Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs. 7–14. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982, male. 7 in Taxonomy of Stenomicra cogani, with description of S. gracilior sp. nov. from Turkey and comparative morphology of terminalia in Stenomicridae (Diptera)

Figs. 7–14. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982, male. 7 – external genitalia, caudally; 8 – genitalia, laterally; 9 – gonostylus, subventrally, widest extension; 10 – genitalia and pregenital synsternum S6–S8 in situ, ventrally; 11 – part with original S6, ventrally; 12 – same, another variant; 13 – internal genitalia, laterally (with ea omitted); 14 – filum of distiphallus, anteroventrally. Figs. 7, 12 based on specimen from Romania: Banat, others on specimens from England. Scales = 0.1 mm (Figs. 7, 8, 10), and 0.05 mm (Figs. 9, 12–14). For abbreviations see text (p. 701).

Figs. 24–29 in Taxonomy of Stenomicra cogani, with description of S. gracilior sp. nov. from Turkey and comparative morphology of terminalia in Stenomicridae (Diptera)

Figs. 24–29. Stenomicra gracilior sp. nov., male (holotype). 24 – external genitalia, caudally; 25 – genitalia, laterally; 26 – gonostylus, subventrally, widest extension; 27 – filum of distiphallus, anteroventrally; 28 – internal genitalia, laterally; 29 – pregenital synsternum S6–S8, ventrally. Scales = 0.1 mm (Figs. 24, 25) and 0.05 mm (Figs. 27–29). For abbreviations see text (p. 701).

Figs. 35–38 in Taxonomy of Stenomicra cogani, with description of S. gracilior sp. nov. from Turkey and comparative morphology of terminalia in Stenomicridae (Diptera)

Figs. 35–38. Podocera delicata (Collin, 1944), female (Czech Republic: N Bohemia). 35 – spermathecae; 36 – postabdomen with posterior part of T5, dorsally; 37 – postabdomen with S5, ventrally; 38 – genital chamber with ventral receptacle and spermathecae, laterally. Scales = 0.05 mm (Figs. 35, 38) and 0.1 mm (Figs. 36, 37). For abbreviations see text (p. 701).

Figs. 1–4. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982 in Taxonomy of Stenomicra cogani, with description of S. gracilior sp. nov. from Turkey and comparative morphology of terminalia in Stenomicridae (Diptera)

Figs. 1–4. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982 (Czech Republic: N Bohemia). 1 – female (body length ca. 2 mm) sitting on leaf of Scirpus sylvaticus; 2 – same, dorsal view; 3 – male (body length ca. 1.5 mm) on the same leaf; 4 – male, head and thorax laterally (from dry mounted specimen). Photo by J. Roháček (Figs. 1–3) and M. Deml (Fig. 4).

Figs. 15–20. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982 in Taxonomy of Stenomicra cogani, with description of S. gracilior sp. nov. from Turkey and comparative morphology of terminalia in Stenomicridae (Diptera)

Figs. 15–20. Stenomicra cogani Irwin, 1982, female (Czech Republic: N Bohemia). 15 – abdomen dorsally; 16 – same, ventrally; 17 – genital chamber with ventral receptacle and spermatheca, laterally; 18 – spermathecae; 19 – postabdomen, dorsally; 20 – S5 and postabdomen ventrally. Scales = 0.2 mm (Figs. 15, 16), 0.05 mm (Figs. 17, 18) and 0.1 mm (Figs. 19, 20). For abbreviations see text (p. 701).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2008View details →

Fig. 5 in A Comparative Study Of Crocodile Lizards (Shinisaurus Crocodilurus Ahl, 1930) From Vietnam And China

Fig. 5. Habitat of Shinisaurus crocodilurus in north-eastern Vietnam: the evergreen lowland forest of Yen Tu Nature Reserve, Quang Ninh province. Photograph by Le Khac Quyet.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2008View details →

Fig. 1 in A Comparative Study Of Crocodile Lizards (Shinisaurus Crocodilurus Ahl, 1930) From Vietnam And China

Fig. 1. Male lectotype of Shinisaurus crocodilurus (ZMB 34034) from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Photograph by T. Ziegler.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2008View details →

Fig. 2 in A Comparative Study Of Crocodile Lizards (Shinisaurus Crocodilurus Ahl, 1930) From Vietnam And China

Fig. 2. Male Shinisaurus crocodilurus (VNUH 31.8.03-3) from Yen Tu Nature Reserve, Vietnam. Photograph by Le Khac Quyet.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2000View details →

Fig. 83. Ratio diagram comparing the mean log10 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 83. Ratio diagram comparing the mean log10 values for each external and cranial dimension among five species of Oecomys from the Rio Jurua´. Levels of significance in comparisons of the raw variables between pairs of taxa are indicated (* = p <0.05; ** = p <0.01; *** = p <0.001).

Fig. 7 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 7. Box and whisker (a, d) and scatter (b, c) plots showing the relationships between the inquiline species richness of individual pitchers and pitcher type (a), pitcher size (b), canopy cover (c), and location (within or outside of the CCNR; d). The plots show that inquiline species richness was higher in lower than upper pitchers (a), and pitcher size (b) and canopy cover (c) had weak positive effects on inquiline species richness, but there was no significant difference in inquiline species richness between pitchers outside of and within the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR) (d). In (a) and (d), boxes represent interquartile ranges, whiskers represent maxima and minima, and points represent outliers. In (b) and (c), points (green = lower, beige = upper pitchers) represent the species richness of individual pitchers, and lines represent the model predictions of the second (b; ΔAICc = 1.94) and third (c; ΔAICc = 1.99) best models for lower (green) and upper (beige) pitchers.

Fig. 11 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 11. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs exemplifying morphological differences in the chelicerae of Nepenthes histiostomatid mites: (a) Creutzeria sp., (b) Zwickia sp., (c) Nepenthacarus sp. Scale bar = 10 micrometres. (Photographs by: Norman J. Fashing).

Fig. 3 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 3. Two-dimensional NMDS plot of the plant communities co-occurring with Nepenthes rafflesiana in plots located within (brown points) and outside (pink points) of the CCNR (a), and box and whisker plot comparing the log-transformed floristic species richness of these locations (b). Plant communities differed significantly in composition (a; pseudo-F1,11 = 3.80, p-value <0.001) and species richness (b; T11 = 4.74, p-value = 0.001). Each point in the NMDS plot (a) represents the plant communities of a single plot. Colours are translucent, so that overlapping points may be distinguished. Points which are located closer to each other in the NMDS plot share more similar plant communities. Texts represent plant species centroids, with font sizes proportional to the number of plots in which each was found (species which were found in two or less plots are not displayed). A species is more likely to occur in a plot if the plot's point is located close to the species' centroid. Bold lines in the box and whisker plot represent median log-transformed species richness, boxes represent interquartile ranges, whiskers represent maxima/minima and points represent outliers.

Fig. 6 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 6. Box and whisker plots show that inquiline taxa were found in different abundances across the different forest types, with several species being confined to the old secondary forests within the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR). Bold horizontal lines represent median log-transformed number of each inquiline taxon in pitchers from each forest type (denoted by colours); boxes represent interquartile range; whiskers represent maximum values. Taxon names are abbreviated as done in the previous figure; rare inquiline taxa which were present in only one sample are not displayed.

Fig. 2 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 2. Habitat types in which Nepenthes rafflesiana plants were found in this study: (a) coastal cliffs; (b) adinandra belukar; (c) old secondary forests (in this case, a tree fall gap within an old secondary forest). Nepenthes rafflesiana plants are indicated by an arrow in panels a and c. Coastal cliffs (a) and adinandra belukar (b) type habitats were mainly found outside the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR), while old secondary forests type habitats were only found within the CCNR. Despite their different locations, plant communities in which N. rafflesiana were found in coastal cliff habitats (a) and typical adinandra belukar habitats (b) were compositionally highly similar and may both be classified as adinandra belukar type plant communities. (Photographs by: Lam Weng Ngai).

Fig. 1 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 1. Nepenthes rafflesiana lower (a) and upper (b) pitchers in situ; location of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR) in Singapore (c). Data sources for (c): Singapore Public Data (https://data.gov.sg); Global Administrative Areas Database version 3.6 (https:// gadm.org/data.html). (Photographs by: Lam Weng Ngai).

Fig. 5 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 5. Sample-size- (a) and coverage-based (b) rarefaction curves of inquiline species richness from pitchers collected outside of (pink lines) and within (brown lines) the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR). Lines represent the interpolated (continuous) and extrapolated (dashed) species richness of each forest type, as a function of the number of individuals sampled within it (a) and the estimated sample coverage (b); shaded regions represent the 95% confidence intervals of these estimates; points represent the observed species richness (these are omitted from panel b to prevent the obscuring of other details in the figure).

Fig. 4 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 4. Two-dimensional NMDS plot of the pitcher inquiline communities of the sampled Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers. Each point represents an inquiline community from an individual pitcher, with its colour denoting the location in which it was found (within [brown] or outside [pink] the Central Catchment Nature Reserve [CCNR]), and its shape denoting its pitcher type (triangles denote upper, and circles, lower, pitchers). Texts represent inquiline species centroids, with font sizes proportional to the number of pitchers in which each was found. A species is more likely to occur in a pitcher if the pitcher's point is located close to the species' centroid. Taxon name abbreviations: Dasy = Dasyhelea spp.; Phor = Phoridae; Ar.giv = Armigeres giveni; Ar.kuc = Ar. cf. kuchingensis; Cx.bre = Culex brevipalpus complex; Cx.cur = Cx. curtipalpis; Tp.tnx = Tripteroides tenax; Lest = Lestodiplosis sp.; Nsyr = Nepenthosyrphus sp. raff; Creu = Creutzeria spp.; M2.sp1 = Histiostomatidae genus 1 sp. 1; Naca = Nepenthacarus spp.; Zwic = Zwickia spp.; Nema = nematodes.

Fig. 9 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 9. Habitus of Armigeres giveni fourth instar larva (a); Ar. giveni female adult (b); Ar. cf. kuchingensis fourth instar larva (c); Ar. cf. kuchingensis male adult (d). Scale bars represent 1 mm. (Photographs by: Yeo Huiqing).

Fig. 10 in A comparative exploration of the inquiline and prey species of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in contiguous and fragmented habitat patches in Singapore

Fig. 10. Illustrations of mite genera inhabiting Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers in Singapore: (a) Undescribed genus (male dorsum), (b) Creutzeria sp. (male venter), (c) Zwickia sp. (male dorsum), (d) Nepenthacarus sp. (male dorsum). Scale bars represent 150 micrometres. (Illustrations by: Norman J. Fashing).