Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 4. — Veredatrypa rosai n. gen., n in New Brazilian Tafaliscina increase the diversity of this Neotropical cricket clade (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae: Paroecanthini)

FIG. 4. — Veredatrypa rosai n. gen., n. sp. male genitalia: A, dorsal; B, ventral; C, lateral; D, posterior. Abbreviations: EctAp, ectophallic apodeme; EctF, ectophallic fold; EndSc, endophallic sclerite; LLophi, lateral lophi of pseudepiphallus; m, membrane; MLophi, median lophi of pseudepiphallus; PsP, pseudepiphallic paramere; R, rami. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 3. — Veredatrypa rosai n. gen., n in New Brazilian Tafaliscina increase the diversity of this Neotropical cricket clade (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae: Paroecanthini)

FIG. 3. — Veredatrypa rosai n. gen., n. sp. male genitalia: A, dorsal; B, ventral; C, lateral. Female copulatory papilla: D, dorsal; E, ventral; F, lateral. Scale bars: A-C, 1 mm; D-F, 0.5 mm.

Figure 2 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 2 Maximum parsimony phylogram of Gnomoniosis based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and tub2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.

Figure 4 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 4 Cryphognomonia pini on Pinus armandii (BJFC-S1725) A–C habit of ascomata on twigs D, E transverse section of ascomata F longitudinal section through ascomata G asci H, I ascospores. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 500 μm (B–F); 10 μm (G–I).

Figure 1 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 1 Maximum parsimony phylogram of Gnomoniaceae based on a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.

Figure 3 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 3 Maximum parsimony phylogram of Plagiostoma based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and tub2 genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 30 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue.

Figure 5 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 5 Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis on Castanopsis fissa (BJFC-S1688) A symptoms on leaves of host plant B the colony on PDAC conidiomata on PDAD, E conidiophores attached with condia F conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (C); 20 μm (D–F).

Figure 6 from: Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian C-M (2020) Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed. MycoKeys 69: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.54012

Figure 6 Plagiostoma populinum on Populus tomentosa (BJFC-S1724) A–C habit of conidiomata on twigs D transverse section through conidiomata E longitudinal section through conidiomata F, G conidiogenous cells attached with conidia H, I condia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 1 mm (B, C); 500 μm (D, E); 10 μm (F–I).

Fig. 3 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Fig. 3. Geographical distribution of four species of menoponid chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken (Gallus spp.). Each circle is divided into four sectors, representing the four louse species: upper left = Menacanthus cornutus (Schömmer, 1913); upper right = Menacanthus stramineus (Nitzsch, 1818); lower left = Menacanthus pallidulus (Neumann, 1912); lower right = Menopon gallinae (Linnaeus, 1758). Black sectors indicate that this louse species is known from this country, whereas hollow sectors indicate that we have found no published records of this species in this country. The presence of the four species of chewing lice in a country is based on the reports summarized in Table 1. Note that the menoponid species Amyrsidea powelli (Bedford, 1920) appears to be established on chicken in Nigeria (Fabiyi 1986, 1996), and that Menacanthus longiscleritus Naz & Rizvi, 2016, has been described from chicken in Pakistan. These are not shown on the map.

Figs 7–8 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Figs 7–8. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). 7. Male subgenital plate and terminal end of abdomen, ventral view. 8. Female subgenital plate and terminal end of abdomen, ventral view. Abbreviations: vms = vulval marginal setae; vss = vulval submarginal setae.

Fig. 1 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of three species of ischnoceran chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken (Gallus spp). Each circle is divided into three sectors, representing the three louse species: upper left = Goniodes gigas (Taschenberg, 1879); upper right = Goniodes dissimilis Denny, 1842; lower = Goniocotes gallinae (De Geer, 1778). Black sectors indicate that this louse species is known from this country, whereas hollow sectors indicate that we have found no published records of this species in this country. Presence of the three species of chewing lice in a country is based on the reports summarized in Table 1.

Figs 5–6 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Figs 5–6. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). 5. Habitus, ♂, dorsal and ventral view. 6. Habitus, ♀, dorsal and ventral views. Legs II and III distorted in all examined males, here illustrated approximately, and rotated compared to how they are in the slide specimen.

Fig. 4 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Fig. 4. Geographical distribution of the known records of Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934), based on the reports cited in Table 1. Black circles indicate countries where G. dentata has been reported at in at least one survey, including the present report. Hollow circles indicate countries for which surveys of domestic chicken have been published, but G. dentata has not been found. In addition to the areas indicated on the map, Emerson (1956) reported G. dentata from "various islands in the Central Pacific Area", but gave no detail.

Fig. 14 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken

Fig. 14. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). Male legs I–III, dorsal and ventral views. Legs II and III distorted in all examined males, and here illustrated approximately; note that marginal and near-marginal setae (marked with small black circles) are illustrated on both dorsal and ventral side, as their exact placement is difficult to establish due to the distortion of the legs. Some setae on tibiae II–III appear hyaline in examined specimens, and have here been illustrated as hollow.

Figure 1 from: Xu X-L, Yang C-L, Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Liu Y-G, Xiao Q-G (2020) Morpho-molecular diversity of Linocarpaceae (Chaetosphaeriales): Claviformispora gen. nov. from decaying branches of Phyllostachys heteroclada. MycoKeys 70: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.54231

Figure 1 Phylogram of RAxML analysis based on a combined ITS, LSU, SSU and TEF-1α sequence dataset within order Chaetosphaeriales. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, left) greater than 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, right) equal to or greater than 0.95 are indicated at the nodes. The tree is rooted to Gelasinospora tetrasperma (CBS 178.33) and Sordaria fimicola (CBS 508.50). All sequences from ex-type strains are in bold. The newly-generated sequence is in red.

Figure 2 from: Xu X-L, Yang C-L, Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Liu Y-G, Xiao Q-G (2020) Morpho-molecular diversity of Linocarpaceae (Chaetosphaeriales): Claviformispora gen. nov. from decaying branches of Phyllostachys heteroclada. MycoKeys 70: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.54231

Figure 2 Claviformispora phyllostachydis (SICAU 16-0007, holotype) a, bStromata on host substrate c section through ascoma with ascomata d ostiole with periphyses e peridium f paraphyses g–j asci k–o ascospores p germinated ascospore q, r colony on PDA after 7 days. Scale bars: 2 mm (a), 500 μm (b), 100 μm (c), 20 μm (d, e), 10 μm (f–p).

Supplementary material 1 from: Xu X-L, Yang C-L, Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Liu Y-G, Xiao Q-G (2020) Morpho-molecular diversity of Linocarpaceae (Chaetosphaeriales): Claviformispora gen. nov. from decaying branches of Phyllostachys heteroclada. MycoKeys 70: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.54231

Figure S1

Supplementary material 2 from: Xu X-L, Yang C-L, Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Liu Y-G, Xiao Q-G (2020) Morpho-molecular diversity of Linocarpaceae (Chaetosphaeriales): Claviformispora gen. nov. from decaying branches of Phyllostachys heteroclada. MycoKeys 70: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.54231

Figure S2

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Figure 6 from: Tennakoon DS, Thambugala KM, Wanasinghe DN, Gentekaki E, Promputtha I, Kuo C-H, Hyde KD (2020) Additions to Phaeosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales): Elongaticollum gen. nov., Ophiosphaerella taiwanensis sp. nov., Phaeosphaeriopsis beaucarneae sp. nov. and a new host record of Neosetophoma poaceicola from Musaceae. MycoKeys 70: 59-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.70.53674

Figure 6 Neosetophoma poaceicola (MFLU 18–2597, new host record) a appearance of ascomata on host b close up of ascomata c vertical section through ascoma d peridium e pseudoparaphyses f–h asci i–k ascospores l germinated ascospore in PDAm colony from above n colony from below. Scale bars: 50 µm (c), 20 µm (d), 30 µm (e–h), 15 µm (i–l).