Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9,882
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
9,882 results for “Scale”
Fig. 2. a in Parasitoids Of The Bedeguar Gall (Diplolepis Rosae): Effect Of Host Scale On Density And Prevalence
Fig. 2. a) Parasitoid number per shrub; b) parasitoid prevalence per shrub; c) parasitoid number per gall; d) parasitoid prevalence per gall as a function of rose shrub density per 50 m × 50 m plot (linear regressions). The dotted lines represent the 95% CI, while the dashed lines the prediction intervals
Fig. 1 in Parasitoids Of The Bedeguar Gall (Diplolepis Rosae): Effect Of Host Scale On Density And Prevalence
Fig. 1. Gall density per shrub as a function of rose shrub density per 50 m × 50 m plot (linear regression). The dotted lines represent the 95% CI, while the dashed lines represent the prediction intervals
Fig. 4. a in Parasitoids Of The Bedeguar Gall (Diplolepis Rosae): Effect Of Host Scale On Density And Prevalence
Fig. 4. a) Parasitoid numbers per shrubs (dots) and galls (triangles); b) parasitoid prevalences per shrubs (dots) and galls (triangles) versus gall numbers per shrub (nested linear fixed effect ANCOVA)
Fig. 3. a in Parasitoids Of The Bedeguar Gall (Diplolepis Rosae): Effect Of Host Scale On Density And Prevalence
Fig. 3. a) Parasitoid numbers per shrubs (dots) and galls (triangles); b) parasitoid prevalences per shrubs (dots) and galls (triangles) versus rose shrub density per 50 m × 50 m plot (nested linear fixed effect ANCOVA)
Data for "Density deficit of the Earth's core revealed by a multi-megabar primary pressure scale"
<p>This file is the dataset used in the article "Density deficit of the Earth's core revealed by a multi-megabar primary pressure scale", Sci. Adv. 9, eadh8706 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh8706</p>
Figure 3 in Lessons learnt from large-scale eradication of Australian swamp stonecrop Crassula helmsii in a protected Natura 2000 site
Figure 3. Photo impressions of the large scale eradication of Crassula helmsii on the Island of Terschelling. A. The dominant infestation of C. helmsii in an artificial lake (location 5). B. Installing a mitigation fence in order to prevent entry by amphibians and reptiles (2.75 linear km). C. Drainage installation and steel road plates tracks. D. Excavation of 40 cm topsoil (Step 4 of the described eradication approach). E. Recolonization of characteristic native plant species in excavated area 2.5 years after the eradication of C. helmsii (March 2021). F. Guided tours in the study area to inform those concerned.
Figure 1 in Lessons learnt from large-scale eradication of Australian swamp stonecrop Crassula helmsii in a protected Natura 2000 site
Figure 1. Locations of the dune slacks (1–5) where measures for eradication of Crassula helmsii were taken.
Figure 2 in Lessons learnt from large-scale eradication of Australian swamp stonecrop Crassula helmsii in a protected Natura 2000 site
Figure 2. Flow chart of the process for large scale eradication of Crassula helmsii on the Island of Terschelling.
Fig. 2 in Macro-Scale Environmental Preferences Of Bombina Bombina: A Modeling Approach
Fig. 2. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve generated in Maxent, showing an average of 50 repetitions of the model; the dark blue range shows the mean of the standard deviations.
Fig. 3 in Macro-Scale Environmental Preferences Of Bombina Bombina: A Modeling Approach
Fig. 3. Results of jackknife test of variable importance, using training gain. The jackknife test in blue bars shows individual environmental variable importance relative to the red bar which shows all environmental variables. Light blue bar shows whether a variable has any information that isn't present in the other variables, and a dark blue bar shows whether a variable has any useful information by itself. Values shown are averages over replicate runs.
Fig. 5 in Surface Structure And Photonic Nanoarchitectures In Scales Of Weevils
Fig. 5. Fotonic nanoarchitectures of scales b) Phyllobius maculicornis, c) Polydrusus mollis, d) Chlorophanus viridis, e) Hypera nigrirostris, f) Phyllobius argentatus, g) Sciaphilus asperatus.
Fig. 1. Weevils a in Surface Structure And Photonic Nanoarchitectures In Scales Of Weevils
Fig. 1. Weevils a) Phyllobius virideaeris, b) Phyllobius maculicornis c) Phyllobius argentatus d) Chlorophanus viridis, e) Hypera nigrirostris, f) Polydrusus mollis g) Sciaphilus asperatus.
Рис. 1. Protoripoda (Protoripoda) bureensis sp. nov.; 1 — ΔорсаΛьная сторона; 2 — вентраΛьная сторона. Масштаб — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Protoripoda (Protoripoda) bureensis sp. nov.; 1 — dorsal view; 2 — ventral view. Scale bar — 50 µm in Sp. Nov. And Other Interesting Finding Of Oribatid Mites (Acari, Oribatida) From Bureinsky Reserve (Khabarovsky Krai)
Рис. 1. Protoripoda (Protoripoda) bureensis sp. nov.; 1 — ΔорсаΛьная сторона; 2 — вентраΛьная сторона. Масштаб — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Protoripoda (Protoripoda) bureensis sp. nov.; 1 — dorsal view; 2 — ventral view. Scale bar — 50 µm
Рис. 4. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., гоΛотип самца (А–Г, Е, Ж), паратип самца (Á, З). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г, Á — гоΛова; Е, Ж — теΛо в обΛасти кΛоаки; З — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm Fig. 4. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male holotype (А–Г, Е, Ж), male paratype (Á, З). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г, Á — head; Е, Ж — cloaca area; З — posterior view. Scale: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam
Рис. 4. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., гоΛотип самца (А–Г, Е, Ж), паратип самца (Á, З). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г, Á — гоΛова; Е, Ж — теΛо в обΛасти кΛоаки; З — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm Fig. 4. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male holotype (А–Г, Е, Ж), male paratype (Á, З). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г, Á — head; Е, Ж — cloaca area; З — posterior view. Scale: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm
Рис. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., cамец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 75 мкм; Б, В — 30 мкм Fig. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior view; В — posterior view. Scale: А — 75 μm Б, В — 30 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam
Рис. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., cамец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 75 мкм; Б, В — 30 мкм Fig. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior view; В — posterior view. Scale: А — 75 μm Б, В — 30 μm
Рис. 1. Seychelliceps cooperi comb. nov., ЗММУ № 23252, 155 мм SL (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) и Suggrundus macracanthus, ИОРАН, Вьетнам, заΛ. Нячанг, 124 мм SL (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11), ΑетаΛи строения: 1, 2 — верхний преоперкуΛярный шип; 3, 4 — гребешки и/иΛи бугорки костей крыши черепа в загΛазничной части; 5, 6 — заΑний конец премаксиΛΛярных зубных Λент; 7, 8 — форма небных зубных Λент; 9, 10 — чешуи преΑорсаΛьной обΛасти; 11 — восьмая чешуйка боковой Λинии (окрашена аΛизарином красным S). Масштаб: 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 — 2,5 мм (7, 8 — Λинейка общая); 3 — 5 мм; 5, 9, 10 — 3 мм; 6 — 2 мм; 11 — 0,3 мм Fig. 1. Seychelliceps cooperi comb. nov., ZMMU no. 23252, 155 mm SL (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) and Suggrundus macracanthus, IORAS, Vietnam, Nha Trang Bay, 124 mm SL (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11), details: 1, 2 — uppermost preopercular spine; 3, 4 — crests and/or tubercles of cranial roofing bone in postorbital portion of head; 5, 6 — posterior ending of premaxillary tooth band; 7, 8 — shape of tooth band on palatine; 9, 10 — predorsal scales; 11 — eighth scale of lateral line (stained by alizarine red S). Scale bars: 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 — 2.5 mm (7, 8 — common bar); 3 — 5 mm; 5, 9, 10 — 3 mm; 6 — 2 mm; 11 — 0.3 mm in Of The Genus (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes)
Рис. 1. Seychelliceps cooperi comb. nov., ЗММУ № 23252, 155 мм SL (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) и Suggrundus macracanthus, ИОРАН, Вьетнам, заΛ. Нячанг, 124 мм SL (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11), ΑетаΛи строения: 1, 2 — верхний преоперкуΛярный шип; 3, 4 — гребешки и/иΛи бугорки костей крыши черепа в загΛазничной части; 5, 6 — заΑний конец премаксиΛΛярных зубных Λент; 7, 8 — форма небных зубных Λент; 9, 10 — чешуи преΑорсаΛьной обΛасти; 11 — восьмая чешуйка боковой Λинии (окрашена аΛизарином красным S). Масштаб: 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 — 2,5 мм (7, 8 — Λинейка общая); 3 — 5 мм; 5, 9, 10 — 3 мм; 6 — 2 мм; 11 — 0,3 мм Fig. 1. Seychelliceps cooperi comb. nov., ZMMU no. 23252, 155 mm SL (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) and Suggrundus macracanthus, IORAS, Vietnam, Nha Trang Bay, 124 mm SL (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11), details: 1, 2 — uppermost preopercular spine; 3, 4 — crests and/or tubercles of cranial roofing bone in postorbital portion of head; 5, 6 — posterior ending of premaxillary tooth band; 7, 8 — shape of tooth band on palatine; 9, 10 — predorsal scales; 11 — eighth scale of lateral line (stained by alizarine red S). Scale bars: 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 — 2.5 mm (7, 8 — common bar); 3 — 5 mm; 5, 9, 10 — 3 mm; 6 — 2 mm; 11 — 0.3 mm
Рис. 2. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., гоΛотип самца (А, Б, В, Á), паратип самца (Г, Е). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г — гоΛова; Á, Е — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 200 мкм; Б, Á, Е — 50 мкм; В, Г — 20 мкм Fig. 2. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., male holotype (А, Б, В, Á), male paratype (Г, Е). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г — head; Á, Е — posterior view. Scale: А — 200 μm; Б, Á, Е — 50 μm; В, Г — 20 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam
Рис. 2. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., гоΛотип самца (А, Б, В, Á), паратип самца (Г, Е). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г — гоΛова; Á, Е — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 200 мкм; Б, Á, Е — 50 мкм; В, Г — 20 мкм Fig. 2. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., male holotype (А, Б, В, Á), male paratype (Г, Е). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г — head; Á, Е — posterior view. Scale: А — 200 μm; Б, Á, Е — 50 μm; В, Г — 20 μm
Рис. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., самец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 150 мкм; Б, В — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior body end; В — posterior body end. Scale bars: А — 150 μm; Б, В — 50 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam
Рис. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., самец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 150 мкм; Б, В — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior body end; В — posterior body end. Scale bars: А — 150 μm; Б, В — 50 μm
Evolution of Nanocavities to Ductile Fractures in Crustal-Scale Faults at the Base of the Seismogenic Zone
<p>cpr files containing EBSD crystallographic data.</p>
Data from: The importance of biotic interactions in distribution models of wild bees depends on the type of ecological relations, spatial scale and range
<p>Studies have found that biotic information can play an important role in shaping the distribution of species even at large scales. However, results from species distribution models are not always consistent among studies, and the underlying factors that influence the importance of biotic information to distribution models, are unclear. 2. We studied wild bees and plants, and cleptoparasite bees and their hosts in the Netherlands to evaluate how the inclusion of their biotic interactions affects the performance of species distribution models. We assessed model performance through spatial block cross-validation and by comparing models with interactions to models where the interacting species were randomized. Finally, we evaluated how, (i) spatial resolution, (ii) taxonomic rank (genus or species), (iii) degree of specialization, (iv) distribution of the biotic factor, (v) bee body size and (vi) type of biotic interaction, affect the importance of biotic interactions in shaping the distribution of wild bee species using generalized linear models. 3. We found that the models of wild bees improved when the biotic factor was included. The model performance improved the most for parasitic bees. Spatial resolution, taxonomic rank, distribution range of the biotic factor, and degree of specialization of the modelled species all influenced the importance of the biotic interaction to the models. 4. We encourage researchers to include biotic interactions in species distribution models, especially for specialized species and when the biotic factor has a limited distribution range. However, before adding the biotic factor we suggest considering different spatial resolutions and taxonomic ranks of the biotic factor. We recommend using single species or genus data as a biotic factor in the models of specialist species and for the generalist species, we recommend using an approximate measure of interactions, such as flower richness.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.