Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in The ecology, distribution, status, threats, and conservation of the Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator) in the Dhaleswari River of Assam, India

Fig. 1. (A) Map of India, highlighting Assam. (B) Map of Assam, highlighting Hailakandi district. (C) Map of Hailakandi district showing the two rivers, Dhaleswari River and Katakhal River, with distribution of the Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator). Dots represent sighting locations during the present survey; current distribution in the Dhaleswari River is shown in green. Further downstream, despite no present records, occurrence in the past (1970s–1980s) was reported by several interviewees (shown in yellow). No reports on present occurrence in the Katakhal River (shown in red) could be found. Map by A.S. Choudhury.

Fig. 1 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Physiographic regions of Hidalgo, Mexico. Abbreviations: GCL = Gulf Coastal Lowlands; SMO = Sierra Madre Oriental; MXP = Mexican Plateau; TMV = Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in The ecology, distribution, status, threats, and conservation of the Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator) in the Dhaleswari River of Assam, India

Fig. 2. Photographs relevant to the habitat and threats of the Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator) in the Dhaleswari River, Assam, India. (A) Research team interacting with the locals at Rongpur 5, Hailakandi. (B) Habitat of the Common Water Monitor in the Dhaleswari River, showing bushes and other features on the banks. (C) The sandy bank of the Katakhal River, prone to erosion and landslides, is the habitat not preferred by the Common Water Monitor. (D) The sluice gate at the mouth of Dhaleswari River at Shahabad, which prevents water flow into it and diverts the water to the Katakhal River. (E) Encroachment and conversion of the Dhaleswari River into fisheries by the locals building dikes at Rongpur 2. Photos by A.S. Choudhury.

Fig. 4 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Mexican Plateau. Vegetation in the vicinity of Santa Monica in the municipality of Metztitlán. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Fig. 3. A in The ecology, distribution, status, threats, and conservation of the Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator) in the Dhaleswari River of Assam, India

Fig. 3. A Common Water Monitor (Varanus salvator) killed for venturing into a human habitation at Rongpur 6, Hailakandi. It was subsequently buried. Photo by R.A. Barbhuiya.

Fig. 7. Forest fires. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 7. Forest fires. A forest fire for land use conversion in the vicinity of El Naranjal, in the municipality of Pisaflores. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas.

Fig. 9 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 9. Deforestation for agricultural purposes. Change in land use for agricultural purposes in the vicinity of San Cristobal in the municipality of Metztitlán. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.

Fig. 9 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 9. Areas within the potential niche of the Ocellated Lizard (in orange) for which there are no observation data (in red), based on Model 6 with its presence probability threshold of 0.70 combined with presence data from observations including a buffer zone with a 5-km radius.

Fig. 5 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 5. Change in vegetation cover from 2000 to 2016: standard deviation of the yearly NDVI values relative to the NDVI mean value for the month of July.

Fig. 3 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 3. Localization of the total presence data for the Ocellated Lizard Timon lepidus collected in France during the period 1970 to 2016.

Fig. 8 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 8. Location of populations that have disappeared in relation to the predicted presence map generated by Model 6 (blue dots).

Fig. 7 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 7. The predicted distribution map generated by Model 6 (in pink) with specific locations of presence data (from observations) from the dataset (black dots).

Fig. 6 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 6. Predictive modelling maps showing presence probability of the Ocellated Lizard (Timon lepidus) in the study area.

Figure 10 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Figure 10: Contribution of protected nature areas to the conservation of Timon lepidus. Predicted presence within protected areas (dark purple) and predicted distribution range (light purple).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →

Fig. 2 in Camera-Trapping Survey Of Mammals In And Around Imbak Canyon Conservation Area In Sabah, Malaysian Borneo

Fig. 2. The observed species accumulation curve (-o-) and 95% CIs (---) for mammalian species in and around Imbak Canyon Conservation Area. The curve was constructed using abundancebased rarefaction approach (i.e., by using the number of independent photographs captured) with 100 randomisation runs in EstimateS (Colwell, 2009).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →

Fig. 3. Activity patterns for 14 in Camera-Trapping Survey Of Mammals In And Around Imbak Canyon Conservation Area In Sabah, Malaysian Borneo

Fig. 3. Activity patterns for 14 mammal species (with n ≥ 8) photocaptured in and around Imbak Canyon Conservation Area in central Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Dotted bar indicates percent frequency of independent photographs taken during the day time (0600–1800 hours); Black bar indicates percent frequency of independent photographs taken during night time (1800–0600 hours). Species are listed in order of decreasing frequency of diurnal activity. Numbers in parentheses indicate sample size.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →

Fig. 1 in Camera-Trapping Survey Of Mammals In And Around Imbak Canyon Conservation Area In Sabah, Malaysian Borneo

Fig. 1. Imbak Canyon Conservation Area (ICCA) in central Sabah, northern part of Malaysian Borneo. Circles show the localities of 13 plots (P1–P13) where camera traps were placed (+). Each plot is approximately 3.5 km in radius.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 2 in PhD Thesis Summary: Biologie, écologie et conservation du requin peau bleue (Prionace glauca) et du requin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) en Atlantique nord-est

Figure 2. – Mercury level (mg kg-1 fresh meat) and body mass index (BMI, kg/cm2) in blue shark (u, N = 37) and shortfin mako (l, N = 46). Dotted line section of the curve represents the extrapolation from regression analysis for blue sharks.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 4 in PhD Thesis Summary: Biologie, écologie et conservation du requin peau bleue (Prionace glauca) et du requin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) en Atlantique nord-est

Figure 4. – Observed mercury level (Hg) (u, l) and estimated values (s) using body mass index (BMI, kg/cm2) as a function of mass (TL, cm). A: Blue shark (N = 37); B: Shortfin mako (N = 46).