Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 4 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 4. — Footprints from Le Veillon compared to tridactyl tracks from the Early Jurassic of the Causses Basin (based on data from Demathieu et al. 2002; Moreau et al. 2021) and the Early Jurassic of the eastern United States (based on data from Weems 1992, 2019; Gand et al. 2018): A, bivariate diagram L vs (L–D)/D; B, bivariate diagram L vs L/W. L in metres.

FIG. 2 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 2. — Measurements taken on tracks from the Lapparent collection: A, for crocodylomorph manus imprint; B, for crocodylomorph pes track; C, for dinosaur footprint. Abbreviations: L, length of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); LM, LP, length of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); W, width of footprint (for dinosaur tracks); WM, WP, width of manus and pes tracks, respectively (for crocodylomorph tracks); LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, lengths of digits I, II, III, IV and V, respectively; D, length of the free part of digit III; I-V, I-IV, II-IV, divarication angles between digits I and V, digits I and IV, then digits II and IV, respectively.

FIG. 12 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 12. — Kayentapus isp.: A-C, track ULB-04C02_A (holotype of "Talmontopus tersi" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 9 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 9. — Eubrontes giganteus Hitchcock, 1845: A-C, track ULB-04D21_A (plaster cast of the holotype of "E. veillonensis" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 10 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 10. — Grallator minusculus (Hitchcock, 1858), Demathieu, Gand, Sciau & Freytet, 2002: A-C, track ULB-04C13_B (plaster cast of the holotype of "G. maximus" that is here invalidated), photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, track ULB-04C10_B, photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F). Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 5 in Crocodylomorph and dinosaur tracks from the lowermost Jurassic of Le Veillon (western France): ichnotaxonomic revision of the type material (Lapparent collection)

FIG. 5. — Grallator variabilis Lapparent & Montenat, 1967: A-C, plaster cast of the holotype, ULB-04C08_D, photograph (A), DEM and false-colour depth map (B) and interpretative sketch (C); D-F, paratype, ULB-04C05_A, photograph (D), DEM and false-colour depth map (E) and interpretative sketch (F); G-I, track ULB- 04C13_A, photograph (G), DEM and false-colour depth map (H) and interpretative sketch (I). Scale bars: 5 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Рис. 2. ИЗобраЖениЯ Mactra sulcataria Deshayes in Reeve, 1854 в работах 19 в.: A – Reeve [1854, pl. 2, fig. 5]; B – Weinkauff [1881, Taf. 18, Fig. 3]; в списке литературы как: Küster, Weinkauff [1841–1884]. in Notes on type material of Mactra sulcataria Deshayes in Reeve, 1854 (Bivalvia: Mactridae) and taxonomic history of the species

Рис. 2. ИЗобраЖениЯ Mactra sulcataria Deshayes in Reeve, 1854 в работах 19 в.: A – Reeve [1854, pl. 2, fig. 5]; B – Weinkauff [1881, Taf. 18, Fig. 3]; в списке литературы как: Küster, Weinkauff [1841–1884].

Supplementary online material for KIC 4150611: A quadruply eclipsing heptuple star system with a g-mode period-spacing pattern. Eclipse modelling of the triple and spectroscopic analysis

Additional figures and data supplementary to the published (or soon-to-be-published) paper KIC 4150611: A quadruply eclipsing heptuple star system with a g-mode period-spacing pattern Eclipse modelling of the triple and spectroscopic analysis.

Dataset for Effects of sacrificial coating material in laser shock peening of L-PBF printed AlSi10Mg

Includes data received from confocal microscope, CT data, full XRD data, and all figures presented in the article.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Medical Students use Online Study Materials more than School-Provided Resources when preparing for USMLE Step 1

In this excel file contains the raw data collected from a survery sent out to students attend ULSOM and UNRSOM. The raw data was processed and analyzed in the sheet titled "graphs".

Dataset for "Engineering defect clustering in diamond-based materials for technological applications via quantum mechanical descriptors"

The unique set of extreme physical properties makes diamond an ideal candidate for applications in the energy industry such as in high-power and high-frequency electronics as well as in electrochemistry and photovoltaics. Furthermore, dopant-vacancy complexes in diamond can be exploited for further development of quantum computers, single-photon emitters, high-precision magnetic field sensing and nanophotonic devices. While certain dopant-vacancy complexes are well-studied, studies of other dopant/vacancy clusters are focused mostly on defect detection while investigations on how to tune their electronic and optical properties for specific applications is mostly omitted. To this aim, we attempted to reveal coupled structural-electronic features and their effect on the band gap of such defects through first principle calculations. We investigated four different defect types: a) dopant-vacancy complexes (X-V), b) two dopants as nearest neighbours (X-X), c) two dopants separated by one carbon atom (X-C-X) and d) two dopants separated by a vacancy (X-V-X). For each of these configurations, we considered Al, B, N, P and Si as dopant atoms. This dataset contains input files needed to reproduce every ground state geometry used in our study.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →

SI Figure 4: SEM images of either unwashed (left) or washed (right) E. antarcticus nematodes. A. Unwashed head region with arrows pointing to attached material and possible fungal hyphae. B. Washed head region with arrows pointing to the remaining attached material. C. Unwashed annules with arrows pointing to commonly attached foreign material. D. Washed annules with arrows pointing to remaining attached material. E. Unwashed somatic pore with arrows pointing to the common organic material. F. Washed vulva with an arrow pointing to remaining attached organic material. G. Unwashed cuticle with arrows showing a possible biofilm. H. Washed cuticle showing single attached cells indicated with arrows. I. Unwashed cuticle showing an off-axis line of attached material. J. Washed cuticle showing a similar off-axis line of material (as indicated with arrow) but reduced in quantity compared to the unwashed. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment

SI Figure 4: SEM images of either unwashed (left) or washed (right) E. antarcticus nematodes. A. Unwashed head region with arrows pointing to attached material and possible fungal hyphae. B. Washed head region with arrows pointing to the remaining attached material. C. Unwashed annules with arrows pointing to commonly attached foreign material. D. Washed annules with arrows pointing to remaining attached material. E. Unwashed somatic pore with arrows pointing to the common organic material. F. Washed vulva with an arrow pointing to remaining attached organic material. G. Unwashed cuticle with arrows showing a possible biofilm. H. Washed cuticle showing single attached cells indicated with arrows. I. Unwashed cuticle showing an off-axis line of attached material. J. Washed cuticle showing a similar off-axis line of material (as indicated with arrow) but reduced in quantity compared to the unwashed.

Crystal structures and hkl data associated with paper 'Metal-free negative linear compressibility (NLC) material - the cocrystal of 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane and fumaric acid'

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

Supplementary material from: Wolz D, Seidel-Greiff R, Behnisch T, Kruppke I, Kuznik I, Bertram P, Jäger H, Gude M, Cherif C (2024) Potentials of Polyacrylonitrile Substitution by Lignin for Continuous Manufactured Lignin/Polyacrylonitrile-Blend-Based Carbon Fibers

This material contains all research data concerning the analyses conducted in the work taht was published as "Potentials of Polyacrylonitrile Substitution by Lignin for Continuous Manufactured Lignin/Polyacrylonitrile-Blend-Based Carbon Fibers" in the MDPI journal Fibers. Process data cannot be included for reasons of confidentiality.

Fig. 22 in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 22. Small dorsal vertebra of a juvenile indeterminate avetheropod (MG 4822) from the Kimmeridgian–Tithonian Sobral Formation, Paimogo (Lourinhã region, Portugal) in?right lateral (A1),?left lateral (A2),?posterior (A3), dorsal (?anterior to the right, A4), ventral (?anterior to the left, A5), and?anterior (A6) views.

Fig. 24 in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 24. Sacral and caudal vertebrae attributed to indeterminate allosauroid theropods from Kimmeridgian Alcobaça Formation, Ourém region (Portugal). A. Sacral vertebra, MG 4824a. B. Posterior caudal vertebra, MG 4831a. Left lateral (A1, B2), right lateral (A2, B1), anterior (A3, B6), dorsal (anterior to the left, A4, B4), ventral (anterior to the right, A5, B5), and posterior (A6, B3) views.

Fig. 23 in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 23. Tooth crown fragment (MG 15) attributed to an indeterminate allosauroid theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Cabo Espichel (Setúbal region, Portugal), in labial or lingual (A1, A2), distal (A3), and mesial (A4) views, and basal cross-section (A5).

Fig. 21. Simplified strict consensus trees resulting from a in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 21. Simplified strict consensus trees resulting from a cladistic analysis performed on a dentition-based data matrix and forcing the constrains defined by Hendrickx et al. (2020a) pruning a priori all morphotypes from the Lusitanian Basin but Morphotype 2 (A), simplified strict consensus tree resulting from the analysis pruning a priori all morphotypes from the Lusitanian Basin but MG 15 (B), and simplified strict consensus tree resulting from the analysis pruning a priori all morphotypes from the Lusitanian Basin but Morphotype 3 (C).

Fig. 19 in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 19. Tooth crown (MNHN/UL.EPt.023) attributed to an indeterminate megalosauroid theropod from the upper Kimmeridgian–lowermost Tithonian Praia da Amoreira-Porto Novo Formation, Porto Dinheiro (Lourinhã region, Portugal) in labial (A3), distal (A4), mesial (A5), and lingual (A6) views; detail of the mesial and distal denticles in the apical part of the crown (A1), detail of the enamel ornamentation (A2), detail of the distal denticles in the central sector of the carina (A7).

Fig. 20 in Taxonomic and stratigraphic update of the material historically attributed to Megalosaurus from Portugal

Fig. 20. Tooth crowns attributed to the megalosauroid theropod cf. Torvosaurus gurneyi Hendrickx & Mateus, 2014 from different Kimmeridgian to Tithonian localities of Portugal. A. MNHN/UL.EPt.8628, Porto Dinheiro (Lourinhã region). B. MG 4813, Montoito (Lourinhã region). C. MG 4818, Praia de S. Bernardino (Peniche region). Labial (A1, B1, C1), lingual (A2, B2, C2), distal (A5, B4, C4), and mesial views (A6, B3, C3); detail of the distal denticles in the central sector of the carina (A3); basal cross-section (A4, B5, C6, C7); cross-section at mid-height of the crown (C5).