Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,092
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,092 results for “resurrection”
Figure 9 from: Haynes JE, Phillips WD, Krings A, Lynch NP, Ranney TG (2020) Revision of Fothergilla (Hamamelidaceae), including resurrection of F. parvifolia and a new species, F. milleri. PhytoKeys 144: 57-80. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.49589
Figure 9 Distribution of Fothergilla in the southeastern United States. Circle = F. major (6x); triangle = F. gardenii (4x); star = F. milleri (2x); plus sign = F. parvifolia (2x). Physiographic provinces follow Fenneman and Johnson (1946), shape files courtesy of usgs.gov. AP = Appalachian Plateau; BR = Blue Ridge; CP = Coastal Plain; ILP = Interior Low Plateau; OP = Ozark Plateau; Pd = Piedmont; VR = Valley and Ridge. Map generated by A. Krings in QGIS (QGIS Development Team 2019).
Figure 6 from: Haynes JE, Phillips WD, Krings A, Lynch NP, Ranney TG (2020) Revision of Fothergilla (Hamamelidaceae), including resurrection of F. parvifolia and a new species, F. milleri. PhytoKeys 144: 57-80. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.144.49589
Figure 6 Fothergilla majora plant form and leaf orientation b adaxial leaf surface c abaxial leaf surface d inflorescence e young infructescence f stem g twig h capsule, and i seeds. Photos by J. Haynes of plants at the Mountain Horticultural Crops Research and Extension Center, Mills River.
Fig. 2 in Genetic and morphological evidence for cryptic species in Macrobrachium australe and resurrection of M. ustulatum (Crustacea, Palaemonidae)
Fig. 2. Single-gene molecular phylogenies for Macrobrachium Spence Bate, 1868 based on the mitochondrial 16S and the nuclear 28S genes with Palaemon debilis Dana, 1852 as outgroup. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (B) analyses, produced with BEAST and RAxML, respectively. Support values from Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses are posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstraps (B), respectively. GenBank accession numbers and working ID numbers are given at nodes. Species names are given on the right-hand side. The name of the sequences produced in the present study are colored in red for M. australe (Guérin-Méneville, 1838 in Guérin-Méneville 1829–1838) and in green for M. ustulatum (Nobili, 1899). For these, sampling locality are given at nodes. See Table 1 and Appendix for details.
Ancestral genetic variation in phenotypic plasticity underlies rapid evolutionary changes in resurrected populations of waterfleas
<p>The role that phenotypic plasticity plays in adaptive evolution has been debated for decades. This is because the strength of natural selection is dependent upon the direction and magnitude of phenotypic responses to environmental signals. Therefore, the connection between plasticity and adaptation will depend on the patterns of plasticity harbored by ancestral populations prior to a change in the environment. Yet, few studies have directly assessed ancestral variation in plasticity and tracked phenotypic changes over time. Here we resurrected historic propagules of <i>Daphnia</i> spanning multiple species and lakes in Wisconsin following the invasion and proliferation of a novel predator (spiny waterflea, <i>Bythotrephes</i> <i>longimanus</i>)<i>. </i>This approach revealed extensive genetic variation in predator-induced plasticity in ancestral populations of <i>Daphnia</i>. It is unlikely that the standing patterns of plasticity shielded <i>Daphnia</i> from selection to permit long-term coexistence with a novel predator. Instead, this variation in plasticity provided the raw materials for <i>Bythotrephes</i>-mediated selection to drive rapid shifts in <i>Daphnia</i> behavior and life history. Surprisingly, there was little evidence for the evolution of trait plasticity as genetic variation in plasticity was maintained in the face of a novel predator. Such results provide new insights into the link between plasticity and adaptation and highlight the importance of quantifying genetic variation in plasticity when evaluating the drivers of evolutionary change in the wild. </p>
Data from: A resurrection experiment finds evidence of both reduced genetic diversity and potential adaptive evolution in the agricultural weed Ipomoea purpurea
Despite the negative economic and ecological impact of weeds, relatively little is known about the evolutionary mechanisms that influence their persistence in agricultural fields. Here, we use a resurrection approach to examine the potential for genotypic and phenotypic evolution in Ipomoea purpurea, an agricultural weed that is resistant to glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in current-day agriculture. We found striking reductions in allelic diversity between cohorts sampled nine years apart (2003 vs. 2012), suggesting that populations of this species sampled from agricultural fields have experienced genetic bottleneck events that have led to lower neutral genetic diversity. Heterozygosity excess tests indicate that these bottlenecks may have occurred prior to 2003. A greenhouse assay of individuals sampled from the field as seed found that populations of this species, on average, exhibited modest increases in herbicide resistance over time. However, populations differed significantly between sampling years for resistance: some populations maintained high resistance between the sampling years whereas others exhibited increased or decreased resistance. Our results show that populations of this noxious weed, capable of adapting to strong selection imparted by herbicide application, may lose genetic variation as a result of this or other environmental factors. We probably uncovered only modest increases in resistance on average between sampling cohorts due to a strong and previously identified fitness cost of resistance in this species, along with the potential that nonresistant migrants germinate from the seed bank.
FIGURE 3 in On the taxonomy of the genus Hymenicoides Kemp, 1917 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae), with resurrection of Limnopilos Chuang & Ng, 1991, and descriptions of two new species
FIGURE 3. Live colour of Hymenicoides robertsi new species. Photograph was taken by Tyson Roberts.
FIGURE 1 in Resurrection of Crypturgus subcribrosus Eggers 1933 stat. n., and its close phylogenetic relationship to Nearctic Crypturgus (Coleoptera, Scolytinae)
FIGURE 1. Dorsal view Crypturgus cinereus (A) and C. subcribrosus (B).
FIGURE 4 in A revision of the Central American species related to Anolis pentaprion with the resurrection of A. beckeri and the description of a new species (Squamata: Polychrotidae)
FIGURE 4. Holotype of Anolis charlesmyersi (SMF 89688) in life. SVL = 65.0 mm. Photo by S. Lotzkat.
FIGURE 5 in A revision of the Central American species related to Anolis pentaprion with the resurrection of A. beckeri and the description of a new species (Squamata: Polychrotidae)
FIGURE 5. Head of holotype of Anolis charlesmyersi (SMF 89688). Scale bars equal 1.0 mm.
FIGURE 1 in Monogenoids (Diplectanidae, Polyonchoinea) from the gills of mojarras (Perciformes, Gerreidae) with the resurrection of Neodiplectanum Mizelle & Blatz, 1941 and the proposal of Darwinoplectanum n. gen.
FIGURE 1. Measurement protocol for some haptoral structures.
FIGURE 14 in A redescription of Carcharhinus dussumieri and C. sealei, with resurrection of C. coatesi and C. tjutjot as valid species (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae)
FIGURE 14. Lateral view of Carcharhinus sp. (CSIRO H 6891–01, 731 mm TL), fresh.
FIGURE 3. Rhynchoplax magnetica n in Resurrection of Rhynchoplax Stimpson, 1858, with the description of two new species from Japan and Australia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae)
FIGURE 3. Rhynchoplax magnetica n. sp. Paratype female, cl 1.97 mm, QM W.4067. a, dorsal carapace; b, rostrum and eyestalk, ventral view; c, rostrum, antennnules, antennae and epistome, ventral view; d, posterior thoracic sternum, pleomere 1; e, pleon (half scale); f, pereopod 2; g, pereopod 5. Scale bar = 1 mm.
FIGURE 2. Rhynchoplax magnetica n in Resurrection of Rhynchoplax Stimpson, 1858, with the description of two new species from Japan and Australia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae)
FIGURE 2. Rhynchoplax magnetica n. sp. Holotype male, cl 1.67 mm, QM W.4068. a, dorsal carapace; b, rostrum and eyestalk, ventral view; c, lateral anterior carapace and rostrum; d, rostrum, antennules, antennae, epistome, and buccal area, ventral; e, left thoracic sternum (showing penial process); f, pleon; g, left maxilliped 3; h, right cheliped, upper view; i, right cheliped, propodus and dactylus; j–m, pereopods 2–4; n, gonopod 1, lateral view (twice scale). Scale bar = 1 mm.
FIGURES 23–24 in Larval morphology of Plagiosterna adamsii (Baly) and P. aenea (Linnaeus) with resurrection of Gastrolinoides Chûjô & Kimoto and P. formosana (Bates) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae)
FIGURES 23–24. Tibia and tarsungulus, last instar larva. 23. Plagiosterna adamsii; 24. P. aenea.
FIGURE 3 in Resurrection of Scolopendra longipes Wood and Scolopendra cubensis Saussure from synonymy with Scolopendra alternans Leach (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha, Scolopendridae): an enigmatic species-group needing phylogeographic analysis, with an overview on the origin
FIGURE 3. Sensillia trichodea from ultimate tergite of S. longipes, Florida (Scale Bar = 50 µm).
Figure 8 from: Liu Y, Dai J-H, Zhuang Q-Y, Zou C-Y, Ma K-N (2024) Resurrection of Perilimnastes (Sonerileae, Melastomataceae) with description of a new species P. nana. PhytoKeys 238: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.238.116168
Figure 8 Distribution of Perilimnastes nana (solid circle), P. setotheca (triangle) and P. stenophylla (square).
Figure 7 from: Liu Y, Dai J-H, Zhuang Q-Y, Zou C-Y, Ma K-N (2024) Resurrection of Perilimnastes (Sonerileae, Melastomataceae) with description of a new species P. nana. PhytoKeys 238: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.238.116168
Figure 7 Perilimnastes nanaA habitat B habit C close-up of a branchlet D adaxial leaf surfaces E abaxial leaf surfaces F a flowering branch showing an inflorescence with a single flower and two large bracts G lateral view of a flower H longitudinal section of a flower showing stamen morphology I lateral view of an old capsule with one persistent bract removed J longitudinal section of an old capsule showing enlarged ovary crown and morphology of the placental column and placentas. Scale bars: 5 mm (G–I); 3 mm (J). All from Chun-yu Zou 3608 (IBK, PE).
Figure 6 from: Liu Y, Dai J-H, Zhuang Q-Y, Zou C-Y, Ma K-N (2024) Resurrection of Perilimnastes (Sonerileae, Melastomataceae) with description of a new species P. nana. PhytoKeys 238: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.238.116168
Figure 6 Holotype of Perilimnastes nana, Chun-yu Zou 3608 (IBK). The insets show details of leaf surface under stereoscope, branchlet and flower. Scale bars: 10 cm, 1 mm (upper right inset); 3 mm (lower insets).
Figure 4 from: Liu Y, Dai J-H, Zhuang Q-Y, Zou C-Y, Ma K-N (2024) Resurrection of Perilimnastes (Sonerileae, Melastomataceae) with description of a new species P. nana. PhytoKeys 238: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.238.116168
Figure 4 Inflorescence (A, B), longitudinal section of flower (C, D), anther morphology (E), infructescence (F), and longitudinal sections of young and old capsules (G, H) of PerilimnastesAP. setothecaBP. ternataCP. sessilifoliaDP. setothecaEP. elliptica, P. ternata, P. ovalifolia, P. setipetiola, P. multisepala, P. nana, P. sessilifolia and P. stenophylla (from left to right and top to bottom) FP. ellipticaGP. ovalifoliaHP. ovalifolia. Scale bars: 5 mm (C–E); 3 mm (G, H).
Supplementary material 1 from: Liu Y, Dai J-H, Zhuang Q-Y, Zou C-Y, Ma K-N (2024) Resurrection of Perilimnastes (Sonerileae, Melastomataceae) with description of a new species P. nana. PhytoKeys 238: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.238.116168
Source of materials studied
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.