Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
20,966
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
20,966 results for “Family”
FIG. 1 in Lectotypifications of four names in the family Gesneriaceae
FIG. 1. — Lectotype (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000858010) and isolectotype (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000858011) of Cyananthus umbrosa Griff. © copyright of the Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Reproduced with permission.
FIG. 2 in Lectotypifications of four names in the family Gesneriaceae
FIG. 2. — Lectotype of Didymocarpus griffithii Wight (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000831968). © copyright of the Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Reproduced with permission.
Supplementary material for: Phylogeny and biogeography of the ancient spider family Filistatidae (Araneae) is consistent both with long-distance dispersal and vicariance following continental drift
<p>Raw data and input files for phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the article "<strong>Phylogeny and biogeography of the ancient spider family Filistatidae (Araneae) is consistent both with long-distance dispersal and vicariance following continental drift</strong>".</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S1. </strong>Matrix of phenotypic characters in .ss format.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S2. </strong>Alignment of COI sequences in fasta format..</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S3. </strong>Alignment of H3 sequences in fasta format.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S4. </strong>Alignment of 16S sequences in fasta format before trimming with gblocks.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S5. </strong>Alignment of 28S sequences in fasta format before trimming with gblocks.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S6. </strong>Input for running parsimony analysis using TNT (phenotypic data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S7. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using MrBayes (phenotypic data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S8. </strong>Input for running parsimony analysis using TNT (sequence data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S9. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using MrBayes (sequence data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S10. </strong>Input for running parsimony analysis using TNT (total evidence).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S11. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S12. </strong>Input for running parsimony analysis using TNT (total evidence, dataset with reduced number of terminals).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S13. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence, dataset with reduced number of terminals).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S14. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence) and estimating node ages using tip-dating.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S15. </strong>Input for running Bayesian inference using Beast (sequence data only) and estimating node ages using node-dating.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S16. </strong>Raw geographic distances among areas in each time slice and dispersal probability matrices for each biogeographic model.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S17. </strong>Inputs for estimating ancestral ranges and performing biogeographic stochastic maps for our dataset.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S18. </strong>Consensus tree found with parsimony analysis using TNT (phenotypic data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S19. </strong>Consensus tree found with Bayesian inference using MrBayes (phenotypic data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S20. </strong>Consensus tree found with parsimony analysis using TNT (sequence data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S21. </strong>Consensus tree found with Bayesian inference using MrBayes (sequence data only).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S22. </strong>Consensus tree found with parsimony analysis using TNT (total evidence).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S23. </strong>Consensus tree found with Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S24. </strong>Consensus tree found with parsimony analysis using TNT (total evidence, dataset with reduced number of terminals).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S25. </strong>Consensus tree found with Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence, dataset with reduced number of terminals).</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S26. </strong>Consensus tree found with Bayesian inference using MrBayes (total evidence) and with node ages estimated using tip-dating.</p> <p><strong>Supplementary material S27. </strong>Maximum clade credibility tree found with Bayesian inference using Beast (sequence data only) and with node ages estimated using node-dating.</p>
Family Type, Mental and Physical Health of in-school Female Adolescents in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
<p>This dataset is based on a cross-sectional survey conducted in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria among in-school female adolescents. The general objective of the study was to examine the influence of family type on the physical and mental health of in-school female adolescents. The data were obtained in 2017 from in-school female adolescents aged 10-18 years old. The respondents were randomly selected from four purposively selected secondary schools. Two schools were selected from the government-owned public schools and two from schools owned by individuals or private organizations. Nigeria operates a six-year secondary education; three years at the junior secondary school (JSS 1-3) and three years at the senior secondary (SS 1-3). The population for this study excluded students in SS3 because they had just concluded their terminal examination at the time of this study. Using the formula proposed by (Krejcie & Morgan, 1970) for deriving a small sample when the population is known, a sample size of 383 was derived from a population of 1656 female students in the four schools. With 10% added to adjust for non-response, a total of 421 students were involved in the study. The number of respondents allocated to each school was proportional to the size of the female students' population in each school. In each school, respondents were assigned to classes proportional to the size, and the particular respondents were identified using a random number. Data were collected with a self-administered structured questionnaire which was piloted before the actual survey. The data is saved in Stata format. </p> <p>A scale for measuring self-reported mental well was designed using questions adapted from Ross, Mirowsky, & Goldsteen (1990) and (Langton & Berger, 2011). The scale reliability coefficient was 0.85. The students were asked to state how often they experience 22 conditions such as feeling sad, discouraged, lonely, hopeless, worthless, wishing you were dead, having trouble concentrating, having difficulty sleeping, crying, and worried among others. </p> <p>Physical health was measured using a scale generated with questions adapted from (Langton & Berger, 2011; Ross et al., 1990). The students were asked to state the frequency of experiencing seven conditions in the month before the survey: feeling sick, tired, dizzy, having chest pain, a headache, muscle or joint pain, and stomach ache. The response options were every day, more than two times, two times, once, and never, graded 1-5.</p> <p>Family type was categorised in four ways: 1) two-parent and single parent. Two parents comprised of couples who were legally married and those who were living together in a consensual union whereas single parents comprised never married, widowed, divorced, and separated mother or father. 2) two-parent (monogamous), two-parent (polygynous), and single parent 3) two-parent, single father, and single mother 4) two-parent, never married, widowed, divorced, and separated</p>
FIGURE 3 Morphological trait sampling for all bird families. AVONET contains 718,662 in AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds
FIGURE 3 Morphological trait sampling for all bird families. AVONET contains 718,662 individual trait measurements, all of which are used to calculate species averages. However, sampling per species varies across families depending on taxonomy. Upper phylogram shows sampling under BirdLife International (11,009 species in 243 families). Families where sampling completeness is below 75% indicated by lighter shading. Most families with lower sampling are species poor (numbers in black circles show species richness). Lower panels show that sampling improves under more conservative taxonomic treatments of eBird (10,661 species in 249 families) and BirdTree (9993 species in 194 families). Coloured bars indicate the proportion of species in each family measured to different levels of completeness. 'Complete set' means a full set of all 9 core morphological traits (not necessarily from the same individual). 'Individuals' means any individual bird with one or more traits measured
Experiences of family caregivers of caring for terminally ill patients in Lithuania
<p>The dataset are the sample of anonymized transcripts of interviews with family caregivers who shared experiences of caring for terminally ill patients in Lithuania in 2020.</p>
Fig. 62 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 62. Xystopyge bentemarieae sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621766). A. Gonopod sternum (sternum 8). B. Sternum 9. C. Midbody dorsal limbus. D–F. First pair of legs. D. Anterior view. E. Lateral view. F. Ventral view. Abbreviations: APS = mesapical prefemoral sensilla; CXS = coxosternal setae; LPS = lateral prefemoral sensilla. Scale bars: A = 0.05 mm; B, E = 0.1 mm; C = 0.01 mm; D, F = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 70 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 70. Xystopyge hippocampus sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621770). A–G. Left gonopod telopodite. A. Anterior view. B. As A, close-up of tip. C. Posterior view. D. Ventral view. E. Dorsal view. F. Mesal view. G. Dorso-mesal view, close-up of tip. H. Right solenomere, tip. Abbreviations: BSS = basal solenomeral spine; dtl1, dtl2 =distal telomeral lobes; sdl = soloenomeral distal lobe; sdp = solenomeral distal process; SLM =solenomere; TM = telomere. Scale bars: A, C–F = 0.2 mm; B, G = 0.1 mm; H not to scale.
Fig. 69 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 69. Xystopyge hippocampus sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621770). A–C. First pair of legs. A. Sublateral view. B. Ventral view. C. Anterior view. D–G. Left gonopod coxa. D. Apical (ventral) view. E. Anterior view. F. Posterior view. G. Mesal view. H. Midbody dorsal limbus. I–J. Sternum 9. I. Posterior view. J. Subapical (subventral) view. Abbreviations: APS = mesapical prefemoral setae; BA = basomere of telopodite (broken); CU = cucullus; CXS = coxosternal setae; fb1, fb2 = fingerlike proplical bulges; LPS = lateral prefemoral setae; lr =longitudinal proplical ridge; mor = metaplical oblique ridge; MP =metaplica; PP = proplica; PPL = proplical lobe. Scale bars. A–G, I–J = 0.2 mm; H = 0.01 mm.
Fig. 73 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 73. Xystopyge proplicatus Frederiksen & Enghoff, 2012, specimen from Kasanga (NHMD 621774). A–C. First pair of legs. A. Sublateral view. B. Anterior view. C. Ventral view. D. Sternum 9. E. Midbody dorsal limbus. F–I. Left gonopod coxa. F. Anterior view. G. Mesal view. H. Posterior view. I. Lateral view. J. Gonopod sternum. Abbreviations: APS = mesapical prefemoral setae; CXS = coxosternal setae; LPS = lateral prefemoral sensilla; MP = metaplica; MPF = metaplical flange; mph = metaplical 'hump'; mps = metaplical 'snout'; PP = proplica; ppr1, ppr2 = proplical processes; pps = proplical spine. Scale bars: A–D, F–J = 0.2 mm; E = 0.01 mm.
Fig. 57 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 57. Syndesmogenus estelleae sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMO), right gonopod telopodite, broken through torsotope and missing basal part; distal part of solenomere also broken off. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior view. C. Ventral view. D. Dorsal view. E. Transverse 'section' (break) through basal part of torsotope. F. Sublateral view. G–H. Distal part of solenomere. Abbreviations: BSS1, BSS2 = basal solenomeral spines; " d" = structure "d" sensu Ribaut (1907); SLM= solenomere; TM = telomere. Scale bars: A–D = 0.1 mm; E, H = 0.02 mm; F–G = 0.05 mm.
Fig. 65. Xystopyge robusta Attems, 1910 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 65. Xystopyge robusta Attems, 1910, ♂, from Morogoro (HU-HR-124), right gonopod. A–D. Coxa. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior view. C. Mesal view. D. Lateral view. E–J. Telopodite. E. Anterior view. F. Posterior view. G. Mesal view. H. Ventral view. I. Lateral view. J. Tip of solenomere. Abbreviations: sx = slender metaplical process; th = telomeral hook;TM = telomere. Scale bars: A–I = 0.2 mm; J = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 61 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 61. Uncodrama coronata gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621765), left gonopod telopodite. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior view. C. Tip of solenomere. D. Ventral view. E. Submesal view. F–G. Two views of terminal anterlike structure on telomere. Abbreviations: BSS = basal solenomeral spine; btf = basal telomeral flange; PN =post-torsal narrowing; SLM = solenomere; tml = telomeral lobe; TT = torsotope. Scale bars: A–B, D–E = 0.1 mm; C = 0.05 mm; F–G = 0.02 mm.
Fig. 54 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 54. Spinotarsus axeli sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621761). A–C. Left gonopod coxa. A. Anterior (-mesal) view. B. Posterior view. C. Mesal view. D. Midbody dorsal limbus. E–G. First pair of legs. E. Anterior view. F. Ventral view. G. Sublateral view. H. Sternum 9. Abbreviations: CXS = coxosternal seta; LCS = lateral coxal spine; MF = metaplical flange; ml = metaplical lobe; PPL = proplical lobe. Scale bars: A–C, E–F = 0.2 mm; G–H= 0.1 mm; D = 0.01 mm.
Fig. 53 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 53. Raduliverpa donatellae sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621759), gonopod telopodites. A. Right telopodite, posterior view. B. Left telopodite, subanterior view. C. Right telopodite, disto-mesal-basal view. D. Close-up of right solenomere tip (also with part of post-torsal spine) to show the genuscharacteristic striation. E. Left telopodite, anterior-basal view. Abbreviations: PTS = post-torsal spine; SLM = solenomere; TL = torsotope lobe; TM = telomere; tlm = telomere lamellae; TT = torsotope. Scale bars: A–C, E = 0.1 mm; D = 0.02 mm.
Fig. 50 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 50. Praludivera paralellamella gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (VMNH110633), A–E. Left gonopod coxa. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior view. C. Lateral view. D. Mesal view. E. Oblique apical view. F. Midbody dorsal limbus. G–I. First pair of legs (right prefemoral lobe broken). Abbreviations: CXS = coxosternal setae; LCS = lateral coxal spine; mbs = metaplical mesad-basal spine; MP= metaplica; PP = proplica; PPL = proplical lobe. Scale bars: A–D, G–I = 0.2 mm; E = 0.05 mm; F = 0.01 mm.
Fig. 48 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 48. Notogallanus mastacembalus gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (VMNH110632). A–D, F. Left gonopod coxa. A. Mesal view. B. Anterior view. C. Posterior view. D. Sublateral view. F. Detail of cucullus and proplica, showing proplical lobe. E. Midbody dorsal limbus. G–H. Left gonopod telopodite. G. Tip of telomere. H. Tip of solenomere. Abbreviations: CU = cucullus; ilp = irregular lateral process; MP = metaplica; mr = metaplical ridge; msl = metaplical subspherical lobe; PP = proplica; trp = triangular process. Scale bars: A–D = 0.1 mm; E = 0.01 mm; F–H = 0.05 mm.
Fig. 58 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 58. Syndesmogenus voiensis (Ribaut, 1907). A–G. Specimen from E Usambara Mts (NHMD 621763). A. Right gonopod, anterior view. B. Right gonopod, posterior view. C. Midbody dorsal limbus, notice interscutal structures. D. Interscutal structures (fungi?) with spherical bodies to the left in the picture and?sockets after such structures to the right. E–G. First pair of legs. E. Ventral view. F. Sublateral view. G. Anterior view. H. Specimen from Mt. Kilimanjaro (NHMD 621764), sternum 9. Abbreviations: APS = mesapical prefemoral setae;BSS1, BSS2= basal solenomeral spines;CU = cucullus; CXS = coxosternal setae; LPS = lateral prefemoral setae; mcp = mesal cucullar process; MP = metaplica; msp = metaplical spinelike process; PP = proplica; PTS = post-torsal spine; SLM = solenomere. Scale bars: A–B, E–F = 0.1 mm; C = 0.01 mm; D = 0.001 mm; G–H = 0.05 mm.
Fig. 47 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 47. Notogallanus mastacembalus gen. et sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (VMNH110632). A–C. First pair of legs. A. Anterior view. B. Sublateral view. C. Ventral view. D. Sternum 9. Abbreviations: APS = mesapical prefemoral setae; CXS = coxosternal setae. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 42 in Mountains of millipedes. The family Odontopygidae in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida)
Fig. 42. Lamelloramus frederiksenae sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NHMD 621744), left gonopod telopodite. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior view. C. Distal (ventral) view. D. Sub-dorsal view (grey area in lower right covered by mounting tape). E. Dorso-anterior view. F–G. Solenomere tip. Abbreviations: BSS = basal solenomeral spine; PN = post-torsal narrowing; PTS = post-torsal spine; SLM = solenomere; stl = 'sidebranching telomeric lamella'; TM = telomere; tp = telomeral process. Scale bars: A–E = 0.2 mm; F = 0.05 mm; G = 0.02 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.