Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

2,744

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

2,744 results for “restoration.”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 13 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 13. Chemical structure of various chemicals such as clearing agents, macerating agents, plasticizer, and organic solvents used for microscope slide preparation, part 1. Me, methyl; Phe, phenyl.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 11 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 11. Chemical structure of the more volatile ingredients of Venetian turpentine from Larix decidua. Ac, acetyl.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 7 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 7. Chemical structure of the ingredients of sandarac resin from Tetraclinis articulata in Euparal. Me, methyl.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 9 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 9. Chemical structure of the potential ingredients of styrax or storax resin from Liquidambar orientalis. Me, methyl.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 3. Small-sized (A-E) or otherwise unusual slides (F-K). Notice bottom (A, arrowheads) or top glass bars (C, F, H), thick cardboard labels (D, G, I, K), label extending beyond glass slide (F, arrowheads mark end of slide), yellowed mounting medium in periphery of coverslips (G), and slide with top glass slide instead of coverslip (J). Coverslip mounted on pieces of glass as spacer (H, arrowheads). K. Trematode mounted between two glass bars (black arrowheads) under coverslip (white arrowheads mark coverslip margins); broken glass slide repaired with the help of a 2nd lower glass slide, cracks of upper slide indicated by black arrows. Specimens mounted in glycerol (now dry) 1868 by von Nathusius (A), in unknown media1888 by Stuhlmann (B), in the 19th century by Krabbe (C), before 1917 by Weltner (D), before 1918 by an unknown person (F), before 1914 by von Linstow (G), before 1918 by Gaffron (H), between 1904 and 1927 by Zelinka (I), between 1906 and 1937 by Wilhelmi (J), and before 1897 by Thoss (K). A-K: macro lens. Scalebars: A-K, 2 cm.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 12 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 12. Chemical structure of various synthetic polymers. Bu, butyl; Cl, chlorine; CMC, carboxy methyl cellulose; CN, cellulose nitrate; Et, ethyl; EtOH, hydroxyethyl; HPMC, hydroxypropyl cellulose; MC, methyl cellulose; Me, methyl; OAc, hydroxyacetyl; PBMA, poly(butyl methacrylate); PDMS, poly(dimethyl siloxane); PEMA, poly(ethyl methacrylate); Phe, phenyl; PHEMA, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); PMMA, poly(methyl methacrylate); PMMA-PBMA, copolymer of PMMA and PBMA; PS, polystyrene; PVAc, poly(vinyl acetate); PVC, poly(vinyl chloride); PVC-co-PVOAc, copolymer of PVC and PVAc; PVOH, poly(vinyl alcohol); PVP, poly(vinyl pyrrolidone).

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 5. A in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 5. A. Glycerol-paraffin mount with spacers (arrowheads), probably some kind of modelling clay; made between 2000 and 2007 by Rückert. B, C. Glycerol mounts with metal spacers (B, arrowheads) and cavities because of evaporation of glycerol (C, arrowheads), sealed with a white varnish; early 1920s by Micoletzky. D, E. Pieces of epidermis and cuticle of nematomorphs; early 1930s by Heinze. Notice lack of coverslip (D) and coverslip fastened to slide with adhesive tape (E, arrowheads) and a small amount of a mounting medium. F. Unfinished histological sections still in paraffin, unstained, and without coverslip; early 1920s by Arndt. G. Specimen information inked on glass slide and covered with mounting medium and coverslips; before 1932 by Eckmann. H. Specimen information written with a "permanent" marker on glass side, partly wiped off during cleaning of slide with lab tissue; after 1974 by Kanev. I, J. Slides with self-adhesive labels; glued on back side of slide, and coverslips adhered with mounting medium to aluminum frame (I); mounted in Malinol between 1995 and 2004 by Schmelz (I) and in an unknown medium in 1996 by Erséus (J). K, L. Surface of dry borosilicate coverslip (K) and of wet sodalime glass slide (L) of same slide at same spot (note white crystal in mounting medium marked by asterisk). A-J: macro lens; K, L: DIC. Scalebars: A-J, 2 cm; K, L, 500 µm.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4. A-I in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 4. A-I. Double-coverslip slides with frames of different materials: aluminum (A, Cobb slides), plastic (B, C: Higgins-Shirayama slide with rectangular opening in B and circular opening in C; D, E: aged plastic, coverslip held in place by label paper and detached in D, see arrowheads), thin (F) or thick (G, H) cardboard, and wood (I, coverslip held in place by paper strips). Notice that certain types of plastic and cardboard slides bend upwards centrally (C, E, H) or get easily distorted (D). J. Stains faded and unknown mounting medium yellowed in the periphery of the coverslip. K. Slide with cardboard labels and spacer consisting possibly of coloured paper tissue. Mounted as glycerol-paraffin mounts between 1999 and 2010 by Neuhaus (A), in Hoyer's medium between 2000 and 2001 by Song and Chang (B) and between 1998 and 2004 by Higgins (C), in Canada balsam after 1925 by Schultze or Heider (D, probably E), in gum dammar dissolved in xylene after 1925 by Heider (F-H), and between 1874 and 1890 by Marenzeller (K). A-K: macro lens. Scalebars: A-K, 2 cm.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 1. Storage of slide collections at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (A–E) and National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. (F–I). A–D. Wooden cabinets with drawers and cardboard trays for horizontal storage. Note replacement label for slide on loan (D) and slide mounts of Aphidina between two coverslips previously stored with insect on needle (E, arrows mark holes from needle in cardboard envelopes). F–I. Metal cabinets composed of several units by Technicon (F–H) and Fisherbrand™ (I). G. Metal tray with holes (arrows) for easy access to standard slides from below. Arrowheads mark bentup slide holders. H. Frontal view of opened single unit. I. Dense vertical storage of slides of similar size. Photographs F–I courtesy of Cheryl Bright. D–F: macro lens.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2. A, D in Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations

FIGURE 2. A, D. Cestode (A) and nematodes (D) on oversized blue and white-opaque glass plates, respectively; before 1901 by Borchmann (A) and 19th century by an unknown person (D). Specimen in A without coverslip. B, C, E, G. Histological sections of flatworms (B, E, G) and oligochaete (C) on oversized glass plates; before 1927 by Schulze (B), before 1897 by Michaelsen (C), before 1914 by Böhmig (E), and in the 1980s in DPX in the lab of Sluys (G). Label in C glued and covered with mounting medium. Self-adhesive label in G with glue having migrated through the label indicated by dark spots on the surface of the label. F. Hirudinea on large glass plate with top glass bars; before 1917 by Weltner. Notice yellowed mounting medium in periphery of coverslips in B–F. H. Cestodes on painted pieces of glass; middle of the 19th century by Küchenmeister. A–H: macro lens. Scalebars: A–H, 5 cm.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Gupta period terracotta Yamunā panel from Ahichhatrā prior to restoration.

<p>This terracotta&nbsp;Yamunā sculpture was discovered on the west face of ACI&nbsp;during excavation of the monument in the early 1940s. The sculpture is in high-relief and measures&nbsp;178 x 69 x 42 cm. The sculpture has since been restored&nbsp;and is on display at the&nbsp;National Museum in&nbsp;New Delhi.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Data Archival for Economic Cost Modeling of Chinook Habitat Restoration in the Stillaguamish River Basin

<p>We used geospatial data to model economic cost estimates of habitat restoration in the Stillaguamish River Basin in the Puget Sound. We utilized data pertaining to the streams/rivers, floodplain habitat, subbasins, elevation, distance to roads, demographics, and land use within the Stillaguamish River Basin to do so. Analysis included using the different attributes of the Stillaguamish River Basin to create low and high cost estimates for floodplain, engineered log jam, and riparian planting habitat restoration. We specifically looked at the slope and size of streams, area of habitat that needed to be restored, slopes of the riparian area, distance to nearest road, and canopy angles as our model inputs. We followed cost estimate guidance provided by the Puget Sound Shared Strategy to identify our cost ranges and updated them to todays prices using the producer price index. An additional land use analysis was performed to quantify the total area and cost of potential agricultural land in the basin. Lastly, we investigated the demographics of the region to identify areas of POC and low income in relation to proposed restoration actions.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

The global biophysical potential for mangrove restoration dataset

<p>This dataset is the restoration potential area estimates, restoration potential index scores and ecosystem service values (carbon and fisheries) to accompany the paper "The global biophysical potential for mangrove restoration" -&nbsp; Worthington et al. (In Review).&nbsp;</p> <h2>Description of files</h2> <p><strong>R Scripts &amp; Data</strong></p> <ul> <li>This folder contain several R scripts and datafiles used to calculate the values in Worthington et al. (In Review)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Mangrove_Typology_v3_Composite</strong></p> <ul> <li>This folder contains a shapefile that is the spatial framework of the research. Full details of the mangrove typology can be found at <a href="../records/8340259">A global biophysical typology of mangroves version 3</a>. <ul> <li>The data in 'Data Exports' can be joined to the mangrove spatial typology shapefile using the 'ID' column.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Data Exports</strong></p> <ul> <li>This folder contains several data exports that summarise the data behind Worthington et al., (In Review)&nbsp; <ul> <li>Unit_Area_Data.csv: This spreadsheet has area statistic data for each of the 3983 mangrove typological units.</li> <li>Restoration_Index_Data.csv: This spreadsheet has the restoration potential index data for each of the 3983 mangrove typological units.</li> <li>Fisheries_Benefits_Data.csv: 3) Fisheries_Benefits_Data.csv: This spreadsheet has the potential additional individuals of 37 mangrove-affiliated marine fish and invertebrate species of commercial importance whose populations are estimated to increase with mangrove restoration.</li> <li>AGB_Carbon_Benefits_Data.csv: This spreadsheet has the potential secured and restored aboveground biomass (AGB) carbon stock (MgC) over a 40-year time horizon from restoration of mangroves.</li> <li>SOC_Carbon_Benefits_Data.csv: his spreadsheet has the potential secured and restored soil carbon stock (MgC, top 1 m) over a 40-year time horizon from restoration of mangroves</li> <li>Country_Statistics.csv: This spreadsheet summarises the restoration, fisheries and carbon benefits at the national level.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Seed functional traits as predictors of seedling establishment success in Brazilian tropical forest restoration

<p>Several ecological filters in deforested and degraded areas reduce seedling emergence and establishment and hinder ecological restoration by direct seeding. Understanding whether functional traits are related to a species' capacity to overcome these filters and predict their field performance might improve the success of direct seeding techniques for ecological restoration. We assessed eight seed functional traits of tropical tree species, seeking those that best explained their establishment success in direct seeding restoration projects. We analyzed a dataset from 52 studies that tested direct seeding techniques with tree species in Brazil. From each study, we collected the mean establishment percentage for all tree species. Seed mass, cotyledon function, and germination speed were the only functional traits that significantly affected the species establishment percentage in direct seeding restoration projects. Species with larger seeds, storage cotyledons, and faster germination had higher establishment percentages. Choosing species with these functional traits for seed mixes will provide higher establishment percentages and, consequently, improve restoration success by direct seeding techniques.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Data for: When do contemporary wildfires restore forest structures in the Sierra Nevada?

<p>This dataset contains GeoTIFF raster layers derived from the analyses described in Chamberlain et al. (2024) ("When do contemporary wildfires restore overstore structures in Sierra Nevada forests"). Each layer represents classified predictions of the probability (using a 0.5 threshold) of restorative fire effects for the year 2020 under a mild (burning index = 53) and moderate (burning index = 71) fire weather scenario. The three layers include predicted probabilities for cover restoration, partial restoraiton, and full restoration.&nbsp;Cover restoration suggests that only canopy cover is likely to be restored in subsequent first-entry wildfires, partial restoration indicates that canopy cover and ladder fuel densities are likely to be restored, and full restoration indicates that canopy cover, ladder fuel density, and clump complexity are all likely to be restored. Please refer to the text in Chamberlain et al. (2024) for complete descriptions of each forest structure metric and how the restoration indices were defined.&nbsp;</p> <p>The codes in each raster layer are as follows:<br>NoData = outside study area<br>0 = restoration unlikely (probability &lt; 0.5) under mild or moderate fire weather conditions<br>1 = restoration likely (probability &gt; 0.5) under mild fire weather conditions<br>2 = restoration likely (probability &gt; 0.5) under moderate fire weather conditions</p> <p>Terms of use: These data are solely for the purpose of general public information; the user should not rely upon the contents of this data for any specific purpose without making independent investigation. The authors assume no responsibility for any risk, loss, or liability that may result from the use of the data. Please contact Caden Chamberlain at cc274@uw.edu if there are any questions or concerns.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Frequency of infraposition and missing contact points in implant supported restorations within natural dentitions over time: a systematic review with meta-analysis

<p>Dataset for the meta-analyses performed in this systematic review</p>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n in Rhopalomenia glandulosa spec. nov., and the restoration of Entonomenia Leloup (Mollusca: Solenogastres)

FIGURE 1. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n.sp., animals (a = holotype, b= paratype), from lateral views. Abbreviations: ba = posterior end, fr = anterior end.

opennotspecifiedApr 2005View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n in Rhopalomenia glandulosa spec. nov., and the restoration of Entonomenia Leloup (Mollusca: Solenogastres)

FIGURE 2. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n.sp. (holotype), sclerites from ventral (ve) and from other body regions (do).

opennotspecifiedApr 2005View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n in Rhopalomenia glandulosa spec. nov., and the restoration of Entonomenia Leloup (Mollusca: Solenogastres)

FIGURE 4. Rhopalomenia glandulosa n.sp., schematic organisation of the posterior body. Abbreviations: Cu = mantle cuticle, Dso = dorso­terminal sens organ, Go = gonad, Gpd = gono­pericardial duct, Mg = midgut, Pac = pallial cavity, Pc = pericardium, Pd = pericardioduct, Pf = pedal fold (foot), Rs = receptaculum seminis, Sc = suprarectal commissure, Sd = spawning duct, Spg = suprapallial glands, Ve = heart ventricle, Vs = vesicula seminalis.

opennotspecifiedApr 2005View details →
zenodo32/100

Anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the mounted skeleton of Tyrannosaurus rex, chiefly from Amer. Mus. 5027, partly from the type specimen Amer. Mus. 973. The sternal ribs are not restored. (The structure of the manus is unknown as yet; the restoration of the digits is conjectural. About natural size. in Skeletal Adaptations of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus

Anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the mounted skeleton of Tyrannosaurus rex, chiefly from Amer. Mus. 5027, partly from the type specimen Amer. Mus. 973. The sternal ribs are not restored. (The structure of the manus is unknown as yet; the restoration of the digits is conjectural. About natural size.

opennotspecifiedDec 1916View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record