Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,059
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,059 results for “Journale”
Key words related to public engagement with science by Society of Freshwater Science journals and conference sessions (1997-2019)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 6 from: Bruyns, P.V.; Klak, C.; Hanáček, P. (2017) A revised, phylogenetically-based concept of Ceropegia (Apocynaceae). South African Journal of Botany:112 399-436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.06.021
Most likely tree from Maximum Likelihood analysis of total data (gaps excluded) of the stapeliads. Numbers above or below branches indicate bootstrap percentages/posterior probabilities (the latter from Bayesian analysis of the same data: bootstrap percentage >50% shown; posterior probability >0.50 shown). The sections of Ceropegia into which the stapeliads are divided are shown on the right hand side.
Fig. 5 from: Bruyns, P.V.; Klak, C.; Hanáček, P. (2017) A revised, phylogenetically-based concept of Ceropegia (Apocynaceae). South African Journal of Botany:112 399-436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.06.021
Consensus tree from Bayesian analysis of total data (gaps excluded) of Brachystelma-Ceropegia. Numbers above or below branches indicate posterior probabilities/bootstrap percentages (the latter from an analysis of the same data using Maximum Likelihood: posterior probability >0.50 shown, bootstrap percentage >50% shown). The sections recognised in Ceropegia are indicated on the right.
"MiRoR13-P1- A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals"
<p>This dataset is related to the publication "A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals". All additional data can be found under 'Additional files' in the publication</p>
List of journal articles on vaccination and autism
<p>List of open access journal articles, dois, Altmetric.com IDs and public dates on the topic of vaccination and autism. Article titles and dois were collected from January 2016 to June 2017 using purposive and snowball sampling. Altmetric IDs were collected in April 2018 using the Altmetric Explorer. The data were used to study the use of open access journal articles by the anti-vaccination movement in the social media. </p>
Journal subscription expenditure in the UK 2010-2019
<p>This dataset contains payments made by UK higher education institutions for access to academic journals from ten publishers from 2010-2019. The data was obtained by sending Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to institutions through the website What Do They Know. The requests, and all original source data, can be found at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/stuart_lawson/requests.</p> <p>The total expenditure with these ten publishers from 2010-2019 was over £982 million. This includes some gaps in the data, so the true figure is almost certainly greater than £1 billion.</p> <p>The data was originally produced in three stages:</p> <p>- Data for 2010-14 was published at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832</p> <p>- Data for 2015-16 was published at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4542433</p> <p>- Data for 2017-19 was published at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3828461</p> <p>These three datasets contain direct links to the original FOI requests. The present dataset is a combination of these three datasets and contains no additional data.</p>
Data for journal article: "Automated precipitation monitoring with the Thies disdrometer: Biases and ways for improvement"
<p>This dataset contains data used for the journal article" Automated precipitation monitoring with the Thies disdrometer: Biases and ways for improvement" submitted to Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.</p>
Superposition for Lambda-Free Higher-Order Logic — Supplementary Material for the Journal Article
<p>We provide the following supplementary material for our <a href="http://matryoshka-project.github.io/pubs/lfhosup_article.pdf">article</a>.</p> <p><strong>Zipperposition</strong></p> <p>Compilation instructions for Zipperposition, in particular instructions for compilation for <a href="https://www.starexec.org/">StarExec</a>, can also be found in the <a href="https://github.com/sneeuwballen/zipperposition#starexec">Zipperposition readme</a>. We used OCaml 4.07.0, branch <code>lmcs2020</code>, commit <a href="https://github.com/sneeuwballen/zipperposition/tree/2031e216c1941acd76187882a073e8f1e53383f2">2031e216c1941acd76187882a073e8f1e53383f2</a></p> <p><strong>Problems</strong></p> <p>We used the following first-order (TFF) and the higher-order (THF) <a href="http://www.cs.miami.edu/~tptp/">TPTP (v7.3.0) problems</a> for the evaluation: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/list_TFF.txt">TFF problem list</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/list_THF.txt"> THF problem list</a>. These lists were obtained by excluding all problems that contain arithmetic, the symbols <code>(@@+)</code>, <code>(@@-)</code>, <code>(@+)</code>, <code>(@-)</code>, <code>(&)</code>, or tuples, as well as the <code>SYN000</code> problems, which are only intended to test the parser, and problems whose clausal normal form takes longer than 15s to compute or falls outside the lambda-free fragment. The following archive contains instructions on how the benchmarks were selected: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/benchmark_selection.zip">Benchmark selection</a></p> <p>Note that Zipperposition is not aware that our calculi are complete for this fragment and it will always report "GaveUp" instead of "CounterSatisfiable" if the calculus saturates.</p> <p>The selection of TPTP problems and the problems generated by Isabelle/Sledgehammer can be downloaded here: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/benchmarks.zip">Benchmarks</a></p> <p><strong>Run scripts</strong></p> <p>We used the following run scripts on StarExec. This archive also contains the Zipperposition binary, compiled for StarExec: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/run_scripts.zip">StarExec run scripts</a></p> <p>The scripts use the following command-line options for Zipperposition</p> <ul> <li>First-order mode:<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=fo-complete-basic</code></li> <li>Applicative encoding mode (intensional):<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=fo-complete-basic --app-encode=intensional</code></li> <li>Applicative encoding mode (extensional):<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=fo-complete-basic --app-encode=extensional</code></li> <li>Nonpurifying intensional calculus:<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=lambda-free-intensional</code></li> <li>Nonpurifying extensional calculus:<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=lambda-free-extensional</code></li> <li>Purifying intensional calculus:<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=lambda-free-purify-intensional</code></li> <li>Purifying extensional calculus:<br> <code>./zipperposition.exe --mode=lambda-free-purify-extensional</code></li> </ul> <p>As additional command line arguments, we provided the problem's filename, the order (<code>--ord=lambdafree_rpo</code> or <code>--ord lambdafree_kbo</code> or <code>--ord epo</code>), and the following parameters for heuristics that were obtained by optimizing the first-order mode in preliminary experiments:</p> <pre>--kbo-weight-fun=modarity \ -q "7|prefer-sos|pnrefined(2,1,1,1,2,2,2)" \ -q "4|prefer-short-trail|pnrefined(1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5)" \ -q "1|prefer-processed|fifo" \ -q "7|prefer-ground|conjecture-relative-var(1,l,f)" \ -q "6|prefer-goals|conjecture-relative-var(1,s,f)" \ --select=e-selection7 </pre> <p>On Starexec, we chose a wallclock timeout of 360 s, a CPU timeout of 180 s, and a memory limit of 128 GB. StarExec's machine specifications are:</p> <pre>Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz (2393 MHZ) 10240 KB Cache 263932744 kB main memory OS: CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) kernel: 3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64 </pre> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>Download the raw output of the evaluation and the .csv files created by StarExec here:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/results_tff.zip">Raw evaluation output TFF</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/results_sh256.zip">Raw evaluation output SH256</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/results_sh16.zip">Raw evaluation output SH16</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/results_thf.zip">Raw evaluation output THF</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/results_csv.zip">Evaluation results as CSV file + script to compile the statistics</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Examples</strong></p> <p>We tested the examples given in our paper in Zipperposition. Here are the problem files we used. Some are in TPTP format (.p) and some are in Zipperposition format (.zf).</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/example_varcond.zf">Example 3.3</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/example_posext.zf">Example 3.4</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/example_supatvars_rpo.zf">Example 3.5</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/example_negext.zf">Example 3.6</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3992618/files/example_add_equiv_defs.p">Example 3.7</a></li> </ul>
Raw data of Call et al. (2020), Journal of Cereal Science 93: 102974
<p>Raw data for the publication "Effects of species and breeding on wheat protein composition" by Call et al. (2020), published in Journal of Cereal Science 93: 102974. ( <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2020.102974">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2020.102974</a> )</p>
Data and R code for The Finer Points of Urban Adaptation: Intraspecific Variation in Lizard Claw Morphology (2020; Biological Journal of the Linnean Society)
<p>This zip file contains all data (tps files, Rdata, csv) and annotated R script to conduct all analyses presented in Falvey et al. (2020, BJLS), which examines claw morphology in 5 species of anole lizards using geometric morphometrics.</p>
Gender inequalities on editorial boards of indexed pediatrics journals
<p>These raw data belong to the study “Gender inequalities on editorial boards of indexed pediatrics journals”. </p> <p>The presence of women in decision-making positions, such as on editorial committees of biomedical journals, is not the same as that of men. This paper analyzes the gender composition of editorial committees (EBMs) and editor-in-chief (ECs) positions of pediatric journals. The gender of EBMs and ECs of 125 journals classified in the pediatrics area of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) were analyzed. The following indicators were calculated: gender distribution of ECs and EBMs by journal, publisher, subject speciality, country, quartile of the journal in JCR and country of affiliation of the members. The total number of EBMs was 4,242. The distribution by sex of the ECs was 19.44% women and 80.56% men, while the EBMs were 33.05% women and 66.95% men. Twenty journals exhibited a greater representation of women than men, and in four there was parity. Journals with greater participation of women specialized in nursing, physical therapy and were related to nutrition (lactation and breastfeeding). Only one-fifth of ECs and one-third of EBMs are female. Women's participation is higher in journals related to nursing, physical and occupational therapy, and nutrition. The United States has the highest number of EBMs, followed by the European Union. </p> <p>This file contains the following variables: Rank, Full Journal Title,Editorial Board Members (EBM), First Name, Gender, Country, Country Code, Geographical Area, Editor-in-Chief (EC), Country Editor-in-Chief, Gender Editor-in-Chief, Url Journals.</p>
Dataset for the submission entitled: Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries
<p>Dataset for the manuscript submission entitled: Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries.</p>
Dados coletados das revistas de revisão aberta do Directory of Open Access Journals
<p>Dados coletados para pesquisa que visa analisar os periódicos científicos adeptos da revisão por pares aberta e que estão indexados no Directory of Open Access Journals. Os dados apontam as características descritivas e características de revisão dos periódicos.</p>
The influence of the global COVID-19 pandemic on manuscript submissions and editor and reviewer performance at six ecology journals
Government policies attempting to slow the spread of COVID-19 have reduced access to research laboratories and shifted many scholars to working from home. These disruptions will likely influence submissions to scholarly journals, and affect the time available for editors and reviewers to participate in peer review. In this editorial we examine how journal submissions, and editorial and peer review processes, have been influenced by the pandemic at six journals published by the British Ecological Society (BES). We find no evidence of a change in the geographic pattern of submissions from across the globe. We also find no evidence that submission of manuscripts by women has been more affected by pandemic disruptions than have submissions by men – the proportion of papers authored by women during the COVID period of 2020 has not changed relative to the same period in 2019. Editors handled papers just as quickly, and reviewers have agreed to review just as often, during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic. The one notable change in peer review during the pandemic is that reviewers replied more quickly to emails inviting them to review (albeit only 4% sooner), and those that agreed to review returned their reviews more quickly (17% sooner), during the pandemic. We thus find no evidence at these six ecology journals that submissions and peer review processes have been negatively impacted by the pandemic. Also, contrary to analyses in other disciplines, we do not find evidence that there have been disproportionate impacts of the pandemic on female authors and reviewers.
Data archive for the peer-reviewed journal article "Detailed characterization of the CAPS single scattering albedo monitor (CAPS PMssa) as a field-deployable instrument for measuring aerosol light absorption with the extinction-minus-scattering method"
<p>Data archive accompanying the peer-reviewed journal article "Detailed characterization of the CAPS single scattering albedo monitor (CAPS PMssa) as a field-deployable instrument for measuring aerosol light absorption with the extinction-minus-scattering method". In 2020 this article was accepted for publication in the journal <em>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</em>. Data are uploaded in the form of ascii text files, Igor Pro experiment files (.pxp), and Jupyter notebook files. In addition, a Jupyter notebook file is included containing an implementation of the error model used in the paper.</p>
Mechanical Engineering: An International Journal ( MEIJ)
<pre>Mechanical Engineering: An International Journal is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that addresses the impacts and challenges of Mechanical Engineering. The journal documents practical and theoretical results which make a fundamental contribution for the development of Mechanical Engineering.</pre>
Supporting dataset – A systematic review of automated journalism scholarship: guidelines and suggestions for future research
<p>This dataset supports the following article, conditionally accepted for publication in Open Research Europe:</p> <p>"A systematic review of automated journalism scholarship: guidelines and suggestions for future research."</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Mechanical Engineering: An International Journal (MEIJ)
<p>CALL FOR PAPERS...!!!!</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Mechanical Engineering: An International Journal (MEIJ)</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><a href="http://airccse.com/meij/index.html"><strong>http://airccse.com/meij/index.html</strong></a></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>ISSN: 2349 – 2651</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Submission Deadline:</strong> <strong>January 30</strong> <strong>, 2021</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>CONTACT US : </strong><a href="mailto:meijjournal@yahoo.com"><strong>meijjournal@yahoo.com</strong></a><strong> or </strong><a href="mailto:meij@airccse.com"><strong>meij@airccse.com</strong></a></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Submission Link</strong> : <a href="https://airccse.com/submission/home.html"><strong>https://airccse.com/submission/home.html</strong></a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Journal recommendations for 4 abstracts
<p>Journal recommendations prepared on results from JANE and whichjournal.com based on 4 abstracts from the disciplines dentistry, psychology and aerosol chemistry.</p> <p>The factsheets with data for each journal should help to decide for the best journal.</p> <p>The data is provided as spreadsheet (xls) and factsheet (pdf).</p>
Journal Selection Factors and Opinions about Open Access of Austrian Researchers in the Humanities and Social Sciences
<p>Data from the Study of Open Access Publishing Data (SOAP, http://bit.ly/ejuvKO) has been selected to explain why the uptake of Open Access publishing in the humanities and social sciences in Austria is reluctant compared to other fields. Two questions from the survey seemed to be especially relevant in this context: factors to choose a journal for publishing and general opinions about Open Access.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.