Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,532
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,532 results for “at present”
MixReality Lab Presentation Video
<p>This video features some Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality projects developed in ISTAR's MixReality Lab</p>
Connectivity Matrices from biophysical modelling studies for A. millepora coral larvae in the Great Barrier Reef (Australia); present day and future scenarios
<p>These data contain connectivity matrices from biophysical modelling simulations of the dispersal of <em>Acropora millepora</em> coral larvae in the southern Great Barrier Reef (Australia), under present-day and future climate scenarios. The connectivity matrices represent modelled strength of larval transfer from one reef to another, and were obtained using a coupled reef-scale, high-resolution, depth-integrated finite element hydrodynamic model (SLIM) of water currents in the Great Barrier Reef, and Individual-Based particle tracking module. Biological parameters to model larval acquisition and loss of competency and mortality were based on the results of experiments detailed in the related journal article. We include connectivity matrices for 2 different water temperature scenarios representing current and future climates, for three different recent spawning seasons (2008, 2009, 2010), and also for scenarios where low-frequency currents through the domain are modulated to mimic the likely effects from future changes to large-scale circulation extracted from CMIP5 global climate models.</p> <p>We also include files summarising the relative changes, per reef, to certain key connectivity metrics between the 2 temperature scenarios (dispersal distance, local retention, number of incoming connections, "source index", and present day "source index" - all metrics are defined in the related journal article and Methods section of this metadata), averaged over all 3 spawning seasons modelled, as plotted in Figs 1a-e in the related journal article. Additionally, we include a separate file summarising changes to reef recovery times following a disturbance to coral cover between the 2 temperature scenarios, per reef, as modelled using the meta-population model described in the related journal article, and as shown in Fig 2 of the article.</p>
Distribution. Throughout mainland SE Asia, from C & S Myanmar to W & SE Thailand, C & S Laos, Cambodia, C & S Vietnam, and Peninsular Malaysia; also present in Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Bali, Lombok, and several adjacent small islands. Most likely extinct from E Bangladesh, where it has not been reported for more than 40 years. Northern and western limits of its range are poorly known. in Manidae
Distribution. Throughout mainland SE Asia, from C & S Myanmar to W & SE Thailand, C & S Laos, Cambodia, C & S Vietnam, and Peninsular Malaysia; also present in Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Bali, Lombok, and several adjacent small islands. Most likely extinct from E Bangladesh, where it has not been reported for more than 40 years. Northern and western limits of its range are poorly known.
Distribution. Discontinuously distributed, from Senegal to Ghana in W Africa, and in the C African rainforest block from Cameroon to Uganda, W Kenya, and W Tanzania, and south to extreme NW Angola, also present in Bioko I. Sightings from Dahomey Gap and S Nigeria remain unconfirmed. in Manidae
Distribution. Discontinuously distributed, from Senegal to Ghana in W Africa, and in the C African rainforest block from Cameroon to Uganda, W Kenya, and W Tanzania, and south to extreme NW Angola, also present in Bioko I. Sightings from Dahomey Gap and S Nigeria remain unconfirmed.
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.
Subspecies and Distribution. P.l.hassamaHeuglin,1863—EAfrica,withspecimensknownfromEthiopia,SSudan,EDRCongo,Uganda,Rwanda,Burundi,Kenya,andTanzania. P.l.koiropotamusDesmoulins,1831—lowerCongoRiver(leftbank),Angola,SDRCongo,Zambia,Malawi,Mozambique,Zimbabwe,Botswana,Swaziland,andSouthAfrica. P. l. somaliensis de Beaux, 1924 — Tana, Juba, and Shebelle rivers in NE Kenya and Somalia. The species is also present in Madagascar and the Comoro Is, but their taxonomic situation thereis still unresolved. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. P.l.hassamaHeuglin,1863—EAfrica,withspecimensknownfromEthiopia,SSudan,EDRCongo,Uganda,Rwanda,Burundi,Kenya,andTanzania. P.l.koiropotamusDesmoulins,1831—lowerCongoRiver(leftbank),Angola,SDRCongo,Zambia,Malawi,Mozambique,Zimbabwe,Botswana,Swaziland,andSouthAfrica. P. l. somaliensis de Beaux, 1924 — Tana, Juba, and Shebelle rivers in NE Kenya and Somalia. The species is also present in Madagascar and the Comoro Is, but their taxonomic situation thereis still unresolved.
Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.simumBurchell,1817—SEAngola,NENamibia,Botswana,Zimbabwe,SMozambique,Swaziland,SouthAfrica,andperhapsformerlyinextremeSWZambia. C. s. cottoni Lydekker, 1908 — historically present in S Chad, Central African Republic, S Sudan, NE DR Congo, and Uganda; last individuals occurred in DR Congo, but possibly extinct in the wild. The "Southern White Rhino," race simum, has been introduced into Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia. Especially vague range map for conservation reasons. in Rhinocerotidae
Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.simumBurchell,1817—SEAngola,NENamibia,Botswana,Zimbabwe,SMozambique,Swaziland,SouthAfrica,andperhapsformerlyinextremeSWZambia. C. s. cottoni Lydekker, 1908 — historically present in S Chad, Central African Republic, S Sudan, NE DR Congo, and Uganda; last individuals occurred in DR Congo, but possibly extinct in the wild. The "Southern White Rhino," race simum, has been introduced into Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia. Especially vague range map for conservation reasons.
Subspecies and Distribution. P.c.capensisPallas,1766—SouthAfrica,includingLesothoandSwaziland. P.c.bamendaeBrauer,1913—CameroonandCentralAfricanRepublic. P.c.capillosaBrauer,1917—SEthiopia. P.c.erlanger:Neumann,1901—SSomalia. P.c.habessinicaHemprich&Ehrenberg,1832—Egypt,NSudan,Israel,SaudiArabia,andYemen. P.c.jacksoniThomas,1900—EKenya. P.c.jayakariThomas,1892—Oman. P.c.johnston:Thomas,1894—SWTanzania,Malawi,Mozambique,andZimbabwe. P.c.kerstingiMatschie,1899—TogoandBenin. P.c.mackinder:Thomas,1900—WKenya. P.c.matschietNeumann,1900—DRCongoandTanzania. P.c.pallidaThomas,1891—NSomalia. P.c.ruficepsHemprich&Ehrenberg,1832—NandWAfrica. P.c.scioanaGiglioli,1888—NEthiopia. P.c.sharicaThomas&Wroughton,1907—Chad. P.c.syriacaSchreber,1784—Syria,Lebanon,Jordan,andIsrael. P. c. welwitschii Gray, 1868 — SW Angola and Namibia. The distribution information for this species is still incomplete; the Rock Hyrax is also present in Eritrea, Niger, Nigeria, C & S Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Zambia and E Botswana, but the subspecific identity of these populations still requires confirmation. in Procaviidae
Subspecies and Distribution. P.c.capensisPallas,1766—SouthAfrica,includingLesothoandSwaziland. P.c.bamendaeBrauer,1913—CameroonandCentralAfricanRepublic. P.c.capillosaBrauer,1917—SEthiopia. P.c.erlanger:Neumann,1901—SSomalia. P.c.habessinicaHemprich&Ehrenberg,1832—Egypt,NSudan,Israel,SaudiArabia,andYemen. P.c.jacksoniThomas,1900—EKenya. P.c.jayakariThomas,1892—Oman. P.c.johnston:Thomas,1894—SWTanzania,Malawi,Mozambique,andZimbabwe. P.c.kerstingiMatschie,1899—TogoandBenin. P.c.mackinder:Thomas,1900—WKenya. P.c.matschietNeumann,1900—DRCongoandTanzania. P.c.pallidaThomas,1891—NSomalia. P.c.ruficepsHemprich&Ehrenberg,1832—NandWAfrica. P.c.scioanaGiglioli,1888—NEthiopia. P.c.sharicaThomas&Wroughton,1907—Chad. P.c.syriacaSchreber,1784—Syria,Lebanon,Jordan,andIsrael. P. c. welwitschii Gray, 1868 — SW Angola and Namibia. The distribution information for this species is still incomplete; the Rock Hyrax is also present in Eritrea, Niger, Nigeria, C & S Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Zambia and E Botswana, but the subspecific identity of these populations still requires confirmation.
FIGURE Phylogenetic relationships of the Coelastrella genus inferred from the 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ), Maximum Likelihood (ML) bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are presented at the nodes (NJ/ML/PP). Only values above 75 are shown. Strains provided in this study are indicated in bold font. Authentic strains marked with asterisks. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. The GenBank accession numbers of Coelastrella can be found in the Table 3. in Morphological and phylogenetic relations of members of the genus Coelastrella (Scenedesmaceae, Chlorophyta) from the Ural and Khentii Mountains (Russia, Mongolia)
FIGURE Phylogenetic relationships of the Coelastrella genus inferred from the 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ), Maximum Likelihood (ML) bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are presented at the nodes (NJ/ML/PP). Only values above 75 are shown. Strains provided in this study are indicated in bold font. Authentic strains marked with asterisks. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. The GenBank accession numbers of Coelastrella can be found in the Table 3.
FIGURE. Neotype of Euphorbia leandriana Boiteau, Boiteau s.n. (P, specimen formerly in spiritu), designated in the present paper. A, B. details of the specimen; C. specimen with copy of the original spirit label (lost), likely by J. Bosser. Credits: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris (A–C). in Novelties in Malagasy Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae)
FIGURE. Neotype of Euphorbia leandriana Boiteau, Boiteau s.n. (P, specimen formerly in spiritu), designated in the present paper. A, B. details of the specimen; C. specimen with copy of the original spirit label (lost), likely by J. Bosser. Credits: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris (A–C).
How solution snippets are presented in answers posted on Stack Overflow and how they could be potentially reused.
<p>Software engineering Q&A websites (e.g., Stack Overflow), harness the collective expertise of users to address technical queries. Over time, these platforms evolve into valuable repositories of software engineering knowledge. Such repositories serve as essential resources for developers looking for <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">solutions</abbr></abbr></abbr> to common programming <abbr title="Sentiment effect: -2">problems</abbr>. In Stack Overflow, developers may approach answering questions in various ways. <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 2">Gaining</abbr> insight into how developers formulate their answers on Stack Overflow can enhance knowledge sharing and streamline the process of finding <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">solutions</abbr></abbr></abbr>. Furthermore, such insights could also inform improvements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools to <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 2">better</abbr> align generated source code for comprehension and understandability, as AI-generated answers are known to include irrelevant information and hallucinations. In this study, we seek to deepen the understanding of how <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">solutions</abbr></abbr></abbr> are presented on Stack Overflow. We conducted an empirical study that investigates programming questions that are answered with a <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">Solution</abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr> Snippet to understand how a <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">Solution</abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr> Snippet is presented, and the ways how it should be adapted when it is reused. Our study resulted in two categorizations: 1) eight categories of how <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">Solution</abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr> Snippets are presented on Stack Overflow answers and 2) five categories of how <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">Solution</abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr> Snippets could be adapted for reuse. Then, we analyzed these categorizations and discussed the implications. We anticipate that Stack Overflow will remain a valuable resource for the foreseeable future, and the insights revealed in our paper lay the groundwork for <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 2">improving</abbr> program comprehension of <abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1"><abbr title="Sentiment effect: 1">Solution</abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr></abbr> Snippets on Stack Overflow and GenAI tools.</p>
Dataset for the paper "VANETs' research overview updated: past, present and future"
<p>These two files contain a form and a dataset, both related to the paper "VANETs’ research overview updated: past, present and future", which was submitted for publication in the <strong>JOURNAL OF BRAZILIAN COMPUTER SOCIETY</strong> ----- by José Anderson Rodrigues de Souza et al., 2023.</p>
Data from: Clinical presentation and management of SMART syndrome
<div class="WordSection1"> <p><span>Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome represents a rare but serious condition manifesting years after cranial radiation therapy (RT). Characterized by migraine-type headaches, stroke-like deficits and/or seizures and MR imaging abnormalities, including cortical gyriform enhancement in irradiated brain regions, SMART remains diagnostically and therapeutically challenging. Distinction from tumor progression is difficult and treatment options are limited. Although frequently reversible, SMART episodes can recur and effectuate persistent neurologic and/or imaging sequelae.</span></p> </div>
FIGURE 6 in The present state of the leech fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania
FIGURE 6. Freshwater leeches in Lithuania:dorsal view of Hirudo medicinalis (T), dorsal papillae (showed by arrow) (U), lateral–ventral view of the body (V); W–lateral view of Haemopis sanguisuga with male copulatory organ outside of the body.
FIGURE 5 in The present state of the leech fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania
FIGURE 5. Freshwater leeches in Lithuania: dorsal view of Erpobdella octocullata (N), head region with full set of eyespots (O) and eyespots developed only in one side of the head (P). Erpobdella monostriata head region (Q) and posterior part of body (R). Erpobdella nigricollis dorsal view of the head region (S).
FIGURE 4 in The present state of the leech fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania
FIGURE 4. Freshwater leeches in Lithuania: Theromyzon tessulatum an adult (J) and juvenile (K). Piscicola geometra anterior (L) and posterior sucker (M).
FIGURE 3 in The present state of the leech fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania
FIGURE 3. Freshwater leeches in Lithuania: dorsal view of Helobdella stagnalis anterior part of body (G), whole body (H) and juveniles attached to the ventral part of body (I).
FIGURE 2 in The present state of the leech fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania
FIGURE 2. Freshwater leeches in Lithuania: ventral view of Alboglossiphonia heteroclita specimen with eggs (A) and dorsal view of the head region (B). Dorsal view of the head region of Hemiclepsis marginata (C). Dorsal view of Placobdella costata whole specimen (D). Dorsal view of Glossiphonia complanata whole specimen (E) and dorsal view of the head (F).
FIGURE. Phylogenetic analysis of Chrysosporium spp. based on ITS sequences. Statistical support values (≥50 %) are shown at nodes, and presented as ML bootstrap support/Bayesian posterior probabilities. Names in black bold are the strains isolated in this study, the coloured names are the new species. in Morphological and phylogenetic characterisations reveal nine new species of Chrysosporium (Onygenaceae, Onygenales) in China
FIGURE. Phylogenetic analysis of Chrysosporium spp. based on ITS sequences. Statistical support values (≥50 %) are shown at nodes, and presented as ML bootstrap support/Bayesian posterior probabilities. Names in black bold are the strains isolated in this study, the coloured names are the new species.
Distribution. Known with certainly from type locality in C Vietnam and one locality in C Laos (Khammouan Limestone National Biodiversity Conservation Area); it might also be present in S China, butthis has yet to be confirmed. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. Known with certainly from type locality in C Vietnam and one locality in C Laos (Khammouan Limestone National Biodiversity Conservation Area); it might also be present in S China, butthis has yet to be confirmed.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.