5–(25.5)–30</td><td>20–(26.3)–35</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-232</th><td>170–(183.4)–195 × 2.5–(5.9)–10</td><td>127.5–(172.8)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>10–(19.4)–30</td><td>15–(25.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-720</th><td>165–(177.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.7)–5</td><td>170–(181.6)–200 × 2.5–(3.3)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.3)–27.5</td><td>15–(27.0)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1018</th><td>145–(160.2)–175 × 2.5–(2.5)–2.5</td><td>180–(195.8)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>22.5–(25.9)–30</td><td>15–(23.4)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1104</th><td>150–(157.9)–175 × 2.5–(3.8)–5</td><td>175–(187.9)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>17.5–(23.3)–27.5</td><td>20–(26.1)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1369</th><td>150–(162.8)–180 × 2.5–(2.8)–5</td><td>170–(186.5)–200 × 2.5–(2.6)–5</td><td>20–(25.7)–30</td><td>20–(23.3)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1443</th><td>145–(161.6)–175 × 2.5–(3.0)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>20–(23.4)–30</td><td>20–(25.1)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1553</th><td>150–(160.4)–180 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>170–(180.9)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>15–(24.1)–30</td><td>17.5–(23.5)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1579</th><td>155–(170.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>180–(186.5)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(19.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1581</th><td>150–(169.2)–185 × 2.5–(3.2)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–200 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.9)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(28.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2374</th><td>125–(150.3)–175 × 2–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(171.3)–190 × 3–(5)–6; 5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–32</td><td>15–(26)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2377</th><td>167.5–(185)–198 × 2.5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(190)–200 × 2.5–(4.2)–5; 5–(5.5)–6.3</td><td>12.5–(22.2)–31.3</td><td>17.5–(33.6)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2379</th><td>142.5–(158)–165 × 1.3–(6.2)–7.5</td><td>120–(167)–182.5 × 2.5–(4.3)–5; 3.8–(4.8)–5.5</td><td>17.5–(25.3)–32.5</td><td>20–(26.5)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>For comparison (non-examined material)</th></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis from Desqueyroux-Faúndez and Van Soest 1997</th><td>123–(157)–190 × 4–8</td><td>107–(139)–170 × 5</td><td>16–26</td><td>16–26</td></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) isodictyalis (Carter, 1882); from Rützler et al. 2007</th><td>148.6–(164.6)–175.2 × 3.8–(4.8)–5.7</td><td>177.9–(198.3)–207.9 × 3.1–(3.9)–4.2</td><td>19.6–(26.3)–41.4</td><td>18.3(21)–22.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

opencc-zeroDec 2012View details →

dryad32/100

Data from: Molecular phylogenetics, species diversity, and biogeography of the Andean lizards Proctoporus (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae)

The family Gymnophthalmidae comprises ca. 220 described species of Neotropical lizards distributed from southern Mexico to Argentina. It includes 36 genera, among them Proctoporus, which contains six currently recognized species occurring across the yungas forests and wet montane grasslands of the Amazonian versant of the Andes from central Peru to central Bolivia. Here, we investigate the phylogenetic relationships and species limits of Proctoporus and closely related taxa by analyzing 2121 base pairs of mitochondrial (12S, 16S, and ND4) and nuclear (c-mos) genes. Our taxon sampling of 92 terminals includes all currently recognized species of Proctoporus and 15 additional species representing the most closely related groups to the genus. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses recovered a congruent, fully resolved, and strongly supported hypothesis of relationships that challenges previous phylogenetic hypotheses and classifications, and biogeographic scenarios. Our main results are: (i) discovery of a strongly supported clade that includes all species of Proctoporus and within which are nested the monotypic Opipeuter xestus (a genus that we consider a junior synonym of Proctoporus), and two species of Euspondylus, that are therefore transferred to Proctoporus; (ii) the paraphyly of Proctoporus bolivianus with respect to P. subsolanus, which is proposed as a junior synonym of P. bolivianus; (iii) the detection of seven divergent and reciprocally monophyletic lineages (five of them previously assigned to P. bolivianus) that are considered confirmed candidate species, which implies that more candidate species are awaiting formal description and naming than currently recognized species in the genus; (iv) rejection of the hypothesis that Proctoporus diversified following a south to north pattern parallel to the elevation of the Andes; (v) species diversity in Proctoporus is the result of in situ diversification through vicariance in the grasslands of the high Andes, with at least five dispersals contributing to montane forest species.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular phylogenetics of Chaetodon and the Chaetodontidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) with reference to morphology

FIGURE 4. The Bayesian inference solution shown in Fig. 3, but with Smith et al.'s (2003) character matrix mapped onto the combined molecular phylogeny. Synapomorphies are listed before the node; unreversed synapomorphies are depicted as black squares and nonunique synapomorphies are depicted as open squares. Autapomorphies in terminal taxa are also shown optimized on the cladogram. Character numbers (above each square) represent the character numbers listed in Appendix C of Smith et al. (2003) with character states below the square. C. (M.) trifascialis and C. (M.) oligacanthus are equivalent to Chaetodon subgenera Megaprotodon and Parachaetodon respectively (see text).

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetics of Chaetodon and the Chaetodontidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) with reference to morphology

FIGURE 1. Phylogenies of the Chaetodontidae determined using morphological characters. a. Blum (1988) produced the first analysis based largely on osteology and included representatives of all nominal genera and subgenera established prior to 1988; b. FerryGraham et al. (2001a) presented a new analysis based on a modification of Blum's matrix; c. Smith et al. (2003) revised the original matrix of Blum (1988) in the light of FerryGraham et al. (2001a) and provided 41 osteological and softtissue characters – numbered nodes are those used in Table 3. Open circles indicate taxa sampled in the present study.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of Chaetodon and the Chaetodontidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) with reference to morphology

FIGURE 2. Molecular phylogenies of the Chaetodontidae, rooted against representative pomacanthids based on a. partial small subunit ribosomal RNA genes, and b. partial mitochondrial cytochrome b. Both trees are solutions provided by Bayesian inference with posterior probabilities indicated at the nodes. Asterisks indicate the likely transposition of the original sequences submitted to GenBank; see text for further details.

FIGURE 3. A in Molecular phylogenetics of Chaetodon and the Chaetodontidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) with reference to morphology

FIGURE 3. A combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Chaetodontidae from a Bayesian inference of rrnS and cytb, each partition modelled independently. Names of Chaetodon subgenera are indicated in the shaded boxes and nodal support values are posterior probabilities. Members of subgenera sampled that are known to hybridize with one another are indicated by stars; other known hybrid pairs are mentioned in the text.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →

dryad32/100

Data from: Phylogenetic systematics of Cochlospermaceae (Malvales) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Cochlospermaceae (Malvales) is a small family of two genera, Amoreuxia and Cochlospermum. Cochlospermum has a pantropical distribution with species present in Mexico, Central and South America, the West Indies, Africa, India, Southeast Asia, and northern Australia, whereas Amoreuxia has a more restricted distribution in the Americas. Amoreuxia is comprised of four herbaceous species, and Cochlospermum has seven tree species and five that are suffrutescent subshrubs. The two genera also differ in floral symmetry, corolla coloration patterns, and stamen morphology. The goals of this study were to reconstruct the phylogeny of Cochlospermaceae to evaluate the monophyly of the family and its two genera, to resolve interspecific relationships, and to interpret patterns of morphological evolution. In addition, a minor goal was to examine its relationship to sister families, such as Bixaceae, a family in which Cochlospermaceae has been variously placed. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using DNA sequences of the following markers: nuclear ribosomal ITS and the chloroplast trnG and trnL-F regions. The data support the monophyly of Cochlospermaceae and its distinctiveness from its sister families. While Amoreuxia is supported as monophyletic, Cochlospermum is paraphyletic with two species (C. orinocense and C. tetraporum) consistently placed outside a clade of all remaining Cochlospermum species. Ancestral character state reconstructions of morphology indicate that the tree habit may be ancestral in Cochlospermaceae with a single shift to an herbaceous growth form in Amoreuxia with the suffrutescent growth form having arisen twice within Cochlospermum, once in South America and once in Africa. There has been a single shift in floral morphology from radial symmetry, solid yellow petals, and uniform stamens to bilateral symmetry, two-toned petals, and dimorphic stamens in Amoreuxia. Anthers with one apical pore found in core Cochlospermum species may be a reduction from anthers with two pores, such as those found in Amoreuxia and in C. orinocense and C. tetraporum. Seed shape supports the sister relationships within Cochlospermaceae, particularly within Amoreuxia.

opennotspecifiedJun 2021View details →

FIGURE 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree inferred from 621 in Description of two new species of Rhamphus related to R. oxyacanthae (Curculionidae, Curculioninae, Rhamphini) from Italy based on a morphological study supported by molecular data

FIGURE 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree inferred from 621 bp of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sampled from the Rhamphus specimens originated from Italy. Bayesian a posteriori probabilities are shown above/below branches (values below 0.7 are omitted). Abbreviation: oxy = R. oxyacanthae; bav = R.bavierai n. sp.; ham = R. hampsicora n. sp.; mon = R. monzinii.

opennotspecifiedApr 2006View details →

FIGURE 1 in Placement of Cacoceria and phylogenetic relationships of the xylotine genera of the tribe Milesiini (Diptera, Syrphidae: Eristalinae) based on molecular characters

FIGURE 1. Strict consensus of three equally parsimonious trees resulting from POY analysis, ga cost 2, change cost 1. Length 2982 steps, C10, 10, RI 0.73. Bremer suppost values indicated above branches.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2006View details →

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic relationships between 23 in Morphological and molecular characterization of a new isolate of Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev, 1934) from Vancouver, Canada, with morphometrical comparison with the topotype population from Russia

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic relationships between 23 species and strains of Steinernema with bootstrap analysis of ITS regions. The eight strains of S. feltiae from a monophyletic group. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap proportion.

opennotspecifiedDec 2013View details →

FIGURE 1 in A new species of Metrodorea (Rutaceae) from Brazil: morphology, molecular phylogenetics, and distribution

FIGURE 1. Geographic distribution of M. concinna and of sympatric species of Metrodorea (the distribution of the entire genus is shown on the largest insert on the upper left corner.) Province names are according to Morrone (2006) with the modifications introduced by Dias et al. (submitted). White areas within Caatinga and Cerrado provinces are "campos rupestres".

opennotspecifiedJul 2013View details →

FIGURE 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree for 60 in Taxonomic reexamination of Portulaca okinawensis (Portulacaceae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago of Japan based on molecular and morphological data

FIGURE 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree for 60 OTUs of Portulaca with three outgroups based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence. The topology of the maximum parsimony (MP) strict consensus tree was highly compatible with the Bayesian tree. Bayesian posterior probabilities (left) and bootstrap percentages in the MP analysis (right) are shown [see the Table 1 for the localities collection of the four ITS types (A–D) of P. okinawensis].

opennotspecifiedJul 2021View details →

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Paguristes tortugae Schmitt, 1933 complex and selected other Paguroidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura)

FIGURE 1 (cont'd). Maximum Likelihood phylogeny (-lnL: 26590.631) inferred in RAxML under the GTR + Gamma model of nucleotide substitution. Bootstrap proportions resulting from 1000 bootstrap replicates are displayed at tree nodes, with values under 50 omitted. Branch lengths are measured as substitutions per site. A) denotes Diogenidae Clade 1, with subdivisions 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d. An asterisk (*) denotes the Paguristes tortugae complex. B) denotes Paguridae Clade 1. C) denotes Lithodidae. D) denotes Paguridae Clade 2. E) denotes Diogenidae Clade 2. F) denotes Coenobitidae. G) denotes Diogenidae Clade 3. H) denotes the family Parapaguridae. For branch labels, taxon name is followed by voucher catalog number and abbreviated collection locality (Table 1). Abbreviations: nwAtlantic = northwestern Atlantic; neCarib = northeastern Caribbean; nwCarib = northwestern Caribbean; seCarib = southeastern Caribbean; swCarib = southwestern Caribbean; neGMx = northeastern Gulf of Mexico; nwGMx = northwestern Gulf of Mexico; seGMx = southeastern Gulf of Mexico; swGMx = southwestern Gulf of Mexico; nePac = northeastern Pacific; wPac = western Pacific; nwPac = northwestern Pacific; sePac = southeastern Pacific; swPac = southwestern Pacific.

opennotspecifiedJul 2021View details →

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Paguristes tortugae Schmitt, 1933 complex and selected other Paguroidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura)

FIGURE 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogeny (-lnL: 26590.631) inferred in RAxML under the GTR + Gamma model of nucleotide substitution. Bootstrap proportions resulting from 1000 bootstrap replicates are displayed at tree nodes, with values under 50 omitted. Branch lengths are measured as substitutions per site. A) denotes Diogenidae Clade 1, with subdivisions 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d. An asterisk (*) denotes the Paguristes tortugae complex. B) denotes Paguridae Clade 1. C) denotes Lithodidae. D) denotes Paguridae Clade 2. E) denotes Diogenidae Clade 2. F) denotes Coenobitidae. G) denotes Diogenidae Clade 3. H) denotes the family Parapaguridae. For branch labels, taxon name is followed by voucher catalog number and abbreviated collection locality (Table 1). Abbreviations: nwAtlantic = northwestern Atlantic; neCarib = northeastern Caribbean; nwCarib = northwestern Caribbean; seCarib = southeastern Caribbean; swCarib = southwestern Caribbean; neGMx = northeastern Gulf of Mexico; nwGMx = northwestern Gulf of Mexico; seGMx = southeastern Gulf of Mexico; swGMx = southwestern Gulf of Mexico; nePac = northeastern Pacific; wPac = western Pacific; nwPac = northwestern Pacific; sePac = southeastern Pacific; swPac = southwestern Pacific.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2014View details →

FIGURE 5. Hygrochilus tsii. A. Flowering plant. B. Flower, front view. C. Flower, side view. D in Revision of Hygrochilus (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae: Aeridinae) and a molecular phylogenetic analysis

FIGURE 5. Hygrochilus tsii. A. Flowering plant. B. Flower, front view. C. Flower, side view. D. Pollinia, front and back views. E. Fruit. Photographs by Wen-Hui Rao.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2014View details →

FIGURE 4 in Revision of Hygrochilus (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae: Aeridinae) and a molecular phylogenetic analysis

FIGURE 4. Bayesian inference result for combined matrix. Numbers at nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap percentages (PP, BBML, BBMP) ''-'' indicates that the node receives weak support in the ML and MP analysis.