Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
972
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
972 results for “morphological barcode”
Figure 5 from: Ainsworth A, Cannon P, Dentinger B (2013) DNA barcoding and morphological studies reveal two new species of waxcap mushrooms (Hygrophoraceae) in Britain. MycoKeys 7: 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.7.5860
Figure 5 - Microscopic characters of Gliophorus europerplexus, A mounted in Melzer's Reagent and B–D(holotype) in Congo Red, scale bars represent 10 µm. A Spores from lamellar squash K(M)181241*B Subregular lamellar trama from squash mount K(M)181246*C–D Basidia K(M)181246*.
Figure 2 from: Ainsworth A, Cannon P, Dentinger B (2013) DNA barcoding and morphological studies reveal two new species of waxcap mushrooms (Hygrophoraceae) in Britain. MycoKeys 7: 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.7.5860
Figure 2 - Basidiomata of Gliophorus reginae showing pileal colour range: A–D purple, E–F pink and G–H reddish brown, scale bars represent 20 mm. Photographs C–F taken in situ at the type locality. A, B K(M)181115* photographed by R.D. Foster. C K(M)181117* and D K(M)181123 photographed by R. Winnall. E(left), F K(M)181128* and E (right) K(M)181127* photographed by A.M.A. G, H K(M)181124* photographed by D.J. Harries.
Figure 6 (A-D) from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 6 (A-D) - Metasoma. 2nd tergite sculpture of Pimpla croceipes female A, Pimpla molesta female B, Pimpla croceipes male C, and Pimpla molesta male D.
Figure 5 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 5 - A frequency histogram of elevations of Malaise samples, for 1) all LLAMA samples, 2) those with Pimpla croceipes, and 3) those with Pimpla molesta.
Figure 4 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 4 - Neighbour-joining tree of the successfully DNA barcoded LLAMA specimens (species; sex; DNA voucher code; location). Numbers above the branches are bootstrap proportions. The two species Pimpla croceipes and Pimpla molesta (stat. rev.) are clearly separated into two well-supported clusters. The results were further supported by morphological examination.
Figure 3 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 3 - The LLAMA study sites where specimens of either Pimpla croceipes, Pimpla molesta, or both, were collected 1 Suchitepequez 2 Sacatepequez 3 Baja Vera Paz 4 Zacapa 5 Ocotepeque 6 Cortés 7 Comayagua 8 Olancho: "La Muralla" 9 Olancho: "Catacamas". See text for more specific descriptions of site locations.
Figure 7 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 7 - Lissonota sp. male (Ichneumonidae: Banchinae) collected at Comayagua (Honduras) showing a similar mimicry pattern to Pimpla croceipes and Pimpla molesta.
Figure 5 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 5 - Differences in microstructures between larvae of Cephaloleia kuprewiczae (left column) and Cephaloleia histrionica (right column). A–B Head C–D Details of dorsal papillae and spiracles E–F Detail of spiracle and surrounding setae G–H Front leg. cl: clypeus, hy: hypopharynx, lb: labrum, lbi: labium, lp: labial palp, ma: malum, mn: mandibula, mp: maxillary palp, p: palpifer, se: seta, sp: spiracle, st: stipe.
Figure 6 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 6 - A Frequency distributions of inter and intraspecific similarities for beetle COI sequences (paired comparisons, percentage of bases/residuals that are identical for each comparison for cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences included in Figure 6B). B Identification of Cephaloleia kuprewiczae sp. n. and Cephaloleia histrionica using cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences. Neighbor-joining tree includes bootstrap values (%) supporting species identifications. Filled circles represent DNA sequences obtained from adults. Empty circles represent DNA sequences obtained from larvae.
Figure 4 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 4 - Larvae of Cephaloleia kuprewiczae (A) and Cephaloleia histrionica (B) feeding on their host plants. Scale bars = 3 mm.
Figure 3 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 3 - A Egg B–C First instar larva (dorsal and ventral views) D–E Second instar larva (dorsal and ventral views). F Adult Cephaloleia histrionica. Scale bars in all panels = 1 mm. From García-Robledo et al. 2013a.
Figure 2 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 2 - A–B Cephaloleia kuprewiczae A dorsal view B ventral view C–D Cephaloleia histrionica C Dorsal view D Ventral view. Scale bars = 3 mm.
Figure 1 from: Garcia-Robledo C, Staines CL, Kress WJ (2015) A new species of bromeliad-feeding Cephaloleia Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) from Costa Rica: evidence from DNA barcodes, larval and adult morphology and insect diets. ZooKeys 477: 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.477.8220
Figure 1 - Pitcairnia arcuata and Pitcairnia brittoniana (Bromeliaceae), host plants of Cephaloleia kuprewiczae. A Pitcairnia arcuata, habit B Detail of a rolled leaf used as a larval and adult food source and adult oviposition site C Pitcairnia arcuata Inflorescence D Pitcairnia brittoniana inflorescence E Leaf damage produced by a feeding adult Cephaloleia histrionica. Scale bars: A–C = 10 cm; D, E = 1 cm. Modified from García-Robledo et al. 2013a.
Figure 4 from: Stur E, Borkent A (2014) When DNA barcoding and morphology mesh: Ceratopogonidae diversity in Finnmark, Norway. ZooKeys 463: 95-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.463.7964
Figure 4 - A, B Forcipomyia sp. 5 female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D Forcipomyia sp. 4 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view.
Figure 2 from: Stur E, Borkent A (2014) When DNA barcoding and morphology mesh: Ceratopogonidae diversity in Finnmark, Norway. ZooKeys 463: 95-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.463.7964
Figure 2 - Taxon-ID tree of the studied Ceratopogonidae specimens based on the neighbor joining algorithm from aligned COI sequences using partial deletion for areas with gaps and 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA 5.2. All included sequences were longer than 500 bp. Bootstrap values shown on branches supported by more than 90% of the bootstrap replicates.
Figure 3 from: Stur E, Borkent A (2014) When DNA barcoding and morphology mesh: Ceratopogonidae diversity in Finnmark, Norway. ZooKeys 463: 95-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.463.7964
Figure 3 - A, B Forcipomyia hygrophila female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D Forcipomyia sp. 1 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view.
Figure 1 from: Stur E, Borkent A (2014) When DNA barcoding and morphology mesh: Ceratopogonidae diversity in Finnmark, Norway. ZooKeys 463: 95-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.463.7964
Figure 1 - Sample sites for Ceratopogonidae in Finnmark, Norway, in 2010. Modified after Fig. 2 in Ekrem et al. (2012). Map by Marc Daverdin, NTNU University Museum.
Figure 2c from: Cocuzza GEM, Di Silvestro S, Giordano R, Rapisarda C (2015) Congruence between cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and morphological data in Anuraphis spp. (Hemiptera, Aphididae) with a comparison between the utility of the 5' barcode and 3' COI regions. ZooKeys 529: 123-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.529.6081
Figure 2c - MrBayes tree estimated using 648 bp at the 3' end of COI for selected Anuraphis species.
Figure 2d from: Cocuzza GEM, Di Silvestro S, Giordano R, Rapisarda C (2015) Congruence between cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and morphological data in Anuraphis spp. (Hemiptera, Aphididae) with a comparison between the utility of the 5' barcode and 3' COI regions. ZooKeys 529: 123-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.529.6081
Figure 2d - MrBayes tree estimated using 658 bp at the 5' end of COI for selected Anuraphis species.
Figure 1a from: Cocuzza GEM, Di Silvestro S, Giordano R, Rapisarda C (2015) Congruence between cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and morphological data in Anuraphis spp. (Hemiptera, Aphididae) with a comparison between the utility of the 5' barcode and 3' COI regions. ZooKeys 529: 123-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.529.6081
Figure 1a - Neighbor-Joining tree showing relationships among selected Anuraphis species estimated using 648 bp at the 3' end of the COI mitochondrial gene. Distance were estimated using the p-distance model of sequence evolution.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.