Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 7. Habitat of Liolaemus anqapuka sp. nov. in (A) dry season and (B) wet season. Photos by A. Quiroz (A), C.S. Abdala (B).

Fig. 2 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 2. Details of the holotype of Liolaemus anqapuka sp. nov. (MUSA 5573; SVL = 73.5 mm, Tail = 63.9 mm): (A) dorsal and (B) ventral views of body; (C) ventral, (D) dorsal, and (E) lateral views of head; (F) ventral view of precloacal pores. Scale = 10 mm.

Fig. 4 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 4. Male specimens of the Liolaemus anqapuka sp. nov. Photos by A. Quiroz (A–D) and C.S. Abdala (E).

Fig. 6 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 6. Geographic distribution of Liolaemus montanus group species from Peru. Symbols with a black dot in the middle represent the type locality of each species. Species with quotation marks in the names belong to the candidate species listed in Aguilar et al. (2016).

Fig. 1 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 1. Biogeographic regionalization proposed by Morrone (2014), showing the limits of the Desert province and Atacama province. The geoform La Caldera batholith, adapted from Ramos (2008), is also shown.

Fig. 3 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 3. Adult male of the holotype, Liolaemus anqapuka sp. nov. (MUSA 5573; SVL = 73.5 mm, Tail = 63.9 mm), from the Department of Arequipa, 2,460 m asl. Photos by C.S. Abdala.

Fig. 11 in Some color in the desert: description of a new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Peru, and its conservation status

Fig. 11. Phylogenetic trees showing the relationships between Liolaemus anqapuka sp. nov. and species within the L. montanus group by (A) Total Evidence analysis, (B) molecular phylogenetic analysis, and (C) morphological phylogenetic analysis. The values correspond to the support measure with symmetric resampling.

Fig. 1 in Problems with imperfect locality data: distribution and conservation status of an enigmatic pitviper

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of the Guatemalan Palm-pitviper, Bothriechis bicolor, based on a review of the literature and museum collections. Circles indicate previously published records, diamonds indicate new records, and question marks approximate the locations of selected problematic records discussed in the text. The easternmost question mark represents the type locality for B. bicolor. The inset illustrates specimen MZFC-HE 33491 (juvenile, snout-vent length 322 mm) in life.

Fig. 6 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 6. Nymphargus balionotus breeding behavior. (A) Calling male; (B) Male and female in amplexus; (C) Egg mass deposited on the bottom surface on a leaf. Photos by Ross J. Maynard (A) and Jaime Culebras (B–C).

Fig 5 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig 5. Iris variation in Nymphargus balionotus. Photos by Jaime Culebras (A–C) and Scott Trageser (D).

Fig. 4 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Metamorphic life stage of Nymphargus balionotus; dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views (ZSFQ 3895). Photos by Ross J. Maynard.

Fig. 3 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Pattern and color variation in adult Nymphargus balionotus. (A) Male, uncollected; (B) Male, ZSFQ 0531; (C) Male, uncollected; (D) Male, uncollected; (E–F) Male, ZSFQ 0532; (G–H) Gravid female, uncollected. Photos by Ross J. Maynard.

Fig. 2 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 2. Audio spectrogram (top), oscillogram (middle), and power spectrum (bottom) graphs of a single male Nymphargus balionotus advertisement call.

Fig. 1 in Discovery of a reproducing population of the Mindo Glassfrog, Nymphargus balionotus (Duellman, 1981), at the Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, with a literature review and comments on its natural history, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Distribution map of known localities for Nymphargus balionotus. Information tags to the left summarize data reported for each locality, including (in order): name of collection site, department/province, number of specimens reported, elevation, and year specimens were collected or observed. Blue circle represents the Río Manduriacu Reserve; red circle marks the type locality; yellow and gray circles represent remaining localities reported in the literature, with the gray (Campamento Chancos) population believed to be a distinct lineage by Cisneros-Heredia and McDiarmid (2006). Note: the "El Tambo" locality in the department of Cauca, Colombia, has been placed as accurately as possible based on available information (see Discussion).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Cultural association and its role in garnering support for conservation: the case of the Mountain Chicken Frog on Dominica

Fig. 1. The Commonwealth of Dominica, and its position in the Caribbean, showing the distribution of Leptodactylus fallax and the study locations (After Adams et al. 2014; IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group 2017).

Fig. 6. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 6. A UPGMA generated dendrogram illustrating the similarity relationships of species richness among the herpetofauna in the four physiographic regions of Hidalgo (based on the data in Table 6). Similarity values were calculated values using Duellman's (1990) Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR).

Fig. 11. Pet trade. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 11. Pet trade. A boa constrictor (Boa imperator) captured by locals for maintenance in captivity as a pet in El Borbollon in the municipality of Huehuetla. Photo by Christian BerriozabalIslas.

Fig. 5 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 5. Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Sierra de Pachuca. Xerophilic scrub in Cerro de San Cristobal in the municipality of Pachuca. Photo by Paola Lazcano-Juárez.

Fig. 3 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Sierra Madre Oriental. Panoramic view in the vicinity of Diego Mateo inside the Parque Nacional El Chico in the municipality of Mineral del Chico. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.

Fig. 8 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 8. Deforestation for ranching purposes. Cattle pasture in the municipality of Tepehuacan de Guerrero. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas.