Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,154
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,154 results for “Extant”
Figure 1. A in How long can insect species exist? Evidence from extant and fossil Micromalthus beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera)
Figure 1. A, photograph of Micromalthus debilis in Dominican amber (MTEC226, MSU Bozeman, USA), female specimen. B, extant female M. debilis in dorsal view. The abdomen appears comparatively short in the extant specimen because of (1) perspective distortion because the abdomen is bent downward and (2) because the segments are retracted. Arrows mark the protruding edges of two segments; in (A) the segments are fully extended.
Figure 3. A–C in How long can insect species exist? Evidence from extant and fossil Micromalthus beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera)
Figure 3. A–C, photographs of heads of Dominican amber specimens of Micromalthus from the Poinar collection. A, coll.no. C 7-191°.B, coll.no. C 7-191B. C, coll.no. C 7-191C. D, scanning electron micrograph of left antenna of extant specimen of Micromalthus debilis, dorsal view.
Figure 2 in How long can insect species exist? Evidence from extant and fossil Micromalthus beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera)
Figure 2. Micromalthus debilis from Dominican amber (MTEC226 MTU Bozeman, USA). A, dorsal view. B, ventral view, wings omitted, mouthparts and mesothorax obscured by white, foggy substance. A cloud of this substance also surrounds the last three abdominal segments. C, reconstruction of wing venation of fossil specimen. Nomenclature of wing veins after Wallace & Fox (1975). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 25 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 25. Ordinary least-square (OLS) regressions between standardized contrasts in the ratios of maximum prey weight (MPW)/cat average weight and the positivized standardized contrasts in bite force. Plots indicate the nodes and lineages of the phylogeny. Nodes connecting different cat lineages are indicated by the age of cladogenesis (Myr), according the cladogram of Johnson et al. (2006) presented in Figure 1.
Figure 18 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 18. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the leopard cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Prionailurus viverrinus, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 11 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 11. Morphological relationships between the members of the bay cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Catopuma temminckii, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 2. Diagram showing the 20 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 2. Diagram showing the 20 skull measurements used in the analysis (see Appendix 1 for definitions).
Figure 1 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 1. Cladogram of the family Felidae, after Johnson et al. 's (2006) phylogeny, adjusted to the number of species analysed. Values on the branches indicate the divergence time between nodes; node numbers are parenthetic.
Figure 7 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 7. Morphological relationships between the members of the Ocelot lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according the skull of Leopardus pardalis, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 4 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 4. Morphological relationships between the members of the Panthera lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Panthera leo, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 3 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 3. Distribution of the 34 cat species, according to their scores from the morphological principal component analysis (PCA). Plots represent species' centroids based on bivariate means of the scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 6 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 6. Morphological relationships between the members of the Lynx lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according the skull of Lynx lynx, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 14 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 14. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the Puma lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Puma concolor, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 13 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 13. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the Panthera lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Panthera leo, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 16 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 16. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the Ocelot lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Leopardus pardalis, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 20 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 20. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the bay cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Catopuma temminckii, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 10 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 10. Morphological relationships between the members of the Caracal lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Profelis aurata, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
Figure 9 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective
Figure 9. Morphological relationships between the members of the leopard cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Prionailurus viverrinus, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.
FIGURES 36–43 in Revision of the genus Lopesiodinia Prado, 1973 (Diptera: Odiniidae) with description of three new species, and a key to the extant Neotropical genera and species of Traginopinae
FIGURES 36–43. Lopesiodinia pontarolloi, sp. nov. Figs 36–39, paratype ♂. Figs 40–43, paratype ♀. 36–39, terminalia male, dorsal, posterior, lateral and ventral views, respectively; 40–42, terminalia female, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively; 43, spermathecae.
FIGURES 22–29 in Revision of the genus Lopesiodinia Prado, 1973 (Diptera: Odiniidae) with description of three new species, and a key to the extant Neotropical genera and species of Traginopinae
FIGURES 22–29. Lopesiodinia argentata, sp. nov. Figs 22–25, holotype ♂. Figs 26–29, paratype ♀. 22–25, terminalia male, dorsal, posterior, lateral and ventral views, respectively; 26–28, terminalia female, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively; 29, spermathecae.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.