Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,864
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,864 results for “live”
Long-term study shows that increasing body size in response to warmer summers is associated with a higher mortality risk in a long-lived bat species
<p>Change in body size is one of the universal responses to global warming, with most species becoming smaller. While small size in most species corresponds to low individual fitness, small species typically show high population growth rates in cross-species comparisons. It is unclear, there- fore, how climate-induced changes in body size ultimately affect population persistence. Unravelling the relationship between body size, ambient temperature and individual survival is especially important for the conservation of endangered long-lived mammals such as bats. Using an individual-based 24-year dataset from four free-ranging Bechstein'sbat colonies (Myotis bechsteinii), we show for the first time a link between warmer summer temperatures, larger body sizes and increased mortality risk. Our data reveal a crucial time window in June–July, when juveniles grow to larger body sizes in warmer conditions. Body size is also affected by colony size, with larger colonies raising larger offspring. At the same time, larger bats have higher mortality risks throughout their lives. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the link between warmer weather and body size as a fitness-relevant trait for predicting species-specific extinction risks as consequences of global warming.</p>
Maternal food restriction during pregnancy affects offspring development and swimming performance in a placental live-bearing fish
<p>How pregnant mothers allocate limited resources to different biological functions such as maintenance, somatic growth, and reproduction can have profound implications for early life development and survival of offspring. Here we examined the effects of maternal food restriction during pregnancy on offspring in the matrotrophic (i.e. mother-nourishment throughout gestation) live-bearing fish species <em>Phalloptychus januarius</em> (Poeciliidae). We fed pregnant females either with a 'low-food' or 'high-food' ration for six weeks and quantified the consequences for offspring size and body fat at birth and one week after birth. We further measured fast-start escape performance of offspring at birth, as well as swimming kinematics during prey capture at zero, two, and seven days after birth. We found that the length of maternal food restriction during pregnancy negatively affected offspring dry mass and lean dry mass at birth, as well as body fat gain during the first week after birth. Moreover, it impacted the locomotor performance of offspring during prey capture at, and during the first week after, birth. We did not observe an effect of food restriction on fast-start escape performance of offspring. Our study suggests that matrotrophic poeciliid fish are maladapted to unpredictably fluctuating resource environments, because sudden reductions in maternal food availability during pregnancy result in smaller offspring with slower postnatal body fat gain and an inhibition of postnatal improving swimming skills during feeding, potentially leading to lower competitive abilities after birth.</p>
Data for the article entitled "ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CORRELATES, AND ENERGETIC CONSEQUENCES OF FITNESS MAXIMISATION ON DIFFERENT MIGRATORY BEHAVIOURS IN A LONG-LIVED SCAVENGER"
<p>Data used in the statistical analyses of the article entitled "ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CORRELATES, AND ENERGETIC CONSEQUENCES OF FITNESS MAXIMISATION ON DIFFERENT MIGRATORY BEHAVIOURS IN A LONG-LIVED SCAVENGER"</p>
Myzus persicae electrical penetration graph (EPG) live plant colonisation videos
<p><em>Myzus persicae</em> electrical penetration graph (EPG) traces with images of a single aphid colonising an <em>Arabidopsis thaliana </em>Col-0 leaf. The merged images and EPG traces show the process of plant colonisation ending in <em>M. persicae</em> phloem feeding as a video. Uploaded is also the script (written in the R programming language) to merge the EPGSystems analysis software 'EPG Stylet+a' exported, tabular EPG traces with camera images.</p>
Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-tablet regimens (STR) have become the golden standard in antiretroviral therapy. However, there are calls to reintroduce (generic) components as multi-tablet regimens (MTR) because of cost-savings. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) are an important touchstone to support or to renounce this proposal. As such, our aim was to compare PROs of people living with HIV taking an STR versus a MTR in a real world setting.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>188 people living with HIV participated in a longitudinal study. 132 remained on their MTR and 56 switched to an STR. At baseline, months 1-3-6-12-18 and 24, participants filled in questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depressive symptoms, HIV symptoms, neurocognitive complaints (NCC) treatment satisfaction and adherence. Generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimation equations mixed models were built.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the two groups did not differ in clinical parameters and PROs. The mixed models revealed differences among the groups regarding neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction. The odds of having NCC increased by 4,1% per month in the STR-group as compared to the MTR-group (p=0.035). Nonetheless, treatment satisfaction also increased in the STR-group: at month 6, median change score was highly positive: 24 (IQR 7,5-29). Treatment satisfaction showed a significantly different evolution in the groups: the estimated state score increased by 3,3 in the STR-group while it decreased by 0,2 in the MTR-group (p=0.003). HRQoL measures, HIV symptoms, depressive symptoms and adherence did not differ between the groups over time.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction differed between the two groups. More people on an STR reported NCC over time compared to the MTR-group. Contrarily, treatment satisfaction in the STR-group increased significantly over time. It should be further investigated to which extent treatment satisfaction is a predictor for long-term treatment persistence and health outcomes.</p>
Live capture and handling of Taiwanese leopard cats_Data
<p>This data set forms the basis of a scientific open access publication in Wildlife Biology:</p> <p><strong>van der Meer E, Dullemont H, Chen WL, Chang AM, Chen CC, Pei KJC, Lai YC (2022) Live capture and handling of Taiwanese leopard cats (<em>Prionailurus bengalensis</em>): an evaluation of trap designs and capture protocol. Wildlife Biology.</strong></p> <p>It contains data on trap characteristics, leopard cat visits, domestic dog visits and bycatch for various trap designs used for the live trapping of leopard cats in Taiwan. It also includes data on leopard cat movement in the first six days after trapping and handling, based on triangulation of the signal from the VHF collars of the study animals.</p> <p> </p>
Raw Data for the article: Patient-Specific Analysis of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm with the Living Heart Human Model
<p>In ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs), aneurysm kinematics are driven by ventricular traction occurring every heartbeat, increasing the stress level of dilated aortic wall. Aortic elongation due to heart motion and aortic length are emerging as potential indicators of adverse events in ATAAs; however, simulation of ATAA that takes into account the cardiac mechanics is technically challenging. The objective of this study was to adapt the realistic Living Heart Human Model (LHHM) to the anatomy and physiology of a patient with ATAA to assess the role of cardiac motion on aortic wall stress distribution. Patient-specific segmentation and material parameter estimation were done using preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) and ex vivo biaxial testing of the harvested tissue collected during surgery. The lumped-parameter model of systemic circulation implemented in the LHHM was refined using clinical and echocardiographic data. The results showed that the longitudinal stress was highest in the major curvature of the aneurysm, with specific aortic quadrants having stress levels change from tensile to compressive in a transmural direction. This study revealed the key role of heart motion that stretches the aortic root and increases ATAA wall tension. The ATAA LHHM is a realistic cardiovascular platform where patient-specific information can be easily integrated to assess the aneurysm biomechanics and potentially support the clinical management of patients with ATAAs.</p>
Long Live The Image: Container-Native Data Persistence in Production
<p>The (Docker) source files for creating a read-only database container.</p> <p><strong>Note:</strong></p> <p>"tail -F /var/log/mysql/error.log" (after the demo of selecting all data) makes the container keep alive as a MySQL server.</p> <p><strong>To be Updated:</strong></p> <p>The database user and password are still hardcoded.</p>
Short-term social dynamics following anthropogenic and natural disturbances in a free-living mammal
<p><span>Anthropogenic disturbances are widely recognized for their </span><span>far-reaching consequences on the survival and reproduction of wildlife, but we understand comparatively little about their effects on the social lives of group-living animals. </span><span>Here we </span><span>examined these short-term changes in affiliative behavior as part of a long-term study </span><span>on a </span><span>human-tolerant and socially flexible population of California ground squirrels </span><span>(<em>Otospermophilus beecheyi</em>).</span><span> We </span><span>used social network analysis to examine</span><span> short-term changes in affiliative behavior and individual consistency in response to disturbances by humans, domestic dogs, or a natural predator (the coyote). </span><span>Overall, juveniles were more involved than adults in affiliative interactions, but the short-term directional effects of these acute disturbances on social cohesion varied by disturbance type. Human and dog presence reduced aboveground connectivity, particularly for juveniles, whereas disturbances by coyotes generally promoted it. Beyond these effects, we also detected non-random responses to disturbances, though individuals were not very consistent in their directional response to different disturbance types. </span><span>Our results demonstrate the flexible changes in social behavior triggered by short-term disturbances imposed by humans and other threats. </span><span>More generally, our findings elucidate the underappreciated sensitivity of animal social interactions to short-term ecological disturbances, raising key questions about their consequences on the social lives of animals.</span></p>
Individual variability in space use near power lines by a long-lived territorial raptor
<p>Evaluating species responses to anthropogenic infrastructures and other habitat changes is often used to assess environmental impacts and to guide conservation actions. However, such studies are generally carried out at the population-level, disregarding inter-individual variability. Here, we investigate population- and individual-level responses towards power lines of a territorial raptor, the Bonelli's eagle Aquila fasciata. We used GPS-PTT tracking data of seventeen adult eagles to model space use as a function of distance to transmission and distribution lines, while accounting for other habitat features known to affect this species. At population level, eagles increased the intensity of space use in the proximity of power lines (up to 1000 m), suggesting an attraction effect. At individual level, some eagles shared the general population attraction pattern, while others showed reduced intensity of space use in the proximity of power lines. These differential responses were unrelated to the sex of individuals, but were affected by the characteristics of the power grid, with a tendency for apparent attraction to be associated with individuals occupying home ranges with a denser network of transmission lines and transmission pylons. However, the study could not rule out the operation of other potentially influential factors, such as individual idiosyncrasies, the spatial distribution of prey availability, and the availability of natural perches and nesting sites. Overall, these results suggest that power lines may drive different behaviors and have differential impacts across individuals, with those attracted to the proximity of power lines potentially facing increased risk of mortality through electrocution and collision, and those avoiding power lines being potentially subject to exclusion effects. More generally, our results reinforce the need to understand individual variability when assessing and mitigating impacts of anthropogenic infrastructures.</p>
Figure 3. Living type males, Maratus candens. 6 in Maratus candens, a new peacock spider in the linnaei group from southwestern Australia (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini)
Figure 3. Living type males, Maratus candens. 6, Dorsal view of opisthosoma. 12, 14-15, Males engaged in courtship display. As in other Maratus, inflation and extension of a very flexible pedicel allows the opisthosoma to be rotated forward and then elevated in a vertical position (15).
Examining the interaction between free-living bacteria and iron in the global ocean
<p>The model outputs, relevant data, and MATLAB scripts to reproduce the figures shown in the manuscript "Examining the interaction between free-living bacteria and iron in the global ocean" by Anh Le-Duy Pham, Olivier Aumont, Lavenia Ratnarajah, and Alessandro Tagliabue.</p> <p>Please contact the corresponding author Anh Pham (anh.pham@locean-ipsl.upmc.fr or anhlpham78@ucla.edu) for any questions.</p>
Co-LivEn : COllective LIVing ENergy Dataset
<p>The dataset contains detailed electricity measurements of appliances in a collective living (co-living) student apartment at KTH Live-in-Lab. The measurements included are RMS voltage, RMS current, real power, and power factor. The data was collected over a period of 277 days between 28th August 2020 and 31st May 2021 with 1 second time resolution. The compressed file "<a href="../api/files/a7c4dc9b-99f1-4497-ae6c-7a1c2cb1b669/appliance_csv.zip">appliance_csv.zip</a>" contains data in plain CSV file format, whereas "<a href="../api/files/a7c4dc9b-99f1-4497-ae6c-7a1c2cb1b669/appliance_mat.zip">appliance_mat.zip</a>" contains data in MATLAB file format. </p> <p>For more detailed information and insights into the dataset and the data collection process, refer to the following article. Kindly cite this when using the dataset.</p> <ul> <li>R. R. Avula, T. J. Oechtering and D. Månsson, "Adversarial Inference Control in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Bayesian Approach With Application to Smart Meters," in IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 24933-24948, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365270. </li> </ul>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (8/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (14/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (7/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (9/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (12/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (11/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
Keizer et al. "Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics" – Data, software and documentation (13/16)
<p>Data, software and documentation to reproduce the results presented in [<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810">Keizer <em>et al.</em> (2022) ‘<strong>Live-cell micromanipulation of a genomic locus reveals interphase chromatin mechanics</strong>’ Science, 377:6605</a>, DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9810].</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Location</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Centralized GitHub repository</strong> with:</p> <ul> <li>Local copy of all the code and trajectory/force files</li> <li>Jupyter notebooks to make all the graphs in Keizer <em>et al</em>.</li> <li>Pointers to all the datasets also shown in this table</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/Keizer-et-al">Keizer <em>et al.</em></a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Raw microscopy data</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Experiments performed with the <strong>30’-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with the<strong> 100”-PR</strong> scheme</li> <li>Experiment performed with high frame rate (<strong>dt = 0.5”</strong>)</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626942">Zenodo 1</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627034">Zenodo 2</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626909">Zenodo 3</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626914">Zenodo 4</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627010">Zenodo 5</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4626981">Zenodo 6</a> (100”-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510099">Zenodo 7</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510103">Zenodo 8</a> (30’-PR)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510065">Zenodo 9</a> (dt = 0.5")<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510105">Zenodo 10</a> (30’-PR)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Concatenated TIFFs and timestamp files for all of the 30’-PR data.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510107">Zenodo 11</a> (1/2)<br> <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510109">Zenodo 12</a> (2/2)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Python pipeline </strong>to generate (i) concatenated movies, (ii) cropped and rotated movies for each cell, and (iii) force time profiles for each cell.</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Final registered and rotated TIFF files</strong>: <ul> <li><strong>30’-PR</strong> experiments: n = 35 cells</li> <li><strong>100”-PR</strong> experiment, including time projections & kymograph</li> <li><strong>dt = 0.5”</strong> experiments: n = 3 cells</li> <li><strong>no force</strong>: n = 11 cells before manipulation, n = 8 cells after manipulation</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Data files with trajectories and force time profiles</strong> for all analyzed cells</li> <li>Instructions and Fiji/Python scripts to reproduce these files.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510207">Zenodo 13</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Single-MNPs fluorescence</strong>: raw data, Python/Fiji scripts and instructions</p> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510209">Zenodo 14</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li>MagSim, <strong>Python library for magnetic simulations</strong></li> <li>Jupyter notebook for calibrating and generating maps (Fig. S5 & Fig. S6).</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/MagSim">MagSim</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 1</strong>: Gradient of free GFP-ferritin in solution</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (6 pillars; Fig. S6B-C)</li> <li>Calculated force maps, with Fiji scripts and instructions to generate them.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4627062">Zenodo 15</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Force calibration – Method 2</strong>: Attraction of ferritin-coated beads (Fig. S7)</p> <ul> <li>Raw microscopy data (free diffusion and attraction)</li> <li>Python/Fiji scripts to calculate forces.</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6510211">Zenodo 16</a></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <ul> <li><strong>Python library for force inference</strong> using different polymer models</li> </ul> </td> <td> <p><a href="https://github.com/SGrosse-Holz/rouselib">rouselib</a> repository</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>License:</strong> All the code, data and documentation in this repository is under <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">GPLv3</a> license. The <a href="https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03740646"><em>Author Accepted Manuscript</em></a> of the study [Keizer <em>et al.</em> 2022] is under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a> license. The <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9810"><em>Final Published Version</em></a>, published by AAAS, is not (<a href="https://www.science.org/content/page/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse">more information</a>).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the raw data repositories (Zenodo 1-10)</strong></p> <p><em>Refer to the Material and Methods section of the article for details on data production.</em></p> <p>Each Zenodo dataset represents one day of acquisition. It includes the data that was not retained for further downstream analysis. Each dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>The raw MicroManager folder architecture (one folder contains multiple positions on the coverslip). On occasions where placement or removal of the external magnet led to a loss of focus, the acquisition was stopped and restarted, creating a new MicroManager folder each time. For instance: <ul> <li>The various positions were imaged before injection (folder with the <em>_preInjection,</em> <em>_1-pre-inj or _1-inj_1</em> suffix)</li> <li>These positions were imaged again after injection (suffix <em>_postInjection,</em> <em>_2-post-inj </em>or <em>_1-inj_2</em>) and before the magnet was added (suffix <em>_beforeexp</em> or <em>_before-attr</em>)</li> <li>They were imaged again with the magnet added (suffix <em>_attraction1</em>). If acquisition was stopped and restarted an extra folder is created (suffix <em>_attraction2</em>)</li> <li>They were then imaged after the magnet was removed (suffix <em>_release1</em>)</li> <li>Finally, the cells were monitored after the experiment (suffix <em>_after-exp</em> or <em>_postexp</em>)</li> </ul> </li> <li>A text file named <em>lab_journal_[...].txt</em> contains extra information the acquisition and experimental procedure</li> <li>Note: the MicroManager metadata in the TIFF file are fully populated</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overview of the concatenated datasets (Zenodo 11-12)</strong></p> <p>In these Zenodo repository, each position (acquired in different folders), is concatenated into a single TIFF movie using code available in the <a href="https://github.com/CoulonLab/chromag-pipeline">ChroMag-pipeline</a> repository. The folder contains:</p> <ul> <li>One TIFF file per selected position</li> <li>One .xls file per selected position, with one line per frame, and columns with the following information: <ul> <li><strong>path</strong> (Relative path): Reference to the original (raw MicroManager) file</li> <li><strong>start_time</strong> (Timestamp): Timestamp saved by MicroManager when the acquisition was started (the «acquire » button was pressed).</li> <li><strong>time_in_file</strong> (seconds): Number of seconds between start_time and the acquisition of the current timepoint</li> <li><strong>start_time_s</strong> (seconds): Variable start_time converted to a number of seconds</li> <li><strong>time</strong> (seconds): Sum of start_time and time_in_file</li> <li><strong>timestamp</strong> (Timestamp): Variable time, back-converted to a timestamp</li> <li><strong>timeOn</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was added. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>timeOff</strong> (Timestamp): Time(s) when the magnet was removed. This timestamp is provided in the datasets.cfg file in the github repository chromag-pipeline</li> <li><strong>forceActivated</strong> (Boolean): If the magnet is present during the current frame (calculated from timeOn and timeOff)</li> <li><strong>seconds_since_first_magnet_ON</strong> (seconds): Number of (relative) seconds since the magnet was added for the first time.</li> <li><strong>Frame</strong> (Integer) Frame number (1-indexed)</li> <li><strong>Positions</strong> (Integer): The position number</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Processed datasets (Zenodo 13) and calibration datasets (Zenodo 14-16)</strong></p> <p>These datasets and their analysis are fully described in the <em>Materials and Methods</em> section of the article and in the different README.md files within the various folders of the datasets.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.