Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Fig. 2 in Migrations and Conservation Implications of Post-Nesting Green Turtles from Gielop Island, Ulithi Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia

Fig. 2: 2005 and 2006 green turtle migration routes following nesting activities at Gielop Island as indicated by satellite telemetry.

Fig. 1 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 1. Map illustrating localities where the five cyprinid hosts were collected in the Cape Fold ecoregion in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Fig. 7 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 7. Rarefaction/extrapolation curve estimating the diversity of parasites as a function of sampling effort for three of the five hosts collected in the OlifantsDoorn River System, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval obtained using the bootstrap method based on 100 repetitions. Created using iNEXT Online (Chao et al., 2016).

Fig. 4 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 4. Pseudobarbus calidus (Barnard, 1938) (max. length: 125 mm) (A). Sclerites of Paradiplozoon sp. from the gills (B). Acanthocephala from the body cavity, whole specimen (C) and hooks on proboscis (top left insert). Larval Contracaecum sp. from the body cavity, anterior (D) and posterior (E) ends, lateral view. Scale bars: 100 μm (B, C, D, E).

Fig. 1 in Conservation of parasites: A primer

Fig. 1. Decision tree for conservation management of threatened parasite species. See text for potential management actions. For other examples of decision trees, used in a more restricted fashion to assess parasite conservation status or to determine which parasites should be the focus of conservation actions, see Moir et al. (2011); Dougherty et al. (2016); Kwak (2018).

Fig. 6 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 6. Sedercypris erubescens (Skelton, 1974) (max. length: 120 mm) (A). Larval Contracaecum sp. from the body cavity, anterior (B) and posterior (C) ends, lateral view. Scale bars: 100 μm (B, C).

Fig. 5 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 5. Pseudobarbus phlegethon (Barnard, 1938) (max. length: 65 mm) (A); Acanthogyrus sp. found from the body cavity (B). Scale bar: 500 μm.

Fig. 3 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 3. Labeobarbus seeberi (Gilchrist et Thompson, 1913) (max. length: 270 mm) (A); Myxobolus sp. (B) and Dactylogyrus sp. from the gills of L. seeberi, hamuli and marginal hooks (C), male copulatory complex (D) and vagina (E). Lateral view of Rhabdochona sp. 2 from the intestine, anterior end of female (F) and male (G), posterior end of male (H); metacercariae of Diplostomidae (I) from black cysts on skin. Scale bars: 10 μm (B); 50 μm (D, E); 100 μm (C, F, G, H, I).

Fig. 2 in Working towards a conservation plan for fish parasites: Cyprinid parasites from the south African cape fold freshwater ecoregion as a case study

Fig. 2. Cheilobarbus serra (Peters, 1864) (max. length: 350 mm) (A); adult Paradiplozoon sp. (B) and sclerites in attachment clamps (C, D) found on the gills; hamuli of Gyrodactylus sp. (E) and marginal hooks (F), and a pre-metamorphic stage of the copepod belonging to the Lernaeidae (G), both from the gills. Anterior (H) and posterior (I) ends of Rhabdochona sp. 1 (lateral view) from the intestine; (J) whole specimen of the Caryophyllidea. Scale bars: 10 μm (E, F); 100 μm (C, D, G, H, I); 500 μm (B); 1000 μm (J).

Figure S2 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure S2. MDS ordination indicating the clear separation of the two land use groups based on the urbanisation measures.

Figure 6. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure 6. A, Percentage distribution of alien and indigenous species per site; B, the indigenous (ISR) and alien (ASR) species richness per site; C, the percentage of the total average cover of all alien species per site; D, the associated adjusted Floristic Quality Assessment Index values (adjFQAI) of each site; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.

Figure S1 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure S1. Cluster analysis results based on the urbanisation measures indicating clear grouping between the urban sites 1 and 2 and the rural sites.

Figure 3. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure 3. A, Total number of species per wetland site (alpha diversity); B, the average species richness per transect for each site; C, the size of each wetland; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.

Figure 4. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure 4. A, Beta diversity between sites (calculated as the average between all the rural sites (R1–R12), the average between the two urban sites and all the rural sites (U1 and U2), and between the two urban sites (U)); B, the SIMPER analysis results of the average similarity of the transects in each wetland site; arranged along a gradient of increasing percentage urban landcover.

Figure 5. A in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure 5. A, Wetland index values (WIV) of each site; B, the average site cover descriptions; C, the percentage average growth form distribution at each site; D, the average functional diversity per site (upland (U), facultative upland (FU), facultative (F), facultative wetland (FW), obligate wetland (OB)); arranged along a gradient of increasing urban landcover.

Figure 1 in Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient

Figure 1. Study area indicating the urban area of Potchefstroom, its rural surroundings and the 14 wetland study sites. Inset map shows the size and location of the urban area and Mooi River within the former Tlokwe Municipal area.

Fig. 5 in A critically co-endangered feather louse Forficuloecus pezopori n. sp. (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) detected through conservation intervention for the western ground parrot Pezoporus flaviventris (Psittaculidae)

Fig. 5. Forficuloecus pezopori Martin, Keatley & Ash n. sp., dorsal (left) and ventral perspective, A. female allotype posterior terminus with egg, B. female alloptype anterior dorsal plate, C. male holotype posterior terminus, D. male holotype terminal genitalia. Tergopleurites and sternopleurites labelled with Roman numerals. Abbreviations: a, basal apodeme; e, endomere; m, mesosomal plate; p, paramere; sgp, subgenital plate; svs, subvulvular sclerite; t, telomere. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Fig. 4 in A critically co-endangered feather louse Forficuloecus pezopori n. sp. (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) detected through conservation intervention for the western ground parrot Pezoporus flaviventris (Psittaculidae)

Fig. 4. Forficuloecus pezopori Martin, Keatley & Ash n. sp. male holotype, ventral perspective, A. proleg, B. metaleg, C. mesoleg. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Fig. 1 in A critically co-endangered feather louse Forficuloecus pezopori n. sp. (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) detected through conservation intervention for the western ground parrot Pezoporus flaviventris (Psittaculidae)

Fig. 1. Inferred phylogeny for species of Forficuloecus based on maximum likelihood analysis of COI mtDNA. Nodal support are from 400 bootstrap replicates. The scale-bar indicates the expected number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 3 in A critically co-endangered feather louse Forficuloecus pezopori n. sp. (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) detected through conservation intervention for the western ground parrot Pezoporus flaviventris (Psittaculidae)

Fig. 3. Forficuloecus pezopori Martin, Keatley & Ash n. sp. head, female paratype, dorsal (left) and ventral perspective. Abbreviations: ads, anterodorsal seta; as, anterior seta; avs, anteroventral seta; dsms, dorsal submarginal seta; mts, marginal temple seta; os, ocular seta; pas, preantennal seta; pcs, preconal seta; pns, postnodal seta; pts, posterior temple seta; vsms, ventral submarginal seta. Scale bar: 200 μm.