Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2014View details →

Fig. 5. A in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 5. A non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination of abundance data (log N+1 transformation) for shrimps (a) collected between 12 different months (j = January, f = February, mr = March, ap = April, my = May, j = June, Jl = July, ag = August, s = September, o = October, n = November, d = December) and (b) at five different habitats in Pattani bay (1 = sandy habitat, 2 = mangrove habitat, 3 = shell-deposited habitat, 4 = muddy habitat and 5 = seagrass habitat).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2014View details →

Fig. 1 in Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?

Fig. 1. Map of study area, Pattani Bay, Thailand, showing habitat characteristics (A1–3 = Sandy habitat, B1–3 = Seagrass habitat, C1–3 = Shell-doposited habitat, D1–3 = Muddy habitat, and E1-3 = Mangrove habitat).

Fig. 7 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 7. Results from LDA analysis showing (a) the distribution and overlap of groups of clusters (ellipsoid) and (b) the contribution of parameters to F1 and F2.

Fig. 4 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 4. Boxplots showing (a) abundance (log10-transformed) and (b) diversity index (H′ index) of fish samples in each habitat. Note: The same letter(s) in each box indicates values that are not significantly different when applying the Duncan's post-test, p-value> 0.05.

Fig. 5 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 5. Nodal diagram showing species and sample groups and abundance (log10-transformed) of fish samples per cluster.

Fig. 1 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling habitats at Had Khanom Mu Ko Thale Tai National Park, Thailand. Note: the sampling sites; ▲ seagrass beds; ■ mudflats; ● sandy beaches; ★ mangroves.

Fig. 1 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast

Fig. 1. Location of study sites. (A) Taiwan, (B) the northern coast of Taiwan, (C) Houcuo fishing port, and (D) Linshanbi fishing port.

Fig. 2 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast

Fig. 2. Mean density (±SE) of mobile molluscs on seawalls, breakwaters, and natural rocky shores, at Houcuo and Linshanbi fishing ports between autumn 2010 and summer 2011. In the same season, means with different letters indicate significant differences according to Student-Newman-Keuls test (p <0.05).

Fig. 5 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast

Fig. 5. Principal component scores for specific taxa at the two ports sampled between autumn 2010 and summer 2011.

Fig. 4. The n in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast

Fig. 4. The n-MDS plots for assemblages at various sampling sites from autumn 2010 to summer 2011. Symbols represent different habitats(: natural rocky shores;:seawalls;:breakwaters) and characters represent different fishing ports (H: Houcuo fishing port; L: Linshanbi fishing port). Shaded shapes represent shaded habitats, and unshaded shapes represent unshaded habitats. Ellipses represent the 60% similarity groups superimposed from the cluster analysis based on the Bray-Curtis resemblance matrix.

Fig. 3 in Intertidal Assemblages On Artifical Structures And Natural Rocky Habitats On Taiwan'S North Coast

Fig. 3. Mean percentage cover (±SE) of algae and sessile animals on seawalls, breakwaters, and natural rocky shores at the 2 ports sampled from autumn 2010 to summer 2011 (n = 10). In the same season, means with different letters indicate significant differences according to Student-Newman-Keuls test (p <0.05).

Fig. 29 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 29. Globaura venusta: A–C, IGM 3/164, nearly complete skull with mandibles from Khulsan, dorsal, ventral, and right lateral views; D–F, IGM 3/160, nearly complete skull with mandibles from Ukhaa Tolgod, dorsal, ventral, and left lateral views.

Fig. 25 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 25. Skull of Parmeosaurus scutatus, new genus and species: A–C, IGM 3/139, incomplete skull with mandibles, dorsal, ventral, and right lateral views; D–F, IGM 3/140, incomplete skull with mandibles, dorsal, ventral, and left lateral views.

Fig. 28 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 28. Scincomorpha, family incertae sedis, Slavoia darevskii: A, B, IGM 3/154, incomplete skull with mandible and partial postcranial skeleton from Khulsan, dorsal and ventral views; C, IGM 3/145, nearly complete skull with mandibles and partial postcranial skeleton from Ukhaa Tolgod, dorsal view D, IGM 3/146, incomplete skull with mandibles and articulated postcranial skeleton from Ukhaa Tolgod dorsal view.

Fig. 37 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 37. Virtually complete lizard skeleton from Ukhaa Tolgod, dorsal view (courtesy of Amy Davidson).

Fig. 36 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 36. Exceptional preservation of lizard specimens at Ukhaa Tolgod: A, SEM photograph of unworn dentary teeth of IGM 3/50 (Carusia intermedia), ×20; B, higher magnification of three posterior teeth in lingual view, ×50; C, undistorted braincase of a possible iguanian, arrows pointing to lateral semicircular canal.

Fig. 19 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 19. Tchingisaurus multivagus: A–C, IGM 3/129, incomplete skull with mandibles, dorsal, left and right lateral views.

Fig. 24 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 24.?Scincoidea, family incertae sedis, Parmeosaurus scutatus, new genus and species: A, B, IGM 3/138 (holotype), skull with articulated postcranial skeleton from Ukhaa Tolgod, dorsal and ventral views.

Fig. 15 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 15. Scincomorpha, Teiidae (Polyglyphanodontinae), Adamisaurus magnidentatus: A– C, IGM 3/116, nearly complete skull with mandibles from Tugrugeen Shireh, dorsal, left and right lateral views.

Fig. 14 in Taxonomic Composition And Systematics Of Late Cretaceous Lizard Assemblages From Ukhaa Tolgod And Adjacent Localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert

Fig. 14. Gekkota incertae sedis, Myrmecodaptria microphagosa, new genus and species: A–C, IGM 3/95 (holotype), incomplete skull with mandibles from Ukhaa Tolgod, left lateral, dorsal, and ventral views.